Post A Reply
my profile
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
»
Hot Stocks Free for All !
»
NDOL : 300% revenue increase, calling *0.47
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Munchkin Man: [QB] The Purl Gurl Is Exposed! Now the Munchkin Man shall deliver the coup de grace. Purl Gurl wrote: "Most laughable, I love this, a bunch of Russians are going to fly over here to America to go after an unknown person who wrote a comical spoof based on their photographs!" _____ What you wrote is now a "comical spoof", huh? The backpedaling begins! Where was your disclaimer that the comments you wrote in your original post with those photographs comprised nothing more than a "comical spoof?' This will probably strike a severe blow to your case. That's because your backpedaling confession of what you wrote, by your very own admission, and in your very own words, was a "comical spoof." What is more potentially damaging to your case is that your late confession comes "after the fact." Here's another point. If what you wrote about the officers of the North-West Oil Group was nothing more than a "comical spoof", then how much else do you write is a "comical spoof" as well? Due the fact that you did not confess that your piece was a "comical spoof" until the Munchkin Man pressured you about it, which also came "after the fact", a lot of readers are going to question the veracity of whatever else you write, past, present, and future. Having exposed the fact that you wrote an extensive bashing of the officers of the North-West Oil Group, without a disclaimer that it was only a "comical spoof", only to backpedal and confess that it was only a "comical spoof" on a later date, how will you expect your readers to take you seriously in the future? Your credibility has now been seriously damaged beyond repair. __________________________________ You wrote: "On the smurf boy, there is only one notion which annoys me. He is a piss poor writer and plays his smurf boy role with the talent of a child." ____ Your psyche is showing. The Munchkin Man is referring to the psyche of a basher. Just as the basher does not bash bad stocks, does the basher also not bash bad writers? If the Munchkin Man were a bad writer, then you would have no need to bash the Munchkin Man's bad writing. Because you are bashing the Munchkin Man's bad writing, this must mean that the Munchkin Man is a good writer. Thank you, Purl Gurl. You are very perceptive, and the Munchkin Man deeply appreciates your comment. Good luck to you. Best Wishes, Munchkin Man [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Allstocks.com Message Board Home
© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2