Post A Reply
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk
World War 4 is HERE
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by glassman: [QB] I agree with you about Russia ray. I would NOT go so far as to lump them in with the Chinese tho. We have given over too much manufacturing capabiltiy to China and we COULD pay for that in ht elong run. In specific repsonse to relentless? 1) the fisrst step in a REAL war is to collapse the comm systems. on 9-11, I went to the bank fisrt as soon as i realised there was more than one plane. I did not sit and watch TV i wnet and got alot of cash in small bill. I did this because i knew that if 9-11 was a true act of war that teh internet would be down by the end of the day. The banks were all using it by then. When we pull the plug on China or Russia? It will stay pulled. We released our technology to them for very specific reasons. Alot of people didn't like it, but China is built on Microsoft and they stole it in a wholesale fashion and we let them do it because it's a trojan horse. China and Russia both have good hacker-warriors, but they are all using our designs. Russia is not in our league relentless. Whne i was in the fleet? We were not worried at all about the Russian surface fleet, and we still aren't. We were more worried on a one-to-one basis of India's ships than we were of the Soviets. The soviets were lazy slobs, and hteir boats in general barely functioned. Most people don't know htis but weps systems do not function when they are not cycled in drills regularly. There aee so many "gremlins" in the systmes that if you are not constantly cycling the system, they take over. The Indians were dedicated to drills in way thatat weven wwere not. The soviets had a (as we do) doomsday device in the sheer number of nukes in subs and on land that they could deliver. That's their real threat to US- the doomsday strategy, not strategic geo/land acquisition. We went around the moon in orer to prove to them that we could launch doomsday to come back in a week even if they did get fiirst strike. Our subs were also capable of evading them and doing the same thing. We have redundancy in all of our systems. They do not. It won't be easy or cheap to force them back out of the Ukraine, the Russkies are not to be trifled with, but it would take a massive screwup on our part to lose any full-on conflict them. Why the hell would we do it though? I'll repeatthe Crimea is Russian has been for centuries now. Forget it. It's just a political play-toy for our people here. We are strecthed too thin. Bush's invasion of Iraq was literally the second biggest military blunder in wolrd history, but we have replaced all that ordinance. The Japanese and the Germans both had better weapon systems than we did in 1940. The Germans built the finest eqpt. the world had ever seen. We beat them with cheap ass tanks and cheap ass rifles that we mass produced. My point is that you sound to me like you are reading directly form the arms merchants advertising sheets (propagnada). We went tot teh F35 because we can build so many more of them. The F22 when iti s working right (thatexpensive) is a 144 to one killing machine in wargame scenarios. The F35 gets you more kills per dollar than the F22 raptor. That's why we are swithching. You actaully hear about he problems because we hide the problems LESS than the Russkies or the Chinese. They have just many problem in their crap as we do, and they have way less ability to produce them and way fewer of them.... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Allstocks.com Message Board Home
© 1997 - 2013 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.