Post A Reply
my profile
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
»
Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk
»
America is becoming a police state- Fast.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by glassman: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Pagan: [qb] Glass...you'll love this. [b]Missouri bill would void federal gun laws, OK machine guns for residents[/b] By Leslie Bentz and George Howell, CNN updated 7:39 AM EDT, Wed September 11, 2013 Kearney, Missouri (CNN) -- The Missouri state legislature is trying to accomplish something that's never been done: pass a law that'll not only let residents own a machine gun, but also arrest federal agents if they try to take it away. What's more, the bill would make it illegal for anyone to publish any information about a gun owner. "There are people saying this is the same as seceding from the Union," said gun owner Kevin Jamison. "Missouri did not secede from the Union in 1862, and it does not do so by passing this law." The legislation already passed once through the Republican-led House and Senate -- only to be vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon. Nixon argued that the legislation violated a provision in the U.S. Constitution called the Supremacy Clause. The Supremacy Clause gives preference to federal laws over state laws. Lawmakers insist what they're proposing is not only constitutional, but essential to protect the rights of gun owners. So Wednesday, the legislature votes on an override of the veto. Colorado recall a proxy in national gun control debate What the bill says The author of the bill is optimistic. "This bill doesn't put one new gun on the street," State Representative Doug Funderburk told CNN. "It strictly says that Missouri is going to protect the Second Amendment rights of Missourians." By superseding current federal regulations, House Bill 436 would make it a criminal offense to enforce background checks or to publish the name and address of a gun owner in the state. It would also allow citizens to own a machine gun, which is banned under federal regulations. Most importantly, it will nullify federal gun laws and make it a misdemeanor for a federal agent to attempt to enforce them. Gun permits for the blind? Iowa grants them, stirs debate Opponents worry Multiple states like Ohio, Minnesota and Texas have pursued similar bills in recent months in reaction to attempts at federal gun control legislation after the December shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Opponents worry such a law could all but end any joint operations between local and federal law enforcement agencies when it comes to taking guns off the streets. St. Louis Police Chief Sam Dotson has been one of its most vocal opponents. "(We are) basically saying to criminals, 'OK criminals, it's OK to come to Missouri. We won't prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law,'" he said. If the state legislature succeeds in overriding the governor's veto, the issue would almost certainly head to court. CNN's George Howell reported from Kearney, Missouri; Leslie Bentz from Washington http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/11/us/missouri-gun-laws-challenge/ [/qb][/QUOTE]i do like it that states who do not agree with what is being done in Washington pass laws contrary to Federal Laws. Especially whne those laws (and treaties) are generally contrary tp popular will of the people. remember that the nation once passed a Caonstitutional amenment to ban alcohol, but now youe see beer commercials all weekned long in between passing and running plays ;) times change, back and forth, ebb and flow.... what the Constitution does not allow the Feds to do the Sates are obligated to cahallenge, if that is the will of the people... the US is always in a revolutionary condition.... but it's peaceful, and hopefully will reamin so... the "supremacy clause" U.S. Constitution Article VI All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. particualrly note that no religious test shall EVER be required. not even putting your hand on a Bible, nor "under God" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Allstocks.com Message Board Home
© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2