Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » Healthcare » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused   BadOne  
Good Luck   More Crap   Wall Bang   Were Up   Were Down    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
IWISHIHAD  - posted
About 5 million Californians got a first glimpse at what they might pay next year under the federal healthcare law. For many, that coverage will come with a hefty price tag.


Compared with what individual policies cost now, premiums are expected to rise an average of 30% for many middle-income residents who don't get their insurance through their employers.

Alternatively, lower-income consumers will reap the biggest savings and are projected to save as much as 84% off their coverage thanks to federal subsidies.

The figures were released Thursday by Covered California, the state agency charged with implementing the federal Affordable Care Act. They underscore the harsh reality that costs for some consumers will have to rise in order to carry out the biggest healthcare expansion in half a century.

"It's hard to design any change of this scale where everybody is a winner and no one is worse off," said Gerald Kominski, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and an expert on health insurance. "Some people will feel they are being unfairly targeted or penalized."

The threat of higher costs could alienate many of the policyholders the state needs to keep in the fold in order to offset the increased costs of covering sicker, poorer people who have been shut out of the system for years.

According to the state, about 1.3 million people who are middle-income or higher and already have coverage not through an employer will bear the brunt of the higher costs. These are individuals making more than $46,000 and families earning more than $94,000 annually. People below those income levels qualify for federal subsidies.

An estimated 3.6 million Californians who are either uninsured or low-income will benefit the most from these changes. They will gain from guaranteed access to health insurance for the first time, regardless of their medical history. And they will no longer face financial ruin from enormous medical bills.

The actual premiums people will pay aren't known yet. Next week, health insurers will submit their proposed rates to the state for coverage starting Jan. 1. Covered California plans to select certain companies for the state-run insurance exchange and negotiate rates by mid-May.

California consumers weary from years of double-digit rate hikes in the current market said they would welcome some relief.

Erin McCoy, a single mother with two sons, said her family's Anthem Blue Cross premiums have shot up 28% in the last year to $820 a month. Next year, the Hermosa Beach resident may qualify for premium subsidies that could lower her costs substantially.

"I'm hoping Obamacare will help me," said McCoy, 48, a self-employed advertising executive.

Chris Peterson of Santa Clarita fears she could end up paying more under the revamped insurance system. A 58-year-old widow, she pays about $1,100 a month for an HMO plan to cover her and her 22-year-old son. She said she doesn't expect to qualify for federal assistance and worries about government taking a bigger role in healthcare.

"I have a feeling things will get worse," she said. "The benefits I have right now aren't so bad."

Insurance industry officials said they support the state's efforts to expand and improve health coverage. But they warn that somebody has to pay more.

"These richer benefits, more predictable coverage and subsidies come at a cost," said Patrick Johnston, president of the California Assn. of Health Plans. "All these expansions add to the already increasing cost of care."

Age is another dividing line. Younger people will generally see higher premiums under the federal overhaul, while older consumers could reap some of the biggest savings. Still, the state said, many younger consumers will qualify for subsidies because they earn less, helping to mitigate higher rates.

State officials are eager to quell mounting worries over potential rate shock. Even supporters of the federal law have expressed concern that the new government requirements will drive up premiums too high.

"It is critical for us to understand the true financial impact on Californians as we move toward 2014, and this is an important step in determining strategies to help protect consumers from cost increases," said Peter Lee, executive director of Covered California. "There may be increases in premiums depending on what product people buy."

Starting next year, income will drive what most consumers ultimately end up paying for their coverage in the individual market.

-
 
raybond  - posted
Its not going to be easy getting this going. This is why England just wound up doing a government plan out of general revenue.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
All the critics said the costs would soar and it would be a nightmare. Meanwhile, lock step sheeple of Obama praised the bribe to get votes bill Now they admit costs are going to be bad after they said they would go down.

Hook line and sinker! This health care bill was promoted like a penny stock! Sleazy means to get everyone on board, slimy backroom deals, and then we are stuck with the bag.


Let me guess, federal tax dollars should be used for sex changes and breast implants too ray?
 
Upside  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:

Let me guess, federal tax dollars should be used for sex changes and breast implants too ray?

I might agree with the breast implant idea.
 
IWISHIHAD  - posted
Originally Posted By Upside:

"I might agree with the breast implant idea"
-------------------------------------------------

As long as a women receives them.

-
 
raybond  - posted
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:

Let me guess, federal tax dollars should be used for sex changes and breast implants too ray?
-------------------------------------------------

You said it cash not me the brits that I know like there health care. they never said anything about implants or sex changes.
 



Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share