Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » Hillary Clinton willbe president in 2012. » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused   BadOne  
Good Luck   More Crap   Wall Bang   Were Up   Were Down    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
logandtimber  - posted
Obama did the dirty work. And he will fall for it. Hillary Clinton, Who should've been the president in 2008. Will beat him in the primaries. And she will be the first woman president. America will flourish under 8 more years of democratic rule.

The republicans answer to Clinton will be Palin. And she will look rediculous when all the Christian, 2012, "end of days" nuts, get caught looking like fanatical cult members.

Clinton wins despite the propaganda machine. [Smile]
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by logandtimber:
Obama did the dirty work. And he will fall for it. Hillary Clinton, Who should've been the president in 2008. Will beat him in the primaries. And she will be the first woman president. America will flourish under 8 more years of democratic rule.

The republicans answer to Clinton will be Palin. And she will look rediculous when all the Christian, 2012, "end of days" nuts, get caught looking like fanatical cult members.

Clinton wins despite the propaganda machine. [Smile]

Hey its a comedy thread! Hilarious!
 
glassman  - posted
there's only one scenario that i see that possible, and i hope that scenario dos not come to be.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
I will say I would rather have Hillary as President than Obama. At least she has a long list of experience and qualifications. Obama's push to Presidency was like the push for health care. Just ram it through as quick as possible!
 
glassman  - posted
i disagree, the Clintons are owned bought and paid for by foreign interests and big biz.

Rush Limbugger made a big push to vote for Hillary in the primaries because he beleived she would lose to McCain and Obama would beat McCain.

how do you think the Clintons gained 100 million$ after Bill left office with legal bills exceeding his worth.

Bill took 800 grand from Columbia to lobby for freetrade wuth them while Hillary was running....

Hillary would have pushed harder for her own version of health care than Obama did and would have bullied the Congress, because she could.
 
logandtimber  - posted
It comes down to the green movement. We need to move to using less fossil fuels. We have the technology to not pollute. But the republicans. Who are on their knees for the Saudi's, pumping the oil money machine for another generation...

Why drill, and pump, and pollute. When you dont have to???????? Why?

Because it gives the power back to the people. Thats why.

And thats what the world needs.

I can imagine the republicans mocking the possibility of an oil rig breaking, and pumping millions of gallons of crude oil into one of the most alive cauldrons of life on earth... Now what? Now imagine an earth quake. Or a huge hurricane. Or a giant mega wave from a volcano, or meteor, or earthquake... And it levels all the rigs at once?????? Then what? Whoops?
 
glassman  - posted
Hillary green? LOL... Hillary may not be in bed with the Saudi's, but she is in bed with big business and big brother much more than Oabama...

it was Obama's inexperience that made him palatable to independents. The Tea Baggers want to replace everybody? well Obama did just that. a few years short of one term as Senator is nothing.

the Dem convention would explode if Hillary even says one word about running against Obama.

the Dems would lose even to Palin...
 
logandtimber  - posted
Wait til the republican propaganda machine goes after obama like their lives depended on it... And burn up all their ammo... Obama,and his extreme tactics used to turn Americas economy around, will be torn apart. His religion. His birth certificate, He'll get busted getting a BJ fromhis receptionist. or his plane will fall out of the sky.

Whatever.

He will be demonized. And in a slick move, during the primaries. the dems will shift to Hillary,and walk away with the election.

1 reason seals the deal. She's a woman. automatically gets the ENTIRE woman vote. and the Dems. And the Minorities...

Clintons are connected. And deffinately have the right resume's to lead America.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
The friends of Chinese are friends of the Clintons!
 
glassman  - posted
well L&T if you are really a Clinton fan you might enjoy this:

http://www.theonion.com/video/victim-in-fatal-car-accident-tragically-not-glenn, 14380/
 
Highwaychild  - posted
Here come da Judge....
 
SeekingFreedom  - posted
quote:

Clintons are connected. And deffinately have the right resume's to lead America.

You have NO idea how sad that statement is, Log...no idea...
 
The Bigfoot  - posted
No way Clinton gonna run against Obama. After Obama...yeah...I expect that. But not against. 2012 goes to Obama when the best that the rep's can put out against him are Palin and Huckabee who will be fighting each other the whole way.
 
SeekingFreedom  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by The Bigfoot:
No way Clinton gonna run against Obama. After Obama...yeah...I expect that. But not against. 2012 goes to Obama when the best that the rep's can put out against him are Palin and Huckabee who will be fighting each other the whole way.

Palin will never run, Big, mark my words. She will become a 'kingmaker' for the Tea Partiers, but she won't give up the celebrity and cashflow that she's found.

Huckabee? I don't think he'll run either. Not enough of a middle grounder to pull sufficient centrist votes. All he did was muddy the water for Romney in '08.

As for who will be the Repub candidate against Obama? Romney, Brown and Jindal are among my guesses. Always could have an out of the blue guy or gal...but I'm guessing at least two of those three will be there.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
I think Romney should run, I would vote for him. We need someone who knows business instead of having advisors who are dirty do it for him.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
Speaking of Hillary I am watching her right now on a late night replay of Sundays meet the press.
 
glassman  - posted
Romney has his religion agin' him.

here in the South? they distrust anybody who is not a Baptist or a Methodist (Baptists that read).

I personally don't think much on it, but many of the Christian sects do not recognise Mormonism as a Christian religion. I know that the Mormons claim otherwise which is their God-given right, but that doesn't convince the good ole bozyandgirlz that i know.


Then when you examine Romney's business dealings you find he's made a few serious enemies. Like Unions, which, even tho they seemed sortof dead due to global trade, we can now count as one reason Obama got elected.


He ran a sortof a hedge fund that did leveraged buyouts, which is one of the reason this country has been gutted financially. Like them or not? They are controversial because they almost always end up cutting jobs. You can argue efficiency all day long, but cutting jobs will be a hard thing to reconcile on the national stage in a Presidentiual debate for another decade.

Finally there's the Mormon Churches involvemnt in fighting gay marriage.

Gay marriage is coming, like it or not, every election brings us closer to gays getting complete rights and the LDS are among the most vocal opponents.

His net woth alone will be attacked unless he is running against a wealthy person too, and Obama is not wealthy (yet). That counted alot against the Clintons. Having alot of money or not prolly shouldn't matter, but HOW you make your money does matter.
 
CashCowMoo  - posted
Funny how the Obama crowd said it shouldnt matter what church Obama went to, but then when it comes to Romney all hell breaks lose. The typical double standard is what I see.
 
glassman  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by CashCowMoo:
Funny how the Obama crowd said it shouldnt matter what church Obama went to, but then when it comes to Romney all hell breaks lose. The typical double standard is what I see.

not really, it's not the same people voting.

you have to consider the GOP base that Dubya used, they are evangelical Christians. Romney cannot tap that. Obama wouldn't try.

Evangelical Christians are very "precise". You must come to Jesus for salvation, there is no other path. The Baptists and the Methodists are highly evangelical. Technically the Mormons are evangelical too since to be a Mormon in Good standing you have to do missionary work. Evangelism is the focus of missionary work. I am not expressing my views, just trying to express what i understand about other peoples beleifs. I have never been evangelised by a Mormon so i don't really know all their specific points of order.

On the other hand, i've had men and many women Evangelcical Christians go to great lenghts to try to "Witness" me. [Wink]
 



Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share