Post A Reply
my profile
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
»
Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk
»
VETERANS DISARMAMENT ACT
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Machiavelli: [QB] [QUOTE] this is just not true. i already showed you the laws, they exist, and they should be enforced... if you went to legally purchase a gun tomorrow, you'd have to get a background check. what goes in the background check is the question here.[/QUOTE]Laws get outdated and should be updated... anyways the laws you cited are not enforced and gun owners such as yourself don't make a big stink about them not being enforced because it's not hitting your wallet... perhaps if you made a big stink about the laws being enforced the issue of Gun Control will never come up again... make sense? ... And it should be a national background check and not a local/state background check the way it seems now... [QUOTE]if you want to open all medical records to anybody and everybody? you are crazy... people will then be asking for your medical records before they hire you too... [/QUOTE]not to anybody or everybody... just for gun background checks and only mental health records... it would prevent alot of deaths in the long run... you sign a waiver letting mental health records to be included in such things for gun ownership... not unreasonable in my book... if you still want your right to own a gun and want to prevent them from getting into the wrong hands... make sense? [QUOTE][b]The Federal Gun Control Act, ever since 1968, has prohibited the possession by a person or the sale to a person who is what they call mentally defective. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms wrote a regulation, and that regulation says that that category includes a person who has been found by some kind of official body to be a danger to himself or others. Cho was found to be a danger to himself or others when he was brought before a magistrate. The magistrate had the option to commit him but found that less restrictive treatment, the outpatient treatment, would be sufficient. Yet even though he wasn't committed, that's sufficient under federal law to bar him for the rest of his life from ever possessing a firearm. And, in fact, there's a case from the federal district court of Michigan, U.S. v. Vertz, that finds exactly that, that, in a very similar situation, the Federal Gun Control Act did apply and prohibited the person from having a gun.[/b] [/QUOTE]Obviously with Cho it didn't work : "Cho paid $571 for a 9 mm Glock 19 pistol just over a month ago, the owner of Roanoke Firearms told CNN Tuesday. He also used a .22-caliber Walther pistol in the attack, police said. (Interactive: The weapons used in the shootings) John Markell said Cho was very low-key when he purchased the Glock and 50 rounds of ammunition with a credit card in an "unremarkable" purchase. Cho presented three forms of identification and did not say why he wanted the gun, Markell said. (Watch how quickly these guns can be fired, reloaded ) [b]State police conducted an instant background check that probably took about a minute, the store owner said.[/b]" Hell of a background check there Glass... a 1 minute background check... DNA, job and other "checks" take longer then that & done properly... a background check imo should take 30 days or have a waiting period of 30 days to be conducted properly and nationally and not statewide only like in Virginia... there is no need to get the gun now if your a legit person... you can wait 30 days... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
Allstocks.com Message Board Home
© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by
Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2