1: If there is a month/day date, translate the month into its numeric equivalent. For example, today, January 12, would be 1/12, and by removing the slash you get 112.
2: If there is spelled number, translate it For example, "four men" is 4.
3: If there are two numbers with zeros, omit the zeros -- zeros don't count! -- and add the other numbers. Take, for example, the sentence "It's 260 miles from Houston to Dallas." The sum of the 2 and the 6 is 8.
4: If there is an 11, just leave it alone, and if there are multiples of 11, then they mean 11, too. It there's a 12, leave it alone, too, since 12 is another special number. Masons use the 11; Jewish Cabalists use the 12.
Simple enough? OK then, you've got the basic rules! Get a piece of paper and pencil, or just read along. I'll put my analysis below the article -- and you can peek if you want help! Just scroll down after you've finished trying decoding the embedded numbers yourself, and you can compare your numbers with mine. Here's the link:
"OKLAHOMA CITY — President Bush issued a federal disaster declaration for the state of Oklahoma on Tuesday in the wake of wildfires that have scorched more than 380,000 acres across the state since Nov. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency said."
This decodes to 11, then 111. Connect the two numbers and get 11111
Second paragraph:
The declaration means federal funding will be immediately available to affected individuals in 12 Oklahoma counties, said Nicol Andrews, a spokeswoman for FEMA in Washington, D.C.
The Jewish Cabalist 12
Ninth paragraph:
"Since Nov. 1, wildfires have consumed more than 380,000 acres, destroyed 220 homes and businesses and killed two people."
This decodes to 111, then 11, then 22, then 2. Connect 22 with 2 and get 222; then reduce the 222 to 111. Now connect the date 111 with the acres 11 with the (modified) destroyed homes/people 111 to get 11111111.
Tenth paragraph:
"Authorities in Texas are also seeking a federal disaster declaration. Wildfires in that state have burned more than 250,000 acres and more than 330 homes since late December."
This decodes to 7, then 33 (Supreme Masonic number), then 12
OK, how did you do? It isn't so hard -- once you start reading numbers carefully!
This story isn't an incredible string of random numbers -- far from it! It's simply coded for those who are able to decode and interpret it! It doesn't take a genius to insert (code) the numbers or extract (decode) the numbers. Street gangs like the Crips and Bloods aren't rocket scientists, but they use coding devices just as sophisticated as these! Code is just a kind of "inside joke" made by folks so that they can communicate about things they don't want other people to know about. In this case it is the controlled media, who use Jewish Cabalism, and the "Bush Boyz" (criminal officials and agents), who use Masonic coding, and they're reporting their handiwork in the Great Plains!
Now we'll "really read" the story hidden inside the story!
THE MEANING
Dateline / First paragraph 111 (a hyped-up variant of the Masonic 11) tells you that the Bush Boyz, who control the feds, are making this a formal federal disaster operation. They have induced a "state of emergency" -- something they're becoming more and more adept at doing. While we're supposed to think that these were spontaneous fires, our careful reading shows that they were set by Bush Boyz: The acreage burned (11) gives it away, as it's a Masonic sign, and Jan. 11 (111) reinforces the message.
Second paragraph "Federal funding" is forthcoming. Chances are that, like the New Orleans flood, the money won't be enough -- of fairly enough distributed -- to enable poor folks to recover their lives and their property, while rich bankers (the Jewish Cabalist 12) will win big. These fires were a very effective way of removing "marginal" Americans, weren't they?
Ninth paragraph Remember, 11 is the key Mason's number, and the Masons are an immensely powerful secret society. Both Boy George and Pa George Bush are allied with it, as part of the Satanic "high-priest" secret society, aptly named Skull and Bones. Sound conspiratorial? Well, it gets even worse when you consider that the other guy running for the presidency in 2004 was John Kerry, also a Skull and Bones member! Sound like maybe the secret society boyz are playing a rigged game with us? Anyhow, you can't sign your cultic signature much louder than to repeat have a paragraph that, decoded, signs your 11 four times: 11111111. This set of ID numbers is proudly set forth by the numbers telling of destruction and death! It's their kinda thing, y'all -- sick puppies!
glassman
posted
you really have a problem there....
this is the GOP political strategy tho... don't address facts or issues.. make up outrageous stories about "the enemy" and anybody who doesn't vote for the candidate is the enemy...
sick...
our country is lost if this keeps up much longer JW... how does it feel to be: not part of, but; the problem?
Johnwayne
posted
Couldn't tell ya Glassman. I'm just having a little fun. Some wacko puts this on his web site and it's my fault? I'm not the one who made this up. Not smart enough.
I don't believe I've called one person on here my enemy. Nor will I ever do that until we meet face to face and cannot get along. I do not consider you or anyone else on here my enemy. In fact I rather consider you a pretty likeable guy. See I do not take web site discussions too seriously, because for the most part I put stock only in face to face discussions, or at worst telephone discussions. Many people on the internet, myself included would not be near so confrontational in person as they are on computer. That is my gripe with the internet as a whole. It gives all of us a bigger set of cajones, puts a little chip on our shoulder and we have exchanges we would never have in a face to face setting. In short I do not believe we represent ourselves in true fashion here. That is why I don't take this site too seriously and I hope others don't get carried away. That is why I will crack jokes at times, because sometimes we all get too carried away here. Nobody in this country should be judged as a whole by their political beliefs. And we all have been guilty of doing that at one time or another. Come on, can anybody honestly say they dislike someone because of their political views? Maybe they dislike their political views, but it shouldn't go further than that.
I believe we have our battles and disagreements because we all feel strongly about our views. But at the end of the day we should all be able to have a laugh or two with each other.
I don't like conspiracy theory's. Repub or democrat.
bdgee
posted
Yeah, but at the same time, you promote any "conspiracy theory" put out by the Party or Fat Rush the Doper or Ann Coulter the Witch in Republicn's Clothing, etc., while getting nasty with anyone that points out that they are exactly that, and declare anything you don't like (that is, anything not sanctioned by the White House Crew that you so dearly love) to be a "conspiracy theory.
Johnwayne
posted
Show me when I've gotten nasty Bdgee? Anybody can have a bad day and get carried away, show me consistently being nasty. You can't and you know it. Also show me a conspiracy theory I promote, not just by pasting it, by actually saying hey I believe this one.
bdgee
posted
Go read your post, JW. You get nasty often.
Worse, you seem to have never learned that disrespect for and misrepresentation of the ideas of others is nasty.
Any claim of any thought that went into the invasion of Iraq by the Administration is a conspiracy theory. They still have no notion what in Hell they are doing or intended to do.
Johnwayne
posted
I disagree and am waiting for you to paste it. You made the claim, back it up. Show me some name calling, show me threats, show me screaming, show me questioning someone's intelligence. Now I know I slip at times, and I know I call Glassman a democrat who wears a tin foil hat, so to that I plead guilty. Show me a pattern. Would you like to see the list of names you call others here?
"Worse, you seem to have never learned that disrespect for and misrepresentation of the ideas of others is nasty."
That's your defnition of nasty. A strange one but you are entitled to it. By that definition you, me and everyone on here is nasty. Are you Telling me you respect my ideas ? Are you telling me you don't misrepesent my ideas? How about my brothers ideas?
bdgee
posted
I don't respond well to directives, JW. Of course that makes being a good true Republican impossible in today's climate.
I have shown you all those things in the past and all it resulted in was more of it.
You need to develop some manners and respect for others.
Honestly, I haven't noticed you "having" any ideas, only claiming everyone should adopt those of the far right religious exteme.
Your brother's ideas all seem to be the same one over and over and over and over - - - He is affixed to misconceptions about genocide. And wordy to excess.
My apologies for being blunt, but it becomes necessary.
Johnwayne
posted
"You need to develop some manners and respect for others."
Are you gonna make me dig through and put up a display of your manners? Ok hold on a minute....
glassman
posted Some wacko puts this on his web site and it's my fault? I'm not the one who made this up. Not smart enough.
OK JW i apologise; you aren't the problem after all, you are just a minor part of it...LOL
re-read? Some wacko puts this on his web site
"so i thought i'd just copy that whacko... gorsh?????"
it is still a god representaiton of the rove political philosophy....
Johnwayne
posted
Ahh hell fellas I don't wanna go down this road again. Bdgee, how about a truce? Now a suggestion, not a command, how 'bout we both go through some of our posts in the hopes we can be less offensive to each other. Past is water under the bridge.
glassman
posted
Rumsfeld today said the fighting in Iraq isn't a "classic" civil war...
WTF does that mean?
Gordon Bennett
posted
Bush started the Texas/Oklahoma fires? Christ! How?! Is he freebasing again?
T e x
posted
they're not playing The Kinks?
Gordon Bennett
posted
Of course not. It's a "New & Improved" civil war.
quote:Originally posted by glassman: Rumsfeld today said the fighting in Iraq isn't a "classic" civil war...
WTF does that mean?
Johnwayne
posted
"so i thought i'd just copy that whacko... gorsh?????" does this offend you Glassman?
Gordon Bennett
posted
Johnwayne: Since you found the story, for God's sake fill me in on the specifics!
Was Dubya playing with matches while drunk? Is he smoking crack again? Is he ridin' the iron horse?
Inquiring minds like mine want to know.
Details, man!
Johnwayne
posted
Well my hunch is he just sent Rove down with a book of matches. The story, as you can see, does not mention how the fire was started.
I suppose anything is possible, including any of your questions.
Gordon Bennett
posted
glassman
posted
hunch? LOL...
rove brought the matches FOR bush:
Gordon Bennett
posted
And Rove will blame it on Clinton.
glassman
posted
will? LOL he already did.....
Johnwayne
posted
Awesome picture Glassman. I almost peed my..... wait no I just peed my pants laughing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
T e x
posted
JW, hope that was a Eddie-Murphy-three-drop-pee...
glassman
posted
these guys are the leaders of the free world?
i feel like i'm in a Stephen King movie that won't end...
bdgee
posted
But a devil only has two horns.
Gordon Bennett
posted
George W. Bush, when asked by Bob Woodward "how is history likely to judge your Iraq war?" replied, "History, we don't know. We'll all be dead."
Not too comforting, is it?
glassman
posted
Bush knew he was signing a 6 trillion dollar check?
bdgee
posted
So what if he did or if he didn't, Glass....?
He knew it was on someone else's bank account, and that's what mattered to him.
Actually, he and Rove, and Rumsfield, etc. knew it was a way to place the whole Treasury out so their "friends" could be served from it.
Gordon Bennett
posted
That's right. The first act of any rogue government is to loot the treasury.
posted ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
