Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » Health Insurance Required By Law » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused   BadOne  
Good Luck   More Crap   Wall Bang   Were Up   Were Down    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
IWISHIHAD  - posted
Mass. Bill Requires Health Coverage
State Set to Use Auto Insurance As a Model

By David A. Fahrenthold
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 5, 2006; A01


BOSTON, April 4 -- The Massachusetts legislature approved a bill Tuesday that would require all residents to purchase health insurance or face legal penalties, which would make this the first state to tackle the problem of incomplete medical coverage by treating patients the same way it does cars.

Gov. Mitt Romney (R) supports the proposal, which would require all uninsured adults in the state to purchase some kind of insurance policy by July 1, 2007, or face a fine. Their choices would be expanded to include a range of new and inexpensive policies -- ranging from about $250 per month to nearly free -- from private insurers subsidized by the state.

Romney said the bill, modeled on the state's policy of requiring auto insurance, is intended to end an era in which 550,000 people go without insurance and their hospital and doctor visits are paid for in part with public funds.

"We insist that everybody who drives a car has insurance," Romney said in an interview. "And cars are a lot less expensive than people."

Tuesday's votes approving the bill -- 154 to 2 in the House and 37 to 0 in the Senate -- were the culmination of two years of politicking and several months of backroom negotiations, as rival health-care plans from Romney and the two Democrat-led chambers were hammered into one.

What resulted is a proposal that health-care experts say is unlike any other in the country. What to do about the 45 million Americans without health insurance has flummoxed both the Bush administration, whose proposal for "health savings accounts" fizzled, and that of Bill Clinton, whose broad plan for health-care changes fell flat.

On the state level, Hawaii and Maine have programs that seek to offer near-universal access to health insurance, and Illinois last year approved a subsidy plan that will widely increase coverage for needy children.

But no state, experts say, has taken the step of making health insurance coverage a legal requirement. The idea was applauded by Uwe E. Reinhardt, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University, who said that he has long believed that the American system of allowing uninsured patients to receive care at the government's expense was nothing more than "freedom to mooch."

"Massachusetts is the first state in America to reach full adulthood," said Reinhardt, noting that the new measure is a move toward personal responsibility. "The rest of America is still in adolescence."

As simple as the idea sounds -- buy insurance or else -- the proposal is complex and, in some cases, still unfinished. For instance, it leaves the task of determining exactly how much some low-income residents will pay for their new, more affordable policies to a new agency that would serve as a liaison between the government, policyholders and private insurance companies.

Because of that uncertainty, some still worry that the residents required to buy insurance would not be able to.

"Who defines what's affordable?" said the Rev. Hurmon Hamilton, a minister in the Boston neighborhood of Roxbury and a leader in an interfaith organization that has pushed for health-care changes.

Another aspect that may change is the $295 annual fee that the bill would require companies to pay for each employee they do not provide with insurance. Legislative leaders have insisted that this money be fed into the pool that would subsidize low-cost policies for the uninsured, but Romney said that would be unnecessary.

"That's likely to be adjusted by me," he said -- potentially through the use of a line-item veto.

This is how Massachusetts leaders envision the plan would work:

Uninsured people earning less than the federal poverty threshold would be able to purchase subsidized policies that have no premiums, and would be responsible for very small co-payment fees for emergency-room visits and other services. Those earning between that amount and three times the poverty-level amount would be able to buy subsidized policies with premiums based on their ability to pay. Though no maximum premium is set in the bill, legislators' intent seems to be for it to top out at about $200 to $250 per month.

All residents will have to provide details about their health insurance policy on their state income tax returns in 2008. Those who do not have insurance would first lose their personal state tax exemption, perhaps worth $150, and later face penalties equal to half the cost of the cheapest policy they should have bought. That might work out to $1,200 per year, officials said. Those who cannot find an affordable plan could obtain a waiver.

Enforcement of the requirement will not be done by hospitals, officials said: They will treat uninsured patients as before.

The bill's passage was celebrated as a victory in the state legislature, with House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi (D) telling colleagues that they had succeeded where other states had failed.

"We did something to solve the problem," he said.

The same message might provide a political boost to Romney, who is considering a presidential run in 2008. By proving he can work with Democrats, and find a health-care solution that relies on the private sector, Romney can portray himself as an executive who can work across the aisle in harshly partisan times.

"It might help him to say, 'Look, I have a solution for health insurance,' " said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history at Boston University.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company
 
BuyTex  - posted
be interesting to see whether it can withstand constitutionality tests...
 
IWISHIHAD  - posted
Let's fine them and throw them in jail because they cannot afford health insurance. Do the politicians every think through what they are doing?
 
BuyTex  - posted
lol, if you have health problems? turn yourself in, go to jail--*then* go to the infirmary...
 
glassman  - posted
or?

join the military...

one of the things that an Honorable Discharge earns you is VA coverage for life......
 
IWISHIHAD  - posted
glassman posted April 05, 2006 13:06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
or?

join the military...

one of the things that an Honorable Discharge earns you is VA coverage for life......
But technically you only have free coverage for service related disibilities.
 
HILANDER  - posted
Tricare offers coverage for reservists coming off of active duty but you had to get in no later than November of last year. It's 84.00 a month for an individual and like 250.00 a month for a family. Also, the coverage only lasts twice as long as you were on active duty so it does run out.
 
IWISHIHAD  - posted
The VA. is really good about health coverage and payment is minimal and i don't think they really pursue payments to hard.
 
glassman  - posted
oh, i didn't mean to imply it was free.....

but a strange thing happened in the VA under the Clinton Administration:

they actually got pretty darn good....

i haven't been to one since the Iraq war started because they need the resources for the troops,
but i saw the VA change from a cluster frick in th e80's to a Fine Operation .....
 
HILANDER  - posted
Sorry guys, I think you misunderstood. The VA is still free, and yes, the care is excellent. Tricare Reserve Select is a healthplan that lets me go to any doctor I want to for, what I think, are very small monthly premiums.
 
IWISHIHAD  - posted
Glassman,

I agree when speaking of the VA. healthcare(I also don't use them i have health insurance) the VA. other than the healthcare still sucks.
 
glassman  - posted
well, i got a treasury check for 14$ the other day cuz i had overpayed the VA for something in 2001...
took 'em awhile huh? LOL

also? i am not sure whether it was the Clinton crew or the Bush the First crew that got the VA turned around, but i do know the Clinton's coulda screwed it back up again if they wanted to.....

i had a neighbor when i lived in Virginia that had been The Pilot on Marine One for Bush 1...
his wife hated Clinton so bad he got re-assigned [Wink]
 
HILANDER  - posted
Holy Sh*t Glass, I think I know who that may have been. I was stationed there briefly toward the end of George 1 term.
 
HILANDER  - posted
Glass, was he an 0-6?
 
bdgee  - posted
I have a question or two or three.

Does Gov. Mitt Romney, who supports the proposal, have heavy investments in the health industry or in insurance? If not, does his brother or wife. Why not support universal healthcare instead, where the State, with its powers can bargin for charges for care and medicines?

Take careful note that when dubya spent your money from the treasury to campaign for and get passed the laws requiring that all school children in the Counttry must frequently take a "standarized" test in order to proceed in school, he well knew that his family is the largest holder of standardized testing business in the world.
 
glassman  - posted
Hilander it's funny you ask that way, i dunno his rank, just like my other neighbor that was a retired nuke sub captain? i don't know his rank either... we all just went on a first name basis...

and i won't pass the name cuz i hope he's back to his old duty...

all i can say is his wife loved Rush Limbaugh and we all knew not to get her started on the Clinton topic....

i was working as a contraqctor at a military base at the time, and some of civilians there said things like they wanted to kill Clinton, for the most part the military guys kept their mouth shut about it, but Clinton was totally hated by everyone i knew that was military or past military....

most of them couldn't understand how Bush the First got voted out.. and neither could i really...
 
Gordon Bennett  - posted
Get sick, go to jail.

The way this country's been going, that sounds about right.
 
BuyTex  - posted
think I could get dental? [Big Grin]
 
HILANDER  - posted
Heck Tex, you could get an MBA, an acquaintance of mine who did ten years did and now he has a job making almost 100k a year.
 
BuyTex  - posted
well, crap! then . . .

there goes another plan...they always get ridda my azz after a few days. Should I do like that Congresswoman and sock a cop, ya think?

Whatever, an MBA would be nice. Maybe my local broker would hire me to tell peeps, "I don't know, but I'll ask the Compliance Dept."
 



Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share