I probably would've been holding it if it had gone DOWN 14,000%
What the heck is "bodyscan" anyhow? Sounds creepy. LOL
Jo
Posted by Repoman75 on :
Make that 29,900% up now!!!!!!!!
Posted by Hannibull on :
well the bid is 0.0002 lol, i don't think I'll be buying Posted by Jo4321 on :
Now why can't that happen to VWKM or WGFL??
JO
Posted by Moneymaker46 on :
How does something like this happen??
Posted by hbomb on :
quote:Originally posted by Moneymaker46: How does something like this happen??
Institutional/Group play perhaps
Posted by Repoman75 on :
But if institutions are buying this high above the inside market... perhaps they know something.
Posted by Jo4321 on :
Hard to find news on this company. But what news I did find is all bad. Things like this:
quote: ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS - COURT ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST BODYSCAN 3:00 p.m. 04/27/2006 Provided by
Apr 27, 2006 (SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RELEASE/ContentWorks via COMTEX) -- On March 7, 2006, the Honorable David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge for the Central District of California, granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for summary judgment and entered a final judgment against Anthony Sciuto, the president and CEO of BodyScan Corporation (BodyScan), permanently enjoining Sciuto from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering Sciuto to pay a civil penalty of $120,000, and barring Sciuto from serving as an officer or director of any company, public or non-public. The Court found that Sciuto had made and disseminated false statements concerning the number of imaging centers operated by BodyScan, the company's prospects for growth, and its anticipated earnings. Previously, on March 17, 2005, the Commission filed a complaint against BodyScan and Sciuto, charging them with making a series of materially false and misleading statements, in violation of the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act. On Aug. 30, 2005, the Court entered a final judgment by default against BodyScan, permanently enjoining it from violating the same antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and ordering it to pay a civil penalty of $600,000. [SEC v. BODYSCAN CORPORATION and ANTHONY SCIUTO, Civil Action No. SACV 05-256 DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal.)] (LR-19672)
Copyright (C) 2006 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc.
Content Provided by Third Parties
Posted by jaescobar22 on :
yeh, go ahead and buy at .03, and then somone will buy at .002 and your money will be worth sh!t
Posted by Repoman75 on :
Could be a shell play soon.
I'm not buying though.
Posted by Rex on :
bid's at .0002 and ask is .03, next ask is over 2 bucks. I'm in at .0002 and I'm selling at 2 bucks. lol, this is bizarre.
Posted by Johnwayne on :
Only been 5 trades all day.
Posted by cottonjim on :
pinksheets won't even quote it.
Posted by MooseLite04 on :
It look like they did a reverse split this morning.
Posted by vinnie1 on :
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)