This stock moved up from .0004-.0005 on Friday to .0010, and it's simply retracing today to .0006-.0007, I think it will get back up to higher levels.
Posted by optimizer_78 on :
YES...0006 soon gone..i expect some great news also.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by optimizer_78: YES...0006 soon gone..i expect some great news also.
What sort of news?
Posted by SincereX13 on :
Yeh what news? News may be what we need to move this sucker back up again.
Posted by evilmonkey on :
the buy out the offered. on that note, i remember reading back on the 3rd when they put out that pr tht there was going to be a NDA on this deal. now, if they got the answer a few days after the 3rd and then had the 20 days DD, could that be why we have not heard a yes or no?
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: the buy out the offered. on that note, i remember reading back on the 3rd when they put out that pr tht there was going to be a NDA on this deal. now, if they got the answer a few days after the 3rd and then had the 20 days DD, could that be why we have not heard a yes or no?
I looked it up and that is indeed what they offered ANS. That being the case, how long before you start getting nervous? Posted by evilmonkey on :
all depends if that NDA was linked to the answer or just the DD.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: all depends if that NDA was linked to the answer or just the DD.
So then it all comes down to when ANS answers? In that case, then, we have nothing telling us when to keep our eyes and ears open. Frustrating! Posted by Fatso on :
USXP buyers seem to be back from the weekend! Posted by ams545 on :
today watch out Posted by iternity on :
you think news today?
Posted by ams545 on :
yes, very big news Posted by optimizer_78 on :
We've got the merger numbers by: mortimerandrandolphduke 01/24/06 12:28 pm Msg: 1608 of 1621
10 million os shares of ans at today's price estimate, $3.52 per share.
3.5 billion usxp shares at .0006.
10 million is 1/350th of 3.510 billion shares.
usxp 1/350 of today's price $3.52 of ans = usxp value of $.01.
usxp is trading approximately 16 times below merger value.
$100 investment in usxp at $.0006 into estimated merger value equals return of $1600 on $100 investment.
Reverse merger price equals purchase price, say $3.52.
Symbol change for usxp/ans but stock price $3.52.
Reduce $3.52 by 90% merger of 10 million shares equal combined price worth of $.35 for ANS/usxp shares.
Multiplied by merger value $.0006 equal combined ans/usxp price of $2.10 per share and listing on AMEX for the two.
Reduce your shares held by 90% and multiply by $2.10 and will give you present value of usxp.
Increase ans shareholders shares by multiple of 125% gives price of approximately $4.35 acquistion price value increase of almost 30%.
Win win deal for everyone and huge upside with short covering to follow.
So how come there aren't a Sh*tload of shares being bought right now if these numbers are correct?
Posted by iternity on :
we had 2,5 billion in 3 trading days. and sells 2 or 3hundred mil. so there was a sh*tload of buying already.
Posted by kilerb on :
But when did this merger info come out? It just seems like today there are hardly any trades in comparison to a couple days ago.
Posted by New_Ventures on :
whos got L2's here
Posted by iternity on :
8x8, ask thinning bid building.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by optimizer_78: We've got the merger numbers by: mortimerandrandolphduke 01/24/06 12:28 pm Msg: 1608 of 1621
10 million os shares of ans at today's price estimate, $3.52 per share.
3.5 billion usxp shares at .0006.
10 million is 1/350th of 3.510 billion shares.
usxp 1/350 of today's price $3.52 of ans = usxp value of $.01.
usxp is trading approximately 16 times below merger value.
$100 investment in usxp at $.0006 into estimated merger value equals return of $1600 on $100 investment.
Reverse merger price equals purchase price, say $3.52.
Symbol change for usxp/ans but stock price $3.52.
Reduce $3.52 by 90% merger of 10 million shares equal combined price worth of $.35 for ANS/usxp shares.
Multiplied by merger value $.0006 equal combined ans/usxp price of $2.10 per share and listing on AMEX for the two.
Reduce your shares held by 90% and multiply by $2.10 and will give you present value of usxp.
Increase ans shareholders shares by multiple of 125% gives price of approximately $4.35 acquistion price value increase of almost 30%.
Win win deal for everyone and huge upside with short covering to follow.
imho. middle cent area for me.
Posted by Golf Money on :
Are those numbers speculation on 'if' they merge?
I don't see anything yet on the merger/buyout being a done deal.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by Golf Money: Are those numbers speculation on 'if' they merge?
I don't see anything yet on the merger/buyout being a done deal.
The USXP proposal was presented to ANS three weeks ago today. How long does a target company typically take to decide on such a bid? Seems to me USXP has no leverage to demand a quick answer, as they need ANS.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by Fatso:
quote:Originally posted by optimizer_78: We've got the merger numbers by: mortimerandrandolphduke 01/24/06 12:28 pm Msg: 1608 of 1621
10 million os shares of ans at today's price estimate, $3.52 per share.
3.5 billion usxp shares at .0006.
10 million is 1/350th of 3.510 billion shares.
usxp 1/350 of today's price $3.52 of ans = usxp value of $.01.
usxp is trading approximately 16 times below merger value.
$100 investment in usxp at $.0006 into estimated merger value equals return of $1600 on $100 investment.
Reverse merger price equals purchase price, say $3.52.
Symbol change for usxp/ans but stock price $3.52.
Reduce $3.52 by 90% merger of 10 million shares equal combined price worth of $.35 for ANS/usxp shares.
Multiplied by merger value $.0006 equal combined ans/usxp price of $2.10 per share and listing on AMEX for the two.
Reduce your shares held by 90% and multiply by $2.10 and will give you present value of usxp.
Increase ans shareholders shares by multiple of 125% gives price of approximately $4.35 acquistion price value increase of almost 30%.
Win win deal for everyone and huge upside with short covering to follow.
I have to admit I do not see the point. If ANS accepts the offer what will a share of USXP be worth?
So the combined USXP/ANS will be valued $2.10 if the merger went through now? What about the naked shorts? Do those have to be covered immediately? What effect does that have on stock price?
I guess I am asking how long we should hold on when the deal goes through, rather than dash out and peddle our USXP shares when the announcement of the merger comes out.
Posted by Golf Money on :
They presented the bid on Jan 3rd, but I saw no indication that the bid was accepted. And when it is accepted they have a 20 day DD period that they have to wait.
Maybe I missed it (and I hope I did).
Posted by richie on :
Do you know of any good penny oil stocks????
Posted by Golf Money on :
Thanks
Hope they have information that I do not.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by iternity: read my posting there:
Re: We've got the merger numbers by: iternity77 01/24/06 01:53 pm Msg: 1618 of 1630
IMHO, NSS will have to buy the float, maybe 50 times or more. They will have to pay what longs want. Much higher prices than 1 cent before the Merger is possible. They MUST cover before merging / moving to Amex. I will not sell to them anyway
When you say "they MUST cover"...is that an exchange rule or an SEC reg? Isnt what some naked shorters are doing with regard to USXP stock a separate issue from what USXP is doing about ANS? Or is it that a merged USXP/ANS entity has to have those things settled so a stock value can be established? And how can you control who you sell to? I mean if there are bids and you decide the time is right for you to sell, how do you know who is buying? Not trying to be a smartass; just trying to factor in as much info as possible. Hey...I can use as much reason as possible for optimism. Posted by iternity on :
no time to explain this all. read the usxp boards please.
nss shares around 8 times of the O/S (given from usxp, moneytv.net). make that around 30 billion nss "shares" than. think what happens if the usxp shares getting changes / merged with ans shares and then moved to amex traded under a new symbol. it would look really bad if there would be still a load of usxp shares in the bulletinboard. they do not want to go to jail. they will cover - they made good money anyway the last years.
- just a picture.
nss would have to pay what longs want, they will have to buy the free float maybe 50 or so. market cap will not be a factor anymore.
jmo.
Posted by New_Ventures on :
.0007' s gotts be gone soon
What is the end of day L2's --
Also noticed some after hour dumping at .0006
Posted by iternity on :
after hour dumping at 6 ??? all were at ask 7 after the bell!!! why are you doing that?
Posted by New_Ventures on :
quote:Originally posted by iternity: after hour dumping at 6 ??? all were at ask 7 after the bell!!! why are you doing that?
Doing What ??
I'm telling you what my scottrader showed --- chill out
Posted by DWE on :
USXP, RUN ALREADY!!!!!
Posted by Allstar on :
quote:Originally posted by New_Ventures:
quote:Originally posted by iternity: after hour dumping at 6 ??? all were at ask 7 after the bell!!! why are you doing that?
Doing What ??
I'm telling you what my scottrader showed --- chill out
Scottrader shows the afterhour trades with the last price traded ! That was 0,0006 ! Shares were all * ask !
Posted by Allstar on :
Last pps traded in the regular trading ! That was 0,0006 !
Posted by iternity on :
Good Morning! Posted by Allstar on :
GOOOOOOOD MORNING !!!! Posted by iternity on :
Posted by iternity on :
MMs waiting? Me too!!
Posted by Allstar on :
No trades ??? Nothing ?!?
Posted by iternity on :
kind of weird. yes.
Posted by Stinky on :
Hmmmmm... I'm showing a volume of 12,239,606 traded so far.... ?
Posted by iternity on :
yes, thats nothing. crazy. where is that pr.
Posted by SincereX13 on :
Yeh this puppy has been in the hundred millions at this time of day over the last couple of weeks.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by Stinky: Hmmmmm... I'm showing a volume of 12,239,606 traded so far.... ?
I have the same number, but with nothing trading in the last ten minutes.
Posted by iternity on :
and thats crazy.
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by SincereX13: Yeh this puppy has been in the hundred millions at this time of day over the last couple of weeks.
What do you suppose is happening? An imminent announcement? Posted by Fatso on :
Woo-hoo! Now we see some action! 12.8million in the last minute. Posted by Stinky on :
Volume at 15,239,606 by 11:15. That's not too horrible.
Posted by iternity on :
yessssssssssss!
Posted by Fatso on :
Do the MMs have any idea when something is about to break? An announcement, for example, or the inside story of the progress of USXP/ANS talks?
Posted by SincereX13 on :
imminenet announcement? we can hope right
volume is really starting to kick in now
Posted by Fatso on :
48 million Posted by New_Ventures on :
67 MIL and most are buys -----
Anyone got the l2's ???
Posted by SincereX13 on :
wow 92 mil just that quick... I am assuming they are buys?
Posted by Allstar on :
WE START MOVING !
Posted by evilmonkey on :
yeah, the amount of MM at the ask just got cut by half, may end in the green today if this picks up
Posted by New_Ventures on :
so what only 4 MM's on ask now ???
Come on someone post the L2's for us poor broke traders --- LOL
Posted by evilmonkey on :
2* .0007 ask 9* .0006 buy
Posted by New_Ventures on :
thanks evil ----- how many on the .0008 ask ??
Posted by Fatso on :
150million
Posted by evilmonkey on :
8
Posted by evilmonkey on :
the last 30 or so transactions have been at the ask, so a lot of people are picking this up this morning
Posted by New_Ventures on :
Man The buys keep pouring in
Posted by evilmonkey on :
down to 1 *.0007
Posted by SincereX13 on :
now if we just has some validity concerning the ans rumors
Posted by evilmonkey on :
those numbers that were posted yesterday are BS, nothing to back them up.
now .0007x.0008
Posted by New_Ventures on :
come on .0008
Posted by evilmonkey on :
good, glad this thing may move again, MM are joining the bid at .0007
Posted by New_Ventures on :
.0008 just printec
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: those numbers that were posted yesterday are BS, nothing to back them up.
That hurts. Posted by iternity on :
that numbers were just spekulation of course. yes.
Posted by evilmonkey on :
anyone can make up numbers, if you knew they were 'speculatioin' you should have said so when you posted them. but if anyone had read the source of those numbers, they would know its BS
Posted by iternity on :
man... please look at that posting again, ok? or did you see a pr anywhere that states there IS a merger? that numbers where from another board, that was clear.
Posted by iternity on :
I WAS NOT the poster of that numbers by the way.
optimizer_78 did.
Posted by Fatso on :
How about we all just focus on making a dumpload of cash? Cant we all just get along?
172 million
Posted by evilmonkey on :
ah yeah, my bad on that name mix up.
Posted by iternity on :
GOOD idea Posted by New_Ventures on :
yeah buys coming in now at .0008
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: ah yeah, my bad on that name mix up.
No sweat. We all are just primates. Posted by evilmonkey on :
odd, fatso quoted you with the source of opt's numbers, but i can't find the origional post
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by New_Ventures: yeah buys coming in now at .0008
Can you tell me where you get such numbers?
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: odd, fatso quoted you with the source of opt's numbers, but i can't find the origional post
The link is on page one, and yesterday I went there and copied and pasted the text here.
Posted by iternity on :
sign up for a free trial, you get 14 days free realtime quotes. ah and tell them you coming from me, ok? Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: odd, fatso quoted you with the source of opt's numbers, but i can't find the origional post
Are you saying I attributed that message to iternity? I did not. I quoted the entire message by optimizer_78.
Posted by New_Ventures on :
My scottrader showes several buys coming in at .0008
Posted by evilmonkey on :
not that message, one below it, posted at 15:58
Posted by New_Ventures on :
another buy of 4.5 mil at .0008 Posted by Fatso on :
Buying pressure is far beyond selling pressure now, and the result is the price $.0008
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: not that message, one below it, posted at 15:58
I do not see the connection. I thought the message being called "BS numbers" is the one that went up at 1417.
Posted by iternity on :
just stop that, ok? Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by iternity: just stop that, ok?
I dont have time to explain. Posted by iternity on :
I understand that fatso Posted by evilmonkey on :
heh, yeah, the BS numbers went up 14:17. fatso put up a post at 15:58, quoteing iternity with a link that went to the messege boards that the BS numbers were posted by that duke guy. that post you asked about the fact the 'they MUST cover'...
PS bid has dropped from 4 MM to 3
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: heh, yeah, the BS numbers went up 14:17. fatso put up a post at 15:58, quoteing iternity with a link that went to the messege boards that the BS numbers were posted by that duke guy. that post you asked about the fact the 'they MUST cover'...
PS bid has dropped from 4 MM to 3
Huh? Here is exactly what I posted in that message:
quote:Originally posted by Fatso:
quote:Originally posted by iternity: read my posting there:
Re: We've got the merger numbers by: iternity77 01/24/06 01:53 pm Msg: 1618 of 1630
IMHO, NSS will have to buy the float, maybe 50 times or more. They will have to pay what longs want. Much higher prices than 1 cent before the Merger is possible. They MUST cover before merging / moving to Amex. I will not sell to them anyway
When you say "they MUST cover"...is that an exchange rule or an SEC reg? Isnt what some naked shorters are doing with regard to USXP stock a separate issue from what USXP is doing about ANS? Or is it that a merged USXP/ANS entity has to have those things settled so a stock value can be established? And how can you control who you sell to? I mean if there are bids and you decide the time is right for you to sell, how do you know who is buying? Not trying to be a smartass; just trying to factor in as much info as possible. Hey...I can use as much reason as possible for optimism.
I realize that you are embarrassed at having showed your arse by accusing the other guy, but that does not shift to me any blame for things I did not say or claim that someone else said.
Posted by New_Ventures on :
Why dont you guys leave it alone ---- MY GOD ---
Has anyone noticed the dumping going on at .0007
Posted by SincereX13 on :
yeh we just can seem to gain momentum
Posted by evilmonkey on :
Holy sh*t you got things a ss backwards.
1- opt put up the BS numbers 2- somehwere itern put up the link to the source of those BS number so everyone could see them, as the link that opt put up would not work for me and i assume others 3- you quoted itern, with the link he supplied, at 15:58, but i can not find that post that you quoted, i assume itern edited for some reason.
back down to .0006/.0007
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: Holy sh*t you got things a ss backwards.
1- opt put up the BS numbers 2- somehwere itern put up the link to the source of those BS number so everyone could see them, as the link that opt put up would not work for me and i assume others 3- you quoted itern, with the link he supplied, at 15:58, but i can not find that post that you quoted, i assume itern edited for some reason.
back down to .0006/.0007
Not quite. Someone named optimizer quoted those numbers from a yahoo board, and I went to that board and copied the message, which I pasted here. I did not attribute that to the guy you slammed earlier today. My questions to him were in response to his words.
Wanna try again?
Posted by evilmonkey on :
lol, slammed? i mixed up 2 names then appologized when i was corrected.
i'll try make this a simple as i can for you fatso, you have a post up that starts with: 'origionally posted by iternity'
what does that mean? it means you quoted a post by iternity, in that post, iternity gives a link to the forum that optimizer got the info that this mortimerandrandolfduke guy posted, with out any source. this is a good thing, which i do not think you are grasping. it gave other people a chance to see the source of this rumor and make up there own mind as to whether it is true or not.
where you got this quote, i do not know. i can not see it in this thread, nor will the link supplied by optimizer work for me, so it could have come from that as far as i know. I am not blameing you for anything, never was.
Posted by Silence is gold on :
can any one make this clear for me ????????????????????????????? someone he send me this in my e-mail >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can any one please make it clear for me..................its driving me creazy?
Posted by evilmonkey on :
ooo, going back up one MM at .0007 ask
Posted by Allstar on :
Someone is buying huge amounts very fast !
Posted by evilmonkey on :
but once again, things come to a halt when it hits .0007/.0008
Posted by Allstar on :
HUGE BID NOW * .0007 !
Posted by Neptunetrader94 on :
wow, already 350 million volume, the attention on this one is building.
Posted by evilmonkey on :
yeah, if it can attract some buyers at .0008 it would be nice, i've only seen 4 the whole time its been there
Posted by New_Ventures on :
I sure like the "invetor confidence" --- every time a slew of sales go thru at .0007 we go back to .0008 with new buys
IMO true support here at .0007 for the time being anyway
I would think most of the .0007 sales are gone -- dont you all ??
Posted by alexr78 on :
This company is in need of some news!!!! They need to post something !
Posted by Stinky on :
*hrumph* I just had a sell order go through for 557,000 at .0008. That's odd. I'll take the small gain and run though....
Posted by alexr78 on :
Something big is going on.. I want to know what it is........ does any one have some insider info.. lots of buying is going on here.
Posted by ams545 on :
buy buy buy buy Posted by iternity on :
ams545, got me?
Posted by 10of13 on :
News Releases
News Releases > 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003
AirNet Systems, Inc. Common Shares Approved for Listing on American Stock Exchange
CONTACT: Gary Qualman AirNet Systems, Inc. (614) 409-4832
Bob Lentz InvestQuest, Inc. (614) 876-1900
COLUMBUS, Ohio – January 20, 2006 –AirNet Systems, Inc. (NYSE: ANS) today announced that its common shares have been approved for listing on the American Stock Exchange and that it expects trading in its common shares on the American Stock Exchange to commence at the market opening on Wednesday, January 25, 2006. This approval is contingent upon the Company being in compliance with all applicable listing standards on the date it begins trading on the Exchange, and may be rescinded if the Company is not in compliance with such standards. The Company’s common shares will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange until the close of that market on Tuesday, January 24, 2006. The ticker symbol for the Company’s common shares will remain “ANS”.
AirNet Systems, Inc.
AirNet Systems, Inc., through its operating subsidiaries, focuses its resources on providing value-added, time-critical aviation services to a diverse set of customers in the most service-intensive, cost-effective manner possible. AirNet operates an integrated national transportation network that provides expedited transportation services to banks and time-critical small package shippers nationwide. Jetride, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, provides Passenger Charter services nationwide to individuals and businesses. The Company operated a total of 127 aircraft, 113 for its cargo airline and 14 for its passenger charter airline at September 30, 2005, located strategically throughout the United States. To find out more, visit AirNet’s website at www.airnet.com.
Universal Express (USXP) Re-Submits Two Proposals For AirNet Systems (ANS) Tuesday December 20, 12:25 pm ET
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 20, 2005--Universal Express Inc. (OTCBB: USXP - News). At 11:30 today, Universal Express presented a new proposal for AirNet's acquisition involving only cash or cash plus warrants and stock. The terms of this proposal will be presented after acceptance or rejection by AirNet's investment banker
Now in reading this, I am pretty sure that USXP would love to purchase ANS....BUT they can't afford it. And ANS has not responded...or at least...I can't find the response any where...basically..I see this as a "ploy" for advertisement by USXP. I don't think that ANS is acknowleding the letter or USXP as a matter of fact..I did find this on ANS's website:
CONTACT: Bob Lentz InvestQuest, Inc. (614) 876-1900
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- December 16, 2005 -- AirNet Systems, Inc. (NYSE: ANS) today announced that it has been unable to reach a definitive merger agreement with the private equity investment firm that entered into a letter of intent with the company on October 26, 2005. As a result, the Special Committee of AirNet's Board of Directors has allowed the exclusivity period with the firm to expire. As previously disclosed, AirNet entered into a letter of intent for the sale of the company to the nationally recognized private equity investment firm in a going private transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the letter of intent, the private equity investment firm had exclusivity until December 15, 2005 to complete its confirmatory due diligence and execute a definitive merger agreement. Speaking on behalf of AirNet's Special Committee, James E. Riddle, Lead Director, stated: "We are disappointed that we have been unable to reach a definitive agreement. Our board and our management team will now focus on continuing to operate AirNet as an independent company. Obviously, in the exercise of our fiduciary duties, if we receive an offer from a qualified potential acquirer, we will consider it."
Notice how the above letter states..."if we receive an offer from a qualified potential acquirer we will consider it."
This is my opinion...but I think that they were referring to USXP...All of this is my opinion...but also know that the "20 days from the time of the January 3 letter has come and gone...I don't think that there will be a response from ANS to USXP to purchase the company....
I'm not trying to bash USXP..I have some of there stock also...and I would love to be totally wrong...I just am putting the info out there...and my interpitation of the info...
You guys decide...please don't start attacking me..
Posted by iternity on :
GOOD MORNING Posted by Allstar on :
Yepp ! GM !
Posted by iternity on :
Bid building
Posted by evilmonkey on :
down to .0006/.0007, we should see a jump in the amount of people picking this up
Posted by 10of13 on :
I sent an email to USXP...this was the reply..
----- Original Message ----- From: Public Relations To: Kathryn Wilson Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: Re: Airnet Systems Inc.
Ms. Wilson,
Thank you for your email. At this time we can not discuss the current status without speaking to all shareholders. It is still on going, as indicated in Mr. Altomare's MoneyTv interview. If you have not seen it, please go to www.usxp.com and you will find it on the main page, lower left side where it says articles and interviews. We are also looking forward to any type of finalization or news that we can share with you and all othre shareholders.
Thank you,
Mark Falk
take it for what it is worth
Posted by evilmonkey on :
remember that they have that NDA, so that could be a good sign.
Posted by evilmonkey on :
i'm looking at old pr's for info on that NDA, but i cant find it, does anyone else remember reading about it?
Posted by ams545 on :
Universal Express Offers to Solve the $100 Million Security Fees Billed to Airlines by the TSA Business Wire - January 26, 2006 12:17
NEW YORK, Jan 26, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Universal Express Inc. (OTCBB: USXP)
"Universal Express through its subsidiary Luggage Express offered to show how it can cover the security fee that airlines are balking at paying to the TSA (see articles below.) In exchange for the payment and security peace of mind, Luggage Express is asking that the movement of luggage be separated from the passenger. We can fund this security fee payment through the revenues gained from sales of shipping luggage," said Richard Altomare, CEO and Chairman of Universal Express, Inc.
"Curiously, this separation will have other benefits as indicated below. These benefits are expanded upon in our position paper entitled 'More Safety, Less Hassle for American Travelers, a Private Sector Solution. (http://www.usxp.com/securitywp.pdf) We're prepared to initiate dialogue with interested parties," concluded Richard Altomare.
-- Decline in passenger baggage reduces the prospect of infiltration of terrorist
-- Reduce demand for baggage screening
-- Reduction of TSA security screening costs
-- Faster and enhanced security check-in
-- Refocusing of screening personal and equipment to cargo screening
-- Airline revenue enhancements because of handling less baggage and faster plane turn around.
Bloomberg article: http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/365301/southwest_fighting_ security_fees/index.html?source=r_technology (Due to its length, this URL may need to be copied/pasted into your Internet browser's address field. Remove the extra space if one exists.)
About Universal Express
Universal Express, Inc. is a 22 year old logistics and transportation conglomerate with multiple developing subsidiaries and services. For additional information please visit www.usxp.com
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein, which are not historical, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, certain delays beyond the Company's control with respect to market acceptance of new technologies, products and services, delays in testing and evaluation of products and services, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SOURCE: Universal Express Inc.
Universal Express, Inc. Investor Relations: Mark Falk, 631-588-1644 publicrelations*usxp.com
Copyright Business Wire 2006
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by evilmonkey: lol, slammed? i mixed up 2 names then appologized when i was corrected.
i'll try make this a simple as i can for you fatso, you have a post up that starts with: 'origionally posted by iternity'
what does that mean? it means you quoted a post by iternity, in that post, iternity gives a link to the forum that optimizer got the info that this mortimerandrandolfduke guy posted, with out any source. this is a good thing, which i do not think you are grasping. it gave other people a chance to see the source of this rumor and make up there own mind as to whether it is true or not.
where you got this quote, i do not know. i can not see it in this thread, nor will the link supplied by optimizer work for me, so it could have come from that as far as i know. I am not blameing you for anything, never was.
Then what your point is or was in attacking me yesterday still is a mystery. I have no idea how you claim that I can be blamed for your blaming that other guy.
And as I previously said, my quotes are taken direct from the people who made them, right here in this discussion. Why you attempted to attack me for your own failure is anyone's guess, but it remains established that I am not to blame for your screwing up in blaming that other guy. He said what he said, I said what I said, and the guy whose numbers were yesterday called "BS numbers" said what he said. This is not something that you can change.
(Private messages are very easily deleted. )
Posted by evilmonkey on :
ask just fell from 5 MM to 1 real fast
Posted by Fatso on :
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: I sent an email to USXP...this was the reply..
----- Original Message ----- From: Public Relations To: Kathryn Wilson Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: Re: Airnet Systems Inc.
Ms. Wilson,
Thank you for your email. At this time we can not discuss the current status without speaking to all shareholders. It is still on going, as indicated in Mr. Altomare's MoneyTv interview. If you have not seen it, please go to www.usxp.com and you will find it on the main page, lower left side where it says articles and interviews. We are also looking forward to any type of finalization or news that we can share with you and all othre shareholders.
Thank you,
Mark Falk
take it for what it is worth
10:
Thanks for this update. I guess we can take it as encouragement that they say they still are discussing the ANS offer, which is better than a flat "No!" from ANS. In fact I take this as confirmation that a deal is on the way.
Posted by evilmonkey on :
and back up she goes
Posted by evilmonkey on :
people starting to pick this thing up at .0008
Posted by SincereX13 on :
I like the sound of that evil
Posted by iternity on :
NSS don´t want that usxp moves up ! They are still shorting like HELL ! ANS Deal and AMEX would kill them all !
Posted by iternity on :
good morning
Posted by ams545 on :
The Coalition for Luggage Security Congratulates Ryanair Business Wire - January 27, 2006 09:00
NEW YORK, Jan 27, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- The Coalition for Luggage Security reports a trend in airlines charging for carry-on and checked luggage. Ryanair Airline, a low-cost Dublin based airline, has announced that they will be charging for checked luggage and cutting fare prices for those without luggage.
"Ryanair and others, such as Flybe, are part of the trend we have been discussing. By decreasing fares for those who travel without luggage and charging a fee for checked-in bags, Ryanair will realize the savings associated with lighter loads. By making a profit from charging for bags, and the benefits of moving passengers through the airport quickly by not being held up on security lines, the Coalitions luggage and passenger discussions begin to attract a larger audience," said Harvey Abelson, Coalition Director.
"Once again we see the impact luggage has on airlines, and how airlines can become more profitable while keeping air travel secure and more enjoyable. Smaller airlines are taking the hint, and we urge larger airlines to follow suit. If a smaller airline can decrease airfares, lessen aircraft load and increase security while speeding up the travel process, imagine the savings in money and time larger airlines would reap. At the same time, air travel will become more secure. All of these elements have been laid out in our white paper (http://www.usxp.com/securitywp.pdf). As the trend of hands free travel grows, we'll be taking airlines, airplanes and airports out of the terrorists gun sights, and returning air travel to the airlines and the traveler," said Richard A. Altomare, Founder and Chairman of the Coalition for Luggage Security, and CEO of Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB: USXP).
The Coalition for Luggage Security was established to ensure the safety of travelers through alternate means of luggage transportation. The Coalition consists of prominent businesspersons and companies that educate the public, Congress and the Administration on the importance of solving the luggage and cargo safety issues that exist in airlines and airports.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein, which are not historical, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, certain delays beyond the Company's control with respect to market acceptance of new technologies, products and services, delays in testing and evaluation of products and services, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
That being the case, how long before you start getting nervous? ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)