Is that what Frank said?
SIX HUNDRED BILLION?
I just can't get around that $600,000,000,000.oo of disposable income of our targeted audience.
Neither can The CEOs of many a Fortune 500 Companies that are drooling over the prospect of developing an intensely loyal consumer base that wields that kind financial clout! My bet is they've already shot the commercials.
No matter how I do the math one percent of SIX HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS keeps coming up as SIX BILLION DOLLARS. One tenth of one percent is SIX HUNDRED MILLION BUCKS!
One tenth of one percent,,,,,,
$600,000,000.oo!
That kind of revenue alone would put this over a buck easy.
That's just one reason that it's so difficult to find a Genuine Broadcasting National TV Network that trades for less than $1 a share. That & the fact that none exist.
There are no real TV Networks trading under a dollar a share.
Think about this for a minute.
What does the word NETWORK imply?
Am I the only one that sees where this is headed?
Q TV Channel
Q TV Movie Channel
Q TV Music Channel
Q TV News Channel
Q TV Comedy Channel
Q TV Social History Channel
Q TV Movie Channel II
Q TV Sports Channel
Q TV Movie Channel III R rated
The list goes on,,,
There's only one way I do not see $1 per share. Frank sells the whole thing & they take it private.
Accumulation Phase continues!
For me this is a genuine long term play.
Matter of time.
Nothing more, nothing less.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
------------------
whizknock
1BigTip
Member posted November 01, 2004 07:27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QBID's 2004 Progress:
Wed, Feb 02, 2004
"TTN Ready to Commence Broadcasting!"
Wed, Feb 19, 2004
Frank Olsen officially underscores ten-year contract with Time-Warner Cable
Wed, Feb 25, 2004
Triangle Begins Production of New Documentary
Thu, Mar 4, 2004
Grunberg Returns to Triangle Television
Mon, Mar 15, 2004
Olsen and Lamont to Broadcast Gay Network
Thu, Apr 1, 2004
Triangle to Have Major Presence At NCTA Convention
Fri, Apr 16, 2004
Triangle Television Announces Name Change to Q Television Network
Mon, May 10, 2004
Q Television Network a Smash Hit at NCTA Convention
Tue, May 11, 2004
Q Television Network Confirms Soft Launch
Wed, May 12, 2004
Q Television Network Announces Details of Test Broadcast
Fri, May 14, 2004
Q Television Network Announces Additional Details of Five-Hour Sneak Preview Broadcast Scheduled for Saturday May 15th
Tue, May 18, 2004
Q Television Network announced today the successful completion of its five-hour test broadcast on Saturday, May 15th
May 26, 2004
Industry soft launch for carriers and advertisers begins June 1, 2004 on Intelsat America's 7, 129 degrees West, Channel 1
May 28, 2004
Number of Market Makers on QBID jumps to 34!
June 03, 2004
Q Television received considerable response from potential carriers and advertisers seeking more information regarding the network
Network executives will travel to New York City June 6 - 11 to meet with private equity funds, hedge funds and securities dealers.
June 15, 2004
Q Television has hired Advertising Executive Scott Seger
June 29, 2004
Cable Industry Executive Joins Q Television Network. Michael Markovsky to Lead Carriage Contract Negotiations
July 21, 2004
Q Television and RCN Corporation Announce Distribution Agreement
Agust 18, 2004
Q Television appears in Deserts Sun Newspapers with a full page ad.
August 31, 2004
Q Television Network Acquires Film Package from Warner Bros. Domestic Cable Distribution
September 8, 2004
Q Television Network launches! In San Francisco on Channel 255.
September 15, 2004
Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications.
September 16, 2004
Q TELEVISION NETWORK PURCHASES STUDIO; Announces It Has Acquired Exclusive Rights to the International Gay and Lesbian Aquatics Championship.
September 17, 2004
Q Television Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications (FCI) to Produce Live Programming.
September 20, 2004
Q Television Network Hires Rubenstein Associates
September 23, 2004
Q Television Network announced the first round of buy-backs for QBID common stock within the next six weeks.
September 24, 2004
Q Television Network Announces Signal Move Successful; QTN is Broadcasting Again
September 30, 2004
Q Television network announces a multi-million dollar cash and barter deal with Chicago organizers of "Gay Games VII" for television and radio broadcast rights.
October 13, 2004
Q Television Network Announces Partnership with Zephyr Media Group. Partnership Will Allow Q Television to Generate Revenues from Infomercials.
October 18&20, 2004
Q Television Network Announces Live Signal Up in New York City & Boston, Massachusetts.
October 26, 2004
Q Television Network, announced today that the company will be at booth number 418 at the Gay Life Expo in New York City.
......................................................................................
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
tqn
Member posted November 04, 2004 15:24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From The Producers Desk
News And Things:
October 31, 2004
WELCOME NEW YORK CITY!
New York City is the latest city to be added to the expanding world of The Q Television Network. GLBT programming and the GLBT market is no longer a novelty item, or something to just wonder about.
Now you can catch THE AGENDA! every Sunday on RCN Digital Cable Channel 255. As we go forward with THE AGENDA! airing on The Q Television Network we are moving towards our goal of bringing and sharing information not only within the GLBT community, but with people everywhere. No matter what community they belong to.
In December 2004, new episodes of THE AGENDA! will will air. From the quiet life in a country town, to the propaganda machines of those who oppose us, we will follow people and stories that relate to and are about us.
As 2004 progresses and passes into 2005, we will be using many of the stories, segments and show ideas that have been sent to us.
With that in mind we would like to thank each of you who have been sending us ideas and suggestions for THE AGENDA!
If you have an idea for a segment or a show we would love to hear from you!
So don't forget, if you see us about town shooting, come over and say hi! Or if you have an idea for a segment or even an entire show, we would love to hear from you! http://herounit.com/apdesk.htm
------------------
whizknock
------------------
The mind is only as good as it is used. Therefore use it and do your homework and study to see which stock is the best buy for the day. To see which is the best for the day, take all the help you can get from just 1, GOD himself. Through JESUS CHRIST I CAN DO ALL THINGS. EVEN WIN AT THE MARKET. TO GOD BE ALL THE GLORY AND 20% OFF ALL PROFITS.
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
is qbid even up and on the television set anywhere/ If so where? Has anybody seen there broadcast's anywhere?
Although I haven't seen it pesonally people have said they've watched it. Furthermore Frank has said their signal presently is unscrambled on RCN.
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
FIRST OF ALL. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THIS CONFERENCE TO HANDLE 50 CALLS IN A 1-HOUR PERIOD LET ALONE HOW DID THEY RECORD 1100 CALLS? FRANKIE FRAUD OLSEN, THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN TELLING PATRONS (AKA STOCKHOLDERS) THAT YOU HANDLED 50,000 INQUIRIES AND 100,000 HOTLINE MESSAGES.FRANK OLSEN IS A 100% FRAUDULENT LIAR!
85-BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE WALL <BURP>
if you where on the Conference call speak up and let us know
so far there are 44 of us
penny trader
firefly
1BigTip
Ric
Doctoall
2 of Docs friends
King Crimson
Kings daughter
Boulder Buddy
TSHRUFUS
driver
RNINALVNG
couple of 1Big Tips friends
Whiznock
stanlee
tnq
sneither
Crygreen1
Sonnydbar
crosseyed
pieman
6 of Dianna's friends
dinger51
21jason21
cashrules
The Wanderer
SMC
snoozenlooze
Ruh420
Degs
Ballystock
dolr’s
bckibler
2 of bckibler's teachers
Boletus
CouchP
who else was there
what do you say to this U4 are we the only ones that where able to get on the CC?
according to you only 50 people could possibly get on. that means that only 6 other could have been there. I'm sure there are that many here lurking that have not spoke up yet. let alone all the other people at other BB's
this doesn't do much to help your credibility and you are trying to call Frank a liar? I'm sorry buddy but at this point in the game i will take my chances with Frank.
I bring to you facts U4 how about you do the same to back your claims
Rod
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 05, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
is qbid even up and on the television set anywhere/ If so where? Has anybody seen there broadcast's anywhere?
Absolutely is! In fact, I was in the process of ordering it for a friend in Boston and RCN told me as soon as he signs up for RCN, he'll be able to view it on the TV. Unfortunately I needed his SS# at the time.
He is now watching it on TV. So yes it's on TV sets.
Where you ask? Boston, San Francisco, NYC and soon Chicago.
RG
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Absolutely is! In fact, I was in the process of ordering it for a friend in Boston and RCN told me as soon as he signs up for RCN, he'll be able to view it on the TV. Unfortunately I needed his SS# at the time.
He is now watching it on TV. So yes it's on TV sets.Where you ask? Boston, San Francisco, NYC and soon Chicago.
so you see U4 knows not what he speaks of. but rather makes it up as he goes to fit into his scheme at the time. Sad that someone would go public like this and make up numbers and accusations and call someone an all out liar and fraud, and risk a charge of slander so blatantly. This in itself tells me that he is nowhere nearly as smart as he would lead you to believe.
It would be in anybodies best interest not to take any head in anything this fool has to say, but rejoice that he is here as he is proving to us that this thing is going to fly.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
I just got off the line with the conferencing center. I asked them if they could handle a conference call of 4500 people at once. her answer was that is no problem at all, will 4500 be enough for you?
so you see U4 knows not what he speaks of. but rather makes it up as he goes to fit into his scheme at the time. Sad that someone would go public like this and make up numbers and accusations and call someone an all out liar and fraud, and risk a charge of slander so blatantly. This in itself tells me that he is nowhere nearly as smart as he would lead you to believe.It would be in anybodies best interest not to take any head in anything this fool has to say, but rejoice that he is here as he is proving to us that this thing is going to fly.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
is qbid even up and on the television set anywhere/ If so where? Has anybody seen there broadcast's anywhere?
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
is qbid even up and on the television set anywhere/ If so where? Has anybody seen there broadcast's anywhere?
[This message has been edited by CashRules (edited November 04, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Bob Frey (edited November 04, 2004).]
Thanks Bob
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 04, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 04, 2004).]
If asked to register, just click exit and Promo Video should start.
QMobile is a Black Hummer
From Video:
Q is out, it's on, and its authentic.
Finally, advertisers have a way to reach the gay community, estimated at 35 million people.
It is the most powerful and rapidly growing demographics in the country.
GLBT has purchasing power of over 500 BILLION dollars
37% are college graduates
20% hold graduate degrees
Gay households are 3.4 times as likely to have a combined annual income over $250,000
53% own their home
31% have high speed connections in their home
89% of this exclusive audience are more likely to seek out brands that advertise to them
A majority of this sought after demographic is willing to pay a premium for quality products and services including entertainment
Premieres Spring 2005
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 04, 2004).]
I own almost a million shares of a broadcasting network this is enough potential to make the hair stand up on my arm.
could you imagine owning a million shares of hbo or univision.
I realise I will probably not hold out long enough for those type of profits but the potential is here.
canada's pride vision trades between 40 and 80 cents a share and they only have 125 thousand subscribers with a total population in canada of about 26 million.
we have 286 million in the usa which is more than 10 times that of canada which means it is easy to expect well over a million subscribers a month after we establish ourselves and add new carriers.
potential is priceless and those that complain about qbid today may well have to eat their hat next year.
goodnight everyone may your protfolios see green tomorrow and if anyone has any good picks for the morning let me know lmao.
But no one here would turn their nose up to .40 a share.
------------------
whizknock
Chicago Gay Games Signs Multi-Million $ Deal for TV/Radio Broadcast Rights.
-
Letter of Intent Signed with California-based Q Television Network
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 04, 2004).]
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Here is a link to the CNBC story. Very cool stuff. I didn't know this aired... I'm sure we'd all like to see much more of this sort of thing!
[This message has been edited by SnoozenLooze (edited November 04, 2004).]
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Snooze, WAKE UP I just posted that a bit ago as I got the same info
I know! I edited my message...ha! I had my web page open all day but hadn't refreshed, sorry. All fixed..
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Well the 2 of us were at the CC for sure, I just wish that I knew how to bring the link to this board.
Done!
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 04, 2004).]
CNBC Morning Call mentions Q Television Network! Shows Promo Video.
Here's the direct link to morning call clip: http://www.vmsdigital.com/download/110104/NBO53392_01.wmv
Try this if that doesn't work:
http://www.vmsdigital.com/MyFiles.aspx?Onum=BC76D27C-C593-4E5A-BF77-3A7ABFD66505
ENJOY.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 19, 2004).]
Lil
quote:
Originally posted by lilpennypincher:
Wow, what great post's tonight. I loved the Morning Call clip. I missed it when it aired. Thanks for posting it here.
Market is going to rebound, penny's will follow, Q is on the move and we are going to enjoy the ride, I just know it.
Still think I may make the Javits show this weekend. I'm trying to get everything done so that I'm able to go.
If I get there, I'll take lots of pictures and get them back here.
Cheers all........Lil
[This message has been edited by Allstocks (edited November 05, 2004).]
1BT....You've got mail.
Lil
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Cheers all,,Hope you get there Lil. Congrats on the house.
Was it aired on CNBC? I am curious.:confused
I remember watching the screen in AWE one day, realizing it wasn't a glitch but the PPS was moving up so fast. Same thing is going to happen before we know it.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 05, 2004).]
Is this the new thread?
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
GREAT DD. THANKS FOR STARTING A NEW THREAD. I LOVE THE POSITIVE ATTITUDE!!
------------------
DIANA
[This message has been edited by CashRules (edited November 05, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by CashRules (edited November 05, 2004).]
i have my laptop working in the truck now so i can stop in through ou the day. the is cool im sitting in a customers driveway waiting for him to show up.
any how just wanted to drop in and say hi and thank eveyone that spoke up for my little pole on who attended the Conference call.
have a great day. we soon have to move forward. would be nice to finish the week in the green.
GLTA
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
good morning team.i have my laptop working in the truck now so i can stop in through ou the day. the is cool im sitting in a customers driveway waiting for him to show up.
any how just wanted to drop in and say hi and thank eveyone that spoke up for my little pole on who attended the Conference call.
have a great day. we soon have to move forward. would be nice to finish the week in the green.
GLTA
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Boletus:
I too was on the CC.
Hearing whispers about an update to the outstanding shares on Bloomberg.com. Can anyone here confirm?
bloomberg shows 9 bil (o/s ??) because float is n/a. market cap 26.1 mil, worked out .0029 per share (based on 9 bil). can anyone make a analysis of this? down by 500 mil - resulted from the buy back? so QBID has been telling the truth the whole time?
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=qbid&x=7&y=12
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 05, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by profit gains:
According to CNBC screen, INTL was 21.02 But, it hasn't been at that price since Oct 2.
[This message has been edited by CouchP (edited November 05, 2004).]
Take That U4.
Bob_Dog
Holding Causiously Optomistic (SP)
Thanks Whiz for the new thread--600 billion, oh yeah.
And, thanks to everyone for posting the CNBC links.
My life has been on fast forward for a couple of weeks. I must confess that I have depended on Allstocks for CC info--thanks again.
December is just around the corner.
quote:
Originally posted by sync2112:
WHIZ............I love ya man but how many PUMPER QBID boards are you going to start????????
This is board XXI.
Since Feb I've noticed that the life expectancy of one of our threads is approx. 3 weeks to a month & a half (38 to 60 pages each). I've never once seen a QBID board fall off the front page & almost always near the top. We sustane huge interest in this thread & many other boards on the internet.
OK I told you why, now as to how many I'll start??? Twenty months from now I will sell most of my position for about $1.25 to $1.75 a share & continue to hold a core position. So the way I see it about 16 more of these threads will be needed for me to pump this price!!!!!!!
Unlike other stocks I own such as TURD.PK, the CEO of this company couldn't screw it up if he tried. As hard as I've looked I can't find any shred of risk in this holding with the exception of not owning it at these prices. In addition I've looked far & wide for a "real" Broadcasting National TV Network that trades for less than $1 a share. There isn't one, period!
Truthtfully, "worst case scenario", we may have 25 Billion O/S! I don't care!
We have a target audiance that's playing with 600 BILLION DOLLARS of disposable income & I'm confident we can generate One Tenth of One Percent of that in revenue before two years time. That $600 Million cash flow while we're still well within a growth cycle would have us trading over a dollar a share EASILY!
The way I see it the hard work is done,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
Hi All,Thanks Whiz for the new thread--600 billion, oh yeah.
And, thanks to everyone for posting the CNBC links.
My life has been on fast forward for a couple of weeks. I must confess that I have depended on Allstocks for CC info--thanks again.
December is just around the corner.
Suzainiee!
That is truley a sight to behold isn't it!
http://www.vmsdigital.com/MyFiles.aspx?Onum=BC76D27C-C593-4E5A-BF77-3A7ABFD66505
How many subpenny stocks have you seen get that exposure on CNBC?
Point of fact, I've never seen even one before this.
------------------
whizknock
the other way is with a wireless network card and drive around and find a signal that has not been secured.
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by penny-trader:
[b]good morning team.i have my laptop working in the truck now so i can stop in through ou the day. the is cool im sitting in a customers driveway waiting for him to show up.
any how just wanted to drop in and say hi and thank eveyone that spoke up for my little pole on who attended the Conference call.
have a great day. we soon have to move forward. would be nice to finish the week in the green.
GLTA
Rod
[/B][/QUOTE]
i wouldnt call it a pumper board though. it is an information board. if it was a pumper board the people like U4 would have been banned long ago.
JMHO
quote:
Originally posted by sync2112:
WHIZ............I love ya man but how many PUMPER QBID boards are you going to start????????
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
you dont have to go to them alli wouldnt call it a pumper board though. it is an information board. if it was a pumper board the people like U4 would have been banned long ago.
JMHO
NOW, the only way QBID will not be profitable for all of us is if Frank folds up. No other reason. Even if they don't get another carrier, ever, subs from RCN will drive QBID up. Advertisers, ect. ect.
The progress they are making now is setting up our future.
So I repeat; the only way QBID WILL NOT be profitable, is if Frank folds up. Do you really think Frank will want to stop operating a business which could generate billions of dollars?? I DON'T THINK SO!
The risk WAS there, not anymore.
Don't let anyone tell you differently. I can just see those people back in the 50's. No, McDonalds won't make it, they're only selling milkshakes.
1. Now that Bush is reelected and will not be legalizing gay marriage how does this play into QBID?
2. QBID has been on the market since 2000. What were they doing back then and what is taking so long?
3. They've been on a gradual decline in price since the pop in May. If I want to buy in should I buy now or wait for an even lower price? I don't want to miss the big pop.
4. QBIDs website isn't anything to brag about. Apparently they only have a handful of employees as well. Does this worry anyone that they're not very professional? I've read posts about the president, Frank?, made false threats on the website to people that were bashing QBID or hounding advertisers.
5. What would be the top ten list for reasons to buy QBID?
6. What would be the top ten list for reasons to NOT buy QBID?
7. They had a soft launch a while ago and are airing in a few cities. When will they go national and therefor probably cause the price to sky rocket?
8. Will going national cause the price to rocket? Would anything else do so? I want to see the dollar mark and then some.
It's 4 AM so I'm a little tired. I'll have many more questions later. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 06, 2004).]
Up until end of August, QBID was having volume of over 225 mill. each day. After that we have dropped to mostly below 125 mill. each day. Which only can mean "consolidation" If I am right to where I think the "rounding bottom" has started, we are in the bottom curve. Maybe another week until we start the up curve and then it will take time to establish the uptrend. Here's an example.
Rounding Bottom (Reversal)
The rounding bottom is a long-term reversal pattern. It is also referred to as a saucer bottom, and represents a long consolidation period that turns from a bearish to bullish.
1. Prior Trend: In order to be a reversal pattern, there must be a prior trend to reverse. Ideally, the low of a rounding bottom will mark a new low or reaction low. In practice, there are occasions when the low is recorded many months earlier and the security trades flat before forming the pattern. When the rounding bottom does finally form, its low may not be the lowest low of the last few months.
2. Decline: The first portion of the rounding bottom is the decline that leads to the low of the pattern. This decline can take on different forms: some are quite jagged with a number of reaction highs and lows, while others trade lower in a more linear fashion.
3. Low: The low of the rounding bottom can resemble a "V' bottom, but should not be too sharp and should take a few weeks to form. Because prices are in a long-term decline, the possibility of a selling climax exists that could create a lower spike.
4. Advance: The advance off of the lows forms the right half of the pattern and should take about the same amount of time as the prior decline. If the advance is too sharp, then the validity of a rounding bottom may be in question.
5. Breakout: Bullish confirmation comes when the pattern breaks above the reaction high that marked the beginning of the decline at the start of the pattern. As with most resistance breakouts, this level can become support. However, rounding bottoms represent long-term reversal and this new support level may not be that significant.
6. Volume: In an ideal pattern, volume levels will track the shape of the rounding bottom: high at the beginning of the decline, low at the end of the decline and rising during the advance. Volume levels are not too important on the decline, but there should be an increase in volume on the advance and preferably on the breakout.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:1. Now that Bush is reelected and will not be legalizing gay marriage how does this play into QBID?It doesn't matter. you don't need a marriage license to watch a Network on TV.
2. QBID has been on the market since 2000. What were they doing back then and what is taking so long?It hasn't been since 2000 but Networks usually take up to 10 years to straighten things out and actually become a smooth running network
3. They've been on a gradual decline in price since the pop in May. If I want to buy in should I buy now or wait for an even lower price? I don't want to miss the big pop.Don't let anyone tell you when to buy or sell. IMO I think it is extremely attractive. No matter where you get in, you'll be thanking yourself years from now!
4. QBIDs website isn't anything to brag about. Apparently they only have a handful of employees as well. Does this worry anyone that they're not very professional? I've read posts about the president, Frank?, made false threats on the website to people that were bashing QBID or hounding advertisers.It doesn't worry me about the employees, they will expand, they're eliminating business expenses right now, and they will have a brand new website up soon. Yes, they will proceed with legal action if that action ends up hurting the Network.
5. What would be the top ten list for reasons to buy QBID?HERE YOU GO.
*****REASONS TO INVEST IN QBID***** We have TIME WARNER contract!!
We have NTI contract!! (they upload SCI-FI, etc..)
We have RCN contract!!(Live in NYC San Fran, & Boston)
We Acquired Film Package from Warner Bros.!
We have Steven Grunberg (New World, Orion Pictures, Trans World, Epic, and Columbia Tri-Star International)
We're appearing in many various news sources. (including CNBC morning call)
We now have an agreement with Firestone Communications.
We Hired Rubenstein Associates
We signed a contract with Zephyr Media Group as an advertising sales partner
Next we have Major advertisers
Next we have exposure from national/world media.
Next we have subscriber revenue stream!!!
Next we have share buyback!!(already have plans for it)
The price per share is extremely cheap.
It's the perfect time for a Good G&L Network. (Look around you)
6. What would be the top ten list for reasons to NOT buy QBID? I only have 3.
1. Frank Shut down operations ( Not likely when the network can generate billions )
2. You are totally against the whole Gay thing and wouldn't want to invest in it.
3. You don't realize the potential.7. They had a soft launch a while ago and are airing in a few cities. When will they go national and therefor probably cause the price to sky rocket? RCN is a national cable company but have a small percentage of subs compares to TW or Comcast. They continue to work in other major cities and I think they plan to be in 55% of the market by end of January.
8. Will going national cause the price to rocket? Would anything else do so? I want to see the dollar mark and then some.Absolutely, maybe not. QBID went up 2700% in a few months, not on news, not on progress, but mostly on new buys coming in. I also think posting profits or hearing they have subscribers or a contract with another carrier, & new investors that just are starting to hear about QBID, will make the stock rise. There is only a small % of people who know about QBID. We'll see $1 before you put in 6000 hours at work.
It's 4 AM so I'm a little tired. I'll have many more questions later. Matt
You're questions and opinions are always welcome here. Enjoy this board and good luck.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 06, 2004).]
This might matter a lot. Don't the folks need a place or as many as possible to gain understanding and or a more favorable understanding of the public at large?
The network could be an ideal place for planning and relaying plans and such.
Kind of like what MTV does for the young... Or what Spike is trying to do for men and or what Lifetime for women...
[This message has been edited by Bob Frey (edited November 06, 2004).]
1bigtip, i have a question. i'm not a chart guy but i've read or looked at the differant charts you have posted for several months. my question is none of the differant companies charts have a o/s of 9 billion. wouldn't that in itself cause qbids chart or pattern follow a differant path? the number of shares has a great deal to do with trading patterns. i'm looking for volume to go into a few hundred million per day and hold for a couple weeks. because of a fickle market & investor confidence i don't think that can be charted with q's o/s
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 06, 2004).]
As far as the o/s, you are beating a dead horse. The o/s only would matter if it was part of a bigger exchange, period. This stock can go up 100% in one day. What was the o/s in begining of 2004? And it went up 10,000%! But as far as patterns, yes there is and will be a pattern for QBID. It's easier to spot it after the trends but a good eye can do it before.
MM's make the charts. They know whats going on.
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
IP: Logged
1BigTip
Member posted November 06, 2004 07:26
Each time we have seen a good PR listing, like going live in NY, Boston, and others, as well as the turning on of the network feeds finally, the price has dropped.
All rational thinking would suggest these events would be the trigger for the price to rise, but instead it has dropped further, suggesting some other force is at work on the price. Events which create a revenue stream such as the signal gaining more carriers and thus more audience, or the signing of advertisers should mean a stronger company and by all rights a stronger stock.
So I figure our pps is suffering for one of a few reasons, only a couple of which I will speculate here.
1) Someone is intentionally driving the price down into the toilet by selling below market. The price now is a profit for some large investors prior to 6 months ago, not much but some I think.
2) Someone is helping with the buy back by doing the above intentionally.
3) Someone hates the idea of qbid becoming a success and is pipe bombing the stock by selling at a loss and taking the loss themselves. This is pretty unlikely I will admit but people do irrational things all the time.
I dont know all the possible ways to drive a price down, other than selling at market and taking what you get, or by setting a price below market to ease the liquidation of your holdings.
I see qbid making good on all its promises in terms of the tasks ahead, they are gaining advertisers, they have overcome the financial challenges, and they have over come the techinical challenges. They are promoting the channel every way they can, and making the most of the target audience's events. They have begun the process of getting the signal carried in major markets, and it will spread quicker and quicker as time goes by, soon it will be a non-event to open in a new city, jnust another day in q-land.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
1. WIZ - Makes you think you're a genius for buying this - but now it's too watered down.
2. SUX - At first this stock kind of stuck on me. On Fridays I couldn't wait to wire money into my account to buy shares. In the end I got cleaned out.
3. VAMP - This stock left me drained with nothing but empty holes in more than my pockets.
4. PIL - Makes you forget why you bought this. It's one of those feel good stocks. Can't remember how I did with this one.
5. KRAP - Buying this one was like me flushing my money down the toilet.
6. PHON - Talk about a long shot. Thought I had made the right call. I guess I got too hung up on this one.
7. TRAN - Had a few good runs - but it ran out of steam. I got in too late - then it crashed.
8. POS - Use to have some nice runs - but now this stock stinks. Stay away from it.
9. PANE - Hurts to talk about this one. Got reemed real good with this stock. Can't sit still any more thinking about it.
10. QUBID - When I first got in I thought this was a dating service company. Hope I don't get screwed by the CEO.
Hope everyone enjoys my off the wall (st.) humor. Go QBID gooooooo...
BB
QBID MY RETIREMENT TRAIN, SITTING IN FIRST CLASS HERE.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
As a side note, I have always been a bit concerned regarding Frank's ability to speak in public. Whether it be the phone updates, inteviews, and most recently the CC, I feel like it's difficult to get past his slow/slurred speech, stumbling on words, changing of mind mid-sentence and just a general tone that has never reflected the king of confidence or command that I think is necessary from the CEO of a company. I have often thought it might be better for this little company to hire a "public speaker" to do these kinds of interviews/reports.
However, after listening to this interview on the Wall Street Reported link, I feel differently. For the first time what I am really noticing in Franks voice is a sincerity and genuine belief in what he is doing and in where he believs this company can go. I also like that I do not hear any arrogance or fake excitment in his voice. I like that I don't get the impression he's trying to "sell" me something (ie. used car sales). There's a genuine sense of humility and honesty in his voice regarding where he has been and where he is going with this company. I like that! So, despite his non-radio/TV voice, I think he's a very good "front-man" for Q. Thanks Frank and keep up the good work!
I'm curious to hear other's impressions of this.
SMC - a holder since GAAY.
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I don't mean to be paranoid but everytime we are getting ready to make an upward trend and the Q is getting stronger and getting more public exposure. We get a new poster who has so many questions that need to be answered. All questions with a negative slant on the Q. Is this the new basher approach or just me reading something in that is not there. Take for example the recent posting of Permanentjaun, I felt that this posting slanted to the negative and could plant negative thoughts for the new investor.
I am glad that BigTip is here to respond and reverse the negative questioning.
I know that this is a place to get information, but "don't, you thing that Permanentjuan has a lot of questions for his first post"???? Can't be to careful with the new posters. Paranoid maybe but also very protective of the "Q" here. If Permanentjuan is sincere with these questions then my apology to him, but maybe we need to watch his postings closely as he did say that he had lots more questions. For what its worth I for one will be watching him/her. GO QBID!!!! Bring On The Green.
Great points here. I notice these "new" posters showing up lately too. Most are asking questions with a negative slant on them as you say. Take Sgt at ARMS....he claims to be just asking questions (do a search on his posts) most of which are just that, questions, but are slanted to the negative side for the most part. I have nothing personal against these people if they are asking legimate questions but....if it quacks like a duck......you know the rest.
QBID is an investment for those who are not weak at heart and are willing to hang on for the long term return.
NOTE: to Sgt. at ARMS, I don't mean to rag on you so much but I really get tired, not of you, but of the type of questions you ask.
I can tell by your past post that you've not been doing this for very long and are learning. So am I. So, if I've offended you, that was not my intention. I only seek to find useful information through whatever means available. My biggest beef is with the usless post, not only by you, but by others who's intention is to bring out negativity by the way they post questions.
QBID is going to be, IMHO, a steady growing stock which will make the strong rich and will make the week cry because they couldn't see the value down the road. They aren't bashers, just weak, newbies who cry the blues after missing out on a real winner.
One of my biggest bluners in this game was with IPIX. I bought it at 4.97, got scared after listening to negative bashers and sold after it dropped to 3.00. Two weeks later it hit $25.00+. I took a vow that day to respond to anybody I felt was bashing or being obviously negative for a purpose.
I don't post much anymore just because of the negative post which anger me and I get tired of getting into pi**ing contest with people who don't have a clue. It may be that I loose my butt on this but, if so, it is money I can afford to loose. The Misses and I are only holding 250K so I'm no where near big time with respect to lots of other owners but it is our money. We look for QBID to hit three dollars but not for at least three years. We may never see that PPS with all 250 K shares. We may wuss out at a buck for at least half of those shares which we believe will happen in a year or possibly less.
I have made one or two poor selections after listening to others, (broke rule number 134), but, again, it is our money. I appreciate all of those who offer great links to sites where I can do my own DD and don't have to rely on bashers or pumpers any longer.
Go Q......long hoping for the best for all of you, especially you Sgt at ARMS.
Dakota told you that......
------------------
Dakota
Just because I'm paranoid don't mean there ain't someone behind me........
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
Suzainiee!That is truley a sight to behold isn't it!
http://www.vmsdigital.com/MyFiles.aspx?Onum=BC76D27C-C593-4E5A-BF77-3A7ABFD66505
How many subpenny stocks have you seen get that exposure on CNBC?
Point of fact, I've never seen even one before this.
Whiz,
Neither have I ever seen nor heard of a subpenny stock being mentioned on any cable stock network such as CNBC or Bloomberg before QBID's exposure on CNBC.
The next time that QBID is on CNBC, the analyst will be able to open with something like, "In October, we first reported that QBID....."
Yep, all WE had to do was launch!
This train has left the station--first stop--loading up the first QBID subscribers with RCN!!!!!!!!!!
December is still just around the corner.
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I don't mean to be paranoid but everytime we are getting ready to make an upward trend and the Q is getting stronger and getting more public exposure. We get a new poster who has so many questions that need to be answered. All questions with a negative slant on the Q. Is this the new basher approach or just me reading something in that is not there. Take for example the recent posting of Permanentjaun, I felt that this posting slanted to the negative and could plant negative thoughts for the new investor.
I am glad that BigTip is here to respond and reverse the negative questioning.
I know that this is a place to get information, but "don't, you thing that Permanentjuan has a lot of questions for his first post"???? Can't be to careful with the new posters. Paranoid maybe but also very protective of the "Q" here. If Permanentjuan is sincere with these questions then my apology to him, but maybe we need to watch his postings closely as he did say that he had lots more questions. For what its worth I for one will be watching him/her. GO QBID!!!! Bring On The Green.
I can assure you I'm not a basher. You can look at my previous posts and see that I am a newbie. I won't be doing any bashing either. If I feel you're making a bad decision then thats your mistake if it goes down. I don't care what you do with your money. I care about what I do with mine though. I'm sorry if it sounded like my questions we're negatively slanted. I just didn't want answers that did a lot more of pumping the stock rather than rationally analyzing it. Right now it's all risk assessment to me. I need to know why I should and why I shouldn't buy the stock. Let's put it this way. I could be dumping funds into CMKX right now but I don't believe in that company. I do feel QBID could make it huge. They're already putting out a product that we've seen and are becoming very reputable. That's why I'm investigating. I doubt my one post, if it was bashing, could keep a stock price down. Anyways here are some more questions.
1. "2. QBID has been on the market since 2000. What were they doing back then and what is taking so long?It hasn't been since 2000 but Networks usually take up to 10 years to straighten things out and actually become a smooth running network" What is the data I see on bigcharts for this company back in 2000 when the stock was at .45?
2. "7. They had a soft launch a while ago and are airing in a few cities. When will they go national and therefor probably cause the price to sky rocket? RCN is a national cable company but have a small percentage of subs compares to TW or Comcast. They continue to work in other major cities and I think they plan to be in 55% of the market by end of January." OK RCN plans on being in 55% of the market by end of January. What does Time Warner and NTI plan on doing?
3. "We'll see $1 before you put in 6000 hours at work." Would it really take that long? I imagine since there are almost no national broadcasters that are valued at less than $1, and people say the homosexual population is very loyal, that the price would rocket quickly. What are the reasons why people feel it will take 3 years or more for the price to break $1?
4. Why does this stock remain to stay on the Pinksheets with Frank withholding information? Some have said that if he had released all of the companies info that many more advertisers would have signed already thus causing great progress in development.
Again I'll have more questions later. Matt
Thanks
I don't know what other media outlet to compare qbid to, it would have to be one without deep pocket backing, and one with a niche market that is not in the normal good favor of the general public. Perhaps BET is a good one, hard to say at the moment without more details. Most cable stations we see today are spinoffs of other already successful channels, or national media networks, so they have a host of facilities already in place, all the techinical crew they could want, and all the inroads paved in gold, making a comparison fairly irrelevant.
We are in a new situation with qbid, until recently, no revenue potential, none. Now we have the product on the shelf and interest is being generated. Money will begin to come with the audience, and the audience is being woo'd as we speak.
I am not a basher, or a pumper, I am hopeful like all other stock owners.
Good luck.
Since you registered in September, you may already know this and have read the last 8-10 weeks of posts for QBID.
If not, scroll to the bottom of the Allstocks page for "Under Ten Cents" to find the past threads for QBID. There is an abundance of information in them to assist you in answering your questions and forming your own opinions and decisions.
In addition, always do your own dd.
It will be time consuming, but it is your money.....good luck.
Suz
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I can assure you I'm not a basher. You can look at my previous posts and see that I am a newbie. I won't be doing any bashing either. If I feel you're making a bad decision then thats your mistake if it goes down. I don't care what you do with your money. I care about what I do with mine though. I'm sorry if it sounded like my questions we're negatively slanted. I just didn't want answers that did a lot more of pumping the stock rather than rationally analyzing it. Right now it's all risk assessment to me. I need to know why I should and why I shouldn't buy the stock. Let's put it this way. I could be dumping funds into CMKX right now but I don't believe in that company. I do feel QBID could make it huge. They're already putting out a product that we've seen and are becoming very reputable. That's why I'm investigating. I doubt my one post, if it was bashing, could keep a stock price down. Anyways here are some more questions.1. "2. QBID has been on the market since 2000. What were they doing back then and what is taking so long?It hasn't been since 2000 but Networks usually take up to 10 years to straighten things out and actually become a smooth running network" What is the data I see on bigcharts for this company back in 2000 when the stock was at .45?
2. "7. They had a soft launch a while ago and are airing in a few cities. When will they go national and therefor probably cause the price to sky rocket? RCN is a national cable company but have a small percentage of subs compares to TW or Comcast. They continue to work in other major cities and I think they plan to be in 55% of the market by end of January." OK RCN plans on being in 55% of the market by end of January. What does Time Warner and NTI plan on doing?
3. "We'll see $1 before you put in 6000 hours at work." Would it really take that long? I imagine since there are almost no national broadcasters that are valued at less than $1, and people say the homosexual population is very loyal, that the price would rocket quickly. What are the reasons why people feel it will take 3 years or more for the price to break $1?
4. Why does this stock remain to stay on the Pinksheets with Frank withholding information? Some have said that if he had released all of the companies info that many more advertisers would have signed already thus causing great progress in development.
Again I'll have more questions later. Matt
you can go back to the previous threat to find all the answer to your question. there are other board as well. 1bigtip was kind enough to give you some headstart for your own dd already. you claimed you are a newbie, you throw many questions and more to come...and expect other posters to give you answer to each and every question, IMO, it's too much to ask. dont think anyone here is obliged to give you anything. do you own dd and make your own decision. it's your own money. i have been here since sept 12 and we finished three threats already if i am not mistaken. you should not miss that much if your registration was sept 20. unless, you throw out more and more questions and want others to sell so you can pick up. dont get mine anyway.
by the way, your questions dont sound like newbie.
[
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 06, 2004).]
Light it up Frank!
http://www.******************.com/profiles/QTelevisionNetwork.html
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Listening again whiz.
Yes!
It's great!
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Hella Yea whiz! Indian channel etc,etc,etc!
Indian channel worth $5 to $6 billion. Also Frank sure doesn't attempt to dispel any suggestion of his history of developing media companies & selling them.
Bottom line he's going to make us money! ALOT of it!
"All he ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Also Pink. Unbelievable. (global)
i like his mentioning that qbid and pink are exchange program - more revenue - less spending.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Thank You permanentjaun for your input. Now I can put you under the "basher, no good" column.Good luck.
I think people need to settle down. I've done a lot more asking questions than adding input. I can't even say I've added really any input. Closest thing to input would be how I think if the stock does take off and break the $1 mark that it won't take 3 years. If you ask me thats not bashing. Besides, all I'm doing is asking questions. The point is to get information and/or have worries squashed. I feel my questions thusfar have been legitimate. Anyways here are some more. Sorry if Im asking questions already answered in other forums. I've used the search function countless times only to find threads hundreds, if not thousands, of posts long. Since I can't zero in on exact posts it becomes a daunting task.
I just read some new posts saying I need to stop asking questions. I suppose I don't understand the concept of a forum. If the search function on this board was more useful it'd be easier to find the answers I need. Anyways I'll stop posting and asking questions. Matt
I like your wisdom. You are like some brave
and graceful knight from the Round Table.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
"Thanks firefly"!!!
[This message has been edited by sneither (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
said the shell will take about a year to clean up
...talking about his kids....lots of disposal income in the gay community..
...talking about advertisers not having an outlet other than 'gay rags'..Q has opening the door to them...
...$7.95 a month...non-intrusive..subscription only
....competitors..Here and LOGO...Frank likes competition...
....Q's benifits..must be invited into the home...3 hr live block per night.
...hurdles: convicing advertisers that we're a non-scrambled station, convicing the cable compaines that we're not going to hurt them in their communty...
...expect to have 35% of the country covered by January...
....'each time we sign a carrier, it's a milestone". Should be in chicago in a couple of weeks, then Wash DC, then continuing to grow our marketplace"
....we have 4 out of the top 10 markets....Avail in NY already.
....'best year Q has ever had'. Program library built up. 4000 movie titles, leaseable to other stations.
...mention of Firestone Communications...using their studios for production in Ft Worth TX...
...30% original programing...Gay's very well educate..in final stages of signing contract for the Gay Games..12,000 atheletes...'Filiming plays, live gay shows' to be aired without interuption'.
....'talking head' type live shows.
....'our job to get the pendulum back toward the gay commm, but not politically'
...generating revenue...'attractive to cable companies...because we are a mini-pay channel...50/50 split with company, $7.95....
...focusing advertising pitches to fortune 500,..cruise companies, computer companies, hygiene and makeup, fasion, womens fasion..
....'great time for shareholders'...stock is .34 mil mkt cap, undervalued...prices bounce around.
.... 'with carriage contracts and ad contracts in hand, we know were worth over a billion dollars'...
....talks about past experience in sales, owned 17 gay bars, been in broadcast for 30 years...
...being the 'man to do the job' during this development stage...might not be the man to do the job during the managment stage/day to day activities...loves Mixed Market broadcasting..
...thinks he has the vision to go forward...
...PinkTV in France..talking to them about doing some program trading.
...Q Television is NOT a porn channel..NOT going to have it..VERY proud of that...
...family values channel for the Gay family...
....Final word...developing a 'native american' network as well...
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by sneither:
w a l l s t r e e t r e p o r t e r....(add this to the address)
or the .com will not work..
http://www.******************.com/profiles/QTelevisionNetwork.htmlThanks Sneither and Firefly.
Dakota told you that......"Thanks firefly"!!!
[This message has been edited by sneither (edited November 06, 2004).]
------------------
Dakota
Just because I'm paranoid don't mean there ain't someone behind me........
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I think people need to settle down. I've done a lot more asking questions than adding input. I can't even say I've added really any input. Closest thing to input would be how I think if the stock does take off and break the $1 mark that it won't take 3 years. If you ask me thats not bashing. Besides, all I'm doing is asking questions. The point is to get information and/or have worries squashed. I feel my questions thusfar have been legitimate. Anyways here are some more. Sorry if Im asking questions already answered in other forums. I've used the search function countless times only to find threads hundreds, if not thousands, of posts long. Since I can't zero in on exact posts it becomes a daunting task.I just read some new posts saying I need to stop asking questions. I suppose I don't understand the concept of a forum. If the search function on this board was more useful it'd be easier to find the answers I need. Anyways I'll stop posting and asking questions. Matt
here is the link to the previous threat with 46 pages. there are many facts, opinions, pumping, bashing that should answer your many questions that you might have. good luck.
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/009561.html
Anyways, I listened to the ****************** interview. Did he say $600 billion or $6 billion? I hear $6 billion. Matt
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
What you guys need to also understand is that I am turning into you guys. I'm getting really excited about this stock as well. You always hear "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is." Not saying you guys are pumping the stock but there sure is a lot of QBID lovin going on. Like I said I'm just assessing the risk. Right now I feel I can get in now, it may go lower since it has been on the gradual, very gradual, decline for months, but when it goes national it will rocket in price.Anyways, I listened to the ****************** interview. Did he say $600 billion or $6 billion? I hear $6 billion. Matt
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
The 6 Billion is what Frank said the company will be worth in 5 year. I thought it was 5 Billion, Oh well have to listen again. The $600 Billion is the Disposible income of the Gay and lesbian community. The $600 billion is what the Advertisers look at to know how much they should spend to get that $600 billion.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 06, 2004).]
i just listened to it again and he did say 6 not 600. i was under the impression the statistic is 600 billion not 6 billion. i hope frank just mispoke.
P.S. - I guess I lied about the more questions.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
i just listened to it again and he did say 6 not 600. i was under the impression the statistic is 600 billion not 6 billion. i hope frank just mispoke.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
http://www.qtelevision.com/promo2.htm
air,,please listen to theee promo.
Frank conjects 5-6 billion worth in 5 years.
QBID worth 5-6 Billion Market Cap. in 5 Years
Disposible Income of the Gay/Lesbian community $600 Billion. Used to figure Advertising.
This is two different things. Not one in the same.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
air,,please listen to theee promo.
Frank conjects 5-6 billion worth in 5 years.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Yes but thats were they are getting confused. There is a big difference people.QBID worth 5-6 Billion Market Cap. in 5 Years
Disposible Income of the Gay/Lesbian community $600 Billion. Used to figure Advertising.
This is two different things. Not one in the same.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 06, 2004).]
i don't know how this got so confusing but i was talking about the interview with frank olsen on the wall street report er frank clearly says very clearly the gay and lesbian community has a $6 billion disposable income. i am guessing he made a mistake when he said that. at least i hope he did.
since i can't post the exact link on here without it being filled with ****** just go to www. wall street reporter .com
[This message has been edited by airdoo (edited November 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
$600,000,000.00 income/worth.
1/2 a trillion dollars american.[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
you're missing three zeros
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
OVER 500 BILLION DOLLORS
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by firefly:
[b]OVER 500 BILLION DOLLORS
[/B][/QUOTE]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Man,, get over it. SO WHAT IF FRANK MISPOKE.
i'm sorry i just wanted to make sure it was just a mistake. so people who hear the interview don't think what he said in the interview is correct. because if the investors started thinking the gay and lesbian community only had 6 billion of disposable income vs. 600 billion that wouldn't be good. with 600 billion that's an avg of just over $20k of disposable per person and 6 billion is JUST $200. there is a HUGE difference in numbers. i wouldn't want anyone to get the wrong idea.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
What is your point aido?
i thought it was obvious. i'm just looking out for my investment. i don't want anyone who hears the interview to think the $6 billion is the right number. i know if i thought it was, i would rethink my investment. since it is $600 billion i feel very secure with my investment.
[This message has been edited by airdoo (edited November 06, 2004).]
Q is on the roll with or without you, and we have at least $500 billion to tap into.
GO QBID!!!!! Bring On The Green !!!!
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 06, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
6 billion vs $600 Billion, in any case the Q promo states $500 Billion. Now I am sure that there are those of you who will try to compare apples with oranges, have at it.I bet we will have the next 10-20 post on this forum to dispute or argue which # is the right one.Q is on the roll with or without you, and we have at least $500 billion to tap into.
GO QBID!!!!! Bring On The Green !!!!
agreed
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Think you need to do some DD, Make your own decisions. Sounds like you are trying to pick a fight. I will not. Good Luck. Make your own decisions. Don't Invest what you can't afford to loose.
Sam
LOL no fight here. I LOVE QBID sorry if it seemed that way. good luck to you too.
Chris
That disposable income appears to be considerable.
"The projected spending power of the gay and lesbian segment of the population, about 15 million people, for 2003 is $485 billion," said Stephanie Blackwood, a New York marketing executive. "That's compared to the Hispanic segment, which is $653 billion, but gays and lesbians are nearly a third the size of the Hispanic segment."
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 07, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
This eb site has it at $514 Billion.
http://www.tototours.com/main/media_information/html/press3.htm
Lesbian households $42,755 (26% above national average)
so i think it would be safe to say it's substantially higher today. gives me a warm feeling inside.
A Must read Article for Q investors!!!
http://www.365gay.com/Corp/ads.htm
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 07, 2004).]
quote:looks like you are good at dd. A widely accepted estimate for total spending by this market is about $515 billion. Simmons Market Research Bureau reports the average income for gay men as $52,624 and $42,755 for lesbians. i can't help but think about all the gay and lesbians that haven't come out of the closet yet.
Originally posted by Ric:
This is the most reputable site for guy/lesbian information and it states $514 Billion Disposable income. I think the $600 Billion was projections if I remember right anyhow.
http://www.365gay.com/Corp/ads.htmRic
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 07, 2004).]
Ric
---------------------
There are more than 35 million gays and lesbians in North America
A marketing survey in the US by Simmons Market Research Bureau shows the annual value of the gay and lesbian market is in excess of $514 Billion (US).
Simmons found the Average household income for gay men was $52,624 (US) or 41% above national average. Among lesbians it was $42,755 (26% above the national US average). 15% of the male households polled had an income over $100,000 (US).
62% of the men polled were college graduates, and 47% held managerial jobs.
The poll concluded that the gay and lesbian community represented the ultimate DINK (double income, no kids) market.
The Associated Press called it "Advertising's most elusive yet lucrative target market"
The publication Computer Economics projects that between 2001 and 2005, the number of gay and lesbian Internet users will grow from 13.5 million to 22.4.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 07, 2004).]
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Ric, FireFly any speculation as to what the "Q" may do this week, what will the PPS do this coming week.
Since we already launched I think the AP's statement would make a good catch phrase.
Advertising's most elusive yet lucrative target market
Ric
I am sitting in a first class seat on the "Q" Retirement Train= The "Q" Express to the Bank. GO QBID!!!!
Thanks for the info.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Ric,,do you think the mms have filled?
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
We need volume. Should be interesting.
1 billion divided by 16 billions O/S equals to 0.0625. So, it's virtually undervalued.
Once it generates 1 billion a year. Microsoft has Fair Market Value $30 more than 4 times of its Book Value per share.
Wal-Mart is $57 now with more than 5 times of its Book Value. And, we are talking about regular consumer products. What we are aiming at is $600 Billion buying power from loyal and quality sentitive community.
Besides, my impression is Frank knows how to use budget smartly.
1 billion divided by 16 billions O/S equals to 0.0625. It's very much undervalued now.
Once it generates 1 billion a year. Microsoft has Fair Market Value $30 and 7 Book Value per share. Wal-Mart is $57 with 10 Book Value per share. And, we are not talking about regular consumer products but $600 billion buying power from loyal and quality sensitive community. Frank knows how to use budget smartly. Our Book Value will grow rapidly with like profits do.
They say to be financially fit, you need to see a trend before it happens and invest in it. QBID will be HUGE! You're lucky this stock isn't already 10 cents, ITS SUB PENNY STILL, can't ask for more. It's like you're future is staring right in your face.
The Progress that they are making is setting up QBID to move like it never did.
Good luck getting in.
Re: QBID - The "QTN" thread
« Reply #75 on: Today at 7:35am » Quote Modify
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like this link, and I think shareholders will to. If you check out the bottom of the story you will notice that Time Warner is at the GAY EXPO....I wonder if they are watching the Q stand....
http://www.nypost.com/business/31693.htm
By: wa****-->Gay Expo update in nyc
07 Nov 2004, 08:45 AM EST
Msg. 63416 of 63442
(This msg. is a reply to 63404 by j*****_56.)
Jump to msg. #
j******56 - Yes they are there. I was there and spoke with Frank before they started filming.
They are also listed as one of the major sponsers. They had a nice booth, one of the larger ones there and the location was on the main aisle comming on about 3rd row deep.
The promo's they had running looked very good.
-
at the end of the interniew, another idea came up with the development of a native american network as well.
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 07, 2004).]
Great post BigRod.
How could TW miss QTN and the filming?
Imagine that you are there representing a beverage or an investment company--whatever.
You are looking for a way to tap this knowledgeable, loyal and well-heeled audience--looking for just the ticket for your company's pocketbook as well as your own.
You check out the magazines and newspapers--pretty good beginning to reach a percentage of the intended audience.
Browsing the aisles, you see the QTN booth. As you approach, you see the promo running.
Wow...............
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ flash before your eyes.
(Just like it did for all of us when we found QBID!)
You turn around and look at all of the other company reps in the exhibit area-----your competition that wants some of your part of the profits------- $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
It is very clear, this is more than just a new TV network--here is a growing "network" ready to explode on the WORLD'S most effective advertising medium.
And--how soon can you get some money to your brokerage firm to buy some QBID stock for yourself?
Call me a dreamer, but for me, it's not just imaginable--it happened--perhaps once--perhaps many, many times!
All of the companies there were checking out both the intended audience and the other companies who want a slice of the $600 B disposable income.
With more companies on board--more leverage with carriers..........
It appears to me that Frank has wisely chosen the best possible moment for reaching potential advertisers and carriers too--more bang for the buck.
I'm a dreamer and very glad that Frank is one too.
[This message has been edited by suzainiee (edited November 08, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:QBID MY RETIREMENT TRAIN, SITTING IN FIRST CLASS HERE.
Just wondering, are a lot of you considering this the ticket to retirement? It is feasible. A $5000 investment now at .0029 would be 1.7 million when the stock hits $1. I dont know about you guys but I could retire on that happily.
I didn't know how to. When I tried, it says only administrator and moderator can edit it. Will ask Webmaster anyway.
Again, this is only my the most conservative Accounting points of view. Nobody knows about future happening as well as Frank's way of looking at shareholders' value (families or just a temp ladder to success). If O/S turns to be 50B tomorrow then my saying is a superficial joke. It's hard to do DD on a non-reporting company. And, we judge by our own assumption. The reponsibility belongs to nobody else.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by profit gains:
Ric,I didn't know how to. When I tried, it says only administrator and moderator can edit it. Will ask Webmaster anyway.
Again, this is only my the most conservative Accounting points of view. Nobody knows about future happening as well as Frank's way of looking at shareholders' value (families or just a temp ladder to success). If O/S turns to be 50B tomorrow then my saying is a superficial joke. It's hard to do DD on a non-reporting company. And, we judge by our own assumption. The reponsibility belongs to nobody else.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 07, 2004).]
Search "assets" on page 2 for the newly-started forum we have:
=========================================
I liked the interview a lot, and Frank's projections are encouraging. The highlights for me:
- he stated we are undervalued and that with all assets currently worth around a billion. Said this makes it a great time for shareholders.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 07, 2004).]
I guess a pinksheet stock can be worth some money.
............................................
Posted by: realmoney2
In reply to: None Date:9/27/2004 9:06:45 PM
Post #of 26713
Pink Sheet stocks with big Market Caps:
RHHBY.PK MC = 84.31 Billion @ $102.51 pps
OGZPF.PK MC = 62.05 Billion @ $31.65 pps
TSCDY.PK MC = 40.45 Billion @ $15.80 pps
RTOLY.PK MC = 36 Billion @ $105.00 pps
LVMUY.PK MC = 30.74 Billion @ $13.10 pps
RWEOY.PK MC = 26.35 Billion @ $46.85 pps
SUHJY.PK MC = 22.21 Billion @ $9.25 pps
HINKY.PK MC = 14.77 Billion @ $30.15 pps
Data as of 09/27/2004 from yahoo.com Financial Screener
50billion shares is worst case, which is what I use personally. What is not known is actual company value and we won't know until they begin filing in the future. The most important aspects of qbid, and why I find it attractive are as follows: 1) they are making good on every promise they have made in the last 6 months or so. 2) they are now in position for income to begin, and 3) its a brand new market and product, and one that has been in need for a while. pps will climb for a variety of reasons, math is never the sole reason for reality.
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
[B]Ok you got my post copied before i took it down, quick sucker heh. It wasnt up more than maybe 10 minutes.[B]
Quote from CC:
Renee: As you know when TMM was purchased we purchased a shell company and we then filled that shell up with assets that we had like the Network. Unfortunately for us the shell that we bought was not as clean as it had been represented to us when we bought it. So it highly unlikely that we can ever pass an audit, we can pass a financial audit we cannot pass an Edgar audit on the shareholder base.
???
Ric
QBID will be HUGE!
people
quote:
Originally posted by profit gains:
Thank 1BigTip for me to repeat this:
I guess a pinksheet stock can be worth some money.
............................................
Posted by: realmoney2
In reply to: None Date:9/27/2004 9:06:45 PM
Post #of 26713Pink Sheet stocks with big Market Caps:
RHHBY.PK MC = 84.31 Billion @ $102.51 pps
OGZPF.PK MC = 62.05 Billion @ $31.65 pps
TSCDY.PK MC = 40.45 Billion @ $15.80 pps
RTOLY.PK MC = 36 Billion @ $105.00 pps
LVMUY.PK MC = 30.74 Billion @ $13.10 pps
RWEOY.PK MC = 26.35 Billion @ $46.85 pps
SUHJY.PK MC = 22.21 Billion @ $9.25 pps
HINKY.PK MC = 14.77 Billion @ $30.15 ppsData as of 09/27/2004 from yahoo.com Financial Screener
From The Producers Desk
November 5, 2004
News And Things:
We would like to thank those of you have been sending email, and questions about THE AGENDA!. Comments about the show, story ideas, questions about topics, what type of things we will be covering, plus when and where to see THE AGENDA!
For the 2005 season, we are covering a vast range of topics that cover and appeal to many cross sections within our own GLBT community. A very wise person said when we first started producing THE AGENDA! that you must be all things to al people. It made sense then, and it makes sense now.
The basic feel of THE AGENDA! will remain the way it is. A down to earth, no sugar coating look at our community, what affects us, and simply stated, who we are.
We are being asked where THE AGENDA! can be seen? Or what cities will The Q Television Network be expanding to? As of today in the USA, we are seen in San Francisco, Boston and now New York on The Q Television Network.
QTN, is available on RCN Digital Cable Channel 255 if those cities. Over the next few months, QTN will expand through RCN and become available to other cities.
Eventually QTN will expand to full nation wide availability. For those who are asking about QTN, and it's expansion place, please visit their website. Simply click on the Q logo to the right of this page.
WELCOME NEW YORK CITY!
New York City is the latest city to be added to the expanding world of The Q Television Network. GLBT programming and the GLBT market is no longer a novelty item, or something to just wonder about.
Now you can catch THE AGENDA! every Sunday on RCN Digital Cable Channel 255. As we go forward with THE AGENDA! airing on The Q Television Network we are moving towards our goal of bringing and sharing information not only within the GLBT community, but with people everywhere. No matter what community they belong to.
In December 2004, new episodes of THE AGENDA! will will air. From the quiet life in a country town, to the propaganda machines of those who oppose us, we will follow people and stories that relate to and are about us.
As 2004 progresses and passes into 2005, we will be using many of the stories, segments and show ideas that have been sent to us.
With that in mind we would like to thank each of you who have been sending us ideas and suggestions for THE AGENDA!
If you have an idea for a segment or a show we would love to hear from you!
So don't forget, if you see us about town shooting, come over and say hi! Or if you have an idea for a segment or even an entire show, we would love to hear from you!
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Probably shouldn't ask this but was going over CC again and one thing puzzles me. I hate being puzzled about things I have money in. Any speculations about this.Quote from CC:
Renee: As you know when TMM was purchased we purchased a shell company and we then filled that shell up with assets that we had like the Network. Unfortunately for us the shell that we bought was not as clean as it had been represented to us when we bought it. So it highly unlikely that we can ever pass an audit, we can pass a financial audit we cannot pass an Edgar audit on the shareholder base.???
Ric
Hi Ric,
Very observant catch! However, it doesn't sound too good on the surface. I wish to hell Frank would keep comments like that to himself or give us a full explanation. If it concerns the shareholders base, I would think we have a right to know.
Steve
somethign that jumped out at me was that it sounds like Dell is one of our advertisers.
did anyone else catch that?
he mentioned american express again. but i think he may have slipped and mentioned Dell.
that is a great boost if they are one of the advertisers.
i listed to it twice now and it stands out to me. maybe im being hopeful
Rod
good evening all qbiddians. I hope everyone had a great weekend and I wish everyone a profitable week.
I am still holding almost a million shares and I am not turning loose of them till I die of old age or make a nice profit lol
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Time Warner was there for a reason and hopefully it will be in our best interests.
It would be nice to see a joint press release from TW and Q stating that we now have our 35 percent of the coverage that we are looking for for the end of the year.
it is going to be a long month waiting to hear subscription numbers. Hopefully we will see them as we will only hear if they are good. if they are bad we will not get numbers.
Sunny we need to take a big stroll in the mall again and maybe hit the liquor store.
Get a case of skittles for Diana, some cloth diapers for Tqn. and a crowbar for the mms. they will need the crow bar to beat my shares out of me as I'm not letting them go at these prices.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Where's Sunny been? We need some sunshine.
Yes Q needs to issue out some news regarding their presense at the Expo.
That Said, I guess that I will follow and go back to the pumpimg. By the way Whiz is not a pumper. He is our Cheerleader. He keeps up our hope. He never says nothing that not true but only loves this stock and wants everyone to know about it. I wish that I was that way sometimes. But I do have questions and a few thousand tied up in this and think I should have any question that I asked answered. I will sure try my best to answer yours if all possible. Seeing how I have been with this stock since Feb. and in this thread longer then most not all, I think that I can ask any question I want.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 08, 2004).]
I don't think that anyone was ignoring your question, its just that there really isn't an answer for it that isn't speculation at this point.
The very thing that Frank is trying to avoid is happening by not reporting. he wants that pps to raise, but he is not willing to inform us of the info required for this stock to finds its true market price.
there are too many unanswered questions for the market to give it a fair pps.
All we have to go on is what we know.
they are on the air
they have a 600 billion dollar market
they only need to grab 1 tenth of one percent to make us happy.
there is terrific potential in this market.
the price is extremely cheap to buy into a nationally televised network.
And we have bashers which is a positive thing as they feel it is worth working on.
we have Boston
we have New York
and we have San Francisco.
Chicago is around the corner
we are supposed to be in 35% of the market by years end. That means more carriers will have to be announced soon.
Yes there is a lot of unknowns but the Knowns are out weighing the unknowns in my books.
We will be rewarded for having patience and holding for the long term in my honest opinion.
Have a good evening and a great day tomorrow.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Probably shouldn't ask this but was going over CC again and one thing puzzles me. I hate being puzzled about things I have money in. Any speculations about this.Quote from CC:
Renee: As you know when TM was purchased we purchased a shell company and we then filled that shell up with assets that we had like the Network. Unfortunately for us the shell that we bought was not as clean as it had been represented to us when we bought it. So it highly unlikely that we can ever pass an audit, we can pass a financial audit we cannot pass an Edgar audit on the shareholder base.???
Ric
edit = spelling
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 08, 2004).]
I agree that no one probably knows the answer too. Was ranting a little I guess. Just sometimes feel like I need to hide when I ask some questions. I am over it now, lol. It really was more of a comment on why a couple people have left the board.
edit = spelling lol Rod. I would have to add that to all my post.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 08, 2004).]
I have choose to wait it out, as i don't see us loosing on this one.
patience will pay off. its just hard sitting here and looking at the if only i hadda done this or that scenarios.
time will heal all that.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
I agree that no one probably knows the answer too. Was ranting a little I guess. Just sometimes feel like I need to hide when I ask some questions. I am over it now, lol. It really was more of a comment on why a couple people have left the board.Ric
have a great night and talk to you tomorrow.
http://www.gfn.com/gfn/gfn50.phtml
The Most Powerful & Gay-Friendly Public Companies in Corporate America
To celebrate gfn.com's 5th Anniversary in 2003, look for our soon-to-be-announced plans for honoring the country's most powerful GLBT-friendly individuals and companies.
In the meantime, consult our data from the 2001 gfn.com 50, a comprehensive list of the most powerful and gay-friendly publicly traded companies.
Using the Fortune 500 and the gfn.com 500 as a starting ground, gfn.coms team of experts spent weeks combing through economic reports, analyst findings and corporate policies on gay, lesbian and HIV policies. First and foremost, only public companies were considered, as public companies are responsible to their shareholders at large and not to a few private gay-friendly individuals. Second, only public companies within the Fortune 500 were considered because of the considerable influence that these companies exercise in shaping not only American corporate policy, but public perceptions, as well.
It was also necessary that two basic prerequisites be satisfied before a firm could be considered for the list. Each company had to have a policy in place stating that it does not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Second, the firm had to extend benefits to same-sex domestic partners.
From there, the companies were analyzed in terms of revenues, growth, economic power, as well as how they ranked on issues of corporate policies relating to diversity training, employee benefits, employee groups, nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in the sale or purchase of goods and services, advertising to the gay market and having in place a ban on any negative stereotypes based on sexual orientation, among others.
Read last year's results. Discuss the gfn.com 50 in our forum!
Rank Company Symbol
1. American Express Co. NYSE: AXP
2. Walt Disney Co. NYSE: DIS
3. Microsoft Corp. Nasdaq: MSFT
4. Lucent Technologies Inc. NYSE: LU
5. Xerox NYSE: XRX
6. International Business Machines NYSE: IBM
7. Hewlett-Packard Co. NYSE: HWP
8. Apple Computer Inc. Nasdaq: AAPL
9. AMR Corp. NYSE: AMR
10. Citigroup Inc. NYSE: C
11. Gap Inc. NYSE: GPS
12. Verizon Communications NYSE: VZ
13. AT&T Corp. NYSE: T
14. AOL-Time Warner Inc. NYSE: AOL
15. JP Morgan Chase & Co. NYSE: JPM
16. Intel Corp. Nasdaq: INTC
17. SBC Communications NYSE: SBC
18. Ford Motor Co. NYSE: F
19. Compaq Computer Corp. NYSE: CPQ
20. New York Times Co. NYSE: NYT
21. Oracle Corp. Nasdaq: ORCL
22. Coca-Cola Co. NYSE: KO
23. Sun Microsystems Nasdaq: SUNW
24. Texas Instruments NYSE: TXN
25. Aetna Inc. NYSE: AET
26. FleetBoston Financial NYSE: FBF
27. Bank of America Corp. NYSE: BAC
28. US Airways Group Inc. NYSE: U
29. General Motors Corp. NYSE: GM
30. Boeing Co. NYSE: BA
31. Merrill Lynch & Co. NYSE: MER
32. Charles Schwab Corp. NYSE: SCH
33. General Mills NYSE: GIS
34. Eastman Kodak Co. NYSE: EK
35. Qwest Communications Int. NYSE: Q
36. UAL Corp. NYSE: UAL
37. Chevron Corp. NYSE: CHV
38. Wells Fargo & Co. NYSE: WFC
39. Cisco Systems Inc. Nasdaq: CSCO
40. Motorola Inc. NYSE: MOT
41. Costco Wholesale Corp. Nasdaq: COST
42. Chubb Corp. NYSE: CB
43. Federated Department Stores NYSE: FD
44. Enron Corp. NYSE: ENE
45. Allstate Corp. NYSE: ALL
46. Gillette Co. NYSE: G
47. Honeywell International NYSE: HON
48. Fannie Mae NYSE: FNM
49. Barnes & Noble Inc. NYSE: BKS
50. Nordstrom Inc. NYSE: JWN
and this from another board:
Gay Expo feedback already people, looking good $$$$$
By: schmoogiepie
07 Nov 2004, 10:43 PM EST
Msg. 623096 of 623121
Jump to msg. #
ATTENTION LOSERS ON THIS BOARD.I WENT TO THE EXPO TODAY AND Q WAS VERY WELL REPRESENTED.ALL I WILL TELL YOU IS THAT QTELEVISION IS IN BETTER SHAPE THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE
Nov 2004, 10:49 PM EST
Msg. 623102 of 623121
Jump to msg. #
SLAP THEY WERE NOT THERE TO ANSWER INVESTOR QUESTIONS I SAW FILMING A LOT OF ACTIVITY AT THEIR BOOTH.COULD NOT ASK TO MANY QUESTIONS BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THERE
Message list / Reply to msg. / Post new msg. « Older / Newer »
By: schmoogiepie
07 Nov 2004, 10:56 PM EST
Msg. 623106 of 623121
Jump to msg. #
I FEEL BETTER SEEING Q FOR MYSELF.WHATEVER HAPPENS WILL HAPPEN.GLTA
By: schmoogiepie
07 Nov 2004, 10:52 PM EST
Msg. 623105 of 623121
Jump to msg. #
Q IS REAL NO SCAM THEY HAD ALL THE PROGRAMMING LAID OUT GAY GAMES AND OTHERS.A LOT OF COMPANIES THERE WERE INQUIRING ABOUT ADVERTISING ON Q
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 08, 2004).]
And If anyone wants my Thoughts on when we will run, One in Feb. (.02+) and one in late March or April (.15). We will start a steady climb soon until the runs start. JMHO
Well finially got my wifes home dialysis started, so off to bed myself. Goodnight.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
i know i wanted to try and answer it as well. i think it is ridiculous the way she got jumped on, and it turned out that she was right in the first place. I don't think that is why she is not here as much though. i think she is trying to make some money in the short term. we have all missed out on some plays that we could have make money at if we didn't have our money wrapped up here. I was really hoping that we would have been in the green by now. I could have been making money else where, but i don't want to miss out on the potential of this one. the wait will pay off but it is hard when you watch other stocks in your watch list take some 100% + jumps and watch the q go red for the day.I have choose to wait it out, as i don't see us loosing on this one.
patience will pay off. its just hard sitting here and looking at the if only i hadda done this or that scenarios.
time will heal all that.
Rod
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 08, 2004).]
Hopefully, someday we will be able to laugh about all of this--and hopefully not too long from now.
quote:
they are on the air
they have a 600 billion dollar market
they only need to grab 1 tenth of one percent to make us happy.
[/B]
Is it possible for QBID to grab that one tenth of 1 percent? There are only so many 7.95 amonth subscriptions they can order. I thought I read an estimated 34 million homosexuals in the US. So 34 million X 7.95 X 12 months = 3.24 billion. Thats if we get almost all of the gay population. That turns out to be .5 percent of the $600 billion.
It's hard to judge how many will sign up though. I've been thinking that maybe some heterosexual households will order the service. It's not only homosexuals that are watching Queer Eye for the Straight Guy.
I haven't found any figures on how much we can expect advertisers to dish out to QTE. Someone prove me wrong and show me how this company can easily reach a value of $6 billion. Again I'm not bashingl just figuring out what will happen with my money. Matt
When advertisers look at a media outlet to consider advertising on it they want to know how much money their audience has to spend on their product. The $600billion is that number they have settled on for now. If we can get control of 1% of the $600billion spending, we are doing terrific.
You will sometimes hear a tv show mention they have a 40 share, or a 20share audience, this is a number that relates to the percentage of people watching television at that hour and night. Knowing the statistics for the typical people watching that channel, at that hour, with an interest in that content then gives you the $ that audience spends on "stuff" and that generates a value for the show.
For instance, a favorite show of mine, Farscape, cost an estimated $1.5 million per episode. SciFi channel decided it did not draw enough of an audience to justify the pricetag so they dropped it. The justification comes from how many people with money to spend will turn to the channel to watch the show. Just an example.
In our case, the gay community is a major part of the audience, but there will also be the straights who sign up thinking it is a porn channel, or the women who like a show or two, or the HIV patients who got sponsoring, or perhaps other groups who are just interested. It may even get lumped into a package deal from a carrier along with other premium channels at some point, some all inclusive channel people don't even know the full contents of, some folks just gotta have it all.
I imagine they will have some very good interior deco shows, some very good cooking/entaining shows, and some interesting travel shows. So there should be something for everyone eventually. I think if played right they will draw far more of a diverse market than the one identified $600billion target market.
Imagine if, once we are in the major cities around the country, we got a likeable spokesman onto Oprah to talk a little. Deal could be a reasonable fee + a horde of stock for Oprah in exchange for an endorsement, perhaps even a segment of her own on the channel, maybe covering the gay family stories of how life goes for them, she is great for the midas touch as well as a positive outlook on life. Just a thought.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
Gay-Friendly Public Companies in Corporate America
1. American Express Co. NYSE: AXP
2. Walt Disney Co. NYSE: DIS
3. Microsoft Corp. Nasdaq: MSFT
4. Lucent Technologies Inc. NYSE: LU
5. Xerox NYSE: XRX
6. International Business Machines NYSE: IBM
7. Hewlett-Packard Co. NYSE: HWP
8. Apple Computer Inc. Nasdaq: AAPL
9. AMR Corp. NYSE: AMR
10. Citigroup Inc. NYSE: C
11. Gap Inc. NYSE: GPS
12. Verizon Communications NYSE: VZ
13. AT&T Corp. NYSE: T
14. AOL-Time Warner Inc. NYSE: AOL
15. JP Morgan Chase & Co. NYSE: JPM
16. Intel Corp. Nasdaq: INTC
17. SBC Communications NYSE: SBC
18. Ford Motor Co. NYSE: F
19. Compaq Computer Corp. NYSE: CPQ
20. New York Times Co. NYSE: NYT
21. Oracle Corp. Nasdaq: ORCL
22. Coca-Cola Co. NYSE: KO
23. Sun Microsystems Nasdaq: SUNW
24. Texas Instruments NYSE: TXN
25. Aetna Inc. NYSE: AET
26. FleetBoston Financial NYSE: FBF
27. Bank of America Corp. NYSE: BAC
28. US Airways Group Inc. NYSE: U
29. General Motors Corp. NYSE: GM
30. Boeing Co. NYSE: BA
31. Merrill Lynch & Co. NYSE: MER
32. Charles Schwab Corp. NYSE: SCH
33. General Mills NYSE: GIS
34. Eastman Kodak Co. NYSE: EK
35. Qwest Communications Int. NYSE: Q
36. UAL Corp. NYSE: UAL
37. Chevron Corp. NYSE: CHV
38. Wells Fargo & Co. NYSE: WFC
39. Cisco Systems Inc. Nasdaq: CSCO
40. Motorola Inc. NYSE: MOT
41. Costco Wholesale Corp. Nasdaq: COST
42. Chubb Corp. NYSE: CB
43. Federated Department Stores NYSE: FD
44. Enron Corp. NYSE: ENE
45. Allstate Corp. NYSE: ALL
46. Gillette Co. NYSE: G
47. Honeywell International NYSE: HON
48. Fannie Mae NYSE: FNM
49. Barnes & Noble Inc. NYSE: BKS
50. Nordstrom Inc. NYSE: JWN
Joined: 18 Mar 2004
Posts: 245
Location: from NY to CT to San Francisco
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:38 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's an article I found from back in April.
It's pretty enlightening.
QBID could really take off with the right catalyst.
From Prudential to Krispy Kreme to Toyota, companies of all sizes and sectors are seeking to proclaim themselves gay friendly to woo a consumer market known for its considerable purchasing power and brand loyalty.
''It's sort of a new frontier,'' said Jeffrey S. Garber, president of OpusComm Group, which specializes in gay marketing and advertising. ``Especially with the economic downturn, companies are realizing that GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender] is a good market to go after.''
Some 90 companies will be setting up shop today and Sunday to do just that at the Gay Life Expo at the Miami Beach Convention Center. The fair, the first to be held locally, is sponsored by JPMorganChase and Bacardi's Martν rum brand and is expected to draw upward of 5,000 people, according to its organizer, Consolidated Management Associates of New York.
Such events are important venues for companies seeking to declare themselves sensitive to gay people. And that's no small matter. According to a gay-consumer study done last year by OpusComm affiliate GL Census Partners, 82 percent prefer buying from gay-friendly companies, defined, in part, as those that extend benefits to domestic partners, have nondiscrimination policies and advertise in specialized media.
''There's a heightened political awareness in the gay community,'' said David Treece, past president of the Miami-Dade Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. ``These events give visibility that is very helpful to companies.''
Once a company is found to be gay friendly, ''brand loyalty is very strong,'' Garber said.
Companies that run afoul of sensibilities may court trouble. When United Airlines failed to extend benefits to its employees' domestic partners in 1997, gays and lesbians boycotted it in favor of American Airlines, which did.
United backed down in 1999 and, a year later, became one of the first companies to distance itself from radio talk-show host Laura Schlessinger, known as ''Dr. Laura,'' after she remarked on the air that gay people were ''deviants'' and ``biological errors.''
Those comments sparked a well-publicized ruckus and caused Procter & Gamble and auto insurer GEICO, among others, to yank their commercials from her show. Schlessinger eventually apologized.
Several characteristics make this niche attractive to marketers. Gays index high on travel, grocery purchases and restaurant and wine consumption, the GL Census found. Spoiling pets is also common, said Tim Winters, sales coordinator for Gay Life Expo, where pet cemeteries and adopt-a-pet agencies are common exhibitors.
''Pets are kind of surrogate kids,'' Winters said.
Relatively few gay households have children, which means that gay people have more discretionary income.
And they like to spend on novel items.
''Gay people are innovative spenders,'' Winters said. ``They like to be on the forefront of new, very different trends.''
And then there's the matter of affluence. According to the GL Census, 32 percent of gay male households and 17 percent of gay female households reported annual incomes of over $100,000, making this a prime market for financial-service and insurance companies and automakers.
''They realize the value of the market,'' said Rafael Armada, president of Miami-Dade Chamber, which counts such mainstream corporations as MetLife, BankUnited and American Express among its 200 members.
And not only are companies seeking gay consumers; they're seeking gay employees, too. Gay Life Expo, which also holds shows in New York and Philadelphia, often allots recruiting pavilions to such gray-suit firms as PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Deloitte & Touche as well as to MBA programs.
It's all part of mainstream America's growing acceptance of gay people, Winters said, adding: ``You didn't see this 20 years ago.''
New York times report SEC examines stock pricing by big brokers. If the link doesn't work go to the Drudge web site
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Frey:
" 1. Now that Bush is reelected and will not be legalizing gay marriage how does this play into QBID?It doesn't matter. you don't need a marriage license to watch a Network on TV."This might matter a lot. Don't the folks need a place or as many as possible to gain understanding and or a more favorable understanding of the public at large?
The network could be an ideal place for planning and relaying plans and such.
Kind of like what MTV does for the young... Or what Spike is trying to do for men and or what Lifetime for women...
[This message has been edited by Bob Frey (edited November 06, 2004).]
GREAT POINT. THANKS BOB!! I KNOW YOU ARE LURKING!!
------------------
DIANA
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by profit gains:
Thank 1BigTip for me to repeat this:
I guess a pinksheet stock can be worth some money.
............................................
Posted by: realmoney2
In reply to: None Date:9/27/2004 9:06:45 PM
Post #of 26713Pink Sheet stocks with big Market Caps:
RHHBY.PK MC = 84.31 Billion @ $102.51 pps
OGZPF.PK MC = 62.05 Billion @ $31.65 pps
TSCDY.PK MC = 40.45 Billion @ $15.80 pps
RTOLY.PK MC = 36 Billion @ $105.00 pps
LVMUY.PK MC = 30.74 Billion @ $13.10 pps
RWEOY.PK MC = 26.35 Billion @ $46.85 pps
SUHJY.PK MC = 22.21 Billion @ $9.25 pps
HINKY.PK MC = 14.77 Billion @ $30.15 ppsData as of 09/27/2004 from yahoo.com Financial Screener
GOOD MORNING ALL,
EXCELLANT DD. I CONTINUE MY EXCITEMENT RE: QBID.
THANKS FOR ALL THE WORK AND POSTS. I ENJOY ALL POINTS OF VIEW AND ALL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
http://www.tradetrek.com/NN/default.asp?symbol=QBID
QBID HAS MOVED FROM MODERATELY OVERSOLD TO SLIGHTLY OVERSOLD. THE ADJUSTMENT IS ALMOST COMPLETE.
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
The $600billion number was never subscription money. The $600billion (I like that number) is the amount of money the target audience, and its not just gays, has to spend on "stuff". This is travel, vacation, food, electronics, homes, credit cards, applainces, magazines, get rich quick schemes, flowers, whatever. $600billion is far beyond the subscriber fees which really only exist for the sake of daily cash flow.When advertisers look at a media outlet to consider advertising on it they want to know how much money their audience has to spend on their product. The $600billion is that number they have settled on for now. If we can get control of 1% of the $600billion spending, we are doing terrific.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
I think it just hit me. It's basically saying, how much are advertisers willing to spend to get as much of that $600 billion. Which makes sense for us because even if they only got one tenth of ten percent, $6 billion, it would still make sense to spend $1 billion or even $5 billion.
Does anyone have any figures on how much revenue a single station, such as NBC, receives from advertisers each year? Perhaps if we look at the disposable income of NBC's viewers we can make a simple, but innaccurate, proportion of how much revenue QTE could make from advertising.
Doing a quick search I found this, http://www.tvb.org/nav/build_frameset.asp?url=/rcentral/index.asp
$42 billion spent on total TV advertising. $22 billion on network television alone. How much of that could be ours? Matt
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
[This message has been edited by Bigrod40 (edited November 08, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
What is the E-Mail about and is there any news from the Expo?
email about interview with frank - and yes, there are some news posted form other board about the expo. all good news. we have too much dd posting going on here, so easy to miss. i have to sign in more often.
------------------
The mind is only as good as it is used. Therefore use it and do your homework and study to see which stock is the best buy for the day. To see which is the best for the day, take all the help you can get from just 1, GOD himself. Through JESUS CHRIST I CAN DO ALL THINGS. EVEN WIN AT THE MARKET. TO GOD BE ALL THE GLORY AND 20% OFF ALL PROFITS.
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
heydinger51. why is your sign off saying thank god for qbid? Do you know who GOD is? If you know who GOD is you would know that GOD's bible say's that a man should not lay with another man., and a woman should not lay with another woman. Hint hint GOD made ADAM and EVE, not ADAM and STEVE. If you know who GOD is then you know that he will punish you fou bringing him into the qbid posts.
Do you think God should punish you for posting hatred and being on the QBID forum??
If it's a sin, what are you doing here??
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
heydinger51. why is your sign off saying thank god for qbid? Do you know who GOD is?
Last time I checked there was more than one God on this planet. Anyhow who needs any religous talk on a stock bbs?
GO QBID
[This message has been edited by Murphy S. Law (edited November 08, 2004).]
If you want to be completely in line with the bible be a priest.
Lets stick to the company and market in our discussions please, not the lifestyle. Too many irrelevant opinions on this flamable subject to dilute the thread with.
Morality is hardly a common factor from culture to culture. In some areas women are still sold to men in one form or another. So lets just avoid that entire line of conversation, stick to the pursuit of profits and we will all get along.
Keep in mind, the money you stuff into your pockets from selling qbid stock at $5 will have "In God we trust" printed on it. May as well thank him before getting it.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
Lets leave the morality arguments at some other thread, in here we are pursuing profit, which in our endeavor only comes at the expense of someone else's impatience or mistakes making it fairly light on morality to begin with.If you want to be completely in line with the bible be a priest.
Lets stick to the company and market in our discussions please, not the lifestyle. Too many irrelevant opinions on this flamable subject to dilute the thread with.
Morality is hardly a common factor from culture to culture. In some areas women are still sold to men in one form or another. So lets just avoid that entire line of conversation, stick to the pursuit of profits and we will all get along.
Keep in mind, the money you stuff into your pockets from selling qbid stock at $5 will have "In God we trust" printed on it. May as well thank him before getting it.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
GREAT POST!!
------------------
DIANA
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
MW: I don't want to sound mean, but I hope you are 75 yrs or better, because if you are only 22 and waiting for old age to make money off QBID, I just can't wait that long
have a great day
I will not discuss religion on this board, and I will not change my signature, but when you read it, understand the way it is being stated.
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
Are you an investor in QBID?
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
The expo means many new eyes within the industry (gay/lesbian oriented business and products) have been exposed to Q. This bodes well for the future of the channel.
The advertising of the Time Life product means there is a revenue stream, which is a first for us.
And it might have been confusion by another poster, since this is the only place I have been able to find it, but the rumor of the Time Warner network carrying Q in the future means many new markets to broadcast Q's channel. This means higher fees for advertising which means more profits for us.
All very good things in just one weekend. This coupled with an overall positive CC, and no negative news means we should see some growth in the very near future as word spreads and the buy back completes.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 08, 2004).]
What a day...I was putting in an order to buy owenq on a bounce at .96 and my stupid, stupid computer like CRASHED!! Had to reboot the entire thing...by the time I was back up it was up to 1.18...thought it was too high...well, the damn stock ran to 1.52!!!! GRRRR.
So, hey, how you guys fairing today? LMAO Sometimes, you just gotta laugh.
Uh, did I just read a God post up above...oh Lordy, lets please not go THERE....think protein shakes, diapers, booze and baisters are a safer path than that one...LOL
Hi 1BIG... and DIANA...still here. Just waiting for more concrete news...and trying to make money in other places, too.
Miss talking to you guys...just feel bad when I get you guys "off topic" ALL of the time...Speaking of off topic, my 2 year old split his chin open last week in the school cafeteria while having lunch with my 7 year old...Talk about staying calm under pressure! I grabbed him under one arm, pushed the stroller with the 1 year old in it and RAN to the Burb...The little guy would have needed 8 stitches under the chin, but now, Thank Goodness, docs have somekind of "dermabond" (skin superglue)...That worked like a dream.
So, okay, I'm out again. Need to rant and rave about my OWENQ. BITES!
Happy trading!
GOOOO QBID! Would love to see this one up around 005 again.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
P.S. - I'm finally on board with QBID. Exciting day for me.
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 08, 2004).]
Opinions please.
quote:
Originally posted by CouchP:
If this truly is consolidation pattern, what event needs to happen for a positive move out of the pattern?Opinions please.
Announcements of,,,
Completed BuyBack!
New carrier!
Sub numbers!
Advertisers!
And or any number of other things!
After all,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
And those things are all in the works, and close at hand.
1...Yes
2...Hope so!
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Perhaps QTE should have paid New Jersey Governor James McGreevey to mention QTE in his resignation speech. Could have been some huge publicity there. Might as well hire him up for a job, public speaker? MattP.S. - I'm finally on board with QBID. Exciting day for me.
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 08, 2004).]
welcome as being qbider. if we all make it, see you in viva lasvegas.
The even closes recently are the bottom edge of the curve.
This is huge if I'm right! Usually rounding bottoms don't come back as low as the curve.
Please read the post I replied to for details.
Good luck.
quote:
Posted by: 1BigTip
Date:11/6/2004 7:27:02 AMRounding Bottom Check it out:
Up until end of August, QBID was having volume of over 225,000 each day. After that we have dropped to mostly below 125,000 each day. Which only can mean "consolidation" If I am right to where I think the "rounding bottom" has started, we are in the bottom curve. Maybe another week until we start the up curve and then it will take time to establish the uptrend. Here's an example.
Rounding Bottom (Reversal)
The rounding bottom is a long-term reversal pattern. It is also referred to as a saucer bottom, and represents a long consolidation period that turns from a bearish to bullish.
1. Prior Trend: In order to be a reversal pattern, there must be a prior trend to reverse. Ideally, the low of a rounding bottom will mark a new low or reaction low. In practice, there are occasions when the low is recorded many months earlier and the security trades flat before forming the pattern. When the rounding bottom does finally form, its low may not be the lowest low of the last few months.
2. Decline: The first portion of the rounding bottom is the decline that leads to the low of the pattern. This decline can take on different forms: some are quite jagged with a number of reaction highs and lows, while others trade lower in a more linear fashion.
3. Low: The low of the rounding bottom can resemble a "V' bottom, but should not be too sharp and should take a few weeks to form. Because prices are in a long-term decline, the possibility of a selling climax exists that could create a lower spike.
4. Advance: The advance off of the lows forms the right half of the pattern and should take about the same amount of time as the prior decline. If the advance is too sharp, then the validity of a rounding bottom may be in question.
5. Breakout: Bullish confirmation comes when the pattern breaks above the reaction high that marked the beginning of the decline at the start of the pattern. As with most resistance breakouts, this level can become support. However, rounding bottoms represent long-term reversal and this new support level may not be that significant.
6. Volume: In an ideal pattern, volume levels will track the shape of the rounding bottom: high at the beginning of the decline, low at the end of the decline and rising during the advance. Volume levels are not too important on the decline, but there should be an increase in volume on the advance and preferably on the breakout.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 08, 2004).]
this could go in all kinds of directions.
Q movies
Q music
Q native
Q news
and on and on and on.
so the potential is priceless.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Is it possible for QBID to grab that one tenth of 1 percent? There are only so many 7.95 amonth subscriptions they can order. I thought I read an estimated 34 million homosexuals in the US. So 34 million X 7.95 X 12 months = 3.24 billion. Thats if we get almost all of the gay population. That turns out to be .5 percent of the $600 billion.It's hard to judge how many will sign up though. I've been thinking that maybe some heterosexual households will order the service. It's not only homosexuals that are watching Queer Eye for the Straight Guy.
I haven't found any figures on how much we can expect advertisers to dish out to QTE. Someone prove me wrong and show me how this company can easily reach a value of $6 billion. Again I'm not bashingl just figuring out what will happen with my money. Matt
Any chance anyone else thinks that if QBID gets that large they'll be an international network? Or should we believe countries will produce their own versions such as PinkTV in France? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
heydinger51. why is your sign off saying thank god for qbid? Do you know who GOD is? If you know who GOD is you would know that GOD's bible say's that a man should not lay with another man., and a woman should not lay with another woman. Hint hint GOD made ADAM and EVE, not ADAM and STEVE. If you know who GOD is then you know that he will punish you fou bringing him into the qbid posts.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
For now QBID is only launching one station correct? Network status in 5 years when they hit the $6 billion mark?Any chance anyone else thinks that if QBID gets that large they'll be an international network? Or should we believe countries will produce their own versions such as PinkTV in France? Matt
Yes,,International. It is a Network not a station now as we speak. http://www.rcn.com/cabletv/lineupDetails.php?lineupID=10
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by qnique:
ARE WE GONNA GET THIS MONEY SOON OR WHAT?
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
For now QBID is only launching one station correct? Network status in 5 years when they hit the $6 billion mark?Any chance anyone else thinks that if QBID gets that large they'll be an international network? Or should we believe countries will produce their own versions such as PinkTV in France? Matt
Perm,,there have so many events happening lately. We are in San Fran,,Ny,,Boston now,,
Please read the PRs as of late. Hope this helps.
Sam http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=qbid.pk
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt. of ARMS:
heydinger51. why is your sign off saying thank god for qbid? Do you know who GOD is? If you know who GOD is you would know that GOD's bible say's that a man should not lay with another man., and a woman should not lay with another woman. Hint hint GOD made ADAM and EVE, not ADAM and STEVE. If you know who GOD is then you know that he will punish you fou bringing him into the qbid posts.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hey guys. I'm almost convinced this is part of the rounding bottom! We are still on the curve part of it but the end of the curve, soon, if I'm right, will slowly start to curve up.The even closes recently are the bottom edge of the curve.
This is huge if I'm right! Usually rounding bottoms don't come back as low as the curve.
Please read the post I replied to for details.
Good luck.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 08, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
P.S. While typing the above, my OWENQ ran to 1.70. Just gonna shake my head and tell myself there's always tomorrow.LOLGOOOO QBID! Would love to see this one up around 005 again.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 08, 2004).]
check out another triangle http://www.tritv.co.nz/
european gay tv http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/10/102504FrTV.htm
Pridevision, the world's first gay TV network signed on two years ago in Canada. Q Television is up and running in several US cities including New York, San Francisco, and Boston. Logo, a new gay channel from Viacom is readying its launch.
Britain already has two channels on the Sky Digital platform - GayDate TV, a teleshopping channel targeting the gay community, and GayTV, a late-night soft-core porn channel. And Sweden has gay-friendly programming.
italian tv http://www.mvs.nl/
amsterdam tv http://www.mvs.nl/
new zealand tv http://tvnz.co.nz/view/tv2_story_skin/418959%3fformat=html
gay news http://www.qtvnews.tv/
q "hq" http://www.gay-palm-springs.info/
this airs in 20 us cities http://www.dyketv.org/new_site/test.php
http://www.lirainbow.org/
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
For now QBID is only launching one station correct? Network status in 5 years when they hit the $6 billion mark?Any chance anyone else thinks that if QBID gets that large they'll be an international network? Or should we believe countries will produce their own versions such as PinkTV in France? Matt
Ric, hope all is well on the homefront...thanks for thinking of me.
And Firefly, Twix and a Martini....OKAY! But are you sure you won't change a couple of diapers? Nothing more humbling than trying to hold down a squirming toddler with a really NASTY diaper! LOL
Builds character.....Hey Penny Trader.
Have a good evening everyone.
Ric
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
QBID WILL BE WORTH 5-BILLION DOLLARS IN 5-YEARS. GAYS HAVE 600-BILLION DISPOSABLE INCOME, ETC.ETC.ETC.ETC.
STOCK SYMBOL TWX IS AOL/TIME WARNER AND HAS 4.5 BILLION SHARES. QBID HAS 71-BILLION SHARES.
AOL ----->ALONE<----- HAS 30+ MILLION SUBS AND 85% ARE FULL SUBS AT $24.95/MONTH. NOW ADD TO THAT; TIME WARNER THEMSELVES ARE ONE OF THE LARGEST CABLE PROVIDERS AS WELL AS PUBLISHING COMPAINES IN THE WORLD.
TOTAL VALUE: 75+ BILLION DOLLARS.
FRANKIE FRAUD OLSEN IS GOING TO SING AND DANCE ABOUT WHAT QBID IS GOING TO DO. THIS IS THE SAME FRANKIE FRAUD THAT TOLD US IN 2000 HE HIRED A ACCOUNTING FIRM TO DO A STOCK UPGRADE. THEN TOLD US IN FEB 2004 THAT HE'S DOING A BUYBACK AND UPGRADING THE STOCK. THEN IN SEPT OF O4, HE ISSUES 6-BILLION SHARES AND ANOTHER 50-BILLION SHARES TO TOTAL QBID AT 71-BILLION SHARES. 2-MONTHS AFTER THIS, FRANKIE FRAUD ANNOUNCES A BUYBACK AND A UPGRADE. THEN THEY DO A CONFERENCE CALL AND RENEE TELLS US THE CORPORATION IS DIRTY AND THEY CAN'T DO A UPGRADE.
FRANKIE FRAUD ALSO TELL US THAT HIS OFFICE HAS HANDLED 50,000 INQUIRIES WHICH WAS IMPOSSIBLE. 100,000 HOTLINE CALLS IN A 2-MONTH PERIOD WHICH ALSO WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAPPEN. KEYWORD IMPOSSIBLE.
FRANKIE FRAUD TELLS US ABOUT ADVERTISERS AND ADVERTISERS THAT ARE GOING TO PAY $150,000-$200,000 TO ADVERTISE ON QBID. WELL SINCE QBID IS A PAY CHANNEL, I GUESS SINCE HBO, CINEMAX AND SHOWTIME ARE ALL PAY CHANNELS, HE CAN RUN COMMERCIALS JUST LIKE THEM. OH YEA, HE CAN'T ANNOUNCE THE ADVERTISERS BUT HE ASSURES US ALL, THEY HAVE GIVEN HIM DEPOSITS.
WITH THIS GREAT SUBSCRIBER BASE HE HAS AND ALL THE EQUIPTMENT AND THAT GREAT 60-FOOT TALL BUILDING, THEY DECIDED TO HOLD A CONFERENCE CALL INSTEAD OF A LIVE CALL-IN BROADCAST ON Q-TV. HOW INTERESTING CONSIDERING HOW "Q IS ON THE MOVE" AND ALL THIS LIVE BROADCASTING THEY ARE GOING TO BE DOING.
I MEAN THEY DIDN'T DO A LIVE-TV CALL IN SHOW BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO INTERRUPT ALL THE SUBSCRIBERS THEY HAVE DURING THEIR REGULAR SCHEDULED PROGRAMMING.
AOL/TIME WARNER WITH 30+ MILLION SUBS AND THE ENTIRE TIME WARNER NETWORK 4.5 BILLION SHARES VALUED AT 75-BILLION DOLLARS.
QBID 71-BILLION SHARES WORTH 6-BILLION IN 5 YEARS. I GET IT NOW, QBID IS GOING TO BE JUST THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF TWX.
84-BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE WALL <BURP, HICCUP>
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Rock and Roll,,Hope all is well Rod,,Sam.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 08, 2004).]
GO QBID!!!!!!!!!!!
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
FIRST OF ALL. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THIS CONFERENCE TO HANDLE 50 CALLS IN A 1-HOUR PERIOD LET ALONE HOW DID THEY RECORD 1100 CALLS? FRANKIE FRAUD OLSEN, THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN TELLING PATRONS (AKA STOCKHOLDERS) THAT YOU HANDLED 50,000 INQUIRIES AND 100,000 HOTLINE MESSAGES.FRANK OLSEN IS A 100% FRAUDULENT LIAR!
85-BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE WALL <BURP>
if you where on the Conference call speak up and let us know
so far there are 44 of us
penny trader
firefly
1BigTip
Ric
Doctoall
2 of Docs friends
King Crimson
Kings daughter
Boulder Buddy
TSHRUFUS
driver
RNINALVNG
couple of 1Big Tips friends
Whiznock
stanlee
tnq
sneither
Crygreen1
Sonnydbar
crosseyed
pieman
6 of Dianna's friends
dinger51
21jason21
cashrules
The Wanderer
SMC
snoozenlooze
Ruh420
Degs
Ballystock
dolr’s
bckibler
2 of bckibler's teachers
Boletus
CouchP
who else was there
what do you say to this U4 are we the only ones that where able to get on the CC?
according to you only 50 people could possibly get on. that means that only 6 other could have been there. I'm sure there are that many here lurking that have not spoke up yet. let alone all the other people at other BB's
this doesn't do much to help your credibility and you are trying to call Frank a liar? I'm sorry buddy but at this point in the game i will take my chances with Frank.
I bring to you facts U4 how about you do the same to back your claims
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
PER FRANK OLSEN:
GET LOST YOU FREAKIN LOSER CREEP!
Sorry, just having a bad day. It's like coming home after a long day only to hear your wife nagging & you wish you were single again. JUST SHUT THE F UP! lol
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 08, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
GET LOST YOU FREAKIN LOSER CREEP!Sorry, just having a bad day. It's like coming home after a long day only to hear your wife nagging & you wish you were single again. JUST SHUT THE F UP! lol
you are not alone. wanna form a pretended single club? hello everyone here tonite. better cleaning up the dog's U4 drop, it's wayyy tooo smelly.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 08, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 08, 2004).]
Who needs a bullseye!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
"At a time when other TV audiences are shrinking, Hispanic TV is a media darling because its viewership just keeps on growing. So far this year, an average of 3.7 million viewers catch Spanish-language movies and south-of-the-border telenovelas (soap operas) on either Telemundo or Univision, according to Nielsen Media Research, an 8.7% jump over the year before. Those numbers helped the two networks record double-digit ad-sales growth for the coming season even as the slowing economy has slashed ad sales elsewhere in TV-land. The U.S. Hispanic population, now 33.6 million and the country's fastest-growing segment, is expected to top 43 million by 2010 (charts). "
This article is from 2001 but still the gay community is estimated at 34 million.
"SERIOUS VIEWERS. What's more, Hispanics tend to watch more TV, on average, than other viewers, are younger, and have rising disposable income. By 2010, U.S. Hispanics will spend $1 trillion a year on goods and services, up from the $444 billion in 2000, according to Standard & Poor's/DRI, a unit of The McGraw-Hill Cos., BusinessWeek's publisher. With those numbers, ``they're no longer an afterthought for us,'' says Andy Donchin, director of broadcast for media buyer Carat North America, which has stepped up ad sales on Hispanic TV for clients such as Pfizer Inc. and Alberto Culver hair products."
Like I said the gay community is better off. $544 billion in disposable income at least, if not the $600 billion.
"HOT PROPERTY. Those kinds of multiples have driven up the price for Univision, which draws an average 1.7 million households a night, five times BET's audience. With its 32 TV stations and Galavision, the top-rated Hispanic cable channel, Univision could more than double its value within a year, to $11 billion, or $55 a share, predicts P. Gordon Hodge, an analyst with Thomas Weisel Partners LLC. Earlier this year, Viacom offered $30 a share, or about $7 billion, say industry sources, but was rebuffed. "
Why do I feel like QTE can get more than 1.7 million viewers a night? Perhaps because there is no other competition right now. There are a few spanish channels, such as Telemundo, that take away viewers from Univision. The article later describes how even telemundo, which is smaller than Univision, has been offered $3 billion. Perhaps those offers came a few years after the launching of each station but it sounds to me like our homosexual community makes for a better target to advertisers than hispanics. Are the values $1 billion within a year and $5-6 billion in 5 years conservative estimates?
By the way, Univision, UVN, is trading at $29.41 with Shares Outstanding: 323.20M
Float: 206.90M
Matt
Here's the whole article:
MEDIA GIANTS ARE GLUED TO LATINO TV
by Ronald Grover in Los Angeles | Sep 24 '01
The Hispanic Television Network is so far a network in name only. Launched early last year, HTVN reaches scarcely 15% of the country. It's essentially a patchwork of 20 TV stations and agreements with cable systems, most of which have yet to air their first salsa music hour. In the 18 months since launching, HTVN has lost $51.7 million on $1.8 billion in revenues. But those numbers haven't deterred several of the largest media companies from going to Fort Worth to sound out potential deals. ``They're names you'd recognize,'' says HTVN Chief Operating Officer Michael Fletcher. ``I don't think anyone can be in the business [of Hispanic TV] right now and not get calls like this.''
In fact, to media giants caught in the frenzy to consolidate, no business seems hotter these days than Spanish-language TV. For months, Telemundo, the No. 2 Hispanic TV network, based in Hialeah, Fla., has been fielding inquiries from Walt Disney, Viacom, AOL Time Warner, and General Electric's NBC, industry insiders say. According to these sources, Viacom made a bid earlier this year--rejected as too low--for Los Angeles-based Univision Communications Inc., the top network in the field, with an estimated 80% of the Hispanic market. Viacom President Mel Karmazin says there was never a ``formal offer'' for Univision. But at Viacom's annual meeting in May, he put shareholders on notice that he's set to buy Hispanic TV assets at the right price. Univision refused comment.
At a time when other TV audiences are shrinking, Hispanic TV is a media darling because its viewership just keeps on growing. So far this year, an average of 3.7 million viewers catch Spanish-language movies and south-of-the-border telenovelas (soap operas) on either Telemundo or Univision, according to Nielsen Media Research, an 8.7% jump over the year before. Those numbers helped the two networks record double-digit ad-sales growth for the coming season even as the slowing economy has slashed ad sales elsewhere in TV-land. The U.S. Hispanic population, now 33.6 million and the country's fastest-growing segment, is expected to top 43 million by 2010 (charts).
SERIOUS VIEWERS. What's more, Hispanics tend to watch more TV, on average, than other viewers, are younger, and have rising disposable income. By 2010, U.S. Hispanics will spend $1 trillion a year on goods and services, up from the $444 billion in 2000, according to Standard & Poor's/DRI, a unit of The McGraw-Hill Cos., BusinessWeek's publisher. With those numbers, ``they're no longer an afterthought for us,'' says Andy Donchin, director of broadcast for media buyer Carat North America, which has stepped up ad sales on Hispanic TV for clients such as Pfizer Inc. and Alberto Culver hair products.
Big Media's new interest in Hispanic TV is part of a push to collect niche programming, such as the Walt Disney Co.'s recent purchase of the Family Channel. And ethnic TV is especially hot. Last year, Viacom paid $3 billion in stock for Black Entertainment Television, a price industry insiders say was 20 times BET's cash flow, or nearly double what traditional TV outlets command. ``Viacom was saying to the rest of us that niche players matter and that they were willing to pay up for them,'' says one media executive.
HOT PROPERTY. Those kinds of multiples have driven up the price for Univision, which draws an average 1.7 million households a night, five times BET's audience. With its 32 TV stations and Galavision, the top-rated Hispanic cable channel, Univision could more than double its value within a year, to $11 billion, or $55 a share, predicts P. Gordon Hodge, an analyst with Thomas Weisel Partners LLC. Earlier this year, Viacom offered $30 a share, or about $7 billion, say industry sources, but was rebuffed. Instead Univision, controlled by former boxing promoter A. Jerrold Perenchio, expanded last year into music and in early 2002 intends to launch a second network aimed at English-speaking Hispanics. Its drawing power is huge. Last year, its Spanish-language movie Las Delicias del Poder drew 1.1 million more Hispanic viewers than NBC's highest rated movie, Titanic. And its nightly Noticiero TV news show often outdraws the Big Three network offerings.
In this climate, once-troubled Telemundo is also drawing intense interest. The privately held network has rebounded from a 1993 bankruptcy to build its audience by 48% after revamping its programming in 1997. It delivers only one-fourth of Univision's audience, but Telemundo's ratings in the May sweeps climbed 30% among the prized 18-49 age group with hot shows such as novela Betty La Fea (Betty the Ugly). Taking on Univision's popular afternoon talk show Cristina, Telemundo's Laura en America became a huge hit with 1 million viewers daily. The bidding so far for Telemundo is said to have hit $3 billion, a sharp hike from the estimated $700 million paid by its majority owners Sony Corp. and John C. Malone's Liberty Media Corp. in 1997. The company has been adding distribution, spending $304 million last year to expand its station group to 24, including in top Hispanic markets Los Angeles and Dallas.
A bid for Telemundo, expected in the coming weeks, could spark bidding for other Hispanic TV assets, including those that produce programs. Some cable companies such as AOL Time Warner and AT&T are said to be pursuing Mexican TV producer TV Azteca, whose year-old plan to launch a network with TV station owner Pappas Telecasting Cos. has been slow to roll out. As for the fledgling HTVN, Michael Fletcher says he's got his cell phone handy.
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 09, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
LMAO. I love when 1BIG gets pissed off.
Eat Yourself U4!
life without hockey is weird, but i survived the last one this is only a minor inconvienience.
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Rod, this guy has no validity...let it go ...he's as Doc said " a POOP"...we KNOW there were several people on the conference call..2slow4u will try to meagerly continue his job and his lowerly exsistennce...like scavenger fish sucking the dredge from the tank...how's life in Canada with no hockey? I took it off my home page because I got tired of reading POSTPONED. LOL!
Terry
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
life without hockey is weird,
It's going to be a long winter! I try to play every weekend to make up for not seeing any games. What are the players doing in their off time?? Did Kovalev sign with Montreal yet?
Just had a chance to catch up on the BB. Thanks for the support.
Go Q!
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
EVERYTHING IS MOVING FORWARD. WHILE MOST WILL TELL YOU THAT IT'S DROPPED
TO
THE CURRENT SUB-PENNY OF .008+/- FROM .018 A FEW WEEKS AGO AND A RECENT
HIGH
OF .027 MEANS IT'S A FRAUD. WELL A .02 STOCK FROM .0001 ISN'T ALL THAT
MUCH
OF ANYTHING TO BASE YOUR OPINION ON. MOST ARE ATTACKING THIS STOCK AT THE
..02 LEVEL AS THOUGH IT'S LISTED ON NASDAQ WITH FULL REPORTING. IF THE
STOCK
WERE SITTING AT .05 RIGHT NOW, NO ONE WOULD BE COMPLAINING AND YOU WOULD
HEAR THE CONTINUED SINGING AND PRAISES OF HOW WONDERFUL AND WHAT A GREAT
FUTURE Q-TV HAS. THE BOTTOM LINE HAS ALWAYS BEEN WITH THIS STOCK, LAUNCH
AND GIVE US THE STRENGTH OF ADVERTISERS. WELL WE HAVE 50% OF THE EQUATION
BEING TEST LAUNCH MAY 15. SOFT LAUNCH JUNE 1 AND "FULL" 8 HR PROGRAMMING
REPEATED 3 TIMES FOR A 24-HR BROADCAST. FRANK OLSEN (CEO) HAS MADE IT
CLEAR
HE WILL NOT RELEASE INFO PERTAINING TO CARRIAGE, MEANING CARRIER
PROVIDERS,
UNTIL HE HAS THE SIGNED CONTRACT IN HAND. WE CAN ONLY GO BY WHAT CONCRETE
FACTS WE HAVE AND THE LAUNCH IS A CONCRETE FACT. YOU CAN TURN ON TV AND
SEE
IT.
Q-TV IS A GOOD OPPORTUNITY AND IN MY OPINION, AT .008 A GOOD TIME TO JUMP
ON
BOARD. YOUR SITTING IN THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME WITH A
GAY/LESBIAN
TV STATION.
A FEW THINGS TO REMEMBER ABOUT THIS STOCK.. 1 IT'S A PINK. 2 PEOPLE ON
MESSAGE BOARDS CREATE 95% OF SEC COMPLAINTS ABOUT A STOCK AND THOSE 95%
ARE
USUALLY PINK SHEET STOCKS. MOST PEOPLE WHO POST DO NOT KNOW HOW STOCKS
WORK
AND SIMPLY BELIEVE THAT SINCE A STOCK IS GOING UP IN PRICE, IT MUST BE
DOING
SOMETHING RIGHT AND WHEN IT GOES DOWN, SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG (FRAUD).
WE
LIVE IN A TABLOIDS SOCIETY AND PEOPLE ARE MORE CONCERNED WITH WHO BRITANY
SPEARS IS GETTING MARRIED TO AND KNOW MORE ABOUT THAT THEN THEY DO ABOUT
THE
STOCKS THEY ARE CLAIMING TO BE FRAUDS. ALSO THE SAME PEOPLE WHO GET ON
BOARDS AND CLAIM FRAUD OR WHAT A JOKE A CERTAIN STOCK IS ARE THE SAME
ONE'S
WHO SIT AT HOME, CLICK ON A MESSAGE BOARD TO RANT AND HAVE DONE ABSOLUTLY
NOTHING FOR THE COMPANY AND IT'S SHARE PRICE. THEY ALL USE THE STANDARD
WELL I OWN THE COMPANY I'M INVESTED IN BUT AREN'T WILLING TO DO ANYTHING
TO
HELP. CASE IN POINT, NUMEROUS PEOPLE IN MIAMI OWN Q-TV AND NOT ONE OF
THEM
HAS DONE ANYTHING TO ASSIST IN PROMOTION FOR Q-TV IN A HIGH POPULATION OF
GAY PEOPLE BUT WILL BE THE FIRST IN LINE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT HOW Q-TV ISN'T
DOING ANYTHING.
SO I'LL HOLD THIS STOCK FOR THE NEXT YEAR TAKING INTO ACCOUNT WHAT IS
TRULY
INVOLVED IN STARTING A TELEVISION STATION AS WELL AS A GAY ONE IN THIS DAY
AND AGE. SUCH A GOOD IDEA A COMPANY SUCH A CBS/VIACOM ANNOUNCES THAT IT'S
FOLLOWING THROUGH AND WILL BEGIN BROADCAST FEB 18, 2005 OF IT'S GAY "LOGO"
NETWORK.
I NEVER PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO PEOPLE TELLING ME HOW HORRIBLE A STOCK IS
WHEN
THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT WORKS ON THE DOUBLE
STANDARD PRINCIPAL TO FIT THEIR VIEWS.
CASE AND POINT. LOOK AT ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING QBID IS A FRAUD AND HAVE NO
KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HOW TO START A TV STATION OR WHAT'S INVOLVED AND FURTHER,
THEY CAN SAY IT'S A FRAUD BUT PROVE IT. AGAIN, WE GO BACK TO 50% WAS
GETTING A SIGNAL UP AND RUNNING WHICH WE ARE AND THE OTHER 25% IS SIGNAL
PROVIDERS AND 25% IS ADVERTISERS.
ULTIMATELY, FRANK AND COMPANY ARE WORKING IN CALIFORNIA TRYING TO MAKE
THIS
WORK AND THEIR FINANCIAL SUCCESS IS BASED UPON THE SHARES THEY ARE ABLE TO
SELL ONCE THEY ARE UP AND RUNNING A COMPLETE NETWORK.
FACTS ARE:
SIGNAL IS UP 24HRS
FRANK MADE IT CLEAR HE MADE THE MISTAKE RELEASEING SIGNAL INFO BACK IN
2000
WHEN HE WAS NOT AUTHORIZED TO DO SO AND CAUSED PROBLEMS SO HE'S NOT
RELEASING THE CURRENT (PENDING) INFO HE HAS UNTIL CONFIRMATION.
YOU CAN FORM YOUR OWN CONCLUSION WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE ACTIVELY SEEKING
ADVERTISERS. I BELIEVE THAT SINCE WE HAVE THE ABOVE 2 FACTS THAT
ADVERTISING IS A GIVEN.
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 09, 2004).]
Nice find there Clyde
.005 would look sooo good right now!
DZ
I would love to see the actual programming we keep hearing about!
Im just a 25yo just out of medical school trying to make a little niche for my future, many frieds just say I'm a dreamer with high hopes for this company..
QBID promising and i like everything they have accomplished thus far
and i think in a year or two ill be doing this-->
TO everyone else
thanx for the optimism and sticking in here and posting some good remarks, but most importantly for sharing your personal thoughts and feelings. theres many of us here feel the same way i do, and it keeps me HOPING
so thanx those who keep the spirit up, you all know who u are
my remark is very simple.. at this pps
im picking up more because its like going shopping when a "sale event" occurs
guys if the smileys get annoying let me know and ill stop using them...im just trying to bring so life back into the Q boards
~RALPH
------------------
Facta Non Verba
thanks,
dz
Has anyone been watching WNMI - Warning Mgmt?
It's gone from 0.0011 to 0.0043 in 2 days,
when will see QBID produce real gains?
How about somebody upping the bid to 0.010 to get the ball rolling!!
quote:
Originally posted by Marva18:
Is this stock going to move at all?Has anyone been watching WNMI - Warning Mgmt?
It's gone from 0.0011 to 0.0043 in 2 days,
when will see QBID produce real gains?How about somebody upping the bid to 0.010 to get the ball rolling!!
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by Qbidder:
U4 if you dont want to be here with us on this ride SELL and get out, and honestly from the bottom of my heart i think you are a very intelligent person, and i feel if you direct your energy in a more productive way in other stocks you will make more $
first i thought you were an unfortunate person who was just frustrated cos u were down $ on this stock, but then i thought anyone who owns this stock and was down would not be posting all these negative posts in MANY FORUMS
so thats why lately i have the impression that your a PAID BASHER and i dont even consider your thoughtsIm just a 25yo just out of medical school trying to make a little niche for my future, many frieds just say I'm a dreamer with high hopes for this company..
QBID promising and i like everything they have accomplished thus far
and i think in a year or two ill be doing this-->[b]TO everyone else
thanx for the optimism and sticking in here and posting some good remarks, but most importantly for sharing your personal thoughts and feelings. theres many of us here feel the same way i do, and it keeps me HOPING
so thanx those who keep the spirit up, you all know who u are
my remark is very simple.. at this pps
im picking up more because its like going shopping when a "sale event" occurs
guys if the smileys get annoying let me know and ill stop using them...im just trying to bring so life back into the Q boards
~RALPH
[/B]
quote:
Originally posted by Marva18:
Is this stock going to move at all?Has anyone been watching WNMI - Warning Mgmt?
It's gone from 0.0011 to 0.0043 in 2 days,
when will see QBID produce real gains?How about somebody upping the bid to 0.010 to get the ball rolling!!
me and a buddy called it the daily double yesterday .. LOL. All I know is that my total value in the stock has gone to single digits .. will use it as one of my losses this year
------------------
78.23% of all statistics are made up on the spot...The other 35% are made up later on.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 09, 2004).]
Who would pay someone to bash and what is their motivation?
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
"HOT PROPERTY. Those kinds of multiples have driven up the price for Univision, which draws an average 1.7 million households a night, five times BET's audience. With its 32 TV stations and Galavision, the top-rated Hispanic cable channel, Univision could more than double its value within a year, to $11 billion, or $55 a share, predicts P. Gordon Hodge, an analyst with Thomas Weisel Partners LLC. Earlier this year, Viacom offered $30 a share, or about $7 billion, say industry sources, but was rebuffed. "Why do I feel like QTE can get more than 1.7 million viewers a night? Perhaps because there is no other competition right now. There are a few spanish channels, such as Telemundo, that take away viewers from Univision. The article later describes how even telemundo, which is smaller than Univision, has been offered $3 billion. Perhaps those offers came a few years after the launching of each station but it sounds to me like our homosexual community makes for a better target to advertisers than hispanics. Are the values $1 billion within a year and $5-6 billion in 5 years conservative estimates?
By the way, Univision, UVN, is trading at $29.41 with Shares Outstanding: 323.20M
Float: 206.90MMatt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 09, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I'm surprised no one commented on what I posted last night/this morning. My main question was does anyone else think the $1 billion in one year - $6 billion in 5 years is a conservative value? What would happen to us if Frank did sell QBID to a company like Time Warner or Viacom for $10 billion or so instead of just signing contracts with them? MattMatt,
Just as soon as I find the QBID crystal ball, I will have all of the answers for you.
I have found pennyland to be more complex than I had expected. Reading past threads on all of my penny stocks has given me a wider perspective of "some" aspects.
I'm still reading everything that I can find.......
Again, there are many opinions and many facts on the last and the previous threads of QBID and others that may interest you--try it--you will get a fuller picture.
Now that is a sure thing!
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
My T&S shows @ 13:27:36 there were 16,469,430 shares traded @ .0028 Would someone w/L2 please tell me if it was a buy or sell. Thanks
Sells:
13:58:15 60000 0.0029 + OTCEQ_NBB
13:54:51 200000 0.0029 + OTCEQ_NBB
13:49:09 2344827 0.0029 + OTCEQ_NBB
13:33:24 1100000 0.0029 + OTCEQ_NBB
13:33:24 50000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:33:12 50000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:36 25000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:36 1079964 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:36 103570 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:36 170000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:36 100000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 14000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 3658600 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 215500 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 250000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 192000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 110767 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 169600 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 999999 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 9000000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 35000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 165000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 181275 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 96000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:27:33 484596 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:12 64085 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:12 39000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:12 100000 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:12 107900 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:09 900107 0.0028 - OTCEQ_NBB
13:25:09 464285 0.0028 -
Everyone is being called to court. Is it a verdict or mistrial? If verdict Guilty or Not?
My bet is mistrial
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 09, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Qbidder:
[b]TO everyone else
thanx for the optimism and sticking in here and posting some good remarks, but most importantly for sharing your personal thoughts and feelings. theres many of us here feel the same way i do, and it keeps me HOPING
so thanx those who keep the spirit up, you all know who u are
my remark is very simple.. at this pps
im picking up more because its like going shopping when a "sale event" occurs
~RALPH
[/B]
howdy man,
keep up the smiley face - keep up the spirit. am heading for that 1 mil share mark. hope that my kids dont have to wear cloth diapers that long...
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 10, 2004).]
Get in on this ground floor investmenent while you can. QBID will be the next big Network of our time. I will reluctantly let go of 500,000 shares this week and this week only for the low low price of .25 a share. For just $125,000.00 dollars you can too own this spectacular company. This is for a limited time only and after this week it will go up double in price.
Ric
i have not heard of any deals on signing but i thought he had signed before they went on strike.
i have not been following to closely anything hockey related other then the fact that they are not back at it yet.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
It's going to be a long winter! I try to play every weekend to make up for not seeing any games. What are the players doing in their off time?? Did Kovalev sign with Montreal yet?
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 09, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
I am not sure if hes paid or not. But if he is a paid pumper turned basher then don't reply directly to his post. He gets paid by the number of responses be it good or bad. If he is paid then he loves it when you bash him, its another dollar in his pocket. But I still think those beers on the wall are kegs and he's just way too drunk to know what hes talking about. Because it really is rambling that makes no sense. And if he starts a new thread lets do one reply that states this is untrue go to the QBID thread for the real facts.Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 09, 2004).]
Never-the-less 100% true,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
i know but there is still the possibility that someone that is new will see his post and think he may be credible. just my due diligence to let them know that hes not all that.life without hockey is weird, but i survived the last one this is only a minor inconvienience.
It is a little wierd without NHL hockey. I guess I'm kind of lucky that in San Diego we have the Gulls that are part of one of those independent leagues. I always drove up to Aneheim or LA to see games and never went to the games in my own backyard. I have actually come to appreciate the Gulls now that there is no NHL. I realize its not the NHL, but aren't you in Canada? There has to be tons of teams like the Gulls up there.
quote:
Originally posted by kbpkt:
It is a little wierd without NHL hockey. I guess I'm kind of lucky that in San Diego we have the Gulls that are part of one of those independent leagues. I always drove up to Aneheim or LA to see games and never went to the games in my own backyard. I have actually come to appreciate the Gulls now that there is no NHL. I realize its not the NHL, but aren't you in Canada? There has to be tons of teams like the Gulls up there.
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
there are we have the farm teams and lots of OHL teams and Minor hokey leagues. we have a city team that is doing quite well. but i miss going to the Corel Center and watching the Senators.
Here's some NEWS!
Gay.com entertainment
Gay.com Home Entertainment
MORE ENTERTAINMENT
More Gaywatch
Sex and the suburbs
An interview with Will from "Big Brother"
Into the OUTZone
A sneak preview of "Will & Grace"
Gaywatch archive
Also on Gay.com
Nielsen to track gay TV viewer habits
Logo reveals program details
The race for gay TV
Here!, announces first LGBT Christmas special
France unveils gay TV channel
TV Gay Guide
Get it
Longtime Companion
Go Fish
Gay.com Zoom
Find a gay video store in your city
Movie Quick Search
Search by title, director, or star:
Advanced Search Browse
Gaywatch: Battle of the gay networks
by Christine Champagne
Most of you have likely heard about the impending launch of Logo. It's not exactly a surprise, given that the gay cable network enjoys the cachet and promotional muscle of its parent company Viacom.
But there are two gay start-up networks already out there -- here! TV and Q Television Network -- that have gotten a jump on establishing identities and attracting viewers, and if you are one of those TV junkies who can't get enough gay programming, you might want to check them out.
Here! TV was the first to hit the airwaves, debuting in 2002 with a limited schedule before going 24/7 this month. Available to satellite and cable operators through In Demand and TVN and offered as a VOD, SVOD or pay-per-view service, here! TV recently expanded its reach to cable households in Boston, Chicago, Milwaukee, New York City, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.
Founded by Stephen Jarchow and Paul Colichman -- who are also the founders of Regent Entertainment, a film studio in Los Angeles -- here! TV's claim to fame thus far has been its massive library of gay and lesbian programming. The network's collection recently increased when here! acquired the U.S. television broadcasting rights to the gay and lesbian titles in MGM's film library. Among them are "Longtime Companion," "Go Fish" and "Jeffrey."
Here! TV has also generated new content, producing a series of original movies, including the upcoming "Too Cool for Christmas." Billed as the first-ever gay-themed family holiday special, "Too Cool for Christmas" premieres in December and stars George Hamilton, Brooke Nevin and Donna Mills. Directed by openly gay director Sam Irvin, the film tells the story of a girl who would rather spend the holidays with her boyfriend than her two dads.
As for original series, here! TV's efforts range from the gay and lesbian gothic horror thriller "Dante's Cove" to "Here! Family," a 12-episode series hosted by Michelle Darne and inspired by her magazine "And Baby."
"The gay and lesbian community has embraced us because we offer them the broad array of entertaining, original and exclusive content that they've been searching for -- but not finding enough of -- on multichannel television," says Colichman, who is president of the network.
Like here! TV, Q Television Network, a premium service launched in September 2004 and available in various markets through RCN, offers a mix of acquired and original programming. Among the network's original programs are a talk show called "Women on Women" and "Q on the Move," a gay travel series. It also produced a documentary on gay marriage entitled "I Will, I Do, We Did."
A wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi Media, Q Television Network also just announced that it has obtained the rights to air live and taped coverage of Gay Games VII, which take place in Chicago from July 15 to 22, 2006.
According to executive vice president Steven Grunberg, Q Television Network stands out because it strives to truly serve the LGBT community.
"This [network] is built by and for the gay community. Rather than a smattering of stereotyped gay characters offered because current market projections indicate it would be profitable, we offer a channel that will unite the gay and lesbian audience through a network that educates, entertains and informs," Grunberg says.
Can the market support a trio of networks that all aim to support the same niche audience? Probably not. Only one or two of these endeavors is likely to survive. But until the inevitable shakeout occurs, the LGBT audience can enjoy a plethora of choices when it comes to gay-oriented programming.
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 10, 2004).]
As Whiz says, "all we need to do is launch." I'm sure the first station that does go national will be the one to survive. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 09, 2004).]
Ric
By Linda Moss 10/4/2004
Here! TV, formerly just an on-demand and pay-per-view service targeting gay audiences, last week launched as a 24-hour premium network.
The linear mini-pay channel is now available to distributors, debuting right on schedule Oct. 1. Here! TV plans to announce its first major carriage deal for that round-the-clock network later this month, CEO Paul Colichman said.
It is up as a 24-hour service, he said, adding that the feed was up on a satellite. Were very pleased with our progress.
Colichman said pricing for the 24-hour premium channel will vary, but didnt offer specifics. He said the linear network will have simply more programming than the video on demand, subscription VOD and PPV offerings.
Here! TVs SVOD service includes new theatricals, Colichman said. The 24-hour network will also air library product, including titles acquired from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (such as My Beautiful Launderette) in September.
The 24-hour Here! feed is using the Playboy Channel model: subscribers can buy a program block or upgrade to the 24-hour linear feed for a monthly subscription fee.
Whereas Logo the 24-hour network for gay audiences MTV Networks will roll out in February can launch on digital tiers, independent Here! TV lacks Viacom Inc.s clout and distribution leverage. Thats one reason Here! TV is going the mini-pay route.
Also, most cable operators claim they dont want more basic channels, and the kind of content Colichman wants on Here! TV isnt appropriate for basic cable. Its not adult content, its not erotica, but it is designed for a mature audience that pays for it and wants it, he said.
The on-demand Here! TV is available to about 25 million subscribers. DirecTV Inc. and Dish Network offer it on PPV and RCN Corp. carries it as an SVOD service. Here! TVs varied on-demand services are available to cable via InDemand and TVN, with Time Warner Cable in Wisconsin among those offering the VOD service.
On-demand pricing is in the neighborhood of $3.99 to $9.99.
Another premium service targeting the gay audience, Q Television Network, is slated to start doing live programming Oct. 14, CEO Frank Olsen said. Priced at $7.95 a month, it will be producing a three-hour live weeknight block, including a two-hour talk program and a sports show, that will get repeat airings.
Q Television is carried by RCN Corp. in San Francisco, and last week began being carried by all RCNs systems, Olsen said. The network also has a hunting license carriage deal with Time Warner Cable.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Makes it harder for us unfortunately doesnt it? Has anyone been able to see Here! TV and QTE to compare?As Whiz says, "all we need to do is launch." I'm sure the first station that does go national will be the one to survive. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 09, 2004).]
You're right! The first one that truely goes national will have a leg up on the other two.
The shake out doesn't have to be so negative either. Look for a merger between two of them before a year & a half passes.
Remember, Frank has a history of getting media companies up & running before cashing in for a hefty profit!
This market is young & contrary to popular belief presently there's room enough for three. Yet only two are on the air. And only one of the two was mentioned by CNBC!
My money's on QBID,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I only wish for now that QTE's website was as nice as Logo's at least. Here!'s really impressed me. Matt
It will be!
------------------
whizknock
Ric
How many network websites have you visited?
I've been watching TV for over 40 years and made my first visit to a TV network website only after I bought QBID stock. At this point I'm more concerned about carriers and subscribers than I am about websites.
With an interactive show, QTN will be upgrading the website as needed.
Try to relax and enjoy the show. Isn't it wonderful to watch QBID's story unfold?
GLTA!
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Only thing that is getting me is I sold WNMI to buy some more Q too early. If I waited I could have bought twice as much, lol.Ric
Me too! & now it wants to move, Schittttt!
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
Matt,How many network websites have you visited?
I've been watching TV for over 40 years and made my first visit to a TV network website only after I bought QBID stock. At this point I'm more concerned about carriers and subscribers than I am about websites.
With an interactive show, QTN will be upgrading the website as needed.
Try to relax and enjoy the show. Isn't it wonderful to watch QBID's story unfold?
GLTA!
I'm 55 & growing up I watched my father go to work every day for 30 years to ABCs channel 7 in Washington DC. I watched him & his co-workers help produce the most powerful communication medium in the history of humanity. Just look at the deal the NFL signed with CBS & FOX! And that was for just a fraction of overall TV airtime. Just two of the networks paying $8 Billion Dollars for some Sundays.
Yep! I'm thoroughly loving watching this unfold! After all,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
By: vegasdave85044
09 Nov 2004, 03:32 PM EST
Msg. 624465 of 624783
Jump to msg. #
schmoogie>>
perhaps you are unaware of the contracts we currently have with Comcast/adelphia/TW??? The sat companies i am not sure of at this time. The PR will come when the back-office stuff is ready to go, such as inputting the programmin schedules...Until this is done we wait at the stop-light knowing it will eventually turn green!!
By: schmoogiepie
09 Nov 2004, 03:33 PM EST
Msg. 624466 of 624783
(This msg. is a reply to 624465 by vegasdave85044.)
Jump to msg. #
vegas you know this as fact
By: vegasdave85044
09 Nov 2004, 03:35 PM EST
Msg. 624471 of 624783
(This msg. is a reply to 624466 by schmoogiepie.)
Jump to msg. #
from what i was told--- YES
By: zandant
09 Nov 2004, 04:22 PM EST
Msg. 624588 of 624783
(This msg. is a reply to 624511 by vegasdave85044.)
Jump to msg. #
vegas - in one of your earlier posts, you mentioned Comcast and Adelphia. Any word on those companies with respect to the timeline. Z
By: vegasdave85044
09 Nov 2004, 04:31 PM EST
Msg. 624600 of 624784
(This msg. is a reply to 624588 by zandant.)
Jump to msg. #
after TW NYC
Adelphia SB JAN--remember they have the BK with TW and comacast bidding so i'm not sure how that plays out with the contract talks
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 10, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 10, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
Matt,How many network websites have you visited?
I've been watching TV for over 40 years and made my first visit to a TV network website only after I bought QBID stock. At this point I'm more concerned about carriers and subscribers than I am about websites.
With an interactive show, QTN will be upgrading the website as needed.
Try to relax and enjoy the show. Isn't it wonderful to watch QBID's story unfold?
GLTA!
I am not an avid television watcher so I can't comment on how many network websites I visit. I have visited a few to get schedules for some of my favored shows.
What you need to think about however is the rising number of homosexuals that are using the internet. The internet is a place you can be faceless if need be so a lot more homosexuals are using the internet because it can be safer and less discriminating.
http://www.whorlpool.905host.net/files/edarchive13.htm
That website estimates 22 million homosexuals will be using the internet in 2005. You also need to take into consideration the example of espn, msnbc, etc. All these networks have websites that they use to poll viewers on topics and then give the results of the viewers answers within minutes on the show. Since QTE will have a large live section that could be crucial. This also is a direct way to show advertisers just how large the viewing community is for QTE.
Just take for example, www.gay.com GO THERE RIGHT NOW! It's 2 am on the east coast so 11 pm on the west coast. Right now there are 21 THOUSAND people on the site RIGHT NOW. Then even more staggering is you can search through over 4.4 MILLION member profiles. That is just for that one website. So think about that.
If there are 34 million gay people in the US with a disposable income of 600 billion that averages to $17647 disposable income per person. So at this instant there is 370 million in disposable income spending time on gay.com. All together on gay.com there is a disposable income of 77 billion registered to that site. You'll notice that every major network website also has banner advertisements of some sort. This is just one more way for QBID to earn money.
To me, a professional website is extremely important. Sometimes people get jobs because they look intelligent and professional. That is how the world works.
But you are correct; at this point carriers and subscribers are more important. Although I'm sure for a small amount such as 10 grand; Frank could probably hire a firm to build the site for them without QTE having to look over their shoulder. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 10, 2004).]
Population by city's that RCN supports.
NYC = 8,008,278
Chicago = 2,896,016
Philadelphia = 1,517,550
San Fransisco = 776,733
Boston = 589,141
Washington DC = 572,059
Total People Q Telelvision will be viewable for is 14,359,777!!
QBID HAS MOVED OUT OF THE OVERSOLD POSITION.
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Just being on RCN, look how many potential people we can make aware of Q Television. Of course they're not all gay and of course they're not all signed up with RCN.Population by city's that RCN supports.
NYC = 8,008,278
Chicago = 2,896,016
Philadelphia = 1,517,550
San Fransisco = 776,733
Boston = 589,141
Washington DC = 572,059Total People Q Telelvision will be viewable for is 14,359,777!!
Hard to look at this value though. You don't pay for a fishing channel if you dont like fishing.
QBID no longer oversold? Should we expect to see some green in the near future? Matt
Thanks for any info.
So for us QBIDers this is a good thing because if a stock is oversold there is usally a rebound in price once the selling slows. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
GOOD MORNING ALL,QBID HAS MOVED OUT OF THE OVERSOLD POSITION.
Now the question is... when will the MM"s let go of the bid and let this thing loose again. 11:20 and only 19.million so far.
Houston...... WE HAVE A PROBLEM...!!!!
Perhaps soon we will be worrying about how we will be spending our profits!
Gaywatch: Battle of the gay networks
by Christine Champagne
Most of you have likely heard about the impending launch of Logo. It's not exactly a surprise, given that the gay cable network enjoys the cachet and promotional muscle of its parent company Viacom.
But there are two gay start-up networks already out there -- here! TV and Q Television Network -- that have gotten a jump on establishing identities and attracting viewers, and if you are one of those TV junkies who can't get enough gay programming, you might want to check them out.
Here! TV was the first to hit the airwaves, debuting in 2002 with a limited schedule before going 24/7 this month. Available to satellite and cable operators through In Demand and TVN and offered as a VOD, SVOD or pay-per-view service, here! TV recently expanded its reach to cable households in Boston, Chicago, Milwaukee, New York City, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.
Founded by Stephen Jarchow and Paul Colichman -- who are also the founders of Regent Entertainment, a film studio in Los Angeles -- here! TV's claim to fame thus far has been its massive library of gay and lesbian programming. The network's collection recently increased when here! acquired the U.S. television broadcasting rights to the gay and lesbian titles in MGM's film library. Among them are "Longtime Companion," "Go Fish" and "Jeffrey."
Here! TV has also generated new content, producing a series of original movies, including the upcoming "Too Cool for Christmas." Billed as the first-ever gay-themed family holiday special, "Too Cool for Christmas" premieres in December and stars George Hamilton, Brooke Nevin and Donna Mills. Directed by openly gay director Sam Irvin, the film tells the story of a girl who would rather spend the holidays with her boyfriend than her two dads.
As for original series, here! TV's efforts range from the gay and lesbian gothic horror thriller "Dante's Cove" to "Here! Family," a 12-episode series hosted by Michelle Darne and inspired by her magazine "And Baby."
"The gay and lesbian community has embraced us because we offer them the broad array of entertaining, original and exclusive content that they've been searching for -- but not finding enough of -- on multichannel television," says Colichman, who is president of the network.
Like here! TV, Q Television Network, a premium service launched in September 2004 and available in various markets through RCN, offers a mix of acquired and original programming. Among the network's original programs are a talk show called "Women on Women" and "Q on the Move," a gay travel series. It also produced a documentary on gay marriage entitled "I Will, I Do, We Did."
A wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi Media, Q Television Network also just announced that it has obtained the rights to air live and taped coverage of Gay Games VII, which take place in Chicago from July 15 to 22, 2006.
According to executive vice president Steven Grunberg, Q Television Network stands out because it strives to truly serve the LGBT community.
"This [network] is built by and for the gay community. Rather than a smattering of stereotyped gay characters offered because current market projections indicate it would be profitable, we offer a channel that will unite the gay and lesbian audience through a network that educates, entertains and informs," Grunberg says.
Can the market support a trio of networks that all aim to support the same niche audience? Probably not. Only one or two of these endeavors is likely to survive. But until the inevitable shakeout occurs, the LGBT audience can enjoy a plethora of choices when it comes to gay-oriented programming.
Matt
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 10, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
logo has viacom backing it. its parent already has contrcts with every cable company out there and can force them to add it to the line-up[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 10, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 10, 2004).]
There's a something going on here.
dz
PALM SPRINGS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 10, 2004--Q Television Network (Pink Sheets:QBID - News), announced today that the company had great success at the Gay Life Expo in New York City. The network secured $1 Million plus in sponsorships and also signed up several hundred potential subscribers.
"The Gay Life Expo was a great forum for us to showcase our offerings to hundreds of potential viewers. We are thrilled with the connections we made at the Expo," said Frank Olsen, President and CEO of Q Television Network. "In addition, we are in the process of expanding into many major markets and negotiating with other major cable carriers."
Q Television's explosive growth continues as the company is also in the process of finalizing the deal for its 4000 title movie library. Q Television is now live in San Francisco, Manhattan and Boston on Channel 255.
About Q Television Network
Q Television Network is an AFFILIATE of Triangle Multi Media. Q Television was organized to create and develop a network devoted to providing television programming for the gay and lesbian community. The company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population. Management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public. The company's programming will be available on a subscription basis to those interested in its programming. The network will broadcast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The network will be available across the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico, through satellite distribution.
dz
beat me to it T!
looks good to me
hope this Q goes green,
for the last 2 weeks i been sitting infront of this PC...
------------------
Facta Non Verba
dz
quote:
Originally posted by CashRules:
Can someone explain why Logo is at .55 and has not aired yet but Q television which did air is at .0027?
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
ugghh!!! mm's love to manipulate when their is good news.
not everything can be blamed on the MM's...
------------------
78.23% of all statistics are made up on the spot...The other 35% are made up later on.
Should be well above the current pps. It's a shame.
dz
MACD is flat
DMI spreading apart in the wrong direction
Fast Stoch is flat
Doesn't mean they couldn't turn quickly but they haven't turned yet and don't look good right now.
Ric
I hate seeing shares dumped when news comes out. Smacks of insider selling.
dz
I don't know what is going on.
Frank needs to regain credibility with shareholders...only concrete info will work now.
Hope you guys are doing well.
Miss talking with ya'll...(TX accent...LOL)
Heading out for now.
Take care.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by qnique:
Man I am starting to think this stock ain't got a snowballs chance in he(( of going up. I been following this stock since April an I am just amazed at the fact that this stock is so far in the dumps right now. This stock should be atleast at .25. I'm still hold my shares but I am starting to be a non believer. What is gonna make this stock move, WHAT.
I'm also getting very frustrated, still holding almost 3mil. red shares.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Not sure about not being oversold. I see a RSI of 33.97 thats up from yesterdays 32.47 but not much. It is still a oversold situation.MACD is flat
DMI spreading apart in the wrong direction
Fast Stoch is flatDoesn't mean they couldn't turn quickly but they haven't turned yet and don't look good right now.
Ric
I won't believe something just because Frank says its so. Not anymore.
Also, what makes you think dilution is finished?
Why buy back and dilute at the same time?
Frank should anwer that.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Well, its a lot like the other pennies that were doing great, dilution. We may not have knew about the dilution but the MM's did. I mean we went from a 3.5Billion float in Feb to a 9.5 Billion now. That should have decreased our value by 2/3 and with the economy and elections it went a little further. The MM's knew because someone had to sell those company shares that were being added to the market. Now that dilution is finished hopefully we can start moving forward. I think there is a lot of wonder out there thats slowing down progress too. I mean Logo, non reporting, and contracts. Once the contracts are made known we will see good movement.Ric
i cant take this pps any longer
i managed to avg down to .004 from when i initally jumped in at .01
but regardless the reason why i kept buying and not bailing (trust me if it was any other stock i would have been long out) is because i believe in the potential of this stock and i know this company will be very profitable
its like having your first baby...ur so excited to bring it home and u realize though that it keeps u up, lose sleep over it and it was more than u expected or asked for. Then as that annoying beautiful baby grows you appreciate the first milestones such as taking first step
first day of school
and eventually graduation and marriage
this is the way i feel about Q, its like my little child and im waiting for it to grow and give me satifaction and at the end i can say.. to myself
now i feel like my child is messing up and im frustrated
but at the end a child costs u money and Q will make me some
------------------
Facta Non Verba
dz
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
But how can we really know for sure if Frank bought back those shares? Can we call the transfer agent for confirmation?I won't believe something just because Frank says its so. Not anymore.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
Ric
I don't get it.
IMHO, this should NOT be in an oversold position, considering that Frank just finished buying back 600,000,000 million shares. That's on top of "good news", this past month.I'm also getting very frustrated, still holding almost 3mil. red shares.
dz
We don't know what O/S is now just Float, so all I have to compare is float.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
Where did you get those #s?
I was in this at .0007, in Feb. or March, and my understanding then was that the float was 7.5 billion.Also, what makes you think dilution is finished?
Why buy back and dilute at the same time?
Frank should anwer that.dz
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 10, 2004).]
Oh well. It's a very legitimate and serious question.
P.S. If this is the metaphoric 'child,' then I'd say right about now he/she needs a good, old-fashioned spanking...with a follow up of time-out... LOL
Really must head out now...take care.
dz
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Hi RIC!! Hope you are having a good day...and that the family is doing well.Really must head out now...take care.
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Oh, me too. Be careful...LOL...people should start yelling any minute now. Especially now that I've brought it again.Oh well. It's a very legitimate and serious question.
P.S. If this is the metaphoric 'child,' then I'd say right about now he/she needs a good, old-fashioned spanking...with a follow up of time-out... LOL
and no blues clues for the day. (that's the killer)
I am still in favor of this stock's potential because I see the other players throwing their full weight at the same project and market. This certifies thje gay/lesbian market as viable and ready for the effort.
I also still think qbid in particualr as a viable stock because of the enormous effort in place building the groundwork. They have a long history of talking to the potential advertisers, many of whom gave them a reuirement or goal to reach before they would be considered, such as, get into so many cities or markets and we will come on board. I think Frank and crew have been working diligently on their project and are now about to reap the rewards, and for a rtelatively tiny effort we are all along for the ride.
On the topic of listing advertisers or sponsors for subsciribers, or the "potential" subscribers, I don;t think its about embarrasment or anything else.
I believe the companies they met at the Gay Expo have all "come out of the closet". They all were listed on the expo listing, so they aren't shy about it at all.
Potential subsribers was used instead of subscribers because currently the channel is broadcast without scrambling, so subscriptions have not kicked in yet.
I think we are getting mired in our analysis of events and we need to not get too granular about things. Their website will grow. I develop websites my self and know that until their is an audience it is difficult to cater to the audience. Without a solid content flow, a staff to maintain it, and some data on what people are looking for from you, building an exciting site is kinda hard. $10,000 would not give them a solid website with all the human and hardware overhead that goes with it.
Lets not get too down on these guys on the eve of our success. It is close, it is just frustrating. This is the end of the year. Many large corporations have frozen budgets now, decision makers are on vacations (or corporate retreats in warm climates), and money is just not flowing freely. Jan 1 will see many budgets freed up, so hold on tight.
I am still very curious about the seemingly endless flow of low price sellers though, I thought for a while they were short sellers at .003 who covered at .0028 but its not usually a marginable stock. So I really don't know any more.
TOO funny, and damn right! "No Blue's Clues and no "Dora Dora, either." LMAO
Good to see you!
It is not a marginable stock to you and me but MM's can short and do short to the extent of breaking the law.
On your other point, I don't think Franks lying. I think he is not giving the information to know the facts. Yes this can be a great investment. But if you don't know the facts it makes it harder for new investors and corporate investors to come on board. And these people cause large increase in pps.
Never fall in love with a stock. Make money from it.
Ric
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 10, 2004).]
help!
------------------
Facta Non Verba
dz
I am still very curious about the seemingly endless flow of low price sellers though, I thought for a while they were short sellers at .003 who covered at .0028 but its not usually a marginable stock. So I really don't know any more.[/B][/QUOTE
dz
If I understand right, the theory is that a market maker or direct trader/floor trader is selling qbid short to raise capital for trading on another stock, and then never covering the qbid short sale or at least not covering by buying / covering with qbid stock, just settling in cash directly to the exchange if thats even possible. This can't continue indefinitely without raising some alarms and closing that operation down. I unfortunately don't know the true details of how this kind of thing can be accomplished so my theory likely has holes.
And yes I have seen the same pattern for a long while now, news of a good profitable nature is released and somehow the price drops, blows me away. qbid abides by inverse rules for now.
I also agree that if MM's were truly in charge of the price at this point they would have forced Frank to buy back at a higher price. So thats out.
[This message has been edited by Scoundrel (edited November 10, 2004).]
I will say this on any stock that I own. CEO's do not have stockholders best interest in there goals. They want their company to make it and make money. Investors are second. Hopefully his goal of making a better company helps us but there are thing that can help the company and hurt the investor. Like diluting shares to raise capital. He needs money to run the company and if getting that money hurts the common investor so be it. It doesn't hurt his investment because for every dollar issued to float a dollar is given to him so he maintaind the 53% ownership.
Now the Board of Directors are suppose to limit this and is for the investor. But since the CEO is the BOD then its not helpful.
Ric
QBID will be a great investment. I think we will be over a dime in under 4 months.
Ric
Ric
I would rather they worry about getting the channel up and running before they concern themselves with the web site.
websites can look really good but the product isn't that great. Look at CMKX big web page, Racing cars all decked out, and what are they offering their share holders other then shares that may never hit the market.
Be happy with what we have in the network. rejoice in the quality of the product, not the way they pump it up to look.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I only wish for now that QTE's website was as nice as Logo's at least. Here!'s really impressed me. Matt
good news today and as usual the pps went down lol.
I keep hoping one of these days I am gonna boot the puter up and see the pps out of the sub penny level.
they say good things come to those who wait well we shall see.
good luck and have a good evening everyone
I am sure a number of folks went thru the IBIZ debacle and hopefully this does not happen again.
We are approaching Feb-2005 very fast for the LOGO launch if that is on schedule.
and what about Here!TV, another competitor and already a number of gay-type shows are on television.
We need the target audience to actually say either here or in the media that they would actually subscribe to the network and be done with it. This guy Frank couldn't care less about us, especially if we don't subscribe, all our shares are way less than 1% of the o/s, there probably will be an r/s if nothing else raises the price.
The best may be an anouncement of other carriers and a short spike to escape with some profits.
I figure there are a very few steps to market recognition which will improve the stock price.
1) raise shareholder confidence by releasing a non-vague PR laying out exactly what has been accomplished, to include who has signed deals and a count of what is on the table being actively pursued.
2) A financial statement showing dollars in and dollars out as well as the whole stock position regarding O/S, A/S and the distributions of those shares with a solid handle on float.
3) Issue a minimum of weekly PR's even if nothing new has occured. This has the effect of keeping people working toward that next release, because if nothing new has happened, they didnt earn their pay. Also, those PR's need to be original, not copied from someone else's PR even if you have their blessing. The PR should be released once a week at a minimum, and not at market close on Friday.
Those are the 3 steps toward improving the acceptance and confidence in terms of the stock image, as for the success of the product, I have no idea what is needed there. I imagine Time Warner is friendlier toward Viacomm, but surely there is room for both channels. Somehow the networks need to be coaxed into carrying the channel, but it may take time and some results from the current deployments to make those sales.
quote:
Originally posted by Marva18:
Instead of talking about o/s and anything else no one has the facts on, has anyone actually seen for themselves QTV on RCN in the cities they supposedly are on.I am sure a number of folks went thru the IBIZ debacle and hopefully this does not happen again.
We are approaching Feb-2005 very fast for the LOGO launch if that is on schedule.
and what about Here!TV, another competitor and already a number of gay-type shows are on television.We need the target audience to actually say either here or in the media that they would actually subscribe to the network and be done with it. This guy Frank couldn't care less about us, especially if we don't subscribe, all our shares are way less than 1% of the o/s, there probably will be an r/s if nothing else raises the price.
The best may be an anouncement of other carriers and a short spike to escape with some profits.
Yes Marv,,Talk to Skunks on the IHUB thread.
He lives in Boston. He has Q Television Network. Mny have seen the programming.
PS It will have LIVE broadcasting this month.
WOW etc. Lots of great DD out there for you to catch up on.
Good Luck,
McFly
Is the MARKET open tomorrow...Veteran's Day...Kids are out of school, but not sure if the Market is up and running...THANKS Qbidders!
Take care.
Market is Open
You tha MAN. LOL
Have a good evening.
and a few protein shakes for those that prefer them
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
welcome back sunny I am here just got back from the store figured I better have a couple beers tonight lol.
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 10, 2004).]
we miss you
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
beer and whiskey seems to make for a higher price the next day. start pouring them into you. I will line up a round of tequila for everyone to get started with.and a few protein shakes for those that prefer them
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 10, 2004).]
Im more of a vodka man. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Im more of a vodka man. Matt
I forget which is which blue label and gold label are 18 and 20 year old scotch just dont remember which is which I know one is about 60 bucks a bottle and the other is about 160 lol big difference for 2 years
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
im a chivas regal man myself i like my scotch
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Frey:
http://www.allstocks.com/html/stock_markets_holidays.htmlMarket is Open
All should read :
By: canarynsx
10 Nov 2004, 04:47 PM EST
Msg. 625835 of 625835
Jump to msg. #
"I went to see Q Television Network"
Hey what's up everyone. I went to see Q Television Network at the Jacob Javits Center in NYC on Sunday. It's about 35 mins away from where I live. All I can say is Q Television is definetly the real deal. They had advertisements all over their booth. Plasma TV's running their advertisements all day long. There was a Q Reps taking people's information down for signing up for Q Television Network. Their booth was packed non-stop. I watched from the sidelines as people just stood around the booth and watched the advertisements on TV and signed a form for info on the network and how to sign up. It was Awesome!! So many people where signing the forms to get Q on their TV. I feel so confident now. I don't care what anyone says on any of these message boards.. I guess I just needed to be reassured I invested in something I believe in and I sure do believe in Q Television Network. The reps answered many questions I had lined up and they where very polite.
Good Luck everyone!
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 10, 2004).]
Is it out of the question for the investors to each donate $10 bucks or so to have one of us go out there and speak directly with Frank and Steve? Perhaps take some pictures of the offices and watch the business work during the day? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I'm wondering what a typical day is like at QBID these days. What is it that takes so long for a company to national. I realize it is a daunting task and I'm not saying they're doing a terrible job. I'd just like to know what the offices are doing now.Is it out of the question for the investors to each donate $10 bucks or so to have one of us go out there and speak directly with Frank and Steve? Perhaps take some pictures of the offices and watch the business work during the day? Matt
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
dont even go there lol you are going to invoke a riot with that plan
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
dont even go there lol you are going to invoke a riot with that plan
Ha...it would be a trip to Palm Springs, CA for one lucky investor. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Rod, Ric,etc., you drunks still awake? Man, it's been a long day...got raped and pillaged by TTCS today...and the Q hitting .0025.....it's still my birthday for 48 more minutes...While I wished I was going to get screwed today, I didn't envision it being by my stocks!!!!HA!!!LOL!!
Terry
Happy Birthday Terry!
Your next birthday you'll be wealthy beyond your wildest dreams!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by ron4498:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bob Frey:
[b] http://www.allstocks.com/html/stock_markets_holidays.htmlMarket is Open
All should read :
By: canarynsx
10 Nov 2004, 04:47 PM EST
Msg. 625835 of 625835
Jump to msg. #
"I went to see Q Television Network"
Hey what's up everyone. I went to see Q Television Network at the Jacob Javits Center in NYC on Sunday. It's about 35 mins away from where I live. All I can say is Q Television is definetly the real deal. They had advertisements all over their booth. Plasma TV's running their advertisements all day long. There was a Q Reps taking people's information down for signing up for Q Television Network. Their booth was packed non-stop. I watched from the sidelines as people just stood around the booth and watched the advertisements on TV and signed a form for info on the network and how to sign up. It was Awesome!! So many people where signing the forms to get Q on their TV. I feel so confident now. I don't care what anyone says on any of these message boards.. I guess I just needed to be reassured I invested in something I believe in and I sure do believe in Q Television Network. The reps answered many questions I had lined up and they where very polite.
Good Luck everyone!
[/B][/QUOTE]
I keep telling you all,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 11, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
I keep telling you all,,,"All we ever had to do is launch!"
To be honest I think you should change that to "All we ever HAVE to do is launch!" To say All we ever HAD to do is like saying we're in the future and QBID never did anything. Almost scares me to think like that. Matt
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Rod, Ric,etc., you drunks still awake? Man, it's been a long day...got raped and pillaged by TTCS today...and the Q hitting .0025.....it's still my birthday for 48 more minutes...While I wished I was going to get screwed today, I didn't envision it being by my stocks!!!!HA!!!LOL!!
Terry
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Ha...it would be a trip to Palm Springs, CA for one lucky investor. Matt
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 11, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Whiz, Ric, Matt...I've updated my previous post.
Terry
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
Its a quote from a Frank Olsen comment a while back. And it is worded like that because we have already launched. The hard part for Qbid is done, now they have the technical parts and qualifications over wiuth and can begin pulling in the money.
Actually it's a quote I've been using since March. I used to say "All we have to do is launch!" Now it's fact accomplished!
I tried to tell people in February that all the really hard work had to be done before a network could even get on the air & that "when" we finally broadcast signal to the public that the most dificult job had been accomplished. But I went on to say that event, in & of it self, would not take us over a dime let alone a buck, but it would open the door to all the opportunity for us to reach those milestones.
We've launched for all intents & purposes & that's all we ever had to do! Everything else will fall in place.
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Thanks Whiz! I'm going to hold you to that!!!LOL! And thanks for the threads and other postings that you and 1Big do to help maintain morale....it definitely helps.
Terry
P.S. 2 1/2 mil at this point and holding. I wasn't in til the .0055's and subsequently lower. And Matt, you're misreading, HAD means that we've accomplished the launch(signal is broadcasting)!!!! And Ric, Happy Belated Birthday![This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 11, 2004).]
Yep! You're 100% correct!
------------------
whizknock
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Ric, Iv'e got 8 years(less 3 days) on ya. You're still just a kid.LOL! Enjoy your youth!!! Have a good evening, Ric and everyone else!
Terry
Dam we getting that old in here!
By: badhabits62
10 Nov 2004, 09:17 PM EST
Msg. 64491 of 64514
Jump to msg. #
LETTER FROM TIME WARNER!!!>
Good Morning,
Thank you for replying to our Email Newsletter; we appreciate the opportunity to address our customerβs questions and concerns.
Currently our Corporate Programming group is in negotiation with Q for carriage. Upon resolution of this contract, TWC South Carolina will make a determination as to the carriage of this network. In all probability it will be offered for an additional monthly subscription as in a
premium network or on a tier.
Thank you for your patronage and please let me know if you have any
additional questions,
Diana Smith
Director of Marketing for Video Services
Time Warner Cable South Carolina
------------------
whizknock
http://www.rolandjoseph.tv/1minnewCR.mov
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Nice...there's too many good things happening recently for this not to climb...in time the pps will have to adjust to all this positive information. Announcement of major carrier will kick this into motion..up,up,up...the only true understanding I have of candlesticks relates to Madonna and hot wax...so I'll digress...may GREEN be our future..
Terry
I think a monster run will hit when we least expect it. To me it doesn't make that big a difference. My core position is on sale now for $1.25! Short of that I'll be holding for a long time!
------------------
whizknock
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Past the 1.25, What do you think the potential is and what time frame?
Terry
Terry!
It's possible for this to see a dollar based on a $600 Billion Dollar target. However I have a sinking feeling that I may never see a dollar only because Frank admits to & has a documented history of developing media companies & selling them. Hope we go through a dollar first but he will sell at some point & if I had to guess & put a cash value to him selling, I would take a shot in the dark & say about .38 only because anything more than that would mean he's not selling for three or more years. I believe he sells sometime within 2 & 1/2 years. We could see a buck by then but i don't think so. Just my very humble opinion this morning & subject to change after some sleep!
I do know this! Frank will sell at some point & it will be a whole lot more than it's worth today.
"All we evr had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
Posted by: yelmight
In reply to: dkgross who wrote msg# 35366 Date:11/10/2004 11:17:29 PM
Post #of 35446
Agree in part. Average down can ease the
overall lost or can increase it. Pinks are
like the crap tables. They are a roll of
the dice, they are that elusive mountain
stream where you suspect flakes of gold
have been harvested by a long departed
prospector. Averaging down might work, you
can also roll a snake eyes once in
awhile. Anyone's guess is as good as the
others. What sets this one aside is that
we have a very big buyer, 2.5 billion shares
we also have a partner in Firestone, most
important we are moving forwards in the
right direction. QBID has been around for 5
years, most penny stock folds in one-or-two years.
Still a crap shoot. Your guess is as good as
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
Actually it's a quote I've been using since March. I used to say "All we have to do is launch!" Now it's fact accomplished!I tried to tell people in February that all the really hard work had to be done before a network could even get on the air & that "when" we finally broadcast signal to the public that the most dificult job had been accomplished. But I went on to say that event, in & of it self, would not take us over a dime let alone a buck, but it would open the door to all the opportunity for us to reach those milestones.
We've launched for all intents & purposes & that's all we ever had to do! Everything else will fall in place.
I always assumed the launch was referring to going national and really tapping in to the entire gay population. Oh well.
What would it mean for the investors if Frank sold at .38? Would that put the company at a value of $1 billion?
After a sell what kind of activity usually occurs? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I always assumed the launch was referring to going national and really tapping in to the entire gay population. Oh well.What would it mean for the investors if Frank sold at .38? Would that put the company at a value of $1 billion?
After a sell what kind of activity usually occurs? Matt
Matt,
i do not have answer for everyone here, but for myself at .38. if that happens, i have to send a big chunk to revenue canada, another big chunk to retire my mortgage, buy my lady a big diamond (not from CMKX), stop using cloth diapers for my children. and if anyone asks me what i do for a living then, tell them, i only work for foods. and by the way, all the MMs, kiss my a#$%%#.
Terry, again, happy birthday; same with you Ric.
Qbidder and everyone else, Long live the Q.
Whiz and everyone, thank you for keeping up the Q spirit. We need it when Q is in the red.
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 11, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 11, 2004).]
#1. The obvious reason, money. Some people bought the stock in the .0001 range and decided to sell and take their profits or at least take some of their money off the table.
#2. Maybe some people still think it is to big of a gamble for them and they do not want to tie up their funds for the holiday.
#3. Some people sold yesterday because they bought high and decided to cut their losses and run. Looking at their portfolio balance sheet instead of potential.
#4. Maybe some people just realized that Q Television Network is not world wide yet. There is some more work to be done. They lost their vision.
Whatever the reason: I am excited. Excited over all the progress of QTN! I was seriously considering buying more shares at .0035. Now I bought 1 million more shares at .0026. I know you think I am nuts. Everyday I just seem to see the pending potential more clearly. To own shares of a TV Network for .0026 is simply amazing!
I the pps will jump with the Advertisers being announced, then another with a new carrier contract, then another bump with the increased and maintained subscripiton level.
I do beleive we will see the pps at that point. I hope Frank and co. decide to hold and not sell.
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I still don't understand why selling the company is a bad thing. At least thats how you guys are making it sound. In the article I posted about the hispanic channels, several companies like Viacom were willing to pay a lot more money for a company than it is actually worth. Besides the fact that possibly getting bought out by a huge network provider like Viacom/TW and earning trust by more investors, wouldn't the buy out possibly raise the PPS simply on the purchase price? What am I misunderstanding? Matt
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
dont even go there lol you are going to invoke a riot with that plan
I would rather donate $10.00 to the send U4 to therapy for his bi-polar disorder.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
So if you own 1,000,000 shares you then would own 250,000. Or they may dissolve the company and absorb some assets/contracts making our stock worthless at that point.
The good possibility is the buyer may merge us with their own share holders, but that would likely lower their stock value initially which their board of directors would dislike.
So, unless I am way off base, a sale of the company is not all that great a thing for us. I do not expect it to happen any time before Franks stock is worth approx $1billion. So if he has 5billion shares, thats $.20. And if there is solid momentum going I imagine he would hold out for a good bit more.
Many many many company leaders form companies with the express purpose of selling them once they reach a certain target. They get the company functional and attractive, build a system for their workflow, and then they load their sales queue with pending deals for new business. At this point they begin taking offers to sell out. The individual who does this is not evil by any means, he is just the personality type that doesn't like routine office jobs or daily operations. They like to create, and move on. So they focus on that aspect and tend to do it well. Frank has demonstrated this trait in the past, so he will continue to do so. Its not a bad thing, just need to keep the possibility in mind and not get burned by it.
I worked for a man who kept saying the first employee to reach 5 yrs with the company would earn a Rolls Royce. Well obviously he was the first employee of the company since it was his, and there was only 1 prize. He sold the company at 5yrs almost to the day, took his few million, bought his Rolls, and his wife divorced him taking about 60% of the money, which we all enjoyed seeing. She did actually work for the company at least along the way. Anyway, I digress.
We are a long way from a company sale for the moment. There is no negative news hold this company back, everything is positive. The pressure is building for the price to rise and much like a volcano the initial jump should be pretty amazing. I would love to know what is nailling the price down to the .003 cap though, so if any hardcore traders have a really detailed transaction analysis of some kind I would love to see it.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
I would rather donate $10.00 to the send U4 to therapy for his bi-polar disorder.
dz
DZ--GREAT TALKING TO YOU THIS A.M. I HOPE QBID SEE'S GREEN A LITTLE MORE OFTEN. LOL THAT GREEN WAS PRETTY SHORT LIVED!! LOL
GUYS--IF YOU OWN 2000.00 DOLLARS WORTH OF QBID AND THE STOCK SELLS TO A COMPANY THAT PPS IS 4.00--YOU WILL OWN 2000.00 DOLLARS WORTH OF THAT COMPANY. :D MAJOR DRAWBACK IS 4.00 STOCK IS NOT AS LIKE T0 DOUBLE AS A .0028 STOCK. I DON'T EXPECT THIS COMPANY TO BE SOLD ANYWAY UNTIL LOTS OF MAJOR CHANGES ARE MADE. REPORTING FOR ONE!! JMHO
im starting to really think this is massively diluted and what pisses me off is that I never got straight answers on this issue...i feel as an investor i am entitled to know what the numbers are
i cant wait til Jan to have this move up!!!
im not abandoning ship, holding strong and long...but im saying info is what i want
------------------
Facta Non Verba
please take a moment to reflect on those men and women who have in the past and are now doing the service of this great country...
they don't all come home, and those that do will never forget...
------------------
Facta Non Verba
dz
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
GREEEEN!!!!dz
wheres everyone?
nice day today in CHItown
im gonna get out of here, think i need a break for a day
take care everyone
------------------
Facta Non Verba
It heartened me when I read the post of some on the Off topic board. They felt that the soldiers life was somehow not as important as a citizen who dies for no cause. They say that we knew the risks when signing up for duty and if we die it was our job. Most of us who sign up do it for the adventure and service but I grant you we never think about death when we join. I joined for the college education but a lot join because of the recruiter who gave them a dream when they have none. When you are 18 and your life seems doomed the service can look good when you are given a glamar picture of service. The service gives you a sense of respect, honor of country, and bravery but one thing they don't teach you is the horrors of war and what it will be like if your injuried with little hope after service. Veterans with no legs who lost all hope homeless. veterans who have the mental flash backs of war who can not hold down a job. These are the ones who need us the most. And to all the veterans out there, Happy Veterans Day.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 11, 2004).]
Ric
check out MSEV and XING. They're heading in the right direction.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by CashRules:
Two buy orders just went in one for 6 million another for 9 million.
wish they were mine
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
I don't know all the possibilities but if the company is sold, which I am sure it will be once it hits a target value only Frank knows, the buyer might reverse split the stock for example, 1 to 4 for example, or more.So if you own 1,000,000 shares you then would own 250,000. Or they may dissolve the company and absorb some assets/contracts making our stock worthless at that point.
The good possibility is the buyer may merge us with their own share holders, but that would likely lower their stock value initially which their board of directors would dislike.
So, unless I am way off base, a sale of the company is not all that great a thing for us. I do not expect it to happen any time before Franks stock is worth approx $1billion. So if he has 5billion shares, thats $.20. And if there is solid momentum going I imagine he would hold out for a good bit more.
I don't know if you're entirely correct when you say a merger would lower the PPS of the parent company. Hypothetical situation. Time Warner buys out QTE. If they pay Frank straight up for the majority of the shares, yes TW loses money. Equally, it gains QTE as an asset to the company that is worth exactly as much as they paid for it. They're investing in QBID's success then just as much as we are. So are they really losing any value?
TWX has $6 billion worth of shares not being traded so it would be possible for them to give us our equivalent worth that we hold in QBID share in TWX shares.
Most likely they could also offer all QBID shareholders a Tender. Basically they try to buy our shares of the company by offering us a price for each of our shares that is higher than the current market price to entice us to sell. I'm sure most of you know about this already. This is what makes me think
Say we are offered a tender and if we don't take it we're given shares of TWX. Again this is just a hypothetical situation with TWX. Anyone could buy QBID and/or go about buying the company in a different manner. Anyways, say we're offered the tender or wait for the equal value TWX shares. Would any of us really want to wait for the TWX shares? The whole point of us investing in QBID is this stock has HUGE potential. It literally could make a lot of us millionaires.
Think about this though. If QBID didn't sell out and went to a value of $5 billion, what would the PPS be? 4-6? If QTE does the same performance but as part of TWX's shares, the PPS might only raise from $17 to $18 since TWX has a market cap of 78 billion. So do we as penny traders take the tender for the quick gain fix and forget about QTE or do we go from the possibilites and thrill of penny trading to a safer large cap stock that won't move nearly as much as QBID could. Run on sentance?
This just worries me because I feel that once this thing starts running, which it probably will soon enough, .20 can't be that far. I'm sure Frank couldn't feel bad about taking his billion and moving on, who wouldn't. To me it just seems like for all the trust, hope, and money we've all invested in QBID and Frank that it'd be a terrible thing to leave us hanging. I understand how he's the type that loves to create. It's like a quick fix. You build, create, and move on when things become clockwork. Perhaps QBID could be his baby though? He is a gay man. Has he done any other projects dealing with the homosexual community? If he has, anything as big as this? I guess I'm just a little physically tired and afraid of the thought that I wouldn't be able to get the full potential out of this stock. Ughhhhhhhhh....palms are sweaty. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 11, 2004).]
In a merger you "can" merge stockholders but its not required.
In a buyout the important aspects of the bought company are transferred to the buyer and the scrap is auctioned/trashed.
We are not currently at risk of a buyout or a merger though, so its just an argument over nothing. I expect the stock to get up to perhaps $.20 before being at risk of such a thing.
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
A buyout is not a merger. I was speaking of a buyout.In a merger you "can" merge stockholders but its not required.
In a buyout the important aspects of the bought company are transferred to the buyer and the scrap is auctioned/trashed.
We are not currently at risk of a buyout or a merger though, so its just an argument over nothing. I expect the stock to get up to perhaps $.20 before being at risk of such a thing.
Well if a companies pays you in shares or stock value wouldn't it still be a buyout? You're getting value for your shares. Only difference between that and a merger is in that case two stocks are dissolved and their value put into one new stock. Correct?
Yea it is a lot of counting the chickens before they hatch, almost literally, but as I said I feel once this thing moves .20 isn't too far away. That's just my opinion. Matt
What would you do in that situation?
Sell, or stick it out?
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 11, 2004).]
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
Thanks, dz
"affiliate" or "wholly-owned subsidiary" Q TELEVISION NETWORK, INC.
http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/search_detail.aspx?name=Q+TELEVISION+NETWORK%2c+INC.&ubi=602391767
[This message has been edited by King Crimson (edited November 11, 2004).]
QTN is abrev. for Q Television Network.
Triangle Multi Media Inc. is the name of the company that the ticker symbol belongs to.
In case you didn't know.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by sonnydbar:
buyouts, mergers,??? this company can barely hold a quarter of a penny! This is a tv network with a broadcast signal in a couple major markets in the US and this is all we can muster, pitiful. All we ever had to do is be managed by a businessman.
Thanks to all our veterans, it is the vets that has made this country great.
back to lurk-land
quote:
Originally posted by sonnydbar:
buyouts, mergers,??? this company can barely hold a quarter of a penny! This is a tv network with a broadcast signal in a couple major markets in the US and this is all we can muster, pitiful. All we ever had to do is be managed by a businessman.
Thanks to all our veterans, it is the vets that has made this country great.
back to lurk-land
Ha...touche'....doesn't hurt to dream
Maybe he has started selling them already.LOL
just joking around. shame on me.
dz
thanks
)) we were thinking about the same thing at the same time,... is this a confirmed statement on the shares being bought back ...???
[This message has been edited by gimmikk (edited November 11, 2004).]
dz
By my date... 6 weeks is over wouldnt u think.
would of ended last week. Yes?
2% buy back of OS/or preferred shares.
2% of what #, nobody really knows for sure.
I wonder if Frank even knows.
dz
[This message has been edited by denzen (edited November 11, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 11, 2004).]
GO QBID!!!!!! Bring On The Green.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Personally I feel they definately need a better spokesperson for QBID. As every time Frank says something the stock has tumbled since march.
Then.. for the love of whatever.. please stop posting vague and questionable PR's about the company. Anything that isnt factual and can"t be confirmed is like blowing hot air into a ballon with a hole at the other end...
Maybe I am wrong.. but it almost seems like they have intentionally given vague PR's with the intention to drive the price back down lower so maybe they could afford to do the buyback. Not certain just a thought.
I have a feeling we wont see too much green again untill a few things have happened...
1. PR entailing that the buyback is finnished with a total figure on just how many shares have been swallowed up.
2.Releasing info on another signed cable carrier or sky network.And when other markets will be coming on air.
3.1st months subcription figures .
4.A PR stating that the movie deal has been signed and sealed and all the movies are theirs to use,and is no longer in negotiation phase . I mean how long does it take to sign the dotted line on this.
5.And last but not least,who are the sponsors...??? and when can we expect to see hard cold figures on monthly or quarterly net income or at least disclose the "secret sponsors".
6. Not a major thing.. but please make a modern website. Sorry to say.. but appearence really is important to alot of the gay community. Style is king . Without it.. you just dont give off a good impression .
So like I stated.. I am not a basher/... Just hoping Frank and company starts getting a little more specific on the details and stop hiding behind vague PR's .
As Whiz keeps saying "All we had to do is launch" , Well we are launched in 3 major cities and the stock keeps dropping.
Well I say to that.. show me some figures and detailed specifics and I'll invest more.. untill then...well.. GLTA.
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
What a terrible day!!! I am as strong a supporter of QBID that there is. But even strong supporters have doubts at times. I would think that Frank should stop putting out "Fluff" PR that really does nothing for the pps. IMO the only PR's that will count will be the ones that give use names of other carriers and names of advertisers. The statements that they attended expos, conventions and shook many hands and talked to all kinds of potential advertisers are just not going to cut it. Sorry but that is my opinion, we need hard facts regarding advertisers who are backing us and carriers who are signing on. IMO nothing else is going to work to get the pps any higher, Frank needs to save the fluff. Blast me if you must but if you do please give me the reasons why the pps is not moving. Still long and holding here.GO QBID!!!!!! Bring On The Green.
Doc - you hit it on the nail head. The PR yesterday was all about nothing. We will see what happens the 15th with the "go live" programming. At this point, I'll be happy to get my money at breakeven.
O/S includes restricted shares period. All issued shares are part of O/S. that means if O/S is 9.5 then the 6 Billion is part of it leaving 3.5 Billion between us and Frank and thats crap. Please keep it a closed issue. They are not going to tell you something they don't tell everyone thats against the law for one. And the second is Frank is not going to have fewer shares then he gives the institutions because if he did and something happened they would have control of the company restricted or not. This is a dead issue because they never gave O/S they gave us parts of the O/S and never give us the total.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
Ric & I disagreed about the o/s a few days ago. in the cc frank said 9.5 in the float. i thought he used the wrong term as in float when he meant o/s. that same ? came up again so yesterday I called Q to ask. the invester relations guy was not in but he did call me back today (out with broken nose) He said he never asked that exactly but that he was 99.9% sure that franks 53% is part of the 9.5 billion. said the only number ever given to him since he's been there is that the o/s is 9.5 billion. that frank owns 53% of that same o/s and that there are 5 billion restricted shares that were used to cover moneys borrowed for the gay games & a couple other content purchases. i did have a brain fart as i meant to ask if the buy back reduced that 9.5 & to what. he did say that he would be seeing frank in the next couple of days & would ask to know for 100% sure that franks 53% is part of the 9.5 billion & call me back if he is wrong. thus our float minus franks 53% & any other insiders puts our float probably under 4 billion.[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 11, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
O/S is unknown because:
O/S includes all issued shares
Restricted shares
Insider shares
Float
He gave us 6 Billion Restricted in CC
9.5 Billion float in CC
No set number on insider just a percentage.
No where did he say O/S was this number ######
Here 4 questions to ponder:
First
If O/S was the number he intended when he said 9.5 B float then why was the 6 Billion given separate. Its part of the O/S period.
Second
Does anyone actually believe Frank would give more shares to the Institutions.
Third
Where did the company get the money over the last year to run its operations.
Forth
If our Float was as low as you intend then the pps could not be this low and the MM's could not hold this size float down.
Ric
By the way, Investor relation doesn't know for sure a question that is so important. Give me a break. I got land in Florida for sell too.
Also Frank knows what is being said about O/S and knows what kind of problems it has cause but not onces has he came out to correct it, not once. Why not. He doesn't have to and hes refusing to answer.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
ric...before you run your mouth again maybe you should pick up the phone second maybe taking off your socks before counting might help as 53% of 9.5 billion is 5,035,000,000. 35,000,000 more then 5,000,000,000 and with 35,000,000,000 in the company treasury (rest of a/s) nobody can take over the company. i for my part went to the company to see if what i believed is right. you just guess & run your mouth. if he calls back & says franks 53% is not part of the 9.5 i will say so in here. i stated what i believe was to be true & Q's invester relations deptarment backs that up. what do you have to back up what you believe???
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 11, 2004).]
Yes, we are being spoon fed, but it is really the sponsors' call. Rather than "fluff", I see it as restraint on Frank's part to not jeopardize any potential contracts (like last time).
.......gee, I was so thrilled yesterday with my .0027 shares......
I do think that whatever is going on with this pps is probably a combination of things--of which we will probably never know.
Think about all of the sells/buys between .0001 and .03 and now at 1/4 of a penny--a lot of profit still being made.
However, if it continues drops again, I'll be in there averaging down again.
I do have a friend that has tried to make me feel bad because I mentioned QBID and they bought in around .025.
Yes, .0025 is better than .025, but I think that anything under .03 will result in profit for every QBID shareholder. The last time that I looked .0025 was available!
...just read through the CC thread again (Thanks BigTip).
......slow and steady climb for three months....
Sure would like to see that climb from November 15--live broadcasting.
If it is from December--well, that's 12 trading days away.
I can wait and wait.........
Here it is;
Frank said the O/S is 15 Billion
Remember now the O/S includes in the total restricted shares, commmon shares, and the float.
Now, out of the O/S which is 15 Billion, 6 Billion is restricted. 15b-6b=9 billion.
Out of the 9 Billion, Franks owns 53% which is roughly 4.77 Billion. So the float roughly is 4.23 Billion and once the buy back is complete subtract a Billion bringing it to 3.23 billion.
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
My proof is that O/S includes the restricted shares. He didn't include that in the 9.5 so that number CAN NOT BE O/S.By the way, Investor relation doesn't know for sure a question that is so important. Give me a break. I got land in Florida for sell too.
Also Frank knows what is being said about O/S and knows what kind of problems it has cause but not onces has he came out to correct it, not once. Why not. He doesn't have to and hes refusing to answer.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 11, 2004).]
------------------
randie gray
Here it is;
Frank said the O/S is 15 Billion
Remember now the O/S includes in the total restricted shares, commmon shares, and the float.
Now, out of the O/S which is 15 Billion, 6 Billion is restricted. 15b-6b=9 billion.
Out of the 9 Billion, Franks owns 53% which is roughly 4.77 Billion. So the float roughly is 4.23 Billion and once the buy back is complete subtract a Billion bringing it to 3.23 billion.
======================================
thank you...did you get this info from calling Q???
By the way I did call them and got the run around and they would have to get back with me. I never heard a word.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
you cannot deduct franks (or other company officer's) shares from the float.
the numbers don't add up. check out definitions and discussion.... http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/009561-40.html
quote:
Originally posted by dolr’s:Here it is;
Frank said the O/S is 15 Billion
Remember now the O/S includes in the total restricted shares, commmon shares, and the float.Now, out of the O/S which is 15 Billion, 6 Billion is restricted. 15b-6b=9 billion.
Out of the 9 Billion, Franks owns 53% which is roughly 4.77 Billion. So the float roughly is 4.23 Billion and once the buy back is complete subtract a Billion bringing it to 3.23 billion.
GO QBID!!!!! Sitting In A First Class Seat On The QBID Express Train To Retirement.
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 11, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 11, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
is this what frank meant when he said he would get revenge on the daytraders lmao.
ah well at least I was rich for a minute in my dream.
who knows with a little luck maybe it can come true.
I honestly dont know what I expect from the Q anymore I do expect to make a profit someday but with the way everything has unfolded I no longer have any prices or hopes of certain prices set in stone.
I will take profit when I can as soon as I can but I will hold a portion probably a good portion of my shares to see if the real payday ever comes.
if nothing else I can honestly say it hasnt been dull going along for the ride lol.
if we can land a couple of the big carriers then maybe over time with some buybacks when pps is still low the O/S whatever it is could be reduced a alot, this is what I am hoping for.
if frank can buy back 1 billion now think what he could do when he has a good revenue stream
I agree. I was predicting .02+ by Feb. and .15+ by April but forgot about Logo going live at the end of Feb. So, I hope we can have a good run before then. Because until investors see how Logo is going to effect us, I don't see us doing much for awhile after Logo go lives. Hopefully I am wrong but with that and other unanswered questions I am not sure anymore myself. I think our best bet for making it is if Q and HereTV could get together. Then I think we could have an edge on Logo. I just don't know how both of us apart will get past them.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 11, 2004).]
I would probably average down with another mil except I have lost 3500 in the last 4 weeks daytrading. and my portfolio is growing smaller lol. if I keep this up I am gonna have to get a real job again.
that would be terrible.lol go Q please go soon.lol
God bless all veterans happy veterans day. with a special thanks in memory of those that died so that I could sit here and have a very cozy life.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
WM LMAO,,that is exactly what he said.
What a bitchfest.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
is this what frank meant when he said he would get revenge on the daytraders lmao.
I will just tell em a bunch of bs and cause trouble lmao.
just having a little fun sorry for all the off topic posts been having a bad time lately with the trading and needed to joke around abit.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
I can just see frank sitting in his office late tonight reading our posts and laughing at us saying that will teach em to daytrade the stock and call up bothering me all the time.I will just tell em a bunch of bs and cause trouble lmao.
just having a little fun sorry for all the off topic posts been having a bad time lately with the trading and needed to joke around abit.
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 11, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I know most of you are hardcore believers in QBID. I just got in at .0029 however. Right now I've placed an order to sell my shares at .0029 since it has hit .0029 for the past few days even though it has declined. In the long run if I can get in at .0026 or lower, it'll make a huge difference if the stock hits big. A lot of you are mentioning a move on Nov 15th which closely approaches.
With all the past positive PR that has come and gone to produce little results am I being too risky in missing the big explosion for QBID? Right now I think no because I was expecting any movement to be in december/january. What are everyone elses thoughts on this coming Nov 15th? Matt[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 11, 2004).]
live programing hit nov 15, stay uncram until dec 1 and first billing go out dec 10. i can expect a pr to anounce the success of live shows on the air third week of nov and announce subs second week of dec. investors might keep eyes on these days to see if qbid is on schedule or some delay as before.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
I have been giving a lot of thought to the reasoning why someone would sell QBID.#1. The obvious reason, money. Some people bought the stock in the .0001 range and decided to sell and take their profits or at least take some of their money off the table.
#2. Maybe some people still think it is to big of a gamble for them and they do not want to tie up their funds for the holiday.
#3. Some people sold yesterday because they bought high and decided to cut their losses and run. Looking at their portfolio balance sheet instead of potential.
#4. Maybe some people just realized that Q Television Network is not world wide yet. There is some more work to be done. They lost their vision.
Whatever the reason: I am excited. Excited over all the progress of QTN! I was seriously considering buying more shares at .0035. Now I bought 1 million more shares at .0026. I know you think I am nuts. Everyday I just seem to see the pending potential more clearly. To own shares of a TV Network for .0026 is simply amazing!
Can't blame you BigT. I'm sorry for those that have lost faith & letting go but I will be buying tomorrow while the sellers keep the price down! I too have become very excited about current pps & will begin buying much more agressively.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
U4TSAF2
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 1
Subject: BRAND NEW PILOT
------------------------
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO TIME IN FLYING. I AM SOON TO BEGIN MY FLIGHT TRAINING/IFR/MULTI-ENGINE. I AM LOOKING FOR AN AIRCRAFT, FOR TIME SAVINGS IN TRAVEL, WHICH I ESTIMATE BEING APPROXIMATELY 150 HOURS ANNUAL TIME. COST IS A CONCERN AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, MAINTENANCE, FUEL, INSURANCE, ETC., IS A BEECH DUKE 60 A GOOD CHOICE OR CAN I OPT. FOR A LEAR 24? EITHER PLANE IN DECENT CONDITION IS IN MY PRICE RANGE, BUT WOULD ANOTHER PLANE BE A BETTER CHOICE? DOES A LEAR 24 USE ALOT OF FUEL AND W/MAINTENANCE, SIT MORE THEN FLY? A ANNUAL ON A DUKE 60 WOULD BE ABOUT 2 GRAND, WHAT ABOUT ON A LEAR? I KNOW I AM AHEAD OF MYSELF, BUT WOULD LIKE SOME ANSWERS. I AM CLUELESS, PLEASE HELP!!!
Submitted by U4TSAF2
Mon, 06/21/2004 - 05:22.
Friendly Talkzone
I speak about 8 phrases in espanol. I need to learn. The truest way to learn is to submerge yourself in the dialect. I am moving to Colombia to either Cali or Bogota but I also want to attend school to learn Spanish. Plus since I'm there "fulltime" work is basically out of the question so my school will be my "job" until I can speak enough Spanish to open a nightclub, restaurant or something of applicable value.
GO QBID!!!!
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
BIG T, your posts always make me feel better
thanx fratello!
havent heard from u in a while
how are you?
WHIZ...
------------------
Facta Non Verba
quote:
Originally posted by famtrecrew:
hey qbidder... where do you find all these little smiley face guys you put in your posts??? just wondering
Smiley Central
downloaded it...felt the morale down (including mine) in this and TTCS forum so
needed to lively things up a little
is it working?
------------------
Facta Non Verba
[This message has been edited by Qbidder (edited November 12, 2004).]
GO Q!
------------------
Facta Non Verba
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
everything on my screen stopped moving I thought my computer frooze up but its just a slow afternoon lol
i think cos its friday
most people are half asleep waiting for the weekend..typical Friday Wallstreet
------------------
Facta Non Verba
[This message has been edited by Qbidder (edited November 12, 2004).]
have a good day everyone!
------------------
Facta Non Verba
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Any thoughts on the Q today, at a low of 0.0025 hummmGO QBID!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doctoall:
[b]Any thoughts on the Q today, at a low of 0.0025 hummmGO QBID!!!!
[/B][/QUOTE]
No, they just went to the same business school
Q Television Network, (Pink Sheets: QBID) announced today that "On Q Live," a 2 1/2 hour entertainment talk show, will begin airing five days a week starting Monday, November 15, 2004. The show will air from 4:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. PST and from 7:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. EST. There will be repeated, live news breaks and interactive emails throughout the evening totaling three hours of live programming.
On Q Live will include three hosts discussing various topics important to the Gay and Lesbian community. On Q Live is a truly interactive show for its audience as viewers will be able to join in discussions with the hosts using their Web cameras. In addition, On Q Live will have Q News Briefs with an anchor reporting on important news and sports topics.
This marks the start of live and original programming for Q Television. "On Q Live is a truly unique show that we are thrilled to bring our viewers. This is a live, spontaneous fun show," said Frank Olsen, president and CEO of Q Television Network. "We know our viewers will enjoy this interactive format that is not found on any other competitive station."
In addition, the premier episode of Q on the Move will air on Monday. On Tuesday, the premier episode of Q Television's soap opera series "Paradise Falls" will air and will continue with a new show each day before On Q Live. Q Television can be found on RCN on Channel 255. Currently Q Television is previewing the station unscrambled for interested viewers - for further information on programming and subscriptions please visit www.qtelevision.com.
Still here, watching Q from the sideline.
Keep and eye on USCI, Huge volume and getting ready to run.
Lil
anything to get this moving up helps!
maybe Frank reads these forums...and said
"i got to do something for these guys before the bail-out"
------------------
Facta Non Verba
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
Another fluffy PR.
------------------
Facta Non Verba
I AM CLUELESS, PLEASE HELP!!!
====================================
its about time he figured it out
So go do what you like, make sure you do it wise
You may find out that your self-doubt means nothing
Was ever there
You can't go forcing something if it's just not right
quote:
Originally posted by CouchP:
GREEN DAY......
So go do what you like, make sure you do it wise
You may find out that your self-doubt means nothing
Was ever there
You can't go forcing something if it's just not right
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 12, 2004).]
QTN mentioned
this used to be a happening place to hang out now there are cobwebs on the door lol.
quote:
Originally posted by Qbidder:
[b]WHIZ...
"All we ever had to do is LAUNCH!"
[This message has been edited by Qbidder (edited November 12, 2004).][/B]
You got that right Qbidder!
Even a blind person can see this freight train coming! I'm in buy mode!
------------------
whizknock
I finally had a green week lol first time in the last 4 weeks I have not lost money. I actually made a few bucks.
Ric
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 12, 2004).]
welcome back we missed you.
mr fly bung is happy to be in and with laugs!!
Did you ever get any shoes?
bung only is with hope thae west wyng does fun.
quote:
Originally posted by bungdiddler:
mr der the owork is clean when secuity gard open doors.
Cheers
from altpennystocks
GOAM went from $2.50 to just under $12.00 (today) in four days.
Guess what I have tons of?
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:25:43 -0500, "News Guy" <myword@byteme.com>
wrote:
>With the interest rate announcement out tomorrow (11/10/04) and the market
>closing today with lower rates, now is the time to buy. When the NYSE opens
>Wednesday morning these are the stocks to buy HEAVY in. Keep them until
>Monday morning and cash out at a 1500% profit. I can't say my sources but
>these come from reliable 'inside' facts. Your retirement companies are:
>
>- American Fire Retardant Corp (AFRD.OB)
>
>- Exus Global Inc (EXGO.OB)
>
>- OMDA Oil and Gas Inc (OMOG.PK)
>
>- Triangle Multi-Media Inc (QBID.PK)
>
>- Titan Consolidated Inc (TTCS.PK)
>
>ALL these companies in the order listed are guaranteed 200% after everything
>settles from the previous 2 weeks. Buy early and ENJOY!!!
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
so Bung what is your take on Q are you still holding?
Actually including Q with them makes Q look bad.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 12, 2004).]
1BT do you know that poster to be reliable?
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
I could never trust anyone that would promote AFRD. What a scam.Ric
It was up %73 today. Reel them in and the R/S
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
It was up %73 today. Reel them in and the R/S
But notice GOAM went from .04 to under $1 in a matter of months. Don't you think people were bashing it at that point and not interested?? YOU NEED TO KNOW WHEN STOCKS ARE ATTRACTIVE. Hell QBID is attractive at .02 to me.
But lets look at the downtrend similarity and look what happened to goam! BAM.
Imagine doesn't post click this link.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4558299
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 12, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Clyde, please don't EVEN say that out loud as I'm deep in Q and TTCS(or were you only referring to AFRD?).
Terry
AFRD only - sorry for the sharp pain in your chest.
QBID is going to make it. I was just saying that I wish it wasn't listed with that crap.
Ric
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Ha...AFRD 52 wk range....0021 - 60000
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 12, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by MW:
how the heck have ya been whiz havent spoke to ya in a long time.I finally had a green week lol first time in the last 4 weeks I have not lost money. I actually made a few bucks.
Good job!
I'm in the hope that over the long haul I'll make a huge windfall right here. Getting ready to buy again in this range while others give it away.
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by bungdiddler:
mr ban te qbid share is have to lanuch!after then we get gold and dollers! that is the my insite.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 12, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
I could never trust anyone that would promote AFRD. What a scam.Actually including Q with them makes Q look bad.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 12, 2004).]
I'll second that. If you have to take this kind of chance with a stock, you might want to find something that won't R/S. Some people just don't understand or are blind to the way this company does business. The products these guys sell are pumped up garbage that is touted to do things they just don't do. Swing this one if you have the nerve but NEVER, NEVER, EVER go to bed owning it. You do the math. Take a million shares, reverse split it at at ratio of 250:1 four times and see what you have left. Do that with any number of shares and it don't take a mental giant to come up with a big fat negative number. I now own a grand total of .0016 shares which won't even show up on my Scottrade account. Why? Because it's nothing, zilch, nodda.....it is gone.
1Big, I'm not sure why you listed this one. I'm sure you are trying to be helpful but for those who don't know this stock, I think we should place a disclaimer beside it's symbol each time we post anything about it.
Just my humble opinion. I'll appologize next week if it does anything close to what you suggest.
Dakota told you that......
------------------
Dakota
Just because I'm paranoid don't mean there ain't someone behind me........
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Anyone know how many subscribers we have out of the cities already being broadcasted too? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Anyone know how many subscribers we have out of the cities already being broadcasted too? Matt
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 13, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 13, 2004).]
By: whizknock
11 Mar 2004, 03:55 AM EST
Msg. 149686 of 629199
Jump to msg. #
**THIS GUY'S GOOD!**
Someone asks "When's a good entry point?"
U4TSAF2 Says,,,,,,,,,,,,
YOU SPEAK AS IF THE STOCK HAS ALREADY HIT $25.00 AND YOU MISSED THE RIDE.
C.E.O. PROMISES NO REVERSE SPLIT.
SATELLITE SIGNAL ALL COORDINATED.
10-YEAR TIME WARNER DEAL EXECUTED.
HOT TOPIC IN ABSOLUTELY ALL MEDIA IS GAY MARRIAGE.
BROADCAST BEGINS MAY 1.
JUST ADDED PROGRAM DIRECTOR WITH 25 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.
THE STOCK IS .003 +/- AND YOU WANT TO KNOW WHEN'S A GOOD ENTRY POINT?
OH COME ON!
U4TSAF2
...................................................................
Yep! And to think,,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
permanentjaun, U4 bought QBID at .0001 or 2 or 3. Either way he sold for a nice profit. He basically wants cheaper shares so shaking weak hands is easier at this point. Don't fall for it.
All investors have no doubt heard of corporations authorizing share buy back programs. Even if you don't know what they are or how they work, you at least understand that they are a good thing. Here are 3 important truths about these programs - and most importantly, how they make your portfolio grow.
Principle 1: Overall growth is not nearly as important as growth per share.
Too often, you'll hear leading financial publications and broadcast talking about the overall growth rate of a company. While this number is very important in the long run, it is not the all-important factor in deciding how fast your equity in the company will grow. Growth per share is.
An over-simplified example may help. Let's look at a fictional company:
Eggshell Candies, Inc.
$50 per share
100,000 shares outstanding
-------------------------------------------
Market Capitalization: $5,000,000
This year, the company made a profit of $1 million dollars.
==================================
In this example, each share equals .001% of ownership in the company.
(100% divided by 100,000 shares.)
Management is upset by the company's performance because it sold the exact same amount of candy this year as it did last year. That means the growth rate is 0%! The executives want to do something to make the shareholders money because of the disappointing performance this year, so one of them suggests a stock buyback program. The others immediately agree; the company will use the $1 million profit it made this year to buy stock in itself.
So the very next day, the CEO goes and takes the $1 million dollars out of the bank and buys 20,000 shares of stock in his company. (Remember it is trading at $50 a share according to the information above.) Immediately, he takes the shares to the Board of Directors, and they vote to destroy them so that they no longer exist. This means that now there are only 80,000 shares of Eggshell Candies in existence instead of the original 100,000.
What does that mean to you? Each share you own no longer represents .001% of the company. Instead, it represents .00125%; that's a 25% increase in value per share! The next day you wake up and find out that your stock in Eggshell is now worth $62.50 per share instead of $50. Even though the company didn't grow this year, you still made a twenty five percent increase on your investment! This leads to the second principle.
Principle 2: When a company reduces the amount of shares outstanding by declaring a stock buy back program, each of your shares becomes more valuable and represents a greater percentage of equity in the company.
If a shareholder-friendly management such as this one is kept in place, it is possible that someday there may only be five shares of the company, each worth one million dollars. When putting together your portfolio, you should seek out businesses that engage in these sorts of pro-shareholder practices and hold on to them as long as the fundamentals remain sound. One of the best examples is the Washington Post, which was at one time only $5 to $10 a share. It has traded as high as $650 in recent months. That is long term value!
Principle 3: Stock buy back programs are not good if the company pays too much for its own stock!
Even though buybacks can be huge sources of long-term profit for investors, they are actually harmful if a company pays more for its stock than it is worth. In an overpriced market, it would be foolish for management to purchase equity at all, even in itself.
Instead, the company should put the money into assets that can be easily converted back into cash. This way, when the market swung the other way and is trading below its true value, shares of the company can be bought back up at a discount, ensuring current shareholders receive maximum benefit. Remember, even the best investment in the world isn't a good investment if you pay too much for it.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 13, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Whiz, Excellent post!! Keep up the great work.permanentjaun, U4 bought QBID at .0001 or 2 or 3. Either way he sold for a nice profit. He basically wants cheaper shares so shaking weak hands is easier at this point. Don't fall for it.
quote:
Originally posted by funnel:
I bought this wonderful stock in April at .0042 and have finally had enough. I sold my shares and bought Harvey Electronics, HRVE. Not a penny but I think it will triple then I might get back into the Q. This stock just seems to never move.
quote:Sorry, as a new member I am not familiar with Qthe procedure to reply. Can someone guide me correctly? As far as selling shares purchased at .0042 I also bought in at this price but WILL not sell until doom and gloom take over. Personally, I have great faith in QBID. I was stunned this past week when my cell rang and the voice on the other end said, "hi, this is
Originally posted by eagle-eye:
quote:I was stunned this past week when my cell rang and the voice on the other end said, "hi, this is Frank Olsen of QBID, do you have any questions about the company?"
Originally posted by eagle-eye:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by eagle-eye:
[b]
Wow - how did he get your cell phone number?
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 13, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Anyone know how many subscribers we have out of the cities already being broadcasted too? Matt
It a big to do about nothing.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by ron4498:
You ALL Must stop what you are all doing and listen to the following QBID Hot line message:
Listen...to this people,QBID owns 100% of the Q-Channel ; QTN is owned by TMM.... http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4561038
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 13, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 13, 2004).]
I'm get more and more excited about this company every day - and I've been an owner for a loooooooooooooong time!!
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Anyone else thinking of asking for QBID stock for christmas? Matt
I would ask Santa for P&G first. And then maybe a barrel full of quarters after that. I haven't started to think about X-Mas yet. To much Halloween candy still left around the house. Kids are still wearing their costumes.
For more clips of his work: http://www.rolandjoseph.tv/www.rolandjoseph.tv
http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?section=10&id=3287
Roland Joseph Torres, principal of the production firm Red Soapbox Visual Media (commonly known for production of commercials and corporate training, sales and marketing videos) has teamed up with Q Television Network to produce an original documentary exploring the prominent gay marriage issue within the gay rights movement.
Specifically, the documentary I Will, I Do, We Did chronicles the journey of a dozen couples, following them through the political and social chain of events that culminated in San Francisco becoming the first city in the United States to issue licenses for same-sex marriages.
"Marriage rights are a top concern of the gay and lesbian community," said Q Televisions Vice President of Programming and Acquisitions Steven Grunberg. "Since Q Television Network was built by the gay community for the gay community, it was obvious that one of our first projects would focus on this issue."
A sneak of the documentary premiered at the National Cable & Telecommunication Associations industry conference in May, and was included in a five-hour sample broadcast of Q Television on May 15.
Q Television and Red Soapbox Visual Media are currently in pre-production on two other collaborations, one a behind-the-scenes look at San Franciscos PRIDE Festival, and the other a follow-up to I Will, I Do, We Did, which will explore the potential effects of divorce on the gay community.
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
This is a promo about the caravan filmed by Q http://www.rolandjoseph.tv/1minnewCR.mov[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 13, 2004).]
quote:I was stunned this past week when my cell rang and the voice on the other end said, "hi, this is Frank Olsen of QBID, do you have any questions about the company?"
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by eagle-eye:
[b] [QUOTE]Originally posted by eagle-eye:
[b]
Wow - how did he get your cell phone number?
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 13, 2004).][/B][/QUOTE]
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Clyde: Now thats different a new member who is pumping, gotta get you thinking Oh well its only telling us what we know, GREAT things yet to come, right from the mouth of Daddy Frank Long and Holding Here. GO QBID!!!!! Bring Me The Green!!!!
you never know!
would not surprise me at all
Go QBID
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Clyde: Now thats different a new member who is pumping, gotta get you thinking Oh well its only telling us what we know, GREAT things yet to come, right from the mouth of Daddy Frank Long and Holding Here. GO QBID!!!!! Bring Me The Green!!!!
DZ
quote:
Originally posted by gto22gekko:
When do we get other cable carriers. Logo has already announced it will air on Time Warner and RCN. HereTV is available on DirectTV, Dish, Adelphia, Time Warner, RCN, and Star power. Without another carrier, Q is available to 400,000 people.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
What the hell do we have? I thought we had TW and RCN!? What are we waiting for? QBID best break the $1 dollar mark. Matt
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 14, 2004).]
I like it. Maybe I should buy QBID for everyone.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Anyone else thinking of asking for QBID stock for christmas? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Clyde: Now thats different a new member who is pumping, gotta get you thinking Oh well its only telling us what we know, GREAT things yet to come, right from the mouth of Daddy Frank Long and Holding Here. GO QBID!!!!! Bring Me The Green!!!!
Frank called me on my cell phone. (not sure how he got my number either ) He wanted to know if I wanted QBID for christmas. I told him about the Halloween candy situation and he said I could send the candy to him (he likes kit kats) Frank was excited when I told him my 3 year old son wore a dress for trick or treat. He thought that was neat. We talked about football. Fanks favorite color is blue by the way. He asked who cuts my hair (not sure why but I told him that I was bald.) We laughed for a long time about that one. Frank said that he would call back in a week or so to see if I had any more ideas about what I wanted for christmas and to check on the family. What a nice guy to call out of the blue (Franks favorite color)
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 14, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 14, 2004).]
Good morning everyone.
Been away for an ENTIRE 2 DAYS...(felt like forever LOL) Had carpet put in upstairs yesterday...Thought I'd have a break down trying to corral four kids and a stressed out husband) House is still a mess, but hopefully by Jan. 05, things will be in place again...LOL
Take care...looking forward to any news Frank puts out....WANT CARRIER INFO!
Have a great Sunday!
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
looking at here tv's website may hold a clue as to why our pps is where its at.
Hmm, I wonder if Ford had a website in the 1900's. Or McDonalds in the 50's, or Nike. Catch the drift? I do agree that nowadays is different. A website provides credibility and a business has a difficult time suceeding without a good website.
A lot of people use a website for information rather then calling the company, however, this is a Network and they rely more on people watching TV not looking at a website. I'm sure in time the website will change for the better..
In fact, it is, as we speak, not up yet.
Thats it. I watch Bravo, USA, TNT, Discover, History Channel, and many others on a regular basis. And as much as I use the computer, I have never been to there web sites. Why would I? Who cares? And if I did, there web site would not stop me from watching there programming. JMHO
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
To be honest, how many TV web sites do any of us go to. I can list on top of my head. Foxnews.com, cnn.com, and msnbc.com for poll questions during the elections. I have been to NBc's web site a long time ago, forget why. And out of all of these what the site looked like or who's looked the best made no differece. The only other website I go to is ESPN's. Now I use that one all the time. But not for any other reason but to get scores, who won what. Especially college football and the BCS.Thats it. I watch Bravo, USA, TNT, Discover, History Channel, and many others on a regular basis. And as much as I use the computer, I have never been to there web sites. Why would I? Who cares? And if I did, there web site would not stop me from watching there programming. JMHO
Ric
You're right Ric. The only time I go to a network web site is to get news CNN,FOX, ESPN and the locals. I never go to NBC, ABC, CBS (well maybe CBS occasionally to give my opinion about dan rather)
Excellent observation Ric!
Tomorrow should prove to be interesting.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
due for fun in this threat.
Sunny,
I got a call from Frank as well. He asked why I havent tried potty training for my boy while Sunny's kid is trying to giving up diaper. Frank gave me some tip for kid potty training. What a guy!!!
Need to buy more Qbid.
And Ric, Frank is gonna call you next. He told me that.
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
due for fun in this threat.
Sunny,
I got a call from Frank as well. He asked why I havent tried potty training for my boy while Sunny's kid is trying to giving up diaper. Frank gave me some tip for kid potty training. What a guy!!!
Need to buy more Qbid.
And Ric, Frank is gonna call you next. He told me that.
Why that silly Frank - he didn't even offer any tips on potty training when he called me. I have 3 in diapers.
Ric - Frank did say he was going to call you. He said he had a question about plumbing and thought you could help. He said that you do a great job at flushing the bashers down the drain and wants some tips on pulling the lever. (Wish my 5 year old would flush - Frank didn't say anything about that either - go figure)
Here's the PPS for QBID if it did 10% per month starting at .0035
Month --- Price
1 -- 0.0035
2 -- 0.00385
3 -- 0.00423
4 -- 0.00465
5 -- 0.0051
6 -- 0.0056
7 -- 0.0062
8 -- 0.0068
9 -- 0.0075
10 -- 0.0082
11 -- 0.009
12 -- 0.0099
13 -- 0.0109
14 -- 0.012
15 -- 0.013
16 -- 0.0146
17 -- 0.016
18 -- 0.0176
19 -- 0.0194
20 -- 0.0214
21 -- 0.0235
22 -- 0.0258
23 -- 0.0284
24 -- 0.0313
25 -- 0.0344
26 -- 0.0379
27 -- 0.041
28 -- 0.045
29 -- 0.0504
30 -- 0.0555
31 -- 0.061
32 -- 0.0671
33 -- 0.0738
34 -- 0.0812
35 -- 0.0894
36 -- 0.0983
37 -- 0.108
38 -- 0.119
39 -- 0.13
40 -- 0.14
41 -- 0.158
42 -- 0.174
43 -- 0.19
44 -- 0.21
45 -- 0.23
46 -- 0.255
47 -- 0.28
48 -- 0.3
49 -- 0.33
50 -- 0.37
51 -- 0.41
52 -- 0.45
53 -- 0.49
54 -- 0.546
55 -- 0.6
56 -- 0.66
57 -- 0.72
58 -- 0.8
59 -- 0.88
60 -- 0.96
NOW DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 5 YEARS TO GET TO .96 CENTS??
DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 1 YEAR TO GET TO A PENNY??
im bettign against it but you never know.
would you have said 3 months ago that with all the news we have we would be sitting where we are?
point is no one knows if and when this thing will go.
im betting the whole share count on it going up. but would not be surprised of we never break a penny.
Im hold on to what i have untill it is up or gone.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Clyde, when Frank recommended vasectomy...it wasn't a stock tip! HA!
Terry
Trust me - I took care of that one.
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 14, 2004).]
Pick yours and enjoy the ride.
http://www.vmsdigital.com/MyFiles.aspx?Onum=BC76D27C-C593-4E5A-BF77-3A7ABFD66505
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hey, just playing with some numbers. If you managed to make just 10% profit every month with a $5000 investment, you will have 1 million dollars in 5 years. JUST 10% a month!Here's the PPS for QBID if it did 10% per month starting at .0035
Month --- Price
1 -- 0.0035
2 -- 0.00385
3 -- 0.00423
4 -- 0.00465
5 -- 0.0051
6 -- 0.0056
7 -- 0.0062
8 -- 0.0068
9 -- 0.0075
10 -- 0.0082
11 -- 0.009
12 -- 0.0099
13 -- 0.0109
14 -- 0.012
15 -- 0.013
16 -- 0.0146
17 -- 0.016
18 -- 0.0176
19 -- 0.0194
20 -- 0.0214
21 -- 0.0235
22 -- 0.0258
23 -- 0.0284
24 -- 0.0313
25 -- 0.0344
26 -- 0.0379
27 -- 0.041
28 -- 0.045
29 -- 0.0504
30 -- 0.0555
31 -- 0.061
32 -- 0.0671
33 -- 0.0738
34 -- 0.0812
35 -- 0.0894
36 -- 0.0983
37 -- 0.108
38 -- 0.119
39 -- 0.13
40 -- 0.14
41 -- 0.158
42 -- 0.174
43 -- 0.19
44 -- 0.21
45 -- 0.23
46 -- 0.255
47 -- 0.28
48 -- 0.3
49 -- 0.33
50 -- 0.37
51 -- 0.41
52 -- 0.45
53 -- 0.49
54 -- 0.546
55 -- 0.6
56 -- 0.66
57 -- 0.72
58 -- 0.8
59 -- 0.88
60 -- 0.96NOW DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 5 YEARS TO GET TO .96 CENTS??
DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 1 YEAR TO GET TO A PENNY??
10 percent profit a month is a very good return on any investment. I don't think it is possible with this stock currently. It is still considered a high risk investment.
it may have come across as negative but wasnt intended that way. What im trying to convey is no one really knows where the price is going to go. weather it is up or down. Im hoping for up, and betting on it, but there are no guarantees. I'm just trying to keep it reel.
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Rod, this isn't your usual tone..have a bad week-end or just grabbed the "depressing" Chivas bottle versus the "positive" Chivas?
I understand and agree that the pps should be above the point it is now, but for now, let's "put on a happy face" and "walk down the sunny(no relation to our beloved Sunny) side of the street"!!!We have a very limited control on what transpires, but we can control our response to it....that's it ..smile...
Terry
P.S. Rod, tried to e-mail you @ripnet.com but it was returned.[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 14, 2004).]
i think maybe you didn't read my post correctly. i was talking about the info on it, namely the 4 cable systems its on. i think maybe its time i quit this thread. in the last week i've been called a liar, had it hinted that i came in as a differant poster to back up what i was accused of lying about & now i make a observation that isn't really negitive & again i'm wrong. I've been posting on the Q thread since april when i bought my first Q share & have never bashed Q in any way. i'm typing for only 1 reason, i honestly speak my mind in everything i do. what ppl in here think about what i post is meaningless.
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
looking at here tv's website may hold a clue as to why our pps is where its at. it is more professional but the main thing is the cable systems its on.
==================================i think maybe you didn't read my post correctly. i was talking about the info on it, namely the 4 cable systems its on. i think maybe its time i quit this thread. in the last week i've been called a liar, had it hinted that i came in as a differant poster to back up what i was accused of lying about & now i make a observation that isn't really negitive & again i'm wrong. I've been posting on the Q thread since april when i bought my first Q share & have never bashed Q in any way. i'm typing for only 1 reason, i honestly speak my mind in everything i do. what ppl in here think about what i post is meaningless.
You're not alone. I'm victim to this as well. People need to chill out in here. They think a question is bashing. I even ask a lot of questions that aren't negative, but they think are negatively slanted. I read them again and they're still just legitimate questions.
I don't understand how I can still be accused of a basher after I've posted several messages about how I am excited about this stock and have even purchased their stock. Ridiculous. Whats the difference between someone known as a "pumper" and someone who can't/denies/won't answer questions about a company that probably don't have desirable answers? Matt
P.S. - I've also already listed reasons to why a professional website is important for QBID. If you don't think so then you are extremely naive. People are becoming extremely dependant on the internet for information. Comedy Central especially consistently puts clips of their shows on their website, such as from The Daily Show. As I see it, HereTV has 2 legs up on us. They've been broadcasting longer with carriers and have a professional website. A professional website for QBID would close the gap somewhat. You can call that bashing only if you don't realize I want a professional website for QBID because I own shares in QBID and see no negative consequences for QBID doing so.
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 14, 2004).]
Clyde...Vasectomy? (double eek)...LOL I'm trying to 'talk' hubby into trying for that little girl...after 4 boys, uh, it could happen with medical...intervention....LOL
Anyway, glad to read some upbeat posts from today. Made me smile.
Hoping tomorrow brings improved pps...and Frank, if you're reading these posts, feel free to jump into the conversation...very diverse bunch of people here...cover all the bases: diapers, birth control, protein shakes, booze, babes, men in speedos and of course QBID.
[This message has been edited by sunny (edited November 14, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Matt, you need to relax and realize that several people here have been waiting a long time compared to your 4-5 days..chill. And Sunny, you want a daughter...labors of love...everyone here just needs to relax..soon we'll know if this investment pays or not...time is the master..hopefully it pays for us all..
Terry
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 14, 2004).]
no one should be mad at each other here. they should be mad that they are purposely avoiding answering the question about the O/S count.
they are purposely not answering for a reason. maybe to keep the price down for the buyback, maybe to keep us confused. maybe to kill the day traders. either way, there is no sence in argueing the numbers that we dont really know any how.
peace guys and girls.
talk to you all soon.
Rod
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 14, 2004).]
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hey, just playing with some numbers. If you managed to make just 10% profit every month with a $5000 investment, you will have 1 million dollars in 5 years. JUST 10% a month!Here's the PPS for QBID if it did 10% per month starting at .0035
Month --- Price
1 -- 0.0035
2 -- 0.00385
3 -- 0.00423
4 -- 0.00465
5 -- 0.0051
6 -- 0.0056
7 -- 0.0062
8 -- 0.0068
9 -- 0.0075
10 -- 0.0082
11 -- 0.009
12 -- 0.0099
13 -- 0.0109
14 -- 0.012
15 -- 0.013
16 -- 0.0146
17 -- 0.016
18 -- 0.0176
19 -- 0.0194
20 -- 0.0214
21 -- 0.0235
22 -- 0.0258
23 -- 0.0284
24 -- 0.0313
25 -- 0.0344
26 -- 0.0379
27 -- 0.041
28 -- 0.045
29 -- 0.0504
30 -- 0.0555
31 -- 0.061
32 -- 0.0671
33 -- 0.0738
34 -- 0.0812
35 -- 0.0894
36 -- 0.0983
37 -- 0.108
38 -- 0.119
39 -- 0.13
40 -- 0.14
41 -- 0.158
42 -- 0.174
43 -- 0.19
44 -- 0.21
45 -- 0.23
46 -- 0.255
47 -- 0.28
48 -- 0.3
49 -- 0.33
50 -- 0.37
51 -- 0.41
52 -- 0.45
53 -- 0.49
54 -- 0.546
55 -- 0.6
56 -- 0.66
57 -- 0.72
58 -- 0.8
59 -- 0.88
60 -- 0.96NOW DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 5 YEARS TO GET TO .96 CENTS??
DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 1 YEAR TO GET TO A PENNY??
No, I don't think that it will take anything near a year to get to a penny.
We did it before....we could do it again.
GLTA! Go QBID live!!!!
[This message has been edited by suzainiee (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hey, just playing with some numbers. If you managed to make just 10% profit every month with a $5000 investment, you will have 1 million dollars in 5 years. JUST 10% a month!NOW DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 5 YEARS TO GET TO .96 CENTS??
DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WILL TAKE 1 YEAR TO GET TO A PENNY??
So this is what I'm trying to understand. Stock value is determined by outstanding shares only, not all authorized shares. So if we believe there to be 9.5 billion outstanding shares, including restricted, QTN would need to have a company value of 9.5 billion for the PPS to reach $1. Which most of us realize would not be possible right now.
"they are purposely not answering for a reason. maybe to keep the price down for the buyback" - penny-trader
Could that be a legitimate reason? That would be the best reason for the low pps thats going no where. If we begin the climb in price now it would be ridiculous hard to reach that $1 mark. A payment for $10 million or so from an advertiser would take out over 3.5 billion shares. Just an example.
Essentially couldn't there be a perpetual buy back? A company doesn't lose money when they buy shares and then destroy them. The PPS rises and the shares they hold already rise in proportion to how much of the total O/S was taken off the market. If they only destroyed the shares they bought back then they would now control a larger portion of the total O/S.
For example, if you consider a stock with 100,000 O/S and company X hold 51% for majority vote. The stock is at $50 for a market cap of 5000000. Their current value of 51% of the stock is 2550000. They buy back 20,000 shares for a total of $1,000,000. The lose the million but then gain it back immediately when the value of the 51000 shares they still hold jumps to 62.5 because each share represents more of the company now. 80,000 shares X 62.5 is still a market cap of 5000000.
Now they hold 60% of the vote however and they find it useless to do so. They want to get back down to 51%. 51% of 80,000 is 40800. So they have 9200 shares they can destroy. This means they destroy them correct? That way they only have 40800 AND the O/S has dropped to 70800. Now with only 70800 shares their 40800 shares represent 57% of the company.
They'd have to wait for the PPS to level at the correct value but then they could destroy shares once more to get down to 51%. 51% of 70800 is 36108. They now have 4692 shares that they can destroy. They destroy them to bring total O/S to 66108 and their share percentage would be 54%. You see the pattern here. They just have to wait for price levels to keep up with the changing O/S count.
Eventually they reach a limit to where they can't destroy more shares unless they want to give up majority holding of the company. In this case that limit would be a total O/S of 59183. There were originally 100,000 shares with 49% traded publicly. They buy back 20,000 from that 49% to leave 29,000 shares still being traded publicly. 29000 is 49% of 59183 and company X would hold 30183 shares for 51% majority. Effectively now each share is $84.48. The only problem with this process is the company needs to wait for the PPS to reach the market cap value before they can destroy the extra shares. In this model the company could still grow in value literally and go to a market cap value of 6 million for example. This would cause prices to sky rocket but the company can destroy shares since they only care about the majority holding.
So in our case if Frank bought back 2% of 9.5 billion then he took 190 million shares back leaving 4.275 billion shares still being traded publicly. If he still wants 53% majority he can destroy 214255319 of his own shares to bring the total O/S down to 9095744681. Which would lead to an increase in PPS by 4.2%.
This still leaves us a long ways away from only 1 billion O/S if we would want to hit the dollar mark. This is assuming the company does get to a worth of $1 billion like he predicts. 3.995 billion shares still need to be bought back for Frank to be able to destroy enough of his shares for 1 billion O/S and still keep 53% majority. Currently 3.995 billion shares would cost a little over 11 million dollars. Would that really be that hard to do? Advertisers will be handing millions to tap into the $600 billion dollar target market.
This is all hypothetical and wishful thinking. I'm trying to get a better hold of how a company handles a buy back and what could happen in the coming months. Is a company capable of buying back such amounts without releasing O/S values and information? Last friday QBID had a volume of 83 million shares traded. This is less than the 470 million value mentioned earlier so could it be possible to take the 3+ billion off the market? The loss in volume because of reduced shares available to trade would be made up in Frank buying the shares himself. Since about 4 billion shares would have been bought back, buying an extra 450 million wouldn't be much of an expense to make the investors that hold on the absolute longest extremely happy. Hehe...if QBID reaches a value of $1 billion we only need 20 million shares to give us a PPS of $50. Again this is all just to help me understand whats going on. Besides it's almost 3 AM so a lot of this has been brought on by sleep deprivation.
Let's put it this way. No bashing on how ridiculous this thought is or how I may not know whats happening. I just want answers. I know you guys aren't psychics but if you read the whole thing you'll see I do have questions. Such as do companies destroy their own restricted shares after they buy back and destroy some of the float? I feel they just care about holding majority. Anyways, bed time? Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 15, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 15, 2004).]
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
But O/S is not 9.5 Billion. Its much larger but no one knows for sure how much larger. The 6 Billion restricted shares were not included in the 9.5 billion figure. They are added to the 9.5 billion alone with unknown numbers. Read transcripts of CC. We have gone over this too many times now.Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
Sorry about the wrong values. Even if there are 50 billion O/S it still remains possible for complete buyback for a company predicting a value of $1 billion within a year and 5-6 billion in 5 years. I still asked concteptual questions that I'd like answered. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Stock value is determined by outstanding shares only
Give me strength. First of all nobody will read a post which looks like 1 long sentence. Break it up into seperate paragraphs, easier on the eyes.
Second, WHAT WAS OUR O/S IN APRIL WHEN WE WENT TO 3 CENTS?? Is that hard to keep in your head. We did it before, we'll do it again, plain & simple. STOP ACTING LIKE A FOOL AND TRYING TO TELL US WITH OUR CURRENT NUMBERS WE CAN'T GET OVER A PENNY.
WE WILL..
Go Q
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
I WANNA SEE GREEN!!
PLEASE
------------------
DIANA
DIANA--Are you still in MBAH...news out today.
GO QBID!!
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Give me strength. First of all nobody will read a post which looks like 1 long sentence. Break it up into seperate paragraphs, easier on the eyes.Second, WHAT WAS OUR O/S IN APRIL WHEN WE WENT TO 3 CENTS?? Is that hard to keep in your head. We did it before, we'll do it again, plain & simple. STOP ACTING LIKE A FOOL AND TRYING TO TELL US WITH OUR CURRENT NUMBERS WE CAN'T GET OVER A PENNY.
WE WILL..
Sorry about the one long sentance format. When I typed it I did have seperate paragraphs with indentations. I'll edit that now.
Once again you're thinking I'm bashing. Not once did I say I didn't believe QBID could reach a penny or more. At most I said with 15 billion O/S we may not reach $1 PPS. Is that so bad? I originally thought, along with a few others, that we could because of the fact that rarely any network stock is less than $1. With such a large market and profitibility for advertisers it seemed very possible. My post is to ask the question is if $1 dollar is really out of the question for QBID if it does have 15 billion O/S.
As I said, IM NOT BASHING. You literally tried to put words in my mouth when I hadn't said anything about QBID not reaching a penny or three. With 15 billion O/S they only need a market cap of 150 million to reach the penny which is well under the 1 billion dollar estimate.
I don't know what to ask anymore. I'm just going to get put down. I asked questions about how much of a buy back is possible before the PPS has to rise. I asked if my model of share destruction is possible. I never put down QBID in my post so don't accuse me of bashing. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Good morning everyone!DIANA--Are you still in MBAH...news out today.
GO QBID!!
SUNNY,
HAVE BOUGHT AND SOLD MBAH ALMOST EVERYDAY FOR 2 WEEKS+. got in at .03. IT'S BEEN A GREAT RIDE!!! MADE UP FOR QBID LOSS OF LATE!!
------------------
DIANA
Well how bout that, I just got a call. It was Franky,he/she was looking for Johnny. Wrong #. LOL
On a positive note, last year I owned PRVH, and kept averaging down from about .09 to .045. I was in the red for 9 months! PRVH ended up going to over .37 early 2004.
It was well worth the wait!
I believe QBID will pay off even greater.
dz
Why? Because if an institution wants to acquire, say, a 1% stake in a stock, it can't do it in one fell swoop. If it did, the buying flurry would make the stock's price rise too fast, forcing the institution to chase its tail as it watches its own buying activity raise costs. Instead, institutions pace themselves, buying smaller yet significant amounts of shares at a time.
That's called accumulation, and it is one of the most important signs that a stock has sunny days ahead. Often, a stock will make modest, little-noticed price gains on above-average volume before it makes a major advance, or just as it begins one. Because the accumulation takes place over prolonged periods, it's likely the stock will make a significant advance thanks to those institutional traders who are buying http://biz.yahoo.com/special/volume04_article1.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20011209055811/www.qbid.net/homepage.html
Did you know we were OTCBB at one time before January 8th, 2000. Well just thought some might like to read articles when our Q began.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by SnoozenLooze:
WOOT!! Haven't checked in in a while. More good news on Friday, sweet! That means we should be able to get down to around .0023 today!! Ha!
Ric
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
Matt your post was an interesting take and yes hard to read. LOL
Accumulation seems to be slow and painful except when buying...............
[This message has been edited by suzainiee (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
Institutions trade in large sums of money and large blocks of shares, dwarfing the action of individual investors. An institutional purchase or sale of a stock usually means thousands of shares and millions of dollars moving the stock. Moreover, an institution must commit itself to spend days, weeks or even months to fulfill its goal.Why? Because if an institution wants to acquire, say, a 1% stake in a stock, it can't do it in one fell swoop. If it did, the buying flurry would make the stock's price rise too fast, forcing the institution to chase its tail as it watches its own buying activity raise costs. Instead, institutions pace themselves, buying smaller yet significant amounts of shares at a time.
That's called accumulation, and it is one of the most important signs that a stock has sunny days ahead. Often, a stock will make modest, little-noticed price gains on above-average volume before it makes a major advance, or just as it begins one. Because the accumulation takes place over prolonged periods, it's likely the stock will make a significant advance thanks to those institutional traders who are buying http://biz.yahoo.com/special/volume04_article1.html
Yep! Good post. I believe most of our accumulation is retail at this point. However Institutions do accumulate and deliberately cover their footprint by having MMs break up their buy oders to match many smaller sells.
I'm accumulating my little bit while others give it away!
------------------
whizknock
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
Top Cable TV & Satellite Companies Ranked By Sales
1. DIRECTV, Inc.
2. Time Warner Cable
3. Cox Communications, Inc. (COX)
4. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.
5. EchoStar Communications Corporation (DISH)
6. Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR)
7. British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (BSY)
8. Cablevision Systems Corporation (CVC)
9. Adelphia Communications Corporation (ADELQ.PK)
10. SKY Perfect Communications Inc.
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
since it's a slow day. just received another call from Frank to follow up his tip on my boy potty training. i guess it's one of his interest...giving potty training tip to newly parents. he said once my boy gives up the diapers...our qbid shares will be up running.
Start straping plastic bags on him and let's get this thing going. Take a plastic shopping bag (walmart bags work well) cut out leg holes and use the handles for shoulder straps. You might want to duct tape the bag around his legs to make it waterproof at night.
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I feel left out because I did not get a call from Daddy Frank But maybe he is waiting to get some news before he calls me. Anyone willing to guess where the "Q' is heading today. GO QBID!!!!!!
If you have a non-published cell phone number, Frank will call. The guy is amazing. I think maybe he's clairvoyant.
Someone posted that bashers have a new way of sneaking in, hmmmmm.
Posted by: U4TSAF2
In reply to: dkgross who wrote msg# 6117 Date:4/24/2004 11:23:12 PM
Post #of 36033
NUMEROUS COMPANIES TRADE ON THE PINKS.
YOU HAVE MANY COMPANIES THAT TRADE FROM $.0001 ALL THE WAY UP TO OVER $100/SHARE. THIS IS ANOTHER MISCONCEPTION AND TO THINK UPGRADE IS NECESSARY THAT IS WRONG.
THE FACT IS ECNC DID IN FACT JUMP FROM .03 TO $18/SHARE. THAT DID IN FACT HAPPEN. SO TO SAY THAT THE O/S OR MARKET CAP OR WHAT-EVER IS COMPLETELY WRONG; IT'S NOT ONLY WRONG IN RESPECT THAT IT'S WRONG AT FACE VALUE, BUT HERE'S A STOCK THAT DID IT AND THAT SPEAKS MORE THAN SOMEONE TRYING TO TELL US WHAT CAN AND CAN'T HAPPEN.
PLUS ALL THE NUMEROUS OTHER COMPANIES THAT DID THROUGHOUT THE 1990'S.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Sorry about the one long sentance format. When I typed it I did have seperate paragraphs with indentations. I'll edit that now.Once again you're thinking I'm bashing. Not once did I say I didn't believe QBID could reach a penny or more. At most I said with 15 billion O/S we may not reach $1 PPS. Is that so bad? I originally thought, along with a few others, that we could because of the fact that rarely any network stock is less than $1. With such a large market and profitibility for advertisers it seemed very possible. My post is to ask the question is if $1 dollar is really out of the question for QBID if it does have 15 billion O/S.
As I said, IM NOT BASHING. You literally tried to put words in my mouth when I hadn't said anything about QBID not reaching a penny or three. With 15 billion O/S they only need a market cap of 150 million to reach the penny which is well under the 1 billion dollar estimate.
I don't know what to ask anymore. I'm just going to get put down. I asked questions about how much of a buy back is possible before the PPS has to rise. I asked if my model of share destruction is possible. I never put down QBID in my post so don't accuse me of bashing. Matt
Also I can't find a quote for ECNC. Did they change their ticker?
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 15, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 15, 2004).]
The public participation phase is where most of the technical trend followers begin to participate, and prices begin to advance rapidly. The distribution phase takes place when the newspapers begin to print increasingly bullish stories, economic news is better than ever and speculative volume increases. It is during this phase that the informed investors begin to distribute before anyone else.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I thought PPS was always determined by O/S and the value of the company. What makes a company jump from .03 to $18? If it's not the O/S and market cap that will determine the PPS then what are the factors? You may have noticed that Ric has also said he believes QBID may never reach a dollar and also said the share structure needs to change before that happens. What am I not understanding? MattAlso I can't find a quote for ECNC. Did they change their ticker?
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 15, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 15, 2004).]
Kudos on highlighting u4's u4oria (read Euphoria) in the past, thereby adding another level of comedy to the post. Everytime I think back to how positive he was and now how utterly negative he is, it makes me laugh. What a maroon.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Matt, I don't recall you asking a question. I have to look back, but stop mentioning the O/S. IT MEANS NOTHING. If your a new investor like you say, you talking an awful lot about the O/S. Read this, maybe it will help.Someone posted that bashers have a new way of sneaking in, hmmmmm.
Posted by: U4TSAF2
In reply to: dkgross who wrote msg# 6117 Date:4/24/2004 11:23:12 PM
Post #of 36033NUMEROUS COMPANIES TRADE ON THE PINKS.
YOU HAVE MANY COMPANIES THAT TRADE FROM $.0001 ALL THE WAY UP TO OVER $100/SHARE. THIS IS ANOTHER MISCONCEPTION AND TO THINK UPGRADE IS NECESSARY THAT IS WRONG.
THE FACT IS ECNC DID IN FACT JUMP FROM .03 TO $18/SHARE. THAT DID IN FACT HAPPEN. SO TO SAY THAT THE O/S OR MARKET CAP OR WHAT-EVER IS COMPLETELY WRONG; IT'S NOT ONLY WRONG IN RESPECT THAT IT'S WRONG AT FACE VALUE, BUT HERE'S A STOCK THAT DID IT AND THAT SPEAKS MORE THAN SOMEONE TRYING TO TELL US WHAT CAN AND CAN'T HAPPEN.
PLUS ALL THE NUMEROUS OTHER COMPANIES THAT DID THROUGHOUT THE 1990'S.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
If it's not the O/S and market cap that will determine the PPS then what are the factors?
So many! Volume for one. Buys another. Reporting profits. Progress. Getting onto big exchanges, reverse splits, best of all, THE DEMAND for the product or service. Without getting technical, the O/S helps also but 1 factor does not control the PPS. Just Watch.
Great question by the way.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 15, 2004).]
PPS will take care of itself soon enough. I just need to make sure I've loaded the boat!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
I think what you are worried about is wheteher or not the company is worth that PPS. My understanding is that the value of the company at this moment or, the value in the future are the determining factors. REalize that someone who was interested in a short term gain would care about today's value vs a long who would care about the future value.
I am simple minded sometimes, so keep the baseball bats in the closet....
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Wouldn't things like volume and demand be more factors for short term growth in price? I'm more concerned with long term right now. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Wouldn't things like volume and demand be more factors for short term growth in price? I'm more concerned with long term right now. Matt
There are two things that factor into a stocks value - Fear and Greed.
Hope you and the kiddos are doing well!
P.S. Something to look forward to...uh, I think Dora Dora is coming out with a Christmas special. I am soooo excited...LOL
Glad QBID held its own today.
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Clyde, thanks for the Walmart-bag-turned- diaper. Man, that will save me gobs of money right there. LOL And the duct tape idea is a gem.Hope you and the kiddos are doing well!
P.S. Something to look forward to...uh, I think Dora Dora is coming out with a Christmas special. I am soooo excited...LOL
Glad QBID held its own today.
We bought our 5 year old a Dora hat, Dora gloves and Dora nightgowns this weekend. She's into it big time. I like Boots the monkey but they don't have undies or anything in adult sizes.
#1. The market cap an not determine how high a stock can go.
#2. The outstanding shares can not determine how high the stock can go.
On 07/24/1996 QBID hit $7.00 per share with 7,800 traded on that day.
I will put up a 1-sided bet which means you dont have to put up any money. You have to prove that QBID can't hit .10 or .50 or 1.00 or 6.00 with the current stock position. I put up $1000 which I will send paypal or money order right to you.
In addition, you have to explain how all those internet companies and tech stocks flew off the handle from 1990-2000 and went upwards of $300-$800/Share when the O/S and Market Cap could never justify that.
I see this time and time again, and for you new people, the outstanding shares or market cap which is determined by the share price & number of shares, can not, will not, nor can it ever determine how high a stock can go. It is impossible and 1000% wrong!
The outstanding shares, float and market cap come into play for the following reasons:
#1. A Buy Out.
#2. A upgrade from say pinks to Nasdaq.
#3. A reverse or forward split.
Neither of the two will apply for the most part until say 2-3 years after broadcasting when it becomes a major player. We have the additional guarantee of a No Reverse split by Frank Olsen and the board of directors and the reason for this is because Frank Olsen understands what a R/S really does to a stock.
Most of you long term holders want to exit at $2 or less, None of this really applies & if it does for some reason then you'll have plenty of notice.
A recent example of this crazy share price which blows the whole theory that QBID can't do something is, TASR which was down from $800/Share to $1.60, then back over $100 in April and now settling at around $70. Again, this is one example of many.
Have we got so in love with this stock that we will throw out all common sense to investing. We will go up and a lot. But until O/S is lowered either by buybacks or stock restructuring we will never see a dollar pps and it is because of O/S.
Look at it this way, we could have 700 billion shares like CMKX and I know for a fact we wouldn't be at .0027. We would be at .0002 just like them. And they are dreaming that O/S means nothing either. Also ask WMNI if O/S means nothing. After there dilution that stock dived. Its going up on talks of takeover but still. TFCT on rumors of Dilution of O/S tanked. They haven't even decided to do it yet.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 15, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Guess what boys and girls ?
We are LIVE.
P.S. You can delete this post too after you read it.
46% of todays volume was comprised of orders over 1 mil. shares. 61% of these orders were buys and 39% were sells. The largest purchase which was most likely one order was at 10:46:36 this morning for 13 mil. shares or $36,400. All this just does not add up to being down 3.57%????????
12:23:27 1000000 0.0025 -
11:10:21 1000000 0.0027 -
15:08:00 1000000 0.0027 +
12:23:27 1000000 0.0027 +
15:37:51 1000000 0.0028 +
12:28:21 1044560 0.0025 -
9:30:39 1050000 0.0026 -
9:35:51 1110000 0.0027 -
15:55:06 1250000 0.0027 +
11:02:18 1523500 0.0027 -
10:26:39 1800000 0.0028 +
15:58:18 1900000 0.0027 +
14:51:39 1923997 0.0027 -
10:29:15 2000000 0.0028 +
16:02:09 3000000 0.0027 +
14:51:39 3570000 0.0028 +
10:46:36 5000000 0.0028 +
10:46:36 7000000 0.0028 +
quote:
Originally posted by krecik:
Looking at todays activity:
46% of todays volume was comprised of orders over 1 mil. shares. 61% of these orders were buys and 39% were sells. The largest purchase which was most likely one order was at 10:46:36 this morning for 13 mil. shares or $36,400. All this just does not add up to being down 3.57%????????
12:23:27 1000000 0.0025 -
11:10:21 1000000 0.0027 -
15:08:00 1000000 0.0027 +
12:23:27 1000000 0.0027 +
15:37:51 1000000 0.0028 +
12:28:21 1044560 0.0025 -
9:30:39 1050000 0.0026 -
9:35:51 1110000 0.0027 -
15:55:06 1250000 0.0027 +
11:02:18 1523500 0.0027 -
10:26:39 1800000 0.0028 +
15:58:18 1900000 0.0027 +
14:51:39 1923997 0.0027 -
10:29:15 2000000 0.0028 +
16:02:09 3000000 0.0027 +
14:51:39 3570000 0.0028 +
10:46:36 5000000 0.0028 +
10:46:36 7000000 0.0028 +
Brings up lots of questions. And I don't even want to go there.
dz
[This message has been edited by denzen (edited November 16, 2004).]
When a stock starts going up fast, more people will buy into it. Therefore making the PPS keep rising.
I mean imagine this stock going .0035, .0045, .0050, .075, I'll want more and more of it to not miss the boat.
Dam mind manipulators! But it will happen.
QBID IS JUST TO BAFFLING TO FIGURE--SO I QUIT TRYING. LOL HAVE A WAIT AND SEE ATTITUDE!!
WATCHING USCI BECAUSE OF NEWS AND OF COURSE MBAH!!
GOOD LUCK TO ALL QBID BELIEVERS!!
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
I think it's almost time the MM's play the game the other way.When a stock starts going up fast, more people will buy into it. Therefore making the PPS keep rising.
I mean imagine this stock going .0035, .0045, .0050, .075, I'll want more and more of it to not miss the boat.
Dam mind manipulators! But it will happen.
When QBID starts to move up, I'll buy more.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Guess what boys and girls ?
We are LIVE.
Yep! And I'ld love to know if anyone is watching so they can tell us if theres commercials.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4575975
Originally posted by whizknock:
Yep! And I'ld love to know if anyone is watching so they can tell us if theres commercials."All we ever had to do is launch!"
Paradise Falls was interesting...and actually pretty good
On Q Live at least tonight was clearly a gay program..don't know if that's it's slant everynight but tonight it was...3 people 2 guys/gay 1 woman/lesbian....Jack E Jette was in the middle with David Taffet on his left and Chrisann Eastwood on his right...they were for a first show pretty cohesive...smooth flowing...they had a few emails up to this point...I think the show will be pretty good....about every 1/2 hour or so they had Qews Break w/Scott Withers...he's good, very good....and did a good job reporting about 3 topics per showing....I saw 3 advertisers Time/Life Video, a snapshot travel of Guadalaja (sp?) and Smart Spin...and a few psa
the quality on all programming was very good...I didn't see any technical difficulties...it all flowed smooth....
dr silk...I didn't have any of that....7:00 the program started promptly..ran through...no commercials....at 7:23 it was over and they put the commercials on until 7:30 which then On Q Live started...there were no technical difficulties here...very smooth
Being their first night with this type of programming I'd say they did pretty good....
oxy...I give a a very good rating....for a first live show I think they did very well...very well coordinated...very cohesive...smooth flow of conversation....each has a different personality so that's also pretty good...they did not run out of any words to say which for a first show is also pretty good and while I watched it (it is still going on)...they had a few emails....
overall I'd rate it pretty good
------------------
[This message has been edited by mullocco (edited November 16, 2004).]
------------------
DIANA
Go Q
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4575975
Originally posted by mullocco:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by whizknock:
[b]
Yep! And I'ld love to know if anyone is watching so they can tell us if theres commercials."All we ever had to do is launch!"
Paradise Falls was interesting...and actually pretty good
On Q Live at least tonight was clearly a gay program..don't know if that's it's slant everynight but tonight it was...3 people 2 guys/gay 1 woman/lesbian....Jack E Jette was in the middle with David Taffet on his left and Chrisann Eastwood on his right...they were for a first show pretty cohesive...smooth flowing...they had a few emails up to this point...I think the show will be pretty good....about every 1/2 hour or so they had Qews Break w/Scott Withers...he's good, very good....and did a good job reporting about 3 topics per showing....I saw 3 advertisers Time/Life Video, a snapshot travel of Guadalaja (sp?) and Smart Spin...and a few psa
the quality on all programming was very good...I didn't see any technical difficulties...it all flowed smooth....
Being their first night with this type of programming I'd say they did pretty good....
[/B][/QUOTE]
Mullocco!
Thank you very much! 3 advertisers! Just the begining...
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Clyde, now THAT'S an idea!!! LOL
It's so simple. I scare myself at times.
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
It's so simple. I scare myself at times.
YOU SCARE US TOO!! ZANAX TIME!! LOL
THAT IS A TOPIC FOR LOS VEGAS!! LOL
------------------
DIANA
Firs tof all you have at least 2 groups of stock holders. Investors and traders. Investors are people who are socking away money into a company because they believe in the long haul and the future of the company. THese people decrease the supply because they are les likely to sell their holdings always expecting tomorrow to be a better day to sell or they are holding the stock for a rainy day.
On the other side of things you have traders. These people are not concerned with longevity of a company only in the volume being traded and the popularity of the company. They get in and out within hours or days and they dont accept much risk of loss. If the stock drops a certain percentage they bail and go play someplace else. These guys create the demand and contribute to the supply because they are quite happy to part with their shares.
Then you have the company itself. It creates a given raw supply of shares (in qbid's case a total of 50 or 51 billion shares of which a percentage is traded in one form or another). It creates a demand for those shares by releasing news, growing its revenue streams, and expansion of the company.
Mix all these things together and you get stock price movement. If no one is selling their holdings, the price does not change. The price as we refer to it is the OFFER or BUY price.
Imagine you wish to sell your car. You may ASK $35,000 but if no one offers you $35,000 it is not worth $35,000. Your highest bid for the car determines its worth at that point in time, in terms of liquidation value. If you choose not to sell thats your choice, but if no one is offering your price, you cannot sell, straddling you with a car instead of cash. Perhaps in the future it will rise in value, and demand will bring the people around to buy your car at your price, but for now, it is a hunkj of metal waiting for a buyer.
Stocks are no different. QBID could be worth $100billion but if people are selling the stock at $.0001 thats the price, no getting around it.
On the buy back they announced they were buying back 2% of the shares which on the con call they said that equated to approximately 1billion shares. This tells me they bought MORE than 2% of the O/S which is a good thing for us. It reduced the supply side by possibly 15% or more.
The only way for the price to rise is for people to not accept the lower price when selling. They must demonstrate faith in the company and hold the stock for a higher price. Nothing else matters.
Right now the stock is being traded out of panic, either panic over the stock or panic from another source. Perhaps people needed the money to pay bills and cashed out their holdings. Whatever the reason, they needed the cash now and took whatever people offered. So the price is holding at a low point.
The price will rise when the company releases a good financial report, I figure the second or third. The first one will be ugly due to the long red period. But it will likelyt have a hint of good. The second will have to be very good, showing a significant number of subscribers (which I feel they should ditch and not encrypt the signal) and more importantly, a fair number of sponsors and advertisers.
quote:
Originally posted by Scoundrel:
Stock price comes down to supply and demand.
Mix all these things together and you get stock price movement. If no one is selling their holdings, the price does not change. The price as we refer to it is the OFFER or BUY price.
Wouldn't this be kind of false. In my opinion there is always going to be someone buying or selling and the price adjusts correct? If someone is looking to buy, if no one is selling then it means the price is too low. If someone is looking to sell but they're not able to then the price is too high. If all it takes is more investors to pledge they won't sell then count me in. I'm not letting go of my shares.
Now that we're live what is our next step? Receiving revenue from subscriptions or broadcasting on a more national level? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
The distribution phase takes place when the newspapers begin to print increasingly bullish stories, economic news is better than ever and speculative volume increases. It is during this phase that the informed investors begin to distribute before anyone else.
What is meant by distribute? Selling their shares? I figured it meant the distribution of the information by newspapers and media but then it mentions that the informed investors begin to distribute before anyone else. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
What is meant by distribute? Selling their shares? I figured it meant the distribution of the information by newspapers and media but then it mentions that the informed investors begin to distribute before anyone else. Matt
Matt - I would recommend buying a book titled "A beginners guide to day trading online" by Toni Turner. I wouldn't take it as the gospel but it's a good read. I'm sure someone else can recommend other reading materials that will help you with a lot of your questions.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by CouchP:
I would think that we should start seeing a slow climb in anticipation of next PR.
quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
does anyone know why we are sitting at the LOD??? i just don't get it. oh well i'm sure it will bounce very soon.
GO QBID!!!!!
if we know, we would not be sitting here looking at the da### red but drinking in lasvegas already. could someone get the crystal ball out?
btw, anyone got call from Frank today?
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 16, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by tqn:
if we know, we would not be sitting here looking at the da### red but drinking in lasvegas already. could someone get the crystal ball out?
btw, anyone got call from Frank today?[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 16, 2004).]
yeah hey when you get that crystal ball out i could use one myself. i hope someone gets one soon.
NEW YORK, Nov 16, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Q TELEVISION NETWORK (Pink Sheets: QBID), the television network for the gay and lesbian community, is premiering two more original series on Friday, November 12. "Q ON THE MOVE," a travelogue of gay-friendly places, people and events will roll out at 6pm (EST) and "WOW! WOMEN ON WOMEN" a lesbian talk show, at 6:30m (EST).
"Q ON THE MOVE" features host Nick Oram on a cross-country discovery of gay America's most fascinating sights, sounds and people. The premiere episode takes Nick to Seattle where he goes backstage with lesbian strippers, plays with the Seattle Gay Rugby team, and visits gay and lesbian performance artists. Other cities explored on the weekly series include San Diego, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., New York, Miami, Chicago, San Francisco and Dallas, where Nick will introduce his audience to the diversity of the gay and lesbian community. Every week there will be a new place and a new adventure.
"WOW! WOMEN ON WOMEN" is a weekly 60-minute lesbian talk show dedicated to issues covering all women - everything from healthcare and gay adoption to travel tips and cooking suggestions. Co-hosts Melinda Tremaglio, veteran activist/producer and currently the president of the Palm Springs Chapter of the National Organization for Women, and comedienne/writer Rasa Hollender, will speak to women from all walks of life -- celebrities, athletes, politicians, and Moms.
As previously reported, on Monday, November 8, Q Television unveiled "On Q Live," a 2 1/2 hour live entertainment talk show, running 4:30pm - 7pm (PST) and from 7:30pm. - 10pm (EST). It is being hosted by Chrisanne Eastwood, a founding member of NYC's famed Planet Q comedy troupe and a regular commentator on the PBS newsmagazine, "In the Life"; comedian and talk show host Jack E. Jett, described as a cross between Graham Norton and The Osbournes, whose "Jack E. Jett Show" will soon be seen on Q Television; and journalist and political activist David Taffet.
Commenting on topics of interest to the gay and lesbian community, the show invites viewers who are subscribers to join in discussions with the hosts using their Web cameras. In addition, "On Q Live" has Q News Briefs with an anchor reporting on important gay-related news and sports topics. There are up-to-date, live news breaks and interactive emails throughout the evening.
Q Television can be found on RCN on Channel 255. For further information on programming and subscriptions please visit www.qtelevision.com.
About Q Television Network
Q Television Network is a subsidiary of Triangle Multi Media. Q Television was organized to create and develop a network devoted to providing television programming for the gay lesbian and bisexual community. The company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population. Management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public. The company's programming will be available on a subscription basis to those interested in its programming. The network will broadcast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The network will be available across the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico, through satellite distribution.
Safe Harbor Statement
As a cautionary note to investors, certain matters discussed in this press release may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such matters involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially, including the following: changes in economic conditions; general competitive factors; the television network's ability to execute its business model and strategic plans; and the risks described from time to time in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
SOURCE: Q Television Network
CWR & Partners, LLP
Ronnie Welch, 508-222-4802
Ronnie@cwrpartners.com
Copyright (C) 2004 Business Wire. All rights reserved.
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
looks like they screwed up the dates.
dz
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 16, 2004).]
tqn
Member posted November 15, 2004 17:51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow, Frank found my email address as well. he asked everyone's opion if the below theory applied to the pink !!!
HEY GUYS, WE'RE GONNA MAKE TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, I MEAN LOOK AT B.E.T. WHICH SOLD FOR 3-BILLION DOLLARS AND NEVER SHOWED A PROFIT. SO WHAT I'M GONNA DO IS ISSUE ANOTHER 6-BILLION SHARES ON TOP OF 50-BILLION MORE TO TOTAL QBID AT 71-BILLION SHARES AND THEN....
GET READY FOR THIS....
I'LL ANNOUNCE A 2% BUYBACK JUST LIKE THE ONE I ANNOUNCED BACK IN FEB '04. I'LL EVEN TOSS IN THERE THAT THE UPGRADE WILL TAKE 6-12 MONTHS. I ANNOUNCED BACK IN FEB A UPGRADE AND ALSO IN 2000 A UPGRADE BUT I NEVER SAID 6-12 MONTHS SO THAT MAKES IT DIFFERENT. "HEY, LET ME BORROW $10 FROM YOU SO I CAN PAY YOU THE $10 I OWE YA."
OH BUT WAIT, RENEE SLIPS AND TELLS US THE CORPORATION IS "DIRTY" AND CAN'T BE UPGRADED. LET'S JUST SWEEP THAT UNDER THE RUG. I MEAN, IT'S CLEAR, NO MATTER WHAT I FLAT OUT LIE ABOUT AND NO MATTER HOW MUCH A FRAUD I AM, I GOT THESE PEOPLE ON MESSAGE BOARDS DEFENDING ME; REGARDLESS.
84-BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE WALL <BURP>
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
[[[SIX HUNDRED BILLION?]]]Is that what Frank said?
SIX HUNDRED BILLION?
I just can't get around that $600,000,000,000.oo of disposable income of our targeted audience.
Neither can The CEOs of many a Fortune 500 Companies that are drooling over the prospect of developing an intensely loyal consumer base that wields that kind financial clout! My bet is they've already shot the commercials.
No matter how I do the math one percent of SIX HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS keeps coming up as SIX BILLION DOLLARS. One tenth of one percent is SIX HUNDRED MILLION BUCKS!
One tenth of one percent,,,,,,
$600,000,000.oo!
That kind of revenue alone would put this over a buck easy.
That's just one reason that it's so difficult to find a Genuine Broadcasting National TV Network that trades for less than $1 a share. That & the fact that none exist.
There are no real TV Networks trading under a dollar a share.
Think about this for a minute.
What does the word NETWORK imply?
Am I the only one that sees where this is headed?
Q TV Channel
Q TV Movie Channel
Q TV Music Channel
Q TV News Channel
Q TV Comedy Channel
Q TV Social History Channel
Q TV Movie Channel II
Q TV Sports Channel
Q TV Movie Channel III R ratedThe list goes on,,,
There's only one way I do not see $1 per share. Frank sells the whole thing & they take it private.
Accumulation Phase continues!
For me this is a genuine long term play.
Matter of time.
Nothing more, nothing less.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 17, 2004).]
4 things to that buyback question.
1. Perhaps the buyback is still going on.
2. Maybe its over but they have been busy with other issues and Pr'S.
3. Maybe they're done and they're working on a PR for it now.
4. Maybe they're done but they decided to buyback more.
Are any of those bad for us? Patience!
Frank Said: Our original live programming will begin November 15th.
Give credit where credit is due:
He was on target but I don't hear any praises. But when they miss a deadline or a date given I hear complaints.
Keep up the great work Frank!
That was only 2 weeks ago. Do you think they completed 40% in 2 weeks? I don't. But maybe they did.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
I was thinking rounding bottom big with the buy back question.
Makes me smile.
Honestly if this rounding bottom therory of mine is correct, we should be coming into the up curve of the rounding bottom and should never see these levels again as a reversal pattern will take place.
Image not showing. Click link to see chart.
dacayiay[dc][pd20,2!f][vc60][iut!uh14,3!lg!lc20!lf!la12,26,9][j31505762,y]]http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c= qbid,uu[e,a]dacayiay[dc][pd20,2!f][vc60][iut!uh14,3!lg!lc20!lf!la12,26,9][j31505762,y]
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 16, 2004).]
Rounding Bottom Check it out:
Up until end of August, QBID was having volume of over 225,000 each day. After that we have dropped to mostly below 125,000 each day. Which only can mean "consolidation"
If I am right to where I think the "rounding bottom" has started, we are in the bottom curve. Maybe another week until we start the up curve and then it will take time to establish the uptrend. Here's an example.
Rounding Bottom (Reversal)
The rounding bottom is a long-term reversal pattern. It is also referred to as a saucer bottom, and represents a long consolidation period that turns from a bearish to bullish.
1. Prior Trend: In order to be a reversal pattern, there must be a prior trend to reverse. Ideally, the low of a rounding bottom will mark a new low or reaction low. In practice, there are occasions when the low is recorded many months earlier and the security trades flat before forming the pattern. When the rounding bottom does finally form, its low may not be the lowest low of the last few months.
2. Decline: The first portion of the rounding bottom is the decline that leads to the low of the pattern. This decline can take on different forms: some are quite jagged with a number of reaction highs and lows, while others trade lower in a more linear fashion.
3. Low: The low of the rounding bottom can resemble a "V' bottom, but should not be too sharp and should take a few weeks to form. Because prices are in a long-term decline, the possibility of a selling climax exists that could create a lower spike.
4. Advance: The advance off of the lows forms the right half of the pattern and should take about the same amount of time as the prior decline. If the advance is too sharp, then the validity of a rounding bottom may be in question.
5. Breakout: Bullish confirmation comes when the pattern breaks above the reaction high that marked the beginning of the decline at the start of the pattern. As with most resistance breakouts, this level can become support. However, rounding bottoms represent long-term reversal and this new support level may not be that significant.
6. Volume: In an ideal pattern, volume levels will track the shape of the rounding bottom: high at the beginning of the decline, low at the end of the decline and rising during the advance. Volume levels are not too important on the decline, but there should be an increase in volume on the advance and preferably on the breakout.
P.S. It's almost 4 hours later and still the ONLY response is from Golf57( the zinger guy). THAT has to be his sorriest attempt to date, weaker than a 93 year old quad with dementia and erectile dysfunction.
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 16, 2004).]
BTW, don't we all like big rounded bottoms???? (Bet Frank does, too...)
Sorry, couldn't help myself...it's the exhaustion setting in.
Take care everyone...still here, just busy these days.
QBID closed up today...0028!
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Too funny RNIN! (What an image! LOL)BTW, don't we all like big rounded bottoms???? (Bet Frank does, too...)
Sorry, couldn't help myself...it's the exhaustion setting in.
Take care everyone...still here, just busy these days.
QBID closed up today...0028!
Hang in there Sunny. I too love rounded bottoms. I think BigTip's graph is a good indication of where we're headed. With commercials no less!!!!!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
Ever ask yourself why bashers don't compile a list of Broadcasting National TV Networks that trade for under $1 a share?
They don't exsist!
Most Broadcasting National TV Networks had to prove their worth before they ever launched!
Yep! QBID was no exception!
When others watch the future unfold & write how surprised they are at how high our share price climbs,,,
I'll be happy,,, but I will not be surprised!
Those that do not hold a strong diciplined core position will be really pissed at new investors that bought their shares & proclaim how obvious this play was. After all,,,
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
I'ld like to know how many people got a chance to view the live programing & how many commercials aired.
Thanks Mullocco for bringing this to us!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4575975
ok watched Paradise Falls/and On Q Live (some) with Qews Break about every 1/2 hour...
Paradise Falls was interesting...and actually pretty good
On Q Live at least tonight was clearly a gay program..don't know if that's it's slant everynight but tonight it was...3 people 2 guys/gay 1 woman/lesbian....Jack E Jette was in the middle with David Taffet on his left and Chrisann Eastwood on his right...they were for a first show pretty cohesive...smooth flowing...they had a few emails up to this point...I think the show will be pretty good....about every 1/2 hour or so they had Qews Break w/Scott Withers...he's good, very good....and did a good job reporting about 3 topics per showing....I saw 3 advertisers Time/Life Video, a snapshot travel of Guadalaja (sp?) and Smart Spin...and a few psa
the quality on all programming was very good...I didn't see any technical difficulties...it all flowed smooth....
dr silk...I didn't have any of that....7:00 the program started promptly..ran through...no commercials....at 7:23 it was over and they put the commercials on until 7:30 which then On Q Live started...there were no technical difficulties here...very smooth
Being their first night with this type of programming I'd say they did pretty good....
oxy...I give a a very good rating....for a first live show I think they did very well...very well coordinated...very cohesive...smooth flow of conversation....each has a different personality so that's also pretty good...they did not run out of any words to say which for a first show is also pretty good and while I watched it (it is still going on)...they had a few emails....
overall I'd rate it pretty good
------------------
[This message has been edited by mullocco (edited November 16, 2004).]
------------------
whizknock
Posted by: skunksyard
In reply to: elijah23 who wrote msg# 36260 Date:11/16/2004 8:21:47 PM
Post #of 36349
ok play by play for tonight....
same 2 programs...I'm getting hooked on Paradise Loss...it's like Dallas or Knots Landing, goes on for 23 minutes (no commercials) a bunch of romances here and there with their individual plots...ya I think I'm hooked on that one....the Q on Live (Internet Cafe) again tonight was very good....I'm amazed at only the 2nd night for these folks and how well they work together...actually they mix humor with gay issues and are REAL outspoken..kind of funny the way the present the facts vs. the non gay talk shows...tonights subject was gay teenagers and they had on a gay 22 year old who gave her coming out story...again the interaction with the 3 Q folks and this person was mixed with humor, facts and candor...this show is going to be VERY GOOD....and each of the 3 Q folks have a good sense of humor...
mixed with Qews Break....Scott Wither is very good..and what I like about it is he talks to the camera facing toward the screen and then is able to smoothly transfer to a side camera to give next segment. And it's interesting to get the same news with the gay spin
commercials:
Time Life
Smart Spin (those plastic bowls, etc)
Snap Shot (the travel commercial)...tonight French countryside....very good
BCDI an at home educational course offering
Quality very good on everything...one brief, very brief technical issue but resolved very quickly....
I suspect the report will be the same until WOW and Q on the Move come out so I won't be giving any more reviews until then...and again providing these shows are on at a time I can watch them.....
Someone's gearing up for a post BuyBack party!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
------------------
whizknock
I really get excited reading the reports. Makes me want to subscribe. No RCN in Denver area.
Have to wait until it's picked up by Direct TV.
dz
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
Whiz,
thanks for those posts on the programs.I really get excited reading the reports. Makes me want to subscribe. No RCN in Denver area.
Have to wait until it's picked up by Direct TV.dz
DZ!
In the not too distant future we will wonder why we didn't motgage the home!
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
DZ!In the not too distant future we will wonder why we didn't motgage the home!
Whiz,
I only need to be .5 to be mortgage-free. can you look at your crystal ball and tell me when?
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
QBID is no exception!
Ever ask yourself why bashers don't compile a list of Broadcasting National TV Networks that trade for under $1 a share?
They don't exsist!
Do you have a list of networks that are traded? I'm not sure how to find them. Most networks are owned by larger companies such as Disney and Time Warner. Thanks. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Do you have a list of networks that are traded? I'm not sure how to find them. Most networks are owned by larger companies such as Disney and Time Warner. Thanks. Matt
Go to their web sites and look for investor information.
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Too funny RNIN! (What an image! LOL)BTW, don't we all like big rounded bottoms???? (Bet Frank does, too...)
Sorry, couldn't help myself...it's the exhaustion setting in.
Take care everyone...still here, just busy these days.
QBID closed up today...0028!
Sunny and I like cute little rounded bottoms, we just have to clean them up all the time.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Do you have a list of networks that are traded? I'm not sure how to find them. Most networks are owned by larger companies such as Disney and Time Warner. Thanks. Matt
Matt!
No!!! I do not have a list. None exists.
I posted this back on April 11th on Raging Bull. That was a week or so after I first asked that question here. I already knew there were no Genuine Broadcasting National TV Networks that trade for less than a buck a share!
To date there's only one National TV Network currently broadcasting content that trades under a dollar,,,QBID!
................................................................
By: whizknock
11 Apr 2004, 01:14 AM EDT
Msg. 191192 of 632498
Jump to msg. #
[[[[[**NEED SOME HELP! BASHERS WELCOME**]]]
Please provide me a list of TV Networks currently broadcasting content that trade under one dollar.
Thanks for any help.
..................................................................
That will not be true a couple years from now!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
I've always supported QBID, even telling you guys, I'll wait another 3 months to start the broadcasting. So I'll say this again, I'll wait 3 months to hear about another carrier.
Right place, right time, right stock.
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Remember most of us were terrified that they would keep delaying the date to air with RCN? Remember when we were terrified thinking if they would air at all? That was when this stock was risky! When it was "just an idea". We're in now. We're on. We're a Network!I've always supported QBID, even telling you guys, I'll wait another 3 months to start the broadcasting. So I'll say this again, I'll wait 3 months to hear about another carrier.
Right place, right time, right stock.
Yep! I remember. Now I'm terefied of how many millions I'll have to turn over to the IRS!
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
Hello.
I am the Happiness Fairy.
I've sprinkled happy dust on you.
So Smile dammit. This **** is expensive.
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
Matt!No!!! I do not have a list. None exists.
I'm not sure if you understood me correctly so I'll ask again. I'm not necessarily asking for Networks that are under a dollar. I just would like to know of network stocks all together regardless if they're under or over a dollar. I'd like to look at their history of growth, etc. Still none? Matt
Clyde, you know I have to love rounded bottoms...Think it was that rounded bottom thing that got me into my current situation (4 little boys running around the house...and they prefer naked to being clothed. Go figure)! Gotta love it, though! LOL.
Have a great day...
Nice 'talking' to you RNIN! You have a good day, too. Good luck.
GOOO QBID!!!
LMAO!
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I'm not sure if you understood me correctly so I'll ask again. I'm not necessarily asking for Networks that are under a dollar. I just would like to know of network stocks all together regardless if they're under or over a dollar. I'd like to look at their history of growth, etc. Still none? Matt
There was a time I had a list of almost all publicly traded TV Networks. We had it on several of our past threads but I never saved it because I satisfied that one question I had. Another thing. Most did not have quite as huge an O/S as we do but on the other hand most were trading ove $10 a share, not just $1! I'll be happy with $1.25!
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
DIANA. I think I need an extra 'sprinkling' over here...Can you be a pal and just pour the whole damn bag/barrel over my head now? Whatever happy dust falls on the floor I can just hoover.LMAO!
YOU ARE A NUT!! I CAN HARDLY WAIT TO MEET YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE HERE.
THERE--I DUMPED A TON OF HAPPY DUST YOUR WAY.
DON'T HOOVER--RECYCLE--ROLL IN IT!!
------------------
DIANA
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
There was a time I had a list of almost all publicly traded TV Networks. We had it on several of our past threads but I never saved it because I satisfied that one question I had. Another thing. Most did not have quite as huge an O/S as we do but on the other hand most were trading ove $10 a share, not just $1! I'll be happy with $1.25!
WHIZ,
I REMEMBER WHEN YOU DID THE RESEARCH. I WILL LOOK AND SEE IF I KEPT IT!! VERY GOOD DD.
NOT TO RE-HASH OLD STUFF BUT FOR NEWBIES MAYBE WE SHOULD PULL UP IMPORTANT OLD DD???
WE ARE IN THIS COMPANY BECAUSE WE DID THE DUE MONTHS AGO.
DOES ANYONE AGREE THAT BRING UP OLD DD WOULD BE GOOD?? IF NOT LET ME KNOW!! DON'T WANT A BUNCH OF BASHING--JUST REMINDING PEOPLE OF THE RESEARCH THAT HAS BEEN DONE...OPINIONS??
------------------
DIANA
It would be very good! Thanks
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
WHIZ,I REMEMBER WHEN YOU DID THE RESEARCH. I WILL LOOK AND SEE IF I KEPT IT!! VERY GOOD DD.
NOT TO RE-HASH OLD STUFF BUT FOR NEWBIES MAYBE WE SHOULD PULL UP IMPORTANT OLD DD???
WE ARE IN THIS COMPANY BECAUSE WE DID THE DUE MONTHS AGO.
DOES ANYONE AGREE THAT BRING UP OLD DD WOULD BE GOOD?? IF NOT LET ME KNOW!! DON'T WANT A BUNCH OF BASHING--JUST REMINDING PEOPLE OF THE RESEARCH THAT HAS BEEN DONE...OPINIONS??
By: trees101ny --**FYI LOOK>>>
17 Nov 2004, 07:03 AM EST
Msg. 65710 of 65714
Jump to msg. #
Good Mornin' QBIDders, FWIW
Here is something kinda interesting.
Nasdaq risk grades.......
Fortune 500s are in the 100 range
Siri is at 312
--**Qbid is rated at 526**--
Not bad when others I looked at (otc-pk) were
in the 2000 to 2500 range.
------------------
whizknock
POTENTIAL IS PRICELESS!!
------------------
DIANA
[This message has been edited by realityinc21 (edited November 17, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by realityinc21 (edited November 17, 2004).]
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
Ric! Good GZ post. I responded without using your post.
quote:
Originally posted by whizknock:
Food for thought!By: trees101ny --**FYI LOOK>>>
17 Nov 2004, 07:03 AM EST
Msg. 65710 of 65714
Jump to msg. #
Good Mornin' QBIDders, FWIW
Here is something kinda interesting.
Nasdaq risk grades.......
Fortune 500s are in the 100 range
Siri is at 312
--**Qbid is rated at 526**--
Not bad when others I looked at (otc-pk) were
in the 2000 to 2500 range.
http://www.nasdaq.com/services/riskMetrics.stm
min riskgrade in us market 17
max riskgrade in us market 17446
avg riskgrade in us market 237
qbid riskgrade 526
investment riskranking: 29% of the tickers in US Markets are riskier than QBID.
S&P500 56
Nasdaq 76
QBID 526
where 0 no risk - 100-700 average risk - over 700 extremly risk.
i am happy with my investment.
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 17, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:Hello.
I am the Happiness Fairy.
I've sprinkled happy dust on you.
So Smile dammit. This **** is expensive.
Diana - I thought you were suppose to snort the expensive dust?????
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I'm not sure if you understood me correctly so I'll ask again. I'm not necessarily asking for Networks that are under a dollar. I just would like to know of network stocks all together regardless if they're under or over a dollar. I'd like to look at their history of growth, etc. Still none? Matt
Matt - again, go to the network web sites, look for investor information, do some homework and report back with what you find.
------------------
Memory's the second thing to go, I can't remember the first.
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited November 17, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
Diana - I thought you were suppose to snort the expensive dust?????
LOL--THOSE WERE THE DAYS.....
------------------
DIANA
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
Memory's the second thing to go, I can't remember the first.
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 17, 2004).]
Who's holding? Did this come to you from Pharm, Diana?
DZ
dz
?
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Shoot I forgot that memory was the second thing let alone what the first was. If I could remember what I have forgotten, I would be a smart man.Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 17, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by denzen:
Morning folks!
What's this about expensive dust and snorting?Who's holding? Did this come to you from Pharm, Diana?
DZ
DZ,
SLEEPING IN? LOL
HOW IS PHARM? HAVE NOT HEARD FROM HIM!!
------------------
DIANA
just finished breakfast.
Don't know about Pharm. He's maybe into drugs!lol
dz
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
DZ,SLEEPING IN? LOL
HOW IS PHARM? HAVE NOT HEARD FROM HIM!!
Kmart Buying Sears in $11 Billion Deal. It will make it the 3rd largest retailer and will be call Sears Holding Corp. Guess K-Mart still knows who has the better name. Might want to watch these stocks. Might be some good swing trades in this.
Ric
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 17, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Ric, KMRT is currently trading @ $118.93 per share. Slightly over a penny!
Terry[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 17, 2004).]
some are under a $1.00
Not a basher, jut asking if these are indeed networks?
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
[This message has been edited by dinger51 (edited November 17, 2004).]
dz
But saying that, out of all those listed, Those under a dollar were either in bankruptcy or going out of Business. URBT was the only one that wasn't.
Well there was Petcare too, but it is only a network for veterinarians. Not a very large subscriber group.
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 17, 2004).]
I just went through the list of networks--most had last traded in the spring and summer.
It is strange that QBID was not on the list--perhaps it was a list of networks that do not broadcast yet???
quote:
Originally posted by dinger51:
I typed in television networks into yahoo finance and got this:
http://finance.yahoo.com/l?s=television+network&t=S&m=USsome are under a $1.00
Not a basher, jut asking if these are indeed networks?
No! they're not what I call a Genuine TV Network.
------------------
whizknock
Potential is priceless with QBID! You'd be a fool to think otherwise.
Channel Symbol PPS Market Cap O/S
TV Guide GMST 5.60 2.39B 423.86M
CBS - Owned by Viacom
NBC - 80%-owned by GE,20% owned by
Vivendi Universal
ABC - Owned by Disney
UPN - Part of Viacom
Fox - Owned by News Corp Inc. (NWS)
PBS - Nonprofit
PAX - Pax 1.21 86.99M 71.89M
WB - Owned by Time Warner
HGTV - Owned by E.W. Scripps Company (SSP)
TBS - Owned by Time Warner
SciFi Channel - Owned by Vivendi Universal
Comedy Central - Owned by Viacom
ESPN - Owned by Disney
USA - Owned by NBC Universal
BET - Owned by Viacom
TCM - Owned by Time Warner
Cartoon Network-Owned by Turner Broadcasting
Travel Channel - Owned by Discovery Comm Inc
Soapnet - Owned by Disney
Golf Channel - Owned by Comcast
Spike TV - Owned by Viacom
E! - Owned by Comcast and Disney
National Geographic - Works jointly with FOX
TV Land - Owned by Viacom
VH1 - Owned by Viacom
MTV - Owned by Viacom
Bravo - Owned by NBC Networks
Food Network - Partners with E.W. Scripps
Health Channel - Owned by Discovery Comm Inc
Speedvision - Part of Fox Network
Weatherchannel - Broadcasted by manyCarriers
Nickelodeon - Owned by Viacom
TNT - Owned by Time Warner
Lifetime - Owned by Disney
CNN - Owned by Time Warner
History Channel - Owned by GE
TLC - Owned by Discovery Communications Inc.
Discovery - Discovery Communications Inc.
A&E - Owned by Disney
Animal Planet - Discovery Communications Inc
Outdoor Life - Teamed with Mariah Media
Tech TV - Owned by Comcast
Trio - Owned by USA Network
Is NBC traded? There is a symbol NBCXF.pk that has no info on yahoo! finance. NBCXF is about $17.00 on bigcharts.com. So I'm not sure how accurate my list is. As far as I know it's correct.
There have to be more than 2 networks trading on the market though. Should I assume that as soon as a network wants to go national they're usually bought up? Matt
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Frey:
NBC is traded it's called GE.
Yea I figured from my list and what I found online. Looking up nbc found some odd symbols. Just making sure. Matt
This is a QBID board but info on other networks is welcome. Don't expect answers for it though.
Doing your own DD always proves to be the best.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Well Matt, it looks like you have alot more work ahead to answer your own questions.
Good Luck.
Here is a transcript of the CC provided by 1BigTip.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
How do I get a replay/transcript of the conferance call? I'm calling the replay number on the website but when I enter the passcode it says that it is invalid. Matt
------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I just don't understand why some people have so many questions about this stock. I would think that you should have done you DD "before" you bought, not after you buy then trying to justify why you bought. That just does not make sense to me. If anyone is not sure of their buy, maybe they should just move along. It seems that some people have misdirected energy when it comes to qbid. Try getting a life or family, that usually works, or better yet spend time making a list of all the things that you are going to do with your "Q" fortune.Frankly, I could care less what other networks do, because the "Q" is very unique and there is not another network to compare the "Q" with. The "Q" target audience is very different, not like BET or the History Channel. So we have to wait and see plain and simple.I have my wish list made: Do you??? GO QBID!!!! Bring Me The Green!!!!!
You can never do enough research obviously. I made my decision to buy QBID on the basis of how I thought the company was doing as a whole individually. The contracts they've signed, how they're already broadcasting, etc etc.
Research on other networks can be extremely important. Frank even mentions other networks in the CC that he believes are niche networks just like QBID. He compared QBID to BET, Bass Channel, QVC, Bravo, Sundance, and the Golf Channel. To look at the results and history of these companies certainly can not hurt. Can it help us? You've apparently made that decision for yourself. I believe researching other similar companies is important.
What ever happened to the saying "the only stupid question is the one you don't ask?" Or there are no stupid questions just stupid answers.
I always felt message boards were also a place to share information and get help from others. Thats all I was doing by posting what I looked up. Clyde had asked me to do so, therefore I did.
From now on I won't share what I find if it bothers you. Matt
For about $3000 or so you can have 1,000,000 shares of a growing network cable channel. If $3,000 is a heartwrenching amount of money for you to lose then you have no business letting it ride on a sub penny stock. They are far too unpredictable.
If $3,000 is not a big problem for you good luck and place your bets.
Spending months trying to rationalize this cheap a stock is fruitless.
Personally I feel that the stock will go up in value, and all the owners will make a tidy profit. But thats my opinion. I looked back on the effort invested by the leadership, decided they weren't going to quit on me, and also on the fact they have made good on every promise in the last several months. As long as that keeps going I am happy with the progress.
We are currently being manipulated by some unseen force, perhaps it is buy back related, I don't know. But I feel that once the buy back is over the price will vary more widely, in a positive direction.
Do all your DD permanentjaun but keep in mind a pink sheet sub penny stock is a gamble and never abides by normal stock market laws of behavior. They trade on fear and greed more than value of company. Spending too much time on the issue only wastes your time. Either you can afford the risk or not. If not get out now.
Frankly, I figure you can clear $200 to $400 a day just trading the swing on this thing. Load up one day all you can at the low, and sell it all back the following day for $.0002 higher. If trading 1million shares thats a couple hundred a day. Nice allowance until the pay off.
Frank hates day traders but so what. We are here to make money, not fund his revolution.
Now thats probably the best post that I have seen in here in a while.
Ric
If new, I highly dought you read through the hundreds of QBID threads.
Are you someone in Disguise? If so, I love these games, makes me use my brain.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Just wondering. Are a lot of you seriously gonna party it up in Las Vegas if/when QBID hits it rich? Sounds like a fun idea but I don't know if Las Vegas is exactly the safest place for some new millionaires. Matt
[/B][/QUOTE]
His other occasional personality is "Temporaryjaun"
(just having fun, that's part of a slow day)
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Just wondering. Are a lot of you seriously gonna party it up in Las Vegas if/when QBID hits it rich? Sounds like a fun idea but I don't know if Las Vegas is exactly the safest place for some new millionaires. Matt
LOL! Vegas ain't my cup of tea. Risk taking in the marketplace is enough for me.
You KNOW there is going to be someone who bets it all on red7 and looses it all. Beside I will have to wait till we get above .40 cents at least before I'll consider it a small fortune. That'll be when I can pay off my mortgage and buy another house with cash.
And no I am not anyone in disguise. Reading over past posts, such as the transcript of the CC, I'm seeing a lot of talk about people buying drinks for others in Vegas. Matt
You would think with the free preview that the more eyes and ears watching the better for subscriptions and word-of-mouth chatter.
but they will get to it in time. they have the hard work done. If you build it they will come.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Marva18:
Any idea when Chicago and Philly are up and running?You would think with the free preview that the more eyes and ears watching the better for subscriptions and word-of-mouth chatter.
quote:
Originally posted by CashRules:
26 more pr's and we will see 0001.
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
then you better sell me your shares as im willing to bet against you there.
i caught it though lol
Rod
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by CashRules:
Can someone tell me what the break out point is for QBID? Last time I think someone said .0038 can someone confirm this?Thanks.
Would someone kindly post that again? Thanks
THANK YOU FOR MENTIONING EMRG THE OTHER DAY!
I don't know that I would have found it otherwise.
Thank you. Thank you....
Hey guys...have a great day!
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
Dianna what are you loooking at today?
SORRY--HAD TO RUN AN ERRAND. MBAH--IDGN--TNGO--APXR--EMRG--CRDM
------------------
DIANA
Woman, I need to know HOW you find these stocks...EMRG has been wonderful...A few weeks ago, you brought up ISON, and that was good to me, too. Thank you.
We really need to talk!!!
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Diana, there you are...Woman, I need to know HOW you find these stocks...EMRG has been wonderful...A few weeks ago, you brought up ISON, and that was good to me, too. Thank you.
We really need to talk!!!
POST YOUR E-MAIL.
------------------
DIANA
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6520847/
Might be an interesting play. Any company dealing with the beef industry overseas may see another big hit. Might do some dd for a penny. After it tanks, it might be a good play.
Ric
$10 'hedglets'...i wonder about the liquidity of the trading, but doesn't seem like a very large initial investment is needed...not sure of fees--more reading required on my part...
http://www.hedgestreet.com/hedgelet/trade/portal/desktop
Now if we can just past resistance, which in my eyes is .0030 right now, we'll be doing better. I still see the rounding bottom. I also am having visions of the classic CUP & handle formation.
http://stockcharts.com/gallery?QBID
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 18, 2004).]
===================================
love your formations but can we hear it for a backwards ski slope...lol
[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 18, 2004).]
I see a slow and steady rise and never looking back. Thats what we want because if we suddenly go to .03, there will be to many sell offs including myself.
Let it establish an uptrend and slowly make people aware they are missing the boat.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Are you guys expecting results as we saw back in April/May?
But I continue to see this rounding bottom we have going.
I'll give you an example again.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
You never know 1Big,,it may pop. Additional carriage with big boys may double or triple. Then a steady climb from there.
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 18, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 18, 2004).]
1. Accumulation Phase
This phase occurs after the stock has bottomed and the innovators (corporate insiders and a few value investors) and early adopters (smart money managers and experienced traders) begin to buy, figuring that the worst is over. Valuations are very attractive. General stock sentiment is still bearish.
Articles in the media preach doom and gloom, and those who were long through the worst of the bear movement have recently capitulated, that is, given up and sold the rest of their holdings in disgust. But in the accumulation phase, prices have flattened and for every seller throwing in the towel, someone is there to pick it up at a healthy discount. Overall stock sentiment begins to switch from negative to neutral.
Todays Trades:
176 Transactions total:
80 Sells
96 Suys
11 Transactions over 1 Mil.
Largest Buy 2200000 $5490
Largest Sell 3000000 $7800
Average Buy 194603 $525
Average Sell 353989 $920
19% of the volume in the last 1/2 Hr.
30 buys
4 sells
There appears to be very little interest and until we go live in more than just 3 cities I do not think anything will change.
quote:
Originally posted by krecik:
We need much more volume before we move too far in any direction:Todays Trades:
176 Transactions total:
80 Sells
96 Suys
11 Transactions over 1 Mil.
Largest Buy 2200000 $5490
Largest Sell 3000000 $7800
Average Buy 194603 $525
Average Sell 353989 $92019% of the volume in the last 1/2 Hr.
30 buys
4 sellsThere appears to be very little interest and until we go live in more than just 3 cities I do not think anything will change.
new website coming up - under construction. look good.
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
tqn, That front page has been up for months. I don't see any substance.
oh, thanks for letting me know. i missed it.
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
POST YOUR E-MAIL.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 18, 2004).]
These are new episodes right? Hmmmm
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 18, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 18, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
1Big, yes, they're calling the network Out or Open, something like that. But it can't hurt Q by any means... and regarding Matt, who I question if he's EVEN out of high school, much less college....while a majority of this group felt the impulse to strangle him, not due entirely to his questions but more the delivery/basis of his questions...MOMMY, why is the sky blue...MOMMY, why do ducks quack...MOMMY, why does the cow moo...you have recently decided to embrace him. Please, can you make it special ed? I KNOW you understand big...thanks for your help..
Terry
This is what I'm talking about. What you just posted is ridiculous. Yes I am out of high school and college. Thank you for being an obnoxious jerk. If you base my educational level because of the minimal knowledge I have about the stock market then you are extremely naive. Asking questions does not hurt anyone. This is what I really don't like about this group. As much as a lot of you know about the stock market and pennies, you try your best to not help people.
I wouldn't have to ask so many questions if the search function for this site wasn't so terrible. I type in a few words on something I want to find information on and several threads pop up which are 30-40 pages long. It doesn't zero in on specific posts that I need to find.
You may think I was asking asinine questions because you felt they were negatively biased but like I've said before, what are you if you only answer the good questions and not the bad? A pumper. I've been trying my best to keep as cool a head as possible but your post RNINALVNG is just ridiculous out of hand. I had not even said anything that others felt was out of line in a while and you come in with something like that. This is where I tell you to shut the hell up because people can only take so much.
I ask questions. Get over it. I ask questions to learn more and to get people to maybe think about things a little differently so we can analyze from all angles. When I post questions and/or information such as the list of network stations I expect people to look at it and then add their own thoughts; not look to me for absolute DD. I'm no Dardadog so you can't expect answers from me just like I can't expect answers from you. Or can I since a lot of you have held this company for a long, long time.
This post is not for anyone else except RNINALVNG. Bash me all you want but you're not going to get rid of me, I'm not going to stop asking questions, and I'm not going to stop adding my own opinion on things. I've already said I own QBID and am not a basher. I've asked just as many positively biased questions as I have negatively biased questions, even though I still don't think they were negative.
I will remove this post only when RNINALVNG removes his/hers. That was extremely immature and uncalled for. I haven't bashed anyone or personally insulted anyone as you just have. You are a jerk in my books. Matt
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 18, 2004).]
I wouldn't have to ask so many questions if the search function for this site wasn't so terrible. I type in a few words on something I want to find information on and several threads pop up which are 30-40 pages long. It doesn't zero in on specific posts that I need to find.
You may think I was asking asinine questions because you felt they were negatively biased but like I've said before, what are you if you only answer the good questions and not the bad? A pumper. I've been trying my best to keep as cool a head as possible but your post RNINALVNG is just ridiculous out of hand. I had not even said anything that others felt was out of line in a while and you come in with something like that. This is where I tell you to shut the hell up because people can only take so much.
I ask questions. Get over it. I ask questions to learn more and to get people to maybe think about things a little differently so we can analyze from all angles. When I post questions and/or information such as the list of network stations I expect people to look at it and then add their own thoughts; not look to me for absolute DD. I'm no Dardadog so you can't expect answers from me just like I can't expect answers from you. Or can I since a lot of you have held this company for a long, long time.
This post is not for anyone else except RNINALVNG. Bash me all you want but you're not going to get rid of me, I'm not going to stop asking questions, and I'm not going to stop adding my own opinion on things. I've already said I own QBID and am not a basher. I've asked just as many positively biased questions as I have negatively biased questions, even though I still don't think they were negative. You may say my post that market cap and O/S will hold us from getting to a dollar PPS but even one of the biggest members in the QBID posts, RIC, believes that market cap and O/S are a huge factor in determining price. No one has yet to determine which is more important in our case, market cap and O/S or demand/supply/hype? of QBID.
I will remove this post only when RNINALVNG removes his/hers. That was extremely immature and uncalled for. I haven't bashed anyone or personally insulted anyone as you just have. You are a jerk in my books. Matt
I want my I want my I want my QTV.
thats the way you do it let me tell you that qboard has fun.
thats not workin thats the way you do it
accumulation boys now run run run.
hows that
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
That's it, Sam. Money for nuthin....Rod, you sing a verse...
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 18, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Hi
Have fun and don't sweat the small stuff!
don't sweat the petty stuff and don't pet the sweaty stuff
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
don't sweat the petty stuff and don't pet the sweaty stuff
That is your choice. LMAO
lets try and drop it. I have not seen anything overly question able from permanentjaun
he has asked questions. if you don't want to answer then then ignore them. If he doesn't get an answer then he has to look for it. it is not doing anyone any good to jump on him every time he posts.
1BigTip with all due respect you jump on me when i jump on our capitalist. I'm going to do the same to you now.
lets just let it go for a while.
peace
Rod
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 18, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Matt, what you do in your boots is your own business. But you are young enough that the post I just wrote(if you noticed I said not the question/ the direction, and maybe I should have said the slant/position is what we questioned. Can you NOT pick up on when Clyde tells you to read a basic primer, or when Firefly says he guesses you have a lot of PERSONAL DD to do...) really ruffled your feathers. Matt, I took the time to answer one of your posts as have several people here. We are all learning daily..I wouldn't even put myself on the plain of the DOG'S plateau. All I'm saying Matt, is do some of your basic homework before you post. CHILL....and unless Bob tells me otherwise, son, I Will continue to post here.
Terry
Actually you attacked both the relevance and basis of my questions. You blatantly said the delivery of my questions but then compared my questions to, "Mommy, why is the sky blue, mommy why do ducks quack."
I only post when I have a question or a simple opinion. Clyde asked me to get information on network stations being traded. I presented what I found and offered some questions to stir some thought.
You're telling me to chill? I'd like to see how happy you would be when someone accuses you of not even having a high school education and asking kindergarten questions. If you knew me you'd understand that all I want is respect and certainly not pity, even though thats the most I would be getting right now. I'm ending this convorsation right now as long as you do. Matt
enough is enough.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Actually you attacked both the relevance and basis of my questions. You blatantly said the delivery of my questions but then compared my questions to, "Mommy, why is the sky blue, mommy why do ducks quack."I only post when I have a question or a simple opinion. Clyde asked me to get information on network stations being traded. I presented what I found and offered some questions to stir some thought.
You're telling me to chill? I'd like to see how happy you would be when someone accuses you of not even having a high school education and asking kindergarten questions. If you knew me you'd understand that all I want is respect and certainly not pity, even though thats the most I would be getting right now. I'm ending this convorsation right now as long as you do. Matt
its party time.
this it going to be a pre uptick party.
tity shooters anyone lol
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Next round on me Rod.
QBID has drawn so much attention that soap operas on these boards will most likely happen sooner or later.
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
1BigTip with all due respect you jump on me when i jump on our capitalist. I'm going to do the same to you now.
just want to see it settle down in here. all we have to do is sit back and wait now.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
penny, dont try to drag me in this. LOL I thought we were hockey buddies. I honestly dont know what your saying. I wasn't involved in this and I dont recall getting on you.QBID has drawn so much attention that soap operas on these boards will most likely happen sooner or later.
Where has winsumlosesum been?
TOTAL DAYS OF LOCKOUT: 64.
TOTAL DAYS OF SEASON MISSED: 37.
GAMES LOST THURSDAY: 9.
TOTAL GAMES MISSED: 241
as far as winsum im not sure. didnt he have to stop spending time in here to help save his relationship, or am i mistaken on who that was?
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
No problem penny. You still have 1 drink left on me at Vegas.Where has winsumlosesum been?
help yourselves boys and girls.
I have a great memory but it is very short.
lol
maybe Winsum has losesum or is just busy gettinsum
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
That is whiz man. Hope it is working out great for them. Thanks whiz and miss whiz!
You to RNINALVNG you can come back too.
lol
now lets all sing
fireball whisky shooters for everyone
Rod
P.S. Okay Rod and Sam, are you happy know, it doesn't interfere with the drinking anymore...next round on me
[This message has been edited by airdoo (edited November 18, 2004).]
Hey all.....WHAZZZZZZ..........UP?!
Sam, Terry, Rod, Sunny, Diana, Ric, 1 .......Etc. Etc. Etc......Oh, and Matt....I don't beleive we've met. Hello!
Missin' every one.
Busy unpackin' the years of pile up. It's insane.
Could really use a virtual shot myself. Pass the bottle.......
It's gonna' take me days to catch up. I think I I'll do that tomorrow and just enjoy the booooooooze tonight. LOL
Cheers.......Raisin' my glass to dirty diapers, depends, and Q on the move. SHOW ME THE VOLUME!
Lil
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
what is that airdoo?
quote:
Originally posted by lilpennypincher:
Airdoo.......That is freakin' amazing! The man is a watchin' that's for sure.
quote:
Originally posted by lilpennypincher:
Hey thanks Sam...
Airdoo......Are you kidding?!!!!
They can see the see the finger prints on my keyboard through my new drapes and actually hear the words I'm typing. Way too deep to think about straight. LOL
all i can do is laugh.
missed you smilies
and your conversation.
Welcome back
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by lilpennypincher:
Hee-Hee........Was just stickin' my head in and saw that chair go by. LOLHey all.....WHAZZZZZZ..........UP?!
Sam, Terry, Rod, Sunny, Diana, Ric, 1 .......Etc. Etc. Etc......Oh, and Matt....I don't beleive we've met. Hello!
Missin' every one.
Busy unpackin' the years of pile up. It's insane.
Could really use a virtual shot myself. Pass the bottle.......
It's gonna' take me days to catch up. I think I I'll do that tomorrow and just enjoy the booooooooze tonight. LOLCheers.......Raisin' my glass to dirty diapers, depends, and Q on the move. SHOW ME THE VOLUME!
Lil
lol
good nite my friend
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Ya'll have fun. And don't fight! (if you do make sure you fight dirty,,bite, scratch etc...)
Night All!
Have a great tommorrow!!!
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 19, 2004).]
My CD's?!!! I CAN'T FIND MY POWER TOYS YET! oops.....Did I say toys......?
I meant tools. LOL
As soon as I get this place unpacked I PROMISE to get one out to you.
Hey Rod, Nice to have a few minutes to get back on the board. The move went well. The baby is really sick....This nasty cold going round'. The first time she is on antibiotics...not bad for a three year old.
Dr.'s say's it was good nursin'.
(Little pat on the back for me).
Never forget the first Martini after I stopped nursing, WOW! What a buzzzzz....
I never realized how much I really don't like the mall until I moved into this house. Thought I could just purchase everything I need online BUT, NO........Seems technology has not yet allowed me to tell whether or not I like an area rug enough without seeing if in person to make a purchasing decision.
Yet, Big Brother can tell how many hooks are on the back of my Bra from a mile a way.
Go figure. LOL
Ok, The little one has kept me up 2 nights in a row without sleep. I am expecting the same tonight. Gotta' hit the sheets early.
Green day tomorrow for Q.
Nite all.
Lil
Q's gonna' shower us....
Nite all.
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Lil
Rod
Lively conversations tonight. Glad a truce was called.
Loved the money shower--perfect visual before retiring. Thanks.
Tonight's Will and Grace--Out TV certainly was
auspicious and timely.
H. Stern was on Letterman doing a gigantic commercial for SIRI!
Wouldn't it be great if some celebrities would do likewise for us?
Of course, we probably need to wait until QTN is available in a few more areas........
[This message has been edited by permanentjaun (edited November 19, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
here have a glass of tequila or a joint or what ever calms ya all down.
.........tity shooters anyone lol
If I knew it was gonna be that kind of party i'd have..... LOL
11/19/2004 12:06:43 AM
Posted By: foxy45
http://f1.pg.briefcase.yahoo.com/bc/burntoranged/lst?.dir=/Q+Television+Folder&.order=&.view=l&.src=bc&.done=http%3a//f1.pg.briefcase.yahoo.com/
I do try to contribute as much as I can. (it's the kid thing that makes it difficult at times. Give me a right on Sunny) Like in life, you have to earn peoples respect and learn to respect people. This is the best board for information but keep in mind "we just like to have fun."
P.S I saw thick skin on auction at Ebay. The starting bid was much less than what a kidney goes for. great deal.
------------------
Memory's the second thing to go, I can't remember the first.
Look at our Q with all the other cable networks!!
http://www.lyngsat-logo.com/tvsat/ia7_2.html
We have TIME WARNER contract!!
We have NTI contract!! (they upload SCI-FI, etc..)
We have RCN contract!!(Live in NYC, Boston & San Fran)
We Acquired Film Package from Warner Bros.!
We have Steven Grunberg (New World, Orion Pictures, Trans World, Epic, and Columbia Tri-Star International)
We're appearing in various news sources
We now have an agreement with Firestone Communications
We Hired Rubenstein Associates
We signed a contract with Zephyr Media Group as an advertising sales partner
Q Television Network Partners with an Investor Relations Firm
Q Television Network signs $1 Million in Sponsorships & has success at the Gay Life Expo in NYC
QTN began airing live shows on RCN
They are currently buying back shares
Next we have Major advertisers
Next we have exposure from national/world media
Next we have subscriber revenue stream!
The price per share is extremely cheap.
It's the perfect time for a Good G&L Network. (Look around you)
WE ARE ON T.V. WHOA....GREAT DD. WE WILL GET PAID. IN THE MEANTIME SIRI IS COOKING!!
------------------
DIANA
Good morning everyone!
P.S. DIANA, I would love to give you my email address. Just trying to figure out how to it without posting our family addy for the world to see....Yes, I'm paranoid and I take medication....may be time to up the dosage...LMAO!
So, if you have your eye on anything that looks interesting, well, Diana, feel free to just toss those ticker symbols out...I'll try to catch.
Happy trading!
name (at) domain dot com something like that..
------------------
FurrySound
-DD-GLTA-Unless I've quoted a source, I know not what I speak of.
Go Q
------------------
Thank God For Qbid
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Amen, Clyde. The kiddo factor is huge right now....I have one who can scale the upstairs and downstairs babygate. And the other one rips his diaper (sorry, but used diaper) off on a whim. I literally type, check tickers and run around the house. Sometimes I think this life of mine would make for a comical (and on days, pathetic) reality show...Good morning everyone!
P.S. DIANA, I would love to give you my email address. Just trying to figure out how to it without posting our family addy for the world to see....Yes, I'm paranoid and I take medication....may be time to up the dosage...LMAO!
So, if you have your eye on anything that looks interesting, well, Diana, feel free to just toss those ticker symbols out...I'll try to catch.
Happy trading!
DO YOU E-MAIL ONE BIG TIP?? HE CAN GIVE YOU MY E-MAIL!!
ONE BIG TIP--WILL YOU SEND SUNNY MY E-MAIL???
THANKS
------------------
DIANA
I haven't posted in a few weeks....glad to read the posts from many of you.
I'm trying to scrape up some cash to get a bunch more at these prices....don't feel we will be seeing it this low for much longer.
GO Q!
1BIG, feel free to pass on my email address to Diana. Thank you. ( big hug to 1BIG) Have you had your chocolate this morning? LOL I had a nutter butter and a diet coke for breakfast...LOL
Okay, Diana. It's up to our wonderful 1BIG to get these emails exchanged.
Looking forward to hearing from you...
Diana and Sunny...mixture for trouble? You have to admit we have a 'unique' sense of humor. Add Crosseyed and Lilpenny to the concoction, and that could be dangerous!
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
WATCH OUR Q-CHANNEL SHOWS & ADVERTISERS ON TV !!!!11/19/2004 12:06:43 AM
Posted By: foxy45
http://f1.pg.briefcase.yahoo.c om/bc/burntoranged/lst?.dir=/Q+Television+Folder&.order=&.view=l&.src=bc&.done=http%3a//f1.pg.briefcase.yahoo.com/
if that works for both of you i dont mind
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by sunny:
Amen, Clyde. The kiddo factor is huge right now....I have one who can scale the upstairs and downstairs babygate. And the other one rips his diaper (sorry, but used diaper) off on a whim. I literally type, check tickers and run around the house. Sometimes I think this life of mine would make for a comical (and on days, pathetic) reality show...Good morning everyone!
P.S. DIANA, I would love to give you my email address. Just trying to figure out how to it without posting our family addy for the world to see....Yes, I'm paranoid and I take medication....may be time to up the dosage...LMAO!
So, if you have your eye on anything that looks interesting, well, Diana, feel free to just toss those ticker symbols out...I'll try to catch.
Happy trading!
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
this link doesnt work for me.
[This message has been edited by CouchP (edited November 19, 2004).]
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
that one didnt work either
Diana, what do you think of TSBI?
but the links to the pictures are coming up with errors.
maybe there are to many looking .
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by CouchP:
I changed it, try again.
PENNY T--YOU HAVE MAIL.
------------------
DIANA
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
SORRY GUYS--BEEN CONSUMED WITH QNSY. BOUGHT AND SOLD ALREADY TODAY. LOOKING FOR ANOTHER LOW BUY IN.PENNY T--YOU HAVE MAIL.
"You what?"
"You bought a Genuine Broadcasting National TV Network for a fourth of a penny?"
Every day that I add a little to the position I have to ask myself if I'm ready for the responsibility of being a billionaire.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
Matter of time.
Nothing more, nothing less.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
HUGE support at .0025, it's unreal. Rounding bottom still looking good. Accumulate baby!
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=qbid,uu[g,a]daclyiay[dc][pf][vc60][iut!uh14,3!lg!lc20!lf!la12,26,9][j26229634,y]
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 19, 2004).]
anything with a rating under 700 is considered average risk, 700 and above and highly risky. youll see the legend underneath the bar
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 19, 2004).]
I tried to fill a order for 4 million today at .0025 but it wouldnt fill. lol was a slow day and I was bored.
"RiskGrades is calibrated to be more intuitive and easier to use than standard deviation or beta. And because RiskGrades is a standardized measure of volatility, it allows comparison of investment risk across all classes and regions."
next, what rounded bottoms. you keep given examples of other companies yet you haven't showed this one with a rounded bottom. because it does not have one. you have to have an increase in price to show a rounded bottom. you keep pumping these bogus facts. like stating we have a TW contract when it has not been announced. you keep pouncing on new members for asking questions yet do this.
You guys ever listen to that promo in your car or on a good system anywhere? I did and it was great! Crystal Clear. I'm sure people turned their heads at me when they heard the words that relate to "Gay".. Actually, pump it up to advertise the Network.
Email me if you want a copy of the CD. Just the audio from that promo is on there for now, not video. In fact First 10 people to email me with their request will get it for Free. After that I have to charge for my time.
Nice to have for when we're in 2008 & look back at today and hear that they just came out. Memories of .0026! We'll laugh and smoke the cubans.
qbiddollar@yahoo.com
"like stating we have a TW contract when it has not been announced." WRONG. We have a 10 year contract. Sorry if you missed that. Try to keep up with the company.
"you keep pouncing on new members for asking questions yet do this."
Never pounce on any questions asked. I do pounce on people like you. And I'm smart enough to know who's who and what they're doing.
quote:
Originally posted by duediligence1:
next, what rounded bottoms. you keep given examples of other companies yet you haven't showed this one with a rounded bottom. because it does not have one. you have to have an increase in price to show a rounded bottom. you keep pumping these bogus facts. like stating we have a TW contract when it has not been announced. you keep pouncing on new members for asking questions yet do this..
[This message has been edited by 1BigTip (edited November 19, 2004).]
YES!
quote:
Originally posted by duediligence1:
all this does is measure volatility. the stock has to increase and decrease in price, or spikes to cause a higher volatility. QBID is only going down for the last 2 months so in turn its Riskgrade will lower."RiskGrades is calibrated to be more intuitive and easier to use than standard deviation or beta. And because RiskGrades is a standardized measure of volatility, it allows comparison of investment risk across all classes and regions."
next, what rounded bottoms. you keep given examples of other companies yet you haven't showed this one with a rounded bottom. because it does not have one. you have to have an increase in price to show a rounded bottom. you keep pumping these bogus facts. like stating we have a TW contract when it has not been announced. you keep pouncing on new members for asking questions yet do this.
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Crashcup:
Is there a full moon tonight? I think the change in the weather is making people feisty.
OZ on TBS plus 9 days off starting now.
All we ever had to do was launch and become well off.
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
A little too much tonight. Lets break out the Chivas Regal, change the dirty dipers, and party. Drinks on Whiz, since he will be a billionaire.All we ever had to do was launch and become well off.
No kidding - Whiz can I be your chauffeur. Any money I make off of QBID will be paying for four kids in college at the same time. The chauffeur gig sounds better than the Walmart greeter career.
Here's a rundown:
Sept 13, 1996..they changed their name to Integrated HealthCare, Inc
Aug 25,1997...it was disolved, THEN reinstated again on Oct 7, 1997
no paperwork until Aug 3, 1999, when Joseph Pittera registered the corporation name as Triangle Multimedia Limited. effective 08.20.99 NO signature of Franks anywhere.
Aug 18,1999
the articles were amended:
300,000,000 shares of no par value. A class of 20,000,000 Supervoting Preferred Stock at a par value of .001 per share and convertible at the option of the holder on a 10 for 1 basis with preferential treatment in liquidation shal also be authorized. Mr. Pittera sill listed as point of contact.
Sept 28, 1999
Amendment to Article V: A Class B non-voting, non-convertible Preferred Stock that the Corporation has authority to issue and which constitutes a seperate and single class of shares with a FIVE year callable 8.25% cumulative interest rate at no par value.
Dec 03, 2001
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this coporation shall consist of 600,000,000 shares at no par value (FIRST paperwork with Franks name on it).
January 05, 2002
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of 900,000,000 shares at no par value.
March 25, 2002
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of 1,500,000,000 shares at no par value.
April 19, 2002
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
2,500,000,000 shares at no par value.
Oct 1, 2002
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
3,500,000,000 shares at no par value
March 03, 2003
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
7,500,000,000 shares at no par value
April 04, 2003,
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
10,000,000,000 shares at no par value
July 16, 2003,
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
15,000,000,000 shares at no par value
Nov 03, 2003
Amendment to Article V: The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of
25,000,000,000 shares at no par value
that's the last paperwork I received from The State of Washington.
-------------------------------
Any one else have an update?
~m~
What we need though is to have a boxing match. Like the Imus show had last year. We get a volunteer to take on U4 and have sponsor signs everywhere stockholders for QBID. Now that would be a good fight to watch. hehe
Ric
Ric
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 19, 2004).]
rodney@hurlbert(.)com
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
SORRY GUYS--BEEN CONSUMED WITH QNSY. BOUGHT AND SOLD ALREADY TODAY. LOOKING FOR ANOTHER LOW BUY IN.PENNY T--YOU HAVE MAIL.
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
No Ric, I was the instigator. Sam and Rod were just refereeing, although their count of points really sucked. I backed off for the sake of unity and drinking. Peace and love to all...and all that other dribble...
Terry
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 19, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Rod, like your dd, I could never pull up that symbol. Don't know what she was playing.
But were glad you joined us. Did you get your response e-mails? L
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Dang Sam, you're just so accommodating. Are you trying to steal Sunny's job? You better watch it , she'll come after you! LOL!
How are you this evening? And where did Rod disappear to. He was on the board several times today. If you promise not to start anymore trouble, maybe we can party tonight. LOL!
Terry
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
I could get it to pull up either. I guess that Perm whatever couldn't take it. Haven't seen him since round two, lol.Ric
Lol...don't worry I could have gone all night long. I stopped because I said I was and because others were tired of it too. You want round 3? Matt
i love my job!!
i can have a drink with you then
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
woo hoo only an hour left and im done work lol i have been home for 2 hours now.i love my job!!
i can have a drink with you then
Got it pal,,IN VEGAS!
we got through the last 24 hours nicely. lets keep that up.
love peace and all those other calming words to you lol
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Ric, I'm guessing you got someone in WAGI, West African Gold, Inc because I couldn't get the symbol to pull up either... am I close? Share your knowledge...
Terry
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
why do ducks quack?
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
Why
Ha...apparently you missed the joke...might wanna read a post by RNINALVNG from last night. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
that was pretty lame matt. Give us some intertainment or your fired.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Ha...apparently you missed the joke...might wanna read a post by RNINALVNG from last night. Matt
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
well then since you brought it up why dont you enlighten us.
I can only say that a duck quacks because it's the only way they can communicate with sound. Yeah? I dunno
It is a fact that a ducks quack does echo though. Don't believe the myth.
whats your point.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
I can only say that a duck quacks because it's the only way they can communicate with sound. Yeah? I dunnoIt is a fact that a ducks quack does echo though. Don't believe the myth.
lol go get him
Ric
so have at it
thanks man
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
double cool im off work now i can partakethanks man
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by penny-trader:
[b]double cool im off work now i can partakethanks man
[/B][/QUOTE]
Well maybe we can just put a Miller label on it, thats better. But still weres the Chivas at.
Ric
P.S. I won 1 of the audio tapes today from 1Big, if it's in cd format I will make 10 copies of it and give them away. As soon as I receive it, I'll let you know!!
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Thanks for the beers (Molson?) dude.
quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
Woah guys take it easy. I wasn't seriously picking a fight. I was trying to make light of the situation. Cut me some slack.
well guys im off to bed.
have a great weekend. im working it
Rod
Ric
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
One more post and we will have had a page of chit. Quite literally. hopefully this will help pps Monday. lolRic
At least we got a page full. No hard news.
Have fun people and "don't take yourself to damned seriously" said the ancient.
[This message has been edited by firefly (edited November 20, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Okay Rod, Have a good REM/NREM evening. Sam and Ric, how much later are you too going to stay awake? I'm old and fading...BUT YET, I'M STILL AWAKE!!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Ric, how old are you, and how old is your wife...what caused the dialysis? I'm sure that's hard on both she and you. 'Splain lucy!!
Terry
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Ric, how old are you, and how old is your wife...what caused the dialysis? I'm sure that's hard on both she and you. 'Splain lucy!!
Terry
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
Sam, DID NOT mean that rudely in any way. It was out of concern I asked. Sorry if I misstated, was intended as entirely personal. Ric, I hope you took it that way...
Terry
Ric
Ric
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Heres a depressing thought, if you would have been the lucky one to buy this stock just one year ago, you would be rich. If you bought $10,000.00 of the stock you would have been a millionaire. If hindsight was foresight we would all have it made, I guess. Our little Q has came a long way from then. But of course if I were able to leave my past a message, it would have been to buy PGHI (GZFX). $1000.00 last year would have made you a millionaire.Ric
read over your conversation with Terry and my prayer will go to yours. our q time will come eventually, i believe.
[This message has been edited by tqn (edited November 20, 2004).]
Just caught up with the posts and wanted to say how happy I am to know that there are still truly caring people 'out there.' You all seem to be so kind....genuinely nice people. (I actually check this thread just to see friendly 'faces.' This thread feels like 'internet homebase' sometimes...LOL)
Ric, think I've mentioneed this a time or two, but I think of you often because of your wife and child. We've had our own big share of health problems in our family, so my thoughts do turn to you through out the day. I hope you have family support...you certainly have 'cyber' support!
Just wanted to say that I empathize with you and hope that all continues to improve! You must be a wonderful father and husband...and I thought I had the last good man...LOL
Take Care.
P.S. 1BIG...you have mail.
Ric
Ric
[This message has been edited by RNINALVNG (edited November 20, 2004).]
Ric
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 21, 2004).]
Ric
quote:
Originally posted by penny-trader:
Wow you must have great medical insurance. that would bankrupt a person without coverage.you have had a tough go of it. Thanks God you are able to do the home treatment after all that you have endured.
You are in my prayers.
Rod
Ric
Bob? why is that post gone? i thought that it was appropriate.
Whats up with the full page add that screws up the where you left off when you refresh?
I know you have to make money Bob but cant you do it differently?
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Well, wonder what happened to Rods post. There was another person that posted, new guy, his disappeared too. Makes you say hum.Ric
Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Were lucky Rod in that way. Insurance I mean. But it wasn't because I had good insurance. It was because of Renal Failure. The law is wrong for other organ failure because Medicare A & B actually cover Renal Failure and pays for dialysis and Kidney transplants. It is the only transplant that it pays for. It also pays for the dialysis medicine and transplant anti-rejection medicine. And you thought that Medicare was only for old people.Ric
[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited November 21, 2004).]
Ric
[This message has been edited by Ric (edited November 21, 2004).]
SIX HUNDRED BILLION?
I just can't get around that $600,000,000,000.oo of disposable income of our targeted audience.
Neither can The CEOs of many a Fortune 500 Companies that are drooling over the prospect of developing an intensely loyal consumer base that wields that kind financial clout! My bet is they've already shot the commercials.
No matter how I do the math one percent of SIX HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS keeps coming up as SIX BILLION DOLLARS. One tenth of one percent is SIX HUNDRED MILLION BUCKS!
One tenth of one percent,,,,,,
$600,000,000.oo!
That kind of revenue alone would put this over a buck easy.
That's just one reason that it's so difficult to find a Genuine Broadcasting National TV Network that trades for less than $1 a share. That & the fact that none exist.
There are no real TV Networks trading under a dollar a share.
Think about this for a minute.
What does the word NETWORK imply?
Am I the only one that sees where this is headed?
Q TV Channel
Q TV Movie Channel
Q TV Music Channel
Q TV News Channel
Q TV Comedy Channel
Q TV Social History Channel
Q TV Movie Channel II
Q TV Sports Channel
Q TV Movie Channel III R rated
The list goes on,,,
There's only one way I do not see $1 per share. Frank sells the whole thing & they take it private.
Accumulation Phase continues!
For me this is a genuine long term play.
Matter of time.
Nothing more, nothing less.
"All we ever had to do is launch!"
------------------
whizknock
quote:
Originally posted by :
[B][/B]
------------------
whizknock
Are we in Kansas Toto?
lol
What happened to the dates?
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/010134-35.html
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
Hello out there,Are we in Kansas Toto?
lol
What happened to the dates?