"Yesterday," reads the e-mail from Allen, a Marine in Afghanistan, "I gave blood because a Marine, while out on patrol, stepped on a [mine's] pressure plate and lost both legs." Then "another Marine with a bullet wound to the head was brought in. Both Marines died this morning."
U.S. forces are being increased by 21,000, to 68,000, bringing the coalition total to 110,000. About 9,000 are from Britain, where support for the war is waning. Counterinsurgency theory concerning the time and the ratio of forces required to protect the population indicates that, nationwide, Afghanistan would need hundreds of thousands of coalition troops, perhaps for a decade or more. That is inconceivable.
So, instead, forces should be substantially reduced to serve a comprehensively revised policy: America should do only what can be done from offshore, using intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, airstrikes and small, potent Special Forces units, concentrating on the porous 1,500-mile border with Pakistan, a nation that actually matters.
Genius, said de Gaulle, recalling Bismarck's decision to halt German forces short of Paris in 1870, sometimes consists of knowing when to stop. Genius is not required to recognize that in Afghanistan, when means now, before more American valor, such as Allen's, is squandered.
simply amazing. i guess it's because there's no oil
Posted by Relentless. on :
So very surprising to see the two sides of the political line switch so easily while policy remains the same... Who could have predicted such an unusual thing?
The lifetime channel is less predictable than this.
Posted by T e x on :
Maybe they'll make some Hallmark specials?
Posted by raybond on :
The right wing swine is just belly aching to get attention from lobbist in other words he looking to get his palm greased. As soon as that happens he will be back to gop policy.Same as if he were a democrat. the same program, a lot less slobbering