This is topic Why can't we respect others enough to allow them to keep certain things private, in forum Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/14/t/002341.html

Posted by bdgee on :
 
no matter who has a license to practice whatever.

Personally, it's none of my business what sort of sex life you have or with whom you share it and I'd appreciate it if you would keep it to yourself, no matter what some religio-centric officials say.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060801/ap_on_he_me/morning_after_pill_20
 
Posted by Up on :
 
I tend to agree with you bdgee. To me, there's a whole different set of criteria that I use to determine if I want to associate with someone, who they sleep with isn't one of them. However, we just had some lesbians move in next door to us and I have to admit, I wanna know the details!
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Bdgee-
I tend to agree. Public displays of affection (PDA's) are at best naseous and at worst offensive. Thank you for bringing attention to this serious issue.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Up, you are turning into a nosey b*st*rd, ain'tcha.

You are thinking that because they do naughty things with one another, they might do naughty things with you?

Bet those are some good lookin lezzies.

heh heh heh
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
- - - -

And they argued all night

Over who had the right

To do which and with what and to whom.
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
The 'morning after pill' may finally put a stop to the increasing number of idiots who feel that they have the right to tell others what they can do with their own bodies.

Good riddance, I say.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
I doubt it Gordo.....
don't think the libs will ever stop trying to make people stop smoking and driving SUV's.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
JW's definition of a lib is anyone with ideas he has difficulties with.
 
Posted by glassman on :
 
speaking of tobacco and Bush?

Justice Dept. Official to Be Questioned in Tobacco Case
Federal Judge Rules That McCallum Must Answer to Group Seeking Records on Department's Conduct

Associated Press
Friday, June 2, 2006; Page A20

A federal judge ruled yesterday that Associate Attorney General Robert D. McCallum Jr. must undergo questioning in a lawsuit by a nonprofit group seeking records about the Justice Department's conduct in a landmark case against the tobacco industry.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington sued last year after the department ignored the testimony of one of its own witnesses in the tobacco trial and reduced the amount the Bush administration is seeking from the tobacco industry from $130 billion to $10 billion.

CREW said the department has failed to produce a single responsive document to demands for information under the Freedom of Information Act.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/01/AR2006060101678. html
 
Posted by Hannibull on :
 
Opponents say wider access to the pill could promote promiscuity

...and? does it matter?
 
Posted by glassman on :
 
well? it only matters if somebody is having fun and not paying their tithes.....

also? i wonder just how much 120billion$ reduction in penalties buys you? i hope it was at least a couple billion and not just afew million...
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
The Bush economy will stop you from driving SUV's. (It might make you want to smoke even more though.)

LOL

quote:
Originally posted by Johnwayne:
I doubt it Gordo.....
don't think the libs will ever stop trying to make people stop smoking and driving SUV's.


 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
More promiscous????...... tell me more.....
Wait, damnit and I have to be married.
Rotten timing as usual.

When I was single even beer couldn't get me any.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
How is a marriage license going to be kept private? Isn't it a matter of public record?
That's all I care about. The rest of the stuff, privacy of there own home, insurance, etc. I could care less about.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Yeah, it's a matter of public record, not religious record.

It's a place that religion needs to learn to respect and stop declaring theirs.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Religous people are a part of the public no?
You are asking a large portion of the public to disregard their beliefs and let something be officially endorsed that they do not agree with.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
When you say why can't we allow people to keep things private.... how is a marriage endorsed by the public considered private?
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
Was your marriage endorsed by me? Funny, I don't recall getting the notice in the mail. [Roll Eyes]


quote:
Originally posted by Johnwayne:
When you say why can't we allow people to keep things private.... how is a marriage endorsed by the public considered private?


 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
JW,

Stop avoiding the fact that you are determined to ignore the Constitution when what you want is a law passed that defines marriage with respect to your own religious bigotry.

"Congress shall make no law respecting....."

[ August 02, 2006, 16:28: Message edited by: bdgee ]
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
What's the word I'm looking for Gordo... not endorsed but..... meaning verified by a public employee. I can't think of what word I am looking for. Who signs the damn marriage license? County Recorder?
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
A marriage is not always a matter of public record. It's perfectly legal, and common, to get a private marriage.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
The constitution says nothing about homosexual marriage. How am I ignoring it?
But while were on the subject..... does the constitution say anything about relatives getting married?
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
You can be legally married without filing with the county recorder?
Don't you have to apply for a marriage license?
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
Yes, but discrimination is unconstitutional.

In some cases, gay couples wishing to be married have taken their case to court. In one of the first cases, in 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that homosexuals as a class were being discriminated against by their inability to marry. Under the Vermont Constitution, such discrimination was not permitted. The Court directed the state legislature to create an institution with all the same rights and privileges of marriage. Thus, civil union was born. The Vermont legislature made a new institution that resembled marriage in all ways except in name. For all intents and purposes, when a couple joined in civil union is in Vermont, they are to be treated as though married.


quote:
Originally posted by Johnwayne:
The constitution says nothing about homosexual marriage.


 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
With a private marriage, my records are the same as yours. The main difference is that, with mine, you will need a court order to see them.

quote:
Originally posted by Johnwayne:
You can be legally married without filing with the county recorder?
Don't you have to apply for a marriage license?


 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Please define private marriage Gordo.
How does it work for tax purposes?
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
It's the same as regular marriage. You just have the right to keep you affairs private.

(Although that's changing fast with the idiots in charge now.)

By the way, what's up with that? Didn't Republicans used to support privacy issues?

[Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
So when you say private marriage it is the same as a regular marriage?
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
No constitutional amendment needed guys. This is good enough for me:

Virginia is one of at least six states voting on a constitutional ban on same-sex unions this fall. Voters in 20 states already have already approved such amendments, most of them overwhelmingly. Twenty-five other states forbid same-sex marriage by statutes.

Let the states decide.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
There is no mention in the Constitution of marriage.

It does not state that there is "gay Marriage" and it does not specify that marriage is between a man and a woman.

Marriage, so long as law is concerned, is a contract between the participants and to declare that only a specific sort of person may have the right to participatein a contract is discrimination.

You are NOT required to marry either a person of different gender or one of similar gender. You are not required to marry at all.

At the same time, you are not required to even recognize the marriage of people, except as it is a function of law.

So you may ignore the marriage of a pair of lesbians, so long as you do not expect the Government to do so, since that would be a violation of the 1st Amendment, which would anmount to acting so as to respect a religious belief.

Of course, they may ignore your marriage too.

Serves you right!
 
Posted by Peaser on :
 
Lance Bass of that group **#~^$^*~#(^~$*

came out of the closet beeg.

Sounds like he wants some repect for his privates life.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Bdgee-
No way in hell I'm gonna ignore lesbians, married or not!!
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Nah, Pease, he's wanting attention because of it.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
JW,

You got the hots for lezzies?
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Use too. My interest has lessoned of late. Doesn't mean I could ignore "lesbian interraction". Hell I'm married I'm not dead LOL!
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Personally, I sort of like the idea that a chick I might be interested in might be interested in me or at least interested in being what I like.

That seems to rule against lesbians.

But I don't have any desire to stop them being interested in what they want.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
"But I don't have any desire to stop them being interested in what they want."

Me neither.....long as I can watch!!!!!!
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
"Personally, I sort of like the idea that a chick I might be interested in might be interested in me or at least interested in being what I like."

yeah I gave up on that pipe dream long ago! I'm Too ugly Bdgee!!
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Ugly is a different thing to us and them.

Try flashing an couple of $100 bills and notice how pretty they think you are.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Will you float me the $200 LOL?
AHHHHHH I can't go there Bdgee. For all my blustery talk I am for all intensive purposes, happily married to a wonderful woman and have two great children.
 
Posted by glassman on :
 
hey! if he's givin' out cash? i'm first in line JW....
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
JW,

You got the hots for lezzies?

Something wrong with that? Remember, I've got two living next door and if I wasn't married, I'd be showing them the error of their ways right now.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Damn that was funny Upside. I almost spit my milk out reading that.
 
Posted by T e x on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
JW,

You got the hots for lezzies?

Something wrong with that? Remember, I've got two living next door and if I wasn't married, I'd be showing them the error of their ways right now.
lol, you'll never quite get the full meaning of futility until you take a drive down *that* road... imagine some guy trying to get you to "bat for the other team."
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Glass..., you sweet thing......
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
JW,

You got the hots for lezzies?

Something wrong with that? Remember, I've got two living next door and if I wasn't married, I'd be showing them the error of their ways right now.
lol, you'll never quite get the full meaning of futility until you take a drive down *that* road... imagine some guy trying to get you to "bat for the other team."
Oh no, couldn't do that. But, I'm trying to talk my wife into letting me try to "convert" them, kind of an experiment. So far she's not going for it. I've even tried laying the "lifestyle choice vs born that way" argument on her so we can dispel one or the other as a myth and possibly gain notoriety with a published paper in the scientific journals but she still wont go for it. Any suggestions?
 
Posted by Hannibull on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
JW,

You got the hots for lezzies?

Something wrong with that? Remember, I've got two living next door and if I wasn't married, I'd be showing them the error of their ways right now.
lol, you'll never quite get the full meaning of futility until you take a drive down *that* road... imagine some guy trying to get you to "bat for the other team."
I'm trying to talk my wife into letting me try to "convert" them, kind of an experiment.
lol please tell me you're joking
 
Posted by jordanreed on :
 
they,d probly pickle your pee-pee
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
Half a joke Jordan. I'd like to give it a shot but I don't think it's gonna happen.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
You best be careful or you'll end up a eunuch.

But I don't know at whose hand, might be the lezzies, might be your wife.
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
You best be careful or you'll end up a eunuch.

But I don't know at whose hand, might be the lezzies, might be your wife.

You know bdgee, I've thought about that. The other day she was outside talking to them for about an hour in between their rototilling. Think I've got something to worry about?
 
Posted by Relentless. on :
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =398630&in_page_id=1811
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Relentless.:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id =398630&in_page_id=1811

Damn! Upside barbequed to death? Well, I can think of worse ways to go. I'd like to get a taste of myself though.
 
Posted by T e x on :
 
"Well, I can think of worse ways to go"

lol...

You bad!
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
I gotta belive that a big old slab of Upside rump roast would be downright tasty. Probably marbled pretty well too.
 
Posted by Relentless. on :
 
Ohhh aren't we high on ourself
 
Posted by T e x on :
 
*accepting no shipments: Return to Sender*

lol...
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
*accepting no shipments: Return to Sender*

lol...

Any idea what you really ate Tex?
 
Posted by T e x on :
 
you bet!

and it dam shore warn't lezzies...been dere, got the hat, the T-shirt, the decree...

lol, couldn't a been you: you sent too large a hunk to be walking!
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
You best be careful or you'll end up a eunuch.

But I don't know at whose hand, might be the lezzies, might be your wife.

You know bdgee, I've thought about that. The other day she was outside talking to them for about an hour in between their rototilling. Think I've got something to worry about?
Any of them named Lorena?
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
Nope. One Korean girl named Ing and another redhead named Jessica. I'm partial to Ing.
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
Ing Bobbitt? Geez, I better find out her last name.
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
And make no mistake about it, up!

This could be serious.
 
Posted by Upside on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
And make no mistake about it, up!

This could be serious.

Upside woke up from a fitful nights sleep to the image of three women hovering over him. He briefly thought he had died and gone to heaven, but then he saw the gleam of the carving knife.....
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
hahahahaha
 
Posted by Chadsly on :
 
Uh Oh Now who's being converted?

quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
You best be careful or you'll end up a eunuch.

But I don't know at whose hand, might be the lezzies, might be your wife.

You know bdgee, I've thought about that. The other day she was outside talking to them for about an hour in between their rototilling. Think I've got something to worry about?

 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
"You know bdgee, I've thought about that. The other day she was outside talking to them for about an hour in between their rototilling. Think I've got something to worry about? "

Not as long as you get to watch!!!
 
Posted by bdgee on :
 
Converted??? lol

Interesting word for it, but I can see some parallel, when you consider that what most rightwing Christians are actually wanting from you when they "wish" you to convert.

They want to cut off the impetus of your intellect.
 
Posted by Johnwayne on :
 
Got to have intellect first Bdgee.
 


© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2