Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board: just to lighten the mood

This is topic just to lighten the mood in forum Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/14/t/002327.html

Posted by jordanreed on :

http://www.mplstudios.com/studio_girls.htm

Posted by Buford Baucom on :

That's pornography.

Pornography is bad.

Especially on a Sunday when you're supposed to be in church.

BB

Posted by jordanreed on :

artistic expression..

simply beautiful..

or would you rather see dog poop and talk about t.p.?

Posted by bdgee on :

How about a complete definition of "pornography, Buford, and a very specfic and full justification of your claim, "Pornography is bad", that isn't just a personal matter of taste.

And make certain you don't just posit some veiled appeal toward the interjection of religion into the Constitution.

Posted by Buford Baucom on :

Pictures of naked womens shown in public is pornography because it makes men get hard ons and think lusty thoughts and lust is a sin and it says right in the Bible.

So there.

BB

Posted by Johnwayne on :

Well this is por......did you say naked women LOL?

Posted by glassman on :

i ain't clikin there....
i ain't clikin there....
i ain't clikin there....

Posted by Johnwayne on :

Dang it these hand helds, thing went nuts and made me click on the link.
And when the pictures loaded this dang screen is so smal I couldn't see anything LOL

Posted by glassman on :

if i clik there i'm goin ta hell...
if i clik there i'm goin ta hell...
if i clik there i'm goin ta hell...

Posted by CashCowMoo on :

that was awesome!!!!

Posted by jordanreed on :

is this pornographic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo%27s_David

Posted by jordanreed on :

or this?..

http://www.yessy.com/art/sculptures/?view=7

Posted by bdgee on :

quote:
Originally posted by jordanreed:
is this pornographic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo%27s_David

I can't see any reason for it to be.

Applying Buford's definition,

"...it makes men get hard ons and think lusty thoughts and lust is a sin and it says right in the Bible", so, clearly, Buford doesn't think it is pornographic.

At least, it doesn't make me have any physical reaction. (I can tell you something that would though! I picture of a bowl of vanilla ice cream with chocolate fudge sauce dripping across it and chopped pecans sprinkled in it. Just the thought makes my tummy feel pangs.)

Do you suppose Buford can't understand that his so called definition is absolutely gender specific (maybe hetero- specific too did he intend to include all men). A definition ISN'T allowed to be case or situation specific. If it is, it leaves the question still unanswered as to what the usage means and, thus, isn't a definition.

I also point out that, I specifically disallowed religious restrictions being the basis of a definition of "pornography" amd Buford didn't respect that. Religious nuts seldom respect anythng.

Oh well, Buford ain't too swift anyway on most subjects, just belligerent.

Posted by T e x on :

quote:
Originally posted by jordanreed:
or this?..

http://www.yessy.com/art/sculptures/?view=7

Jordan, that one's entitled "The Ashley."

Posted by glassman on :

omygod its a "PACKAGE"... never look at the package

never look at the package
never look at the package
never look at the package

Posted by T e x on :

lol, "rainman"?

Posted by Buford Baucom on :

That's different.

That's art.

Art is art.

Pornography is pornography.

Plain and simple.

It takes a keen eye and a good sence of taste to tell the difference.

BB

Posted by Buford Baucom on :

Beegee,

You can't define pornography into words. You have to be able to know it when you see it.

BB

Posted by T e x on :

"good sence of taste"

Posted by jordanreed on :

quote:
Originally posted by Buford Baucom:
Beegee,

You can't define pornography into words. You have to be able to know it when you see it.

BB

so dweeby... is this porno?...

http://epguides.com/epguidesposters/c2/10581~raquelwelch~10104209.rem

Posted by jordanreed on :

quote:
Originally posted by Buford Baucom:
Pictures of naked womens shown in public is pornography because it makes men get hard ons and think lusty thoughts and lust is a sin and it says right in the Bible.

So there.

BB

she isnt naked here,but all the rest of your definition apllies...

http://www.tracilords.com/

Posted by jordanreed on :

this one gets me all warm and fuzzy...

http://bahcecikdevekusu.com/evamendes/gallery2/evamendes30.htm

Posted by T e x on :

lol, Jordan...give it up: by DWE's definition? the whole world would have to be cold oatmeal. Everything else contributes to woodies...

Posted by bdgee on :

You get on doing crosswords then?

Posted by Buford Baucom on :

Jordan Reed,

In regard to that picture you showed of Raquel Welch.......

The answer is no.

That is not really porn.

Hope that makes you feel better.

On the other hand........

It has been said that Raquel Welch did a porno sceen in a movie called "Myra Brekinrigdge" or something else like that.

Never saw it.

So cannot comment.

Haven't heard much about her since.

Have you?

BB

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :

BB.. couldnt respond to your PM because my PM's are deactivated.. sorry about that!

Posted by T e x on :

quote:
Originally posted by bdgee:
You get on doing crosswords then?

ohh, gawd, yessss

all kinds of ways to trigger images via puzzles... [Big Grin]