This is topic Black holes in forum Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/14/t/000522.html

Posted by glassman on :
 
they aren't really black....
 
Posted by DiQuiRiesco on :
 
They aren't really holes.
 
Posted by kevin954 on :
 
they might not even exist
 
Posted by Kate on :
 
My, what a profound thread! [Smile]
 
Posted by glassman on :
 
something is missing Kate, i just can't figger out what....
 
Posted by Lucy Lastic on :
 
my ass?
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
A yellow submarine....and the acid.
 
Posted by Lucy Lastic on :
 
stephen hawking.
 
Posted by Dustoff101 on :
 
tried to catch a black horse at night, is that where that damn horse went till morning?
 
Posted by Ktrain420 on :
 
i seen um.......
 
Posted by keithsan on :
 
I like em pink but i'll take em black
 
Posted by Swampman on :
 
Might be where my profits have gone lately
 
Posted by Blue#1 on :
 
Ahem...this thread is hard to follow....anyway, they aren't really black, they aren't really a hole, and they might not exist, but what is for certain is there maybe one on the bottom of my ass.
 
Posted by Art on :
 
Excerpted from news@nature.com

Published online: 31 March 2005; | doi:10.1038/news050328-8

Black holes 'do not exist'
by Philip Ball


These mysterious objects are dark-energy stars, physicist claims, may in fact be pockets of 'dark energy'.

According to a physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, these awesome breaches in space-time do not and indeed cannot exist.

Over the past few years, observations of the motions of galaxies have shown that some 70% the Universe seems to be composed of a strange 'dark energy' that is driving the Universe's accelerating expansion.

George Chapline thinks that the collapse of the massive stars, which was long believed to generate black holes, actually leads to the formation of stars that contain dark energy. "It's a near certainty that black holes don't exist," he claims.

Black holes are predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity, which explains gravity as the warping of space-time caused by massive objects. The theory suggests that a sufficiently massive star, when it dies, will collapse under its own gravity to a single point.

But Einstein didn't believe in black holes, Chapline argues. "Unfortunately", he adds, "he couldn't articulate why." At the root of the problem is the other revolutionary theory of twentieth-century physics, which Einstein also helped to formulate: quantum mechanics.

In general relativity, there is no such thing as a 'universal time' that makes clocks tick at the same rate everywhere. Instead, gravity makes clocks run at different rates in different places. But quantum mechanics, which describes physical phenomena at infinitesimally small scales, is meaningful only if time is universal; if not, its equations make no sense.

This problem is particularly pressing at the boundary, or event horizon, of a black hole. To a far-off observer, time seems to stand still here. A spacecraft falling into a black hole would seem, to someone watching it from afar, to be stuck forever at the event horizon, although the astronauts in the spacecraft would feel as if they were continuing to fall. "General relativity predicts that nothing happens at the event horizon," says Chapline.

However, as long ago as 1975 quantum physicists argued that strange things do happen at an event horizon: matter governed by quantum laws becomes hypersensitive to slight disturbances. "The result was quickly forgotten," says Chapline, "because it didn't agree with the prediction of general relativity. But actually, it was absolutely correct."

This strange behaviour, he says, is the signature of a 'quantum phase transition' of space-time. Chapline argues that a star doesn't simply collapse to form a black hole; instead, the space-time inside it becomes filled with dark energy and this has some intriguing gravitational effects.

Outside the 'surface' of a dark-energy star, it behaves much like a black hole, producing a strong gravitational tug. But inside, the 'negative' gravity of dark energy may cause matter to bounce back out again.
--------------------------------------------

Art: Ron Pearson has some interesting ideas as to the nature of existence:

http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/articles/pearson/summary.htm

Skeptics should consider this:

http://aldonsubatomic.com/mat1.html

This is interesting:

http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/90/360/15323_Demkina.html


 -
 
Posted by Nicholas on :
 
Art, big bang recently had a bunch of gaps filled in, search a bit
 
Posted by *Magnetic*Microspheres* on :
 
On a perpendicular thought.... I always felt that Vincent was a much more lovable droid than R2D2  -
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Sounds like a QBIDers dream come true.
 
Posted by Swampman on :
 
QUOTE from ART; "These mysterious objects are dark-energy stars, physicist claims, may in fact be pockets of 'dark energy'."

BEWARE the DARK POWER, it will force you into merciless killing of innocent chickens !
 
Posted by Art on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Swampman:
BEWARE the DARK POWER, it will force you into merciless killing of innocent chickens !

Horrible thought! Sick, sick, sick!

Humans, not innocent chickens, need to be killed, to save the planet.

We need more cannibalism - perhaps a religion based on cannibalism of non-believers.


 -
 


© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2