posted
Just like Standard Oil and other megalomaniac Cartel-like manipulators, it's past time to break the sleazy DTCC into little, tiny, limp-wienied pieces...!!!
StockGate: Ignoring Warning, DTCC Board Allows Brazen Libel By Its Chief Counsel / FinancialWire®
November 11, 2005 (FinancialWire) You have to “give it to” Larry Thompson, Chief Counsel for the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., for what appears to be a brazen and open libel of FinancialWire directly in the face of warnings that members of his Board of Directors received only Monday for what Attorney Marshal Shichtman, Esq., referred to as reckless and apparently willful misbehavior against the media.
November 11, 2005 (FinancialWire) You have to “give it to” Larry Thompson, Chief Counsel for the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., for what appears to be a brazen and open libel of FinancialWire directly in the face of warnings that members of his Board of Directors received only Monday for what Attorney Marshal Shichtman, Esq., referred to as reckless and apparently willful misbehavior against the media.
All 20 members of DTCC’s board, including Jill M. Considine, Chair and CEO, and Donald F. Donahue, COO, DTCC; Jonathan E. Beyman, CEO, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH); Randolph L. Cowen, Global Head of Technology and Operations, Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS); Dianne Schueneman, Senior VP, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER), New York; Douglas Shulman, President, NASD, Inc., Washington, DC; and Timothy J. Theriault, President, The Northern Trust Co. (NASDAQ: NTRS); and Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange, had been asked by Shichtman to “reign in” Thompson and other high executives of DTCC following two documented instances of media tampering involving FinancialWire.
The latest attack came in a letter to Financial Express in India, in response to Sucheta Dalal's column, 'Pitfalls ahead in new Sebi proposal?” Stating that the reference to the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation is “largely inaccurate,” Thompson said that “DTCC's stock borrow programme is not being probed by NASD or any other regulator.”
Earlier in the year, the DTCC’s counsel had also said it had not been sued despite public evidence that it had been.
Thompson said that DTCC's subsidiaries serve as the central infrastructure in the US for post-trade clearance and settlement of virtually all trading of equities and fixed income securities. “Our activities are highly regulated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve and the New York state banking department.
“Ms Dalal's reliance on Financialwire is unfortunate. It is not a legitimate news source.”
He added that on her reference to lawsuits, DTCC has been sued by a handful of companies and investors in regard to naked short-selling. In every case but two (which are still pending dismissal motions), the cases have been dismissed or withdrawn by the plaintiffs.
“DTCC does not regulate short selling (naked or otherwise) or other marketplace transactions, and has no power either to allow or stop it. Regulatory and enforcement powers rest with the SEC and with the exchanges upon which the transactions are conducted.”
Shichtman was not available to comment Thursday but the published statement is very similar if not the same as has been made to distribution vendors of the newswire in attempts to directly interfere with its publication.
Financial Express has been asked by FinancialWire to ascertain Thompson’s “proof” behind his assertions, noting that its team of editors and reporters, most of whom are profiled at http://www.financialwire.net , have extensive journalism backgrounds, and that there is no basis whatsoever for what now appears to be libelous comments.
The most recent effort, the week of September 18, followed the DTCC’s successful interference with FinancialWire’s distribution via Investors Business Daily and Yahoo, Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) on February 7, 2005, a deed to which attorneys for the DTCC admitted to in a letter to Shichtman in April, in what appears to have been at the time a full-court press against unfriendly news.
On April 10, for example, a much-vaunted expose on General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) Dateline NBC program was abruptly and suspiciously cancelled, and run weeks later in an extremely truncated form that made no mention of the DTCC, said to have been the program’s primary target. The extent of potential interference in that programming remains a mystery, as those close to it have all declined to discuss it.
If there was interference, it would surely denigrate NBC in stark contrast to the standards set by CBS’s 60 Minutes in the infamous “Big Tobacco” expose that became a highly-acclaimed movie, “The Insider,” and more recently the movie “Good Night, and Good Luck,” about how that network stood up to Joe McCarthy in the Communist media-baiting era of the 50s.
On or about the same time, the DTCC had castigated EuroMoney after a March, 2005 article on illegal naked short selling quoted then U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Head of Market Regulation Annette Nazareth’s assistant, James Brigagliano that prior lawbreakers were “grandfathered” because “we were concerned about generating volatility where there were large pre-existing open positions, and we wanted to start afresh with new regulation, not re-write history.” Nazareth, now an SEC Commissioner, had previously told the New York Times that naked short selling amounted to no more than complaining shareholders “who want their stock to go up.”
Since, one of those “large pre-existing open positions,” apparently in the neighborhood of $10.5 billion, has come back to haunt the SEC, in the form of a line item, “securities sold, not yet purchased” in the bankruptcy filing of Refco (NYSE: RFX; OTC: RFXCQ), according to the Financial Times. These events apparently have created a huge crisis of confidence in the institutions previously believed to be there to protect the individual investor and create a level playing field.
A recent Investrend Poll at http://www.investrendinformation.com showed that a whopping 89% of online respondents believe the SEC should be “hugely” blamed for the Refco meltdown. An even more lopsided 92.05% stated that the DTCC should “be punished” for censorship violations of the First Amendment. And in the current Investrend Poll, 50% so far believe that these new scandals will keep individual investors on the sidelines and out of the markets.
The DTCC remains under intense pressure from regulators over its controversial “stock borrow program,” its move to automated settlements that has unsettled many in the financial community, including foreign exchanges such as Sebi in India, according to the Financial Express, that are now reconsidering copying such a system, and from a score of lawsuits claiming the agency’s policies and loans have undermined the financial system and hurt hundreds of small public companies and thousands of individual investors who have lost millions.
The DTCC itself admitted in its front-page editorial complaining of Euromoney and the charges it expected from Dateline NBC, that $6 billion of securities go unsettled every day. The admittance was in the form of a boast that this amounted to just a small segment of each day’s clearances.
In his letter, Shichtman noted that while the DTCC’s standing of an SRO, is “highly disputed,” and with it “any claim to any type of immunity,” that it has a “heightened responsibility to the public” as a quasi-SRO “solely owned by SROs,” meaning NASD and the NYSE. He asked the DTCC directors to set a proper “tone at the top” by reigning in the media-bashing and news interferences practiced by the DTCC’s top executives.”
He said that the DTCC’s guise of its interference as “free speech” does not excuse slander, libel and tortuous interference, nor, if the DTCC is held to be a government-aided organization, the clear violation of FinancialWire’s First Amendment rights.
DTCC board members include Gerald A. Beeson, Senior Managing Director and CFO, Citadel Investment Group, Chicago; Jonathan E. Beyman, CEO, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), New York; Frank J. Bisignano, CEO Global Transaction Services, Citigroup (NYSE: C), New York; Michael C. Bodson, Managing Director, Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD), J. Charles Cardona, Vice Chair, The Dreyfus Corp.; Stephen P. Casper, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer, Fischer Francis Trees & Watts, Inc., New York; Arthur Certosimo, Executive VP, Bank of New York (NYSE: BNY), New York;
Also, Jill M. Considine, Chair and CEO, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), New York; Paul F. Costello, President, Business Services Group, Wachovia Securities (NYSE: WB), Charlotte, NC; Randolph L. Cowen, Global Head of Technology and Operations, Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS); Donald F. Donahue, Chief Operating Officer, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), New York; Norman Eaker, Principal, Edward Jones, Des Peres, MO; Allan D. Greene, Executive VP, State Street Corp. (NYSE: STT), Boston, MA; and
Also, Catherine R. Kinney, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer, New York Stock Exchange, Boston; Heidi Miller, CEO, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM); Eileen K. Murray, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR), New York; Ronald Purpora, CEO, Garban LLC, Jersey City, New Jersey; Dianne Schueneman, Senior VP, Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER), New York; Douglas Shulman, President, NASD, Inc., Washington, DC; and Timothy J. Theriault, President, The Northern Trust Co. (NASDAQ: NTRS), Chicago.
Citing FinancialWire’s coverage of the widening financial scandals associated with naked short sales, Financial Express had said the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) must rethink any automated trading systems such as those used and proposed by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., which it said American investors no longer trust.
Columnist Dalal cited manipulative scandals involving Refco (NYSE: RFX) and Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) as reasons M. Damodaran, Sebi chief, should go slow on permitting short-selling by institutional investors. Short sales abuses have vexed and embarrassed American regulators as well as institutions such as Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR).
Financial Express said that automation has its downsides. “Unless the regulatory system is constantly alert, ingenious crooks are always working to identify weak links.”
Dulal said that a “lending and borrowing mechanism is expected to prevent rampant price manipulation and keep out naked short-sales, that led to the demise of the old badla-based system of forward trading. Will it achieve this aim?
“It is pertinent to look at the growing US controversy over illegal naked short-sales and its consequences. FinancialWire … posted an article in March 2005 about a Michigan man, Robert C Simpson, who acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Global Links Corp. Two days later, he found over 50 million shares of the company shares were traded on the bourses. This case came up for discussion by the Senate Banking Committee and was probably the earliest official acknowledgement of naked short-sales (without first borrowing shares, as is legally required).”
“Since then, Patrick Byrne, CEO of a company called Overstock has gone public with the fact that his company’s float changed hands four or five times in a day. How, in a perfectly functioning lending and borrowing mechanism? And where are all the extra shares coming from to give delivery, unless there is a large incidence of illegal naked short-sales? Byrne has publicly alleged his father failed to get delivery of 200,000 shares purchased by him through a blue-chip brokerage firm. He is quoted as saying anywhere between 5-20 million counterfeit shares are currently in the marketplace, presumably on the major exchanges alone.
“The US debate is important, as their trading system has become the global standard for capital markets. It is, hence, pertinent to note that extraordinary trading volumes (yet unexplained phenomena in highly manipulated Indian stocks as well) and short delivery during settlements are increasingly being flagged as manifestations of a possible scam.
“More startling, many investors have accused The Depository Trust & Clearing Corpo-ration (DTCC), a holding company that clears and guarantees almost all trades in the US, of engineering naked short-selling schemes. The DTCC has faced 12 lawsuits in this connection. Most of these were dismissed, but the corporation itself has admitted, in a Q&A posted on its website, that naked short-selling occurs, but the extent to which it occurs is unclear.
“The DTCC’s stock lending and borrowing programme also continues to be under regulatory scrutiny by the NASD and other government agencies. The US debate attributes naked short-selling to counterfeiting and collusion between brokers, dealers and, of course, shadowy hedge funds. In most cases, the sales, accompanied by large, unexplained trading volumes, aimed to destroy the value of small companies.
“An October 13 report by FinancialWire also suggests research analysts, especially Net-based ones, also have a role to play in setting the stage for shorting. It quotes specific examples of alleged collusion between broker-dealers and independent research firms to publish negative information, to beat down the prices of target companies.
“This raging American debate over rampant price manipulation and misuse of automated trading systems is extremely relevant for us, since Sebi plans to permit short-selling by institutional investors. Indian investors, too, have noticed that a large and unexplained spurt in trading volumes always signals the start of a big price ramping operation. Our stock exchanges and regulators simply sleep over this phenomenon, even when these are pointed out to them.
“Second, Indian regulators are clueless about the true beneficial ownership of the most powerful market segment, namely, foreign institutional investors. Add Sebi’s record of poor prosecution of important cases and our slow judicial system and we have a recipe for serious trouble. Sebi may end by attempting to regulate institutional short-sales, while remaining partially blindfolded.”
FT says that the firm’s IPO underwriters Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Credit Suisse First Boston (NYSE: CSR) both have investigators looking into the illegal but allegedly widely practiced manipulative practice among essentially unregulated hedge funds and other financial institutions that now appears to be a naked short sales bubble that could imperil the U.S. and worldwide financial markets.
Overstock’s CEO Patrick Byrne appeared on News Corp.’s (NYSE: NWS) Fox with Neil Cavuto to state that there are at least twelve Refco’s “buried in the system,” and Cavuto said some say it could be as many as 60 institutions ready to implode. He said a “systemic” problem could cost the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. as much as $100 billion to clean up.
The line item was so unbelievably monumental that two of the major critics of naked short selling, Dave Patch, of InvestigatetheSEC.com, and Bob O’Brien, director of the National Coalition Against Naked Short Short Selling, were reluctant to positively identify the $10.5 billion as Refco’s naked short position. The Financial Times says investigators are not so reticent, and “have been unable to find which shares, if any, were involved.”
Critics have said that if you lift the covers off similar financial institutions and hedge funds, and even many of Wall Street’s top investment banks and brokerages, the $10 billion exposure at Refco could be multiplied 100 times over, and may inhabit every nook and cranny on the Street. Few companies initiate buy-ins, and such exposure is just bounced around, or “borrowed” from a DTCC. that may also be at significant risk should it be forced to call in its “loans.” The DTCC has also said that there are $6 billion in “fails to deliver” every single trading day. That could add up to some $1.5 trillion every year, not counting attrition from late deliveries.
Already the SEC and the U.S. attorney is probing a $1.4 billion hedge fund, Alexandra Investment Management LLC, and it is not yet known what that investigation will uncover. The fund has revealed that regulators are investigating “numerous participants” in PIPEs, an anacronym for private investments in public equities. Often such investigations end, however, with only a knuckle knock, with no restitution to shareholders of targeted small public companies.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is under heavy scrutiny as well over Refco since many claim it is just the tip of the iceberg in the illegal naked short selling scandal known as StockGate.
Said the New York Post:
“It is believed the monies at the heart of the Refco scandal are in fact unsettled funds related to the illegal naked short selling, and many have theorized that there may be untold billions of dollars in other financial institutions and hedge funds in the same leaking lifeboat.”
The Post said no new laws are needed. “Enforcement is needed.”
In his Fox appearance, Byrne said he does not expect the SEC to be able to clean up this situation, and hinted that it will require either judicial or Congressional intervention.Gadfly David Patch’s CNBC interview questioning the SEC’s involvement is at http://www.vmsdigital.com/MyFiles.aspx?Onum=8FD88353-D1CF-49AB-96FB-F5B3D748534D
His site, http://www.investigatethesec.com , has long held that the SEC has scrambled to protect illegal manipulators for fear that the lawbreaking had gone on so long and that it is so huge that it threatens the nation’s financial underpinnings. On CNBC, Patch again asked why the SEC can sit by and watch scores of companies listed on the Regulation SHO threshold list for almost a year, signifying that they are in continuous default of settlements required by the law.
He also asked why the SEC would try to “grandfather” the millions of settlement failures that preceded Regulation SHO, which went into effect in January. The “grandfathering” still hasn’t been court-tested as to whether it may be a kind of “pardon” that only a President may issue.
The SEC and the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. continue to stonewall any attempt to require transparency in the marketplace as to the extent of fails to deliver, which some see as just a euphanism for “counterfeit shares.”
This scandal comes hard on the heels of allegations of misdeeds by Gradient Analytics and employees of TheStreet.com (NASDAQ: TSCM), in conspiracy with David Rocker and Rocker Partners in manipulating the stock of Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) and others comes another explosive case, this time against Refco Inc. (NYSE: RFX), one of the primary alleged miscreants in destroying Sedona Corp. (OTCBB: SDNA), once a Nasdaq-listed company.
Not since the Enron and Worldcom scandals has the financial markets been under such growing suspicion, except this time the cancer is not just in a treatable part of the body. This time it has spread through the lymph nodes and appears to be present in every vital organ as scores of companies seem permanently entrenched in the threshold lists maintained by Nasdaq and the NYSE, signifying over three-quarters of a year of the existence of counterfeit shares and unsettled trades.
Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne, for instance, has released transcripts of discussions between himself and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD) over shares that he could not get delivery on, and says his father has still not gotten delivery on 75,000 shares that he bought.
Byrne said that he believes between 5 million and 20 million counterfeit shares are currently in the marketplace, presumably on the major exchanges alone.
He has also added libel to the list of legal charges against Rocker and Gradient and others.
Former Refco CEO Phillip Bennett has been arrested on charges of deliberately misleading shareholders when they purchased shares in the company’s recent public offering. He had been placed on leave by his company as it launched an investigation into $430 million the company said was owed by an entity he controlled in a transaction that was hidden from the public.
The company had already lost $1.65 billion in market value, leaving investors in the public offering extremely angry.
Also fired was Santo Maggio, president of Refco Securities, whom the company said was believed to have known about Bennett’s activities.
According to the New York Post, Maggio was already “in the middle of an SEC probe that would have probably gotten him suspended one year from his supervisory duties” related to Refco’s relationship with Rhino Advisors, a hedge fund that illegally shorted the stock of Sedona Corp.
The new case winds its way right back to the growing StockGate scandal as the Post quotes a “source familiar with the investigation” that the receivables in the latest probe “probably came from short sale positions made from a shuttered hedge fund.”
The levees protecting the underworld of naked short selling, despite efforts of many regulators to try to prop up a system on weakened stilts appear to be crumbling, forecasting a potential Wall Street disaster that would not be unlike what happened in New Orleans and in other low-lying real estate.
An undermining of confidence in the “independence” of subscription-based institutional research, in the financial media that could even involve General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) CNBC and of course, the undeniable clout of already besieged hedge funds and the “King of Shorts,” David Rocker, whose targets are said to include Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (NYSE: MSO), would be disastrous in the event of any one of them, but altogether, it could result in a total collapse as investors look for safer investment and savings venues than “crooked” markets.
In a commentary, Motley Fool said any “mirth” regarding “sith lords” and other irrelevant allegations are “obscuring a case with fairly broad implications for security analysis, First Amendment rights, and the credibility of our public markets.”
It said that in an affidavit recently acquired by The Motley Fool, and also apparently acquired by DealFlow and others, Demetrios Anifantis, who identifies himself as a former employee of the research firm Gradient Analytics, alleges that the company conspired with David Rocker of the hedge fund Rocker Partners to publish damaging information "for the purpose of negatively influencing the price of Overstock shares so that Rocker could profit from its existing or intended short positions in Overstock shares.
“Two additional sworn statements in our possession, ostensibly by former Gradient employees Robert Ballash and Daryl Smith, also allege that Gradient provided biased research on behalf of its clients. Both Anifantis and Ballash additionally accuse Gradient of running a hedge fund advisory called Pinnacle Investment Advisors, contrary to the company's public statements at that time.”
Motley Fool notes “the most detailed and apparently most damaging affidavit, if it is true, was delivered by Anifantis. He worked as a customer service representative for Gradient from November 2003 until November 2004. New York Post reported that he was fired from the research firm for forwarding his employer's client list to his personal email.
“According to his statement, Anifantis recalled being on phone discussions, during which "David Rocker, Marc Cohodes, or other representatives of a hedge fund called Rocker Partners, LP, requested that the special report contain more negative information, or that the report emphasize a specific negative fact and that the report downplay any positive facts.
“Anifantis also states that customers like Rocker would ask that Gradient not disseminate a negative report ‘to the public for a specific period of time, so the customer could get their own position in the stock before the public got the information.’ This conspiracy went beyond just Vickrey and Rocker, according to Anifantis, who also says that it "appeared" to him that Herb Greenberg, who then wrote for TheStreet.com, joined in coordinating the attacks on Overstock.
“At first glance, the affidavits raise troubling questions about the nature of ‘independent research.’ If the three former employees of Gradient are telling the truth, the alleged conspiracy between the research firm and Rocker Partners would represent an egregious example of market manipulation, which most likely would have seriously harmed individual investors, as well as Overstock itself.”
The Fool points out that “the veracity of these individuals has not been established, and Rocker Partners and Gradient vigorously deny the charges.
“As New York Post has reported, at least two of the affiants may have credibility issues or reasons to hold grudges against Gradient. If this case makes it to trial, Anifantis, Ballash, and Smith will have to testify in court and withstand cross-examination by top defense attorneys. It will be interesting to see whether their charges are supported by documentary evidence, such as emails, revised reports, notes of phone calls, and the like. Within the affidavits are charges that would prove quite persuasive if supported with concrete documents.
“For example, in support of the charge that Rocker had considerable input on the creation of reports, Anifantis's affidavit refers to an "exhibit 5" (which we did not receive) allegedly containing revised reports on Overstock with Rocker's revisions in brackets.
“Ultimately, we believe that these affidavits raise important questions for investors about the integrity of our financial system. Unlike a lot of the silliness in the media relating to Overstock, this complaint is not frivolous on its face, and although Overstock will need to prove its allegations, the case must be taken seriously. The question to us is why the atmosphere around this lawsuit has, from the beginning, been comical. If the behavior set forth in these allegations is true, then the implications of the ease at which the financial professionals can manipulate the public markets are stark.”
The affidavits, from former employees of Gradient, according to DealFlow state that the research firm provided “hatchet jobs” on companies chosen by clients “coordinated to deliver maximum trading benefits to them.” The affidavits state that reporters for TheStreet.com “leaked” Gradient’s negative reports to the market ahead of their release. It notes that Rocker Partners is the largest shareholder in TheStreet.com and that Rocker is a contributing columnist. The affiants also say that former TheStreet.com columnist Herb Greenberg had an office at Gradient where he ghost-wrote research reports for Gradient clients such as Rocker.
The former employees, one of whom had been fired after raising questions about Gradient’s practices, said the firm stated its team of 18 to 20 analysts were comprised of CPAs and CFAs when none of them had advanced credentials, and were instead recent college graduates with business-related degrees.
They also note that the research firm’s executives, Donn Vickery and James Carr Bettis, also managed hedge funds and a mutual fund that traded in the securities of companies covered by the research side.
Gradient is a member of InvestorSide, which told FinancialWire that a violation of its code of ethics, if proven, would disqualify any member from further participation in that organization.
Former employee Demetrios Anifantis, in a sworn statement, said that Gradient would regularly generate “custom reports” for clients, after receiving specific instructions from the clients on whether it should be a “negative” or “positive” report.
Many of the reports were redistributed to PIPES traders and hedge funds by Sagient Research, which distributes the Placement Tracker database of PIPES transactions. Sagient reportedly said it has not distributed Gradient reports since August, 2004. Release dates on the reports were said to have been often delayed for three to five days while Rocker and other Gradient partners secured short positions. These allegations were contained in several affidavits.
The affidavits said that an associate editor working with Greenberg, now at Marketwatch.com, Brian Harris, worked for Gradient to draft research, and had an office in a Gradient office in Seattle. It was noted that TheStreet.com removed Harris’ name as an associate editor shortly after Overstock’s lawsuit was filed.
The affidavits contain numerous other explosive allegations.
In other naked short selling developments, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., reportedly itself under NASD scrutiny for its controversial stock lending program that some, including an 11 state state North American Securities Adminitrators Association task force headed by Connecticut’s chief securities officer, and former NASAA president, apparently believe facilitates the illegal naked shorting industry, has been very secretive about the status of shares for individual companies, stonewalling even companies’ efforts to determine their true ownerships and short positions.
Brokerage and clearing firms are apparently under intense NASD pressure to settle failed short trades in Regulation SHO threshold securities or have their clearance firms do it for them at possible substantive losses.
The NASD is in turn acting under political and regulatory pressure from the 11-state task force.
Lambiase had publicly asked the SEC to “fix” the DTCC “problem” as it was considering the adoption of Regulation SHO last year, but taking a page from numerous U.S. Senators, he and other state regulators have grown tired of waiting for Regulation SHO to do more than simply shine a magnification light on the massive fails-to-deliver problem.
DealFlow said NASD officials are concerned that stock loan programs are being used to settle failed short trades in Reg SHO threshold stocks, which must be closed out voluntarily or through forced buy-ins within 13 days. “The regulators are concerned that the stock loan are being used instead of market purchases to provide the shares needed for settlement, creating new transactions that will ultimately fail to settle as well.”
The state regulators, DealFlow said, have been “highly critical of the SEC's decision to ‘grandfather’ settlement failures resulting from naked short sales up to levels that trigger threshold status under Reg SHO.”
NAASA was particularly concerned about Regulation SHO, because it excluded the small cap market from any meaningful regulation. “NASAA said the proposal included replacing the so-called ‘tick test’ with a rule that would provide a uniform price test using the "consolidated best bid" as the reference point for permissible short sales. This, however, would not address problems relating to the naked short selling of smaller, less liquid securities, because , NASAA argued, the requirement of the consolidated best bids meant it could not be applied to securities that were not subject to real-time consolidated quotes. That included Nasdaq Small Cap, OTCBB, and Pink Sheet securities.
NASAA also questioned the wisdom of grandfathering settlement failures under the threshold level, asking why the SEC was willing to permit significant settlement failures at all.”
“While there are instances when settlement may be legitimately delayed, existing regulations provide for extensions for settlement. If the Commission continues to allow settlement failures, it may well facilitate the harm that the proposal is designed to remedy,” Lambiase warned the SEC.
According to DealFlow, Lambiase urged the SEC to reconsider its stance regarding the role of the stock borrow program operated by the Depository Trust Corp. (DTC). NASAA wrote that as a threshold matter, NASAA believes that the Commission should explicitly prohibit the DTC from lending more shares of a security than it actually holds. The utility of the overall proposed rule would be severely impaired unless the Commission undertakes to implement such a prohibition."
Brent Baker, an attorney with Woodbury Kesler in Salt Lake City and counsel to naked shorting target and eight-month old threshold list company Overstock.com, previously spent 14 years at the SEC, including time in the Division of Enforcement, was quoted as saying he believes that the SEC tried, with Regulation SHO, to put "their finger in the dike" but failed.
“Three or four years ago naked short selling was being perpetrated by promoters in the micro cap world," he says. "they would publish 'exposes' on the Internet... and they would bring pressure on these little companies."
“However, short selling has changed,” noted DealFlow. He believes the SEC does not realize that abusive short selling practices have been adopted by others and are now built into business models of large, mainstream hedge funds.
Meanwhile, the NY Post has reported that traders in Nasdaq stocks are racing to beat a rumored regulatory deadline to close out their positions — or take huge losses as clearing firms do it for them.
“Naked short sales are trades executed without borrowing stock beforehand. Naked short sellers can overwhelm an orderly trading market, since unlike traditional short sellers, there is technically no limit to how much stock can be sold short illegally, noted the Post.
The Post also reported recently that the NASD and numerous state securities regulators, led by Ralph Lambiase of Connecticut's Division of Securities and Business Investments, have vowed to increase scrutiny of naked short sales.
“A buy-in is the worst possible development for a short-seller, since he has to accept any price given,” it stated.
In a letter to constituent investor advocate Dave Patch, whose persistence in criticizing Federal regulators over the past several years for shareholder losses at the hands of illegal manipulators was at times a lone quest, often covered only by FinancialWire, Connecticut Division of Securities Director Ralph A. Lambiase, the immediate past president of the North American Securities Administrators Association outlined for the first time the efforts a “working group” of state regulators have been undertaking to assail abusive market practices that Lambiase said has been directly responsible for “an unmistakable loss of investor confidence by the arguably millions of investors who have lost their monies.”
It was an unusual move by Lambiase to outline the states’ enforcement plans in a letter to Patch, who has been vilified and scorned by many top regulators and institutions for his efforts, which includes the maintenance of a website, http://www.investigatethesec.com .
Lambiase said that his efforts, and efforts of others, such as Tanya Solov, Director of the Illinois Securities Department, Tanya Durkee, Deputy Commissioner, Vermont Department of Securities, and Rex A. Staples, General Counsel for NASAA, was stimulated by Patch, and an ever-growing group of concerned citizens who have “continued to champion the issue of reform in the naked short selling area for so long,” and added that it has been those grassroots efforts that constitute the “primary reason we are beginning to see reform of any sort.” Lambiase was clear in stating that it is “your determination and persistence in seeing that this wrong is righted is in part responsible for my interest, as well as that of other state regulators.”
Lambiase, whose initial letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stated that the SEC needs to look at the role of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. in allowing these abuse practices to continue, said that it seems “clear that had the SRO’s and the SEC exercised greater diligence in enforcing pre-existing rules, Reg SHO would likely have been unnecessary.”
He said his working group has begun meeting with SRO’s and issuers alike, and that it will “continue to exert substantial effort to remedy the remaining abusive practices in naked short selling until we are confident at the state level that the companines in our communities and citizens that invest in them will no longer be the possible targets of abusive naked short sellers.”
It had been previously rumored that the reason the NASD has been issuing subpoenas to a dozen or more brokerages over their “fails to deliver” and their failures to enforce buy-ins is due to those regulating at the Federal level not wanting to be trumped again by a state investigation such as occurred in several Spitzer reform efforts.
Lambiase so far appears to be taking the posture that the state group is ready to step in if the Federal regulators do not, thus “inspiring” the current efforts rumored to be occurring at the Federal level.
To make the point, he told Patch in the letter obtained by FinancialWire that “there remains a substantial distance between REG SHO and the ultimate goal of including substantive protections for small business issuers.”
It is these small businesses in our communities, Lambiase pointed out, “who take entrepreneurial risks to grow their companies through listings on the OTCBB and Pink Sheets. These small businesses not only provide employment for the residents of their communities, but also offer the general public the opportunity to invest in local businesses with promising products or services.
“While it may be true that a number of small companies lack the financial depth to succeed, they are nonetheless entitled to succeed or fail by their own honest business decisions and not as a result of the corrupt acts of abusive short sellers.
In what some believe is another swipe at the secretive DTCC, he said that “without transparency, we cannot, as yet, precisely identify each small business that failed as a direct result of abusinve naked short selling nor quantify the exact number of jobs lost to our local economies when these companies are forced to close their doors.”
In what is an unmistakable prod to the SEC, Lambiase said that institution is “moving slowly forward as Reg SHO in its current state is studied and debated seemingly ad infinitum. While slight modifications to the existing Rule may result from such an approach, a far more threatening pattern of abuse is certain to continue unless wholesale reforms are made to remedy the concerns of the small business community.”
He said that even Congress, whose members have also called the SEC on the carpet for the slow progress associated with Reg SHO may in fact be missing the point that “abusive short selling poses a direct threat to the economic well being of small business and the entire community.”
The 11-state task force reportedly was in serious strategy sessions a few weeks ago.
New York Post quoted one regulator as saying there is “an epidemic” of naked shorting. Regulation SHO has made that evident for the world to see. Numerous U.S. Senators have called the Regulation fully ineffective, and have repeatedly called upon the SEC Commissioners to get the practice under control.
The Post said that an SEC official confirmed to it “that no complaints have been brought in the nine months since Regulation SHO went into effect.”
It quoted one state securities regulator, Bill Reilly of Florida, as saying he expects the increased effort will result in more voluntary compliance from dealers, as well as enforcement activity.
That may or may not resolve the DTCC “problem.” Recently a stock transfer agent, Transfer Online Inc., had asked then-SEC Chair William Donaldson to put a stop to the control the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. and Automatic Data Processing (NYSE: ADP) are fast gaining over the transfer business, and to demand DTCC transparency.
Excerpts from the letter, posted at http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/LettersToEditor/1012.html , states: “Over the years as the amount of shares held at DTC has increased it has become more and more difficult to determine who owns the shares, who is trading them and if the trading is proper. This trend, and the resulting problems I will detail below, continues to increase because a minority of the total number of shareholders are reflected on the books and records of the corporation, most activity takes place behind the wall of ownership that is designated as Cede & Co. and neither the company nor the transfer agent has any access to the underlying information.
“Furthermore, DTC recently managed to put through a rule change (Release No. 34-50758A; File No.S7-24-04) that prohibits a transfer agent from representing any company who seeks to withdraw from the DTC system. This change effectively leaves companies with no voice or choice in the management of their stock and their ability to have any transparency as to what is actually taking place in the market in regard to their stock.
“I receive calls from companies seeking information as they watch millions of shares trade in a single day, who watch their share price decrease in value and who have no access to information regarding who is behind the trading of these shares, or if in fact the trades are at all legitimate. As the system now operates, most companies have a large percentage of shares on their books registered to Cede & Co.
“Given the importance of shareholder voting and communication one would assume that the same requirements placed on transfer agents as to accuracy and reporting would be placed on ADP and Cede & Co. as they usually hold or service the majority of the shares owned in any given company.
“I have found; however, that when presented with the tabulation reports from ADP the share totals they report sometimes exceed the total number of shares outstanding for the company. Let me restate this because it is a very important part of my concern about a system that is more and more headed in the direction of increased control by DTC. The shares presented by ADP, that are the shares voted by the brokers on behalf of the shareholders for whom they hold accounts, EXCEED when added to the shareholders of record the total number of shares outstanding.
“Where are these extra shares coming from? Why are there no controls on the number of shares held in the nominee name Cede & Co. vs. the ownership on the books and records of the brokers and why is the company not privy to any information unless it pays whatever fees it is told it must pay by the organizations that control the data?
“In fact, as the system is evolving, DTC is de facto becoming the largest transfer agent in the industry even though it is an organization formed by and working for the interests of the brokerage community. If, ultimately, the S.E.C. is in place to protect investors then this issue can not be ignored because in the end when the market is completely under the control of the brokers and the organizations that represent them then the market can neither be transparent nor fair.”
FinancialWire is an independent, proprietary news service of Investrend Information, a division of Investrend Communications, Inc. It is not a press release service and receives no compensation for its news or opinions. Other divisions of Investrend, however, provide shareholder empowerment platforms such as forums, independent research and webcasting. For more information or to receive the FirstAlert daily summary of news, commentary, research reports, webcasts, events and conference calls, click on http://www.investrend.com/contact.asp
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
