posted
What would I be apologizing for? I was asking a follow up question to your post (which you never answered). Didn't realize that was an apology-deserving offense
If anyone should apologize, it should be you for not responding to me and making me miss an opportunity to make some money here
What's the background on the supposed short squeeze?"
I know better than what? That short squeeze is just a thrown around term and it wont happen here? Whats the background...well volume and the fact that 20% of the shares in the float were shorted leading to covering when share price goes up. I did answer your question, just not who reported the info which doesnt matter. But either way I was commenting on your first post.
-------------------- Disclaimer: Not accountable for anything I say
IP: Logged |
posted
Fair enough, I was looking at my second post where I asked for the source. I don't think that's irrelevant at all. If it was on buy ins or something I would have moved on. If it was from hte otcbb report, I probably would have bought.
My initial post was merely meant as a good natured ribbing of the fact that typically when anyone posts a pick and says "short squeeze" people like Repo will immediately jump in and demand more info. I was trying to do it in a less confrontational manor. How about if I apologize for not being more clear, while refraining from apologizing for asking for more information?
IP: Logged |