The reason they are there and "sealed" in bunkers was they said the cost to transport them and destroy them was higher than just trying to bury them there.
-------------------- It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so. Posts: 6949 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
if they try to use that stuff after it's been neglected all that time? they will likely wipe themselves out before they can use them on enmeies.
those chemical weapons have alot of basic routine maintenance activity around them just to keep them safe enough to use in a war. they are likely to kill themsevls just moving them. you don't need an explosion to have a bad accident with some of those wepsys. I wouldn't be touching or trusting any full chemical drums in a building like that
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: if they try to use that stuff after it's been neglected all that time? they will likely wipe themselves out before they can use them on enmeies.
those chemical weapons have alot of basic routine maintenance activity around them just to keep them safe enough to use in a war. they are likely to kill themsevls just moving them. you don't need an explosion to have a bad accident with some of those wepsys. I wouldn't be touching or trusting any full chemical drums in a building like that
lol.. They won't need to.
Just like they did in Syria, they have freshly supplied weapons from our gubment.
Yes..
DIRECTLY supplied.
I've seen and read the emails.
Posts: 2965 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |