Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009. (Updated)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009. (Updated)
raybond
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for raybond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ExxonMobil paid no federal income tax in 2009. (Updated)
Last week, Forbes magazine published what the top U.S. corporations paid in taxes last year. “Most egregious,” Forbes notes, is General Electric, which “generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing to Uncle Sam. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.” Big Oil giant Exxon Mobil, which last year reported a record $45.2 billion profit, paid the most taxes of any corporation, but none of it went to the IRS:

Exxon tries to limit the tax pain with the help of 20 wholly owned subsidiaries domiciled in the Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands that (legally) shelter the cash flow from operations in the likes of Angola, Azerbaijan and Abu Dhabi. No wonder that of $15 billion in income taxes last year, Exxon paid none of it to Uncle Sam, and has tens of billions in earnings permanently reinvested overseas.

Mother Jones’ Adam Weinstein notes that, despite benefiting from corporate welfare in the U.S., Exxon complains about paying high taxes, claiming that it threatens energy innovation research. Pat Garofalo at the Wonk Room notes that big corporations’ tax shelter practices similar to Exxon’s shift a $100 billion annual tax burden onto U.S. taxpayers. In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”

[Wall Bang]

--------------------
Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
raybond
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for raybond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This story might not get much play now, but wait until July. When gas is noticeably over $3 a gallon at the cheapest


trickle down,trickle down, and tricked

--------------------
Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
And the banks are stingy, and getting stinger by the day, even after all those bail outs.
...now we have Tax evaders?
How many crooks are there here now? It's getting hard to keep up with...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CashCowMoo
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for CashCowMoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Do you blame any of these companies for having accounts outside of the US? And does anyone think that it is going to change? With Obama at the helm businesses are leaving if they have the capability to do so.

Look at the Obama cabinet and how many didnt pay taxes. lmao

--------------------
It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jordanreed
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for jordanreed     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
look at most millionaires...same gawddam thing!..again cash, this isnt a left or right issue..its not because of obama that these companies leave..its all about their bottom line..the ability to divert income and not having to pay income tax is a luxury that they take advantage of...you would do the same..so would i..and most people would too..

--------------------
jordan

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
they open accounts in places like Bahamas, Bermuda and the Cayman.

tell me what happens if those places get "attacked"? we the US taxpayer will send our carriers and air force to defend them. Thoise places and others where Exxon does business are all protected by the US defense which Exxon apparently pays not one cent to?

why should we if they are draining our defense dollars? the 2009 defense budget was 680 billion. That is 2266$ per person in the US.

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
raybond
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for raybond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”
-------------------------------------------------


I guess this blows the myth that U.S. corporations are the highest taxed in the world

When are the working people of this country going to wake up and not listen to this b.s. that comes out of the mouth of large corporations.

There kids use our schools, the entire infrastucture is at there disposal and they come crying to us like a bunch of conservative limp wrists when they get in trouble wether it is financial or need of military services. Yet they don't feel that they owe any obilagation to pay for it.

--------------------
Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lockman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lockman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Corporations have Children?

--------------------
Let's Go METS!!!

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pagan
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pagan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Lockman:
Corporations have Children?

Sure. Their called wholly owned subsidiaries. [Wink]

--------------------
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
raybond
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for raybond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What I should have said are the people that run them and direct them.

Did not the Supreme Court give them rights as if they were people such as free speach. And corporations can not talk. But humans can talk through them

--------------------
Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by raybond:
What I should have said are the people that run them and direct them.

Did not the Supreme Court give them rights as if they were people such as free speach. And corporations can not talk. But humans can talk through them

yes,
“Government may not suppress political speech on the basis of the speaker’s corporate identity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the 57-page majority opinion. “No sufficient governmental interest justifies limits on the political speech of nonprofit or for-profit corporations.”

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2010/0121/Supreme-Court-Campaign-finance-li mits-violate-free-speech


sadly, this was bi-partisan legislation that very few people disagreed with.


the decision itself was reached by "Judicial Activism' of the conservative members of the bench.

when the case was first brought in March it was expected to be decided on narrow grounds...

the Cheif Justice Roberts redirected the arguments to include a larger question. So it was re-argued on broader grounds in a second hearing and the so-called conservative Judges used it to overturn McCain-Feingold and even a couple of previously established rulings...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by raybond:
In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”

That's an interesting statistic. It tells me that one out of every three United States corporations are mis-managed.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
quote:
Originally posted by raybond:
In fact, in 2008, the Government Accountability Office found that “two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005.”

That's an interesting statistic. It tells me that one out of every three United States corporations are mis-managed.
LOL.

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Didn't really mean it as a joke Glass. I'm sure you know that there's a myriad of ways for a business be it an S, C, LLC, etc. to avoid paying actual corporate income taxes.

Just from my own experience in my small steel business it's very easy to show a fiscal year end loss or break even regardless of how the year actually turned out.

Granted, in wildly profitable years a lot of the profits would be bonused out to employees and they'd have to pay taxes on it at their individual rates but every year our corporation (S by the way) makes sure that we're operating at break even at best.

It's easily done, it's legal and it's what every corporation should do from the smallest to the largest. I'm in business to benefit myself and my employees, not the government.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jordanreed
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for jordanreed     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
exactly!

--------------------
jordan

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SeekingFreedom
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for SeekingFreedom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
I'm in business to benefit myself and my employees, not the government.
Preach it!!!

--------------------
/weepforthenation

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Didn't really mean it as a joke Glass. I'm sure you know that there's a myriad of ways for a business be it an S, C, LLC, etc. to avoid paying actual corporate income taxes.

Just from my own experience in my small steel business it's very easy to show a fiscal year end loss or break even regardless of how the year actually turned out.

Granted, in wildly profitable years a lot of the profits would be bonused out to employees and they'd have to pay taxes on it at their individual rates but every year our corporation (S by the way) makes sure that we're operating at break even at best.

It's easily done, it's legal and it's what every corporation should do from the smallest to the largest. I'm in business to benefit myself and my employees, not the government.

i know, and that's the funny part.

corporations are only tools just like money is only a tool.

i guess the real question is how you go about doing it isn't it? if you pay shareholders and employees? then they pay taxes anyway, right?

sending it offshore is another way and there's so many ways to do it, you can copyright a name of a product, register it in Barbados and pay that account all of your profits if you want, and then you can legally spend that money anywhere but here.


what i have such a hard time with in general is the idea that the government only serves any particular person if their particular party is in charge.


for instance? i've been posting for several years that we are overspending and undertaxing. Suddenly the GOP discovers this? the thing that's made this a serious problem is that its done in conjunction with a major trade deficit.

this love hate relationship is destroying our economy.

once the money leaves the country it is a TOOL that we as nation have lost.

regardless of whether you like or hate the govt? it is in fact the source of all money.

you can't have this type of society in a barter system, and somebody has to stand behind the money

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
anybody else notice that as soon as the Govt lowered Capital Gains Taxes to a mere 15% everybody went hog-wild putting their money into trying for Capital Gains and we ended the decade with less Capital than we had before the tax was lowered?

it was supposed to increase investment Capital to create more jobs, and instead we have less jobs? [Roll Eyes]

taxes are necessary evil, there's never been a society that didn't have to tax it's members.

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
raybond
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for raybond     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
upside my post was about mega corporations that are sending there money elsewhere and not giving there fair share to the system that made them and protected them.

I am thinking that your business is a small one that employs some folks and the tax laws are set up for you to grow I am all for that as a matter of fact I think it is great this is where we get the majority of growth in this country. From any way that the Government can help you is good. Wether it is tax law, healthcare,or help providing financial asst.

--------------------
Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Peaser
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Peaser     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37037022/ns/world_news-europe/

--------------------
Buy Low. Sell High.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
good article...
cutting govt spending brings real violence? no surprise to me....
the people that want to cut govt spending and cut it hard are not thinking the whole process thru.

all those people go back ino the unemployment line, others lose their home cuz they made committment to a mortgage they can no longer meet if their takehome is 20% less, and the next economic crash begins...


we can freeze govt spending, we can lower it back to Bush levels fast and then lower it to lower levels very slowly...our current level is not safe and neither is drastic cut.

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share