Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Section 9 of the US Constitution.

" No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. "


A bill of attainder is a legislative act declaring the guilt of an individual or a group of persons and punishing them. Only the courts may determine whether one has violated a criminal statute. An ex post facto law declares an act illegal after it has been committed, or increases the punishment for an offense already committed.

I am thinking the above just shows how out of control the current group in the house is. After they voted to tax the folks or do any thing to a us citizen after the fact.

If the US Constitution is the law of the land then or so called reps have gone way to far for a very long time!

http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm

[More Crap]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
they got away with it last year too:

Telecom immunity remains intact as Democrats split on vote

* Elana Schor in Washington
* guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 12 February 2008 08.36 GMT

Despite a boost from Barack Obama — but not the absent Hillary Clinton — Democratic senators today failed to stop the Bush administration from winning legal immunity for telecom companies that helped the government eavesdrop on Americans.

Obama voted with 30 fellow Democrats to allow the telecom companies to face lawsuits, which civil liberties groups consider a crucial chance to unearth information on the administration's programme of wiretapping without a court warrant.

But the immunity survived, with 18 Democrats crossing over to support George Bush.

Clinton missed the vote on a day of intense last minute campaigning as Virginia, Maryland, and the capital all held presidential primaries. Whether her absence will spark criticism from liberal Democrats, who have made the fight against so-called "telecom immunity" a high priority, remains to be seen.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/feb/12/terrorism.usa

not only does that violate section 9?

it also violates ammendment 7...

Amendment 7 - Trial by Jury in Civil Cases. Ratified 12/15/1791.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


these guys just don't seem to care...

"it's just a peice of paper"?

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share